HRF condemns AP Cabinet's proposed 10-hour work day
The Human Rights Forum (HRF) has criticised the Andhra Pradesh Cabinet's recent approval of the AP Factories Amendment Bill, 2025, which seeks to extend the workday to 10 hours. The HRF described it as an irresponsible and deliberate assault on labour rights, and has demanded its immediate and unconditional withdrawal.
In a statement on Tuesday, V. Rajesh, HRF AP State general secretary, and V.S. Krishna – HRF AP & TG Coordination Committee member—said that the amendment to the Factories Act, 1948, is no 'reform' but rather a regressive and exploitative move. It undermines decades of hard-fought battles by the working class that established a humane and sustainable working environment.
The HRF leaders pointed out that the State government now seeks to dismantle these rights to benefit corporate interests. The 8-hour workday is the cornerstone of modern-day labour rights, achieved through decades of working-class resistance. B.R. Ambedkar, who played a decisive role in institutionalising the 8-hour workday, was in many ways its architect. Ambedkar's relentless efforts in the 1940s, in conjunction with the working-class struggles, led to an 8-hour cap on daily work. This is now being sought to be rolled back.
Mr. Krishna and Mr. Rajesh noted that HRF was of the view that the much-talked-about 'ease/speed of doing business' has become a euphemism for curtailing labour rights so as to appease the capital investors. In the current policy discourse in the State, 'attracting investment' is shorthand for systematic deregulation, casualisation, weakening of regulatory oversight, and erosion of labour rights.
Extending the maximum daily working hours amounts to entrenching exploitation and a rollback of hard-won labour safeguards. It normalises overwork, erodes the right to rest and leisure, and deprives workers of dignity from labour. This measure constitutes a fundamental breach of the government's Constitutional obligations.
The HRF leaders called upon all democratic forces to oppose this devious and retrograde move.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Repeal anti-worker amendments, labour unionists tell Punjab govt
Ludhiana: Factory workers and labourers have called for the immediate repeal of recent amendments to labour laws that they allege strip them of their fundamental rights and protections. The unions have urged the Punjab govt to uphold and enforce workers' legal entitlements, expand the labour department, and raise the minimum wage in the state. Lakhwinder Singh, president of Karkhana Mazdoor Union, recently said, "The workers are protesting against amendments made to the Punjab Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1958, which exclude establishments with fewer than 20 workers from the scope of basic labour protections. They argue that, if enforced, these changes will leave a large section of workers, particularly in shops and small businesses, without legal safeguards related to working hours, minimum wages, attendance records, or workplace safety. " The labour unions are also demanding the reversal of amendments made to the Factories Act during the Covid-19 lockdown by the previous govt, and again in Sept 2023 by the current govt. These amendments allow for extended overtime, up to four hours per day and 144 hours per quarter in commercial establishments, and up to 115 hours per quarter in factories. They fear that these changes legalise exploitative practices and normalise excessive work without addressing workers' core needs, especially decent wages. Another major point of their concern is the introduction of four new labour codes by the Centre. The unions want the Punjab legislative assembly to pass a resolution rejecting the implementation of these codes in the state. They said the new codes dilute long-standing worker protections under the guise of simplification and ease of doing business. The unions are also pressing for an increase in the monthly minimum wage to Rs 26,000, based on an eight-hour workday. They argue that many workers are currently forced to depend on overtime just to make ends meet. "Instead of creating conditions that force labourers into longer hours, the state should ensure a living wage that eliminates this compulsion altogether," said one union representative. In addition to repealing recent amendments, the workers have called for a comprehensive strengthening of the labour department, including hiring more officers and inspectors, expanding the number of labour courts, and improving the inspection framework for industries, shops, and commercial establishments. They emphasised the need for effective enforcement to stop ongoing violations of labour laws. The unions also alleged widespread corruption in the labour department and demanded strict action to eliminate bribery and red tape that has been affecting workers' access to justice.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Bharat Mata row: CPI(M) accuses Kerala Governor of crossing Constitutional line by using RSS symbols at State events
Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] has accused Kerala Governor Rajendra Arlekar of crossing a Constitutional line by using Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's (RSS) emblems at official functions hosted by Raj Bhavan. CPI(M) State secretary M.V. Govindan told reporters on Friday (June 20, 2025) that General Education Minister V. Sivankutty had held the Constitutional line by walking out of a State function where Mr. Arlekar paid obeisance to the image of a 'woman holding a saffron flag', a ubiquitous heraldic device used by the RSS. He said the picture, 'replete with majoritarian religious imagery, broadcast the RSS' schismatic aspiration to render India a Hindu nation by supplanting the Constitution with the Manusmriti', an anachronistic and ancient text subscribes to a Hindu society defined by a segregationist and repressive caste and gender-based hierarchy. The CPI(M) welcomed the government's decision to include the Governor's role, responsibilities and Constitutional limitations as Head of State of Provincial Governments. 'Under severe social criticism for using RSS imagery at State events, Raj Bhavan initially recanted the political symbolism but relapsed to Sangh Parivar's ways soon after,' Mr. Govindan said.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Kerala to include Governor's responsibilities, limitations in higher secondary syllabus amid govt-Raj Bhavan tussle
Kerala's General Education department will modify the higher secondary syllabus to include the Governor's role, responsibilities and limitations as the Constitutional Head of Provincial Governments. General Education Minister V. Sivankutty told reporters on Friday (June 20, 2025) that it was socially imperative that students learn about the democratic and Constitutional processes that inform the country's federal polity, including the official role of the Governor as the de jure head of State and the well-defined Constitutional curbs on the high office. Mr. Sivankutty said the younger generation should understand the executive power vested in the elected Chief Minister and Council of Ministers and their collective responsibility to the Legislative Assembly and the public. The move assumed legal and political relevance against the backdrop of protracted Kerala government-Raj Bhavan dispute over the Constitutional bounds of the Governor's office, including alleged intervention in the administration of State-funded varsities as Chancellor, 'refusing' assent to Bills passed by the Legislative Assembly inordinately, 'displaying' political symbols at State events and 'delaying' key Bills by reserving them for the President's assent. Moreover, the LDF had repeatedly accused Raj Bhavan of providing a bully pulpit for Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's (RSS) political messaging. Notably, Rajendra Arlekar's assumption of the Governor's office in January had signalled a thaw in the earlier government-Raj Bhavan relations, often characterised by publicly acrimonious and muckraking confrontations with his predecessor, Arif Mohammed Khan. Nevertheless, Mr. Khan's refusal to sign the Bill seeking the removal of the Governor as Chancellor of State Universities, Raj Bhavan's opposition to the Kerala Lok Ayukta Amendment (Bill), which empowered the executive to accept or reject the ombudsman's findings, and the former Governor's decision to reserve some key Bills for the President's consideration remain serious bones of contention between the political executive and the Constitutional office. Following his swearing-in, Mr. Arlekar held out an olive branch to the government by promising to lobby the Centre for Kerala's development, calling on Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on the latter's birthday, and co-hosting an 'informal breakfast meeting' with Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in New Delhi. Mr. Arlekar's varied tack appeared to broadcast a detente and incremental normalisation of relations. However, a coldness of manner crept has into the government-Raj Bhavan ties, with Left student organisations protesting against Mr. Arlekar's nominations to varsity senates, accusing him of continuing Mr. Khan's alleged bid to saffronise State varsities. The chill seemed to reach a high point, with two Ministers walking out of Raj Bhavan recently to protest against the use of a saffron flag bearing Bharat Mata's image, allegedly an RSS emblem, at State functions. An apparently unrelenting Raj Bhavan dug its heels in, refused to remove the controversial image from the central hall, and termed Minister Sivankutty's boycott a protocol violation and insult.
