Scientists are racing to discover the depth of ocean damage sparked by the LA wildfires
On a recent Sunday, Tracy Quinn drove down the Pacific Coast Highway to assess damage wrought upon the coastline by the Palisades Fire.
The water line was darkened by ash. Burnt remnants of washing machines and dryers and metal appliances were strewn about the shoreline. Sludge carpeted the water's edge. Waves during high tide lapped onto charred homes, pulling debris and potentially toxic ash into the ocean as they receded.
"It was just heartbreaking," said Quinn, president and CEO of the environmental group Heal the Bay, whose team has reported ash and debris some 25 miles (40 kilometers) south of the Palisades burn area west of Los Angeles.
As crews work to remove potentially hundreds of thousands of tons of hazardous materials from the Los Angeles wildfires, researchers and officials are trying to understand how the fires on land have impacted the sea. The Palisades and Eaton fires scorched thousands of homes, businesses, cars and electronics, turning everyday items into hazardous ash made of pesticides, asbestos, plastics, lead, heavy metals and more.
Since much of it could end up in the Pacific Ocean, there are concerns and many unknowns about how the fires could affect life under the sea.
"We haven't seen a concentration of homes and buildings burned so close to the water," Quinn said.
Fire debris and potentially toxic ash could make the water unsafe for surfers and swimmers, especially after rainfall that can transport chemicals, trash and other hazards into the sea. Longer term, scientists worry if and how charred urban contaminants will affect the food supply.
The atmospheric river and mudslides that pummeled the Los Angeles region last week exacerbated some of those fears.
When the fires broke out in January, one of Mara Dias' first concerns was ocean water contamination. Strong winds were carrying smoke and ash far beyond the blazes before settling at sea, said the water quality manager for the Surfrider Foundation, an environmental nonprofit.
Scientists on board a research vessel during the fires detected ash and waste on the water as far as 100 miles (161 kilometers) offshore, said marine ecologist Julie Dinasquet with the University of California, San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Things like twigs and shard. They described the smell as electronics burning, she recalled, "not like a nice campfire."
Runoff from rains also are a huge and immediate concern. Rainfall picks up contaminants and trash while flushing toward the sea through a network of drains and rivers. That runoff could contain "a lot of nutrients, nitrogen and phosphate that end up in the ash of the burn material that can get into the water," said Dias, as well as "heavy metals, something called PAHs, which are given off when you burn different types of fuel."
Mudslides and debris flows in the Palisades Fire burn zone also can dump more hazardous waste into the ocean. After fires, the soil in burn scars is less able to absorb rainfall and can develop a layer that repels water from the remains of seared organic material. When there is less organic material to hold the soil in place, the risks of mudslides and debris flows increase.
Los Angeles County officials, with help from other agencies, have set thousands of feet of concrete barriers, sandbags, silt socks and more to prevent debris from reaching beaches. The LA County Board of Supervisors also recently passed a motion seeking state and federal help to expand beach clean ups, prepare for storm runoff and test ocean water for potential toxins and chemicals, among other things.
Beyond the usual samples, state water officials and others are testing for total and dissolved metals such as arsenic, lead and aluminum and volatile organic compounds.
They also are sampling for microplastics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, that are harmful to human and aquatic life, and polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, a group of man-made chemicals shown to cause cancer in animals and other serious health effects. Now banned from being manufactured, they were used in products like pigments, paints and electrical equipment.
County public health officials said chemical tests of water samples last month did not raise health concerns, so they downgraded one beach closure to an ocean water advisory. Beachgoers were still advised to stay out of the water.
Dinasquet and colleagues are working to understand how far potentially toxic ash and debris dispersed across the ocean, how deep and how fast they sunk and, over time, where it ends up.
Forest fires can deposit important nutrients like iron and nitrogen into the ocean ecosystem, boosting the growth of phytoplankton, which can create a positive, cascading effect across the ecosystem. But the potentially toxic ash from urban coastal fires could have dire consequences, Dinasquet said.
"Reports are already showing that there was a lot of lead and asbestos in the ash," she added. "This is really bad for people so its probably also very bad for the marine organisms."
A huge concern is whether toxic contaminants from the fire will enter the food chain. Researchers plan to take tissue fragments from fish for signs of heavy metals and contaminants. But they say it will take a while to understand how a massive urban fire will affect the larger ecosystem and our food supply.
Dias noted the ocean has long taken in pollution from land, but with fires and other disasters, "everything is compounded and the situation is even more dire."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
8 hours ago
- New York Times
Vera Rubin Scientists Reveal Telescope's First Images
On Monday, the cosmic curious are getting a first full look at pictures of the universe that reveal the capabilities of the new Vera C. Rubin Observatory. One shows a riotously pink view of the Trifid and Lagoon nebulas. The two sprawling clouds of dust and gas, thousands of light-years away from Earth in the constellation Sagittarius, have been photographed often by both amateurs and professional astronomers. More powerful instruments have taken more detailed photos, but with their narrow field of view, they only see a small slice of the scene. 'You've not seen the whole thing, all captured at once at this depth with so many objects there,' said Steven Ritz, a physicist at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and the project scientist for Rubin construction. 'That, I would point out, is new. And just how pretty it is.' Dr. Ritz hopes this teaser image will pique people's curiosity enough to tune in to a news conference on Monday, June 23, at 11:30 a.m. Eastern time when observatory officials will reveal what they are calling Rubin's 'First Look' images. The Rubin Observatory, a joint venture of the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, will provide a comprehensive view of the night sky unlike anything astronomers have seen before. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks the Trump administration's National Science Foundation research funding cuts
BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump 's administration from making drastic cuts to research funding provided by the National Science Foundation. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston struck down on Friday a policy change that could have stripped universities of tens of millions of dollars in research funding. The universities argued the move threatened critical work in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, semiconductors and other technology fields. Talwani said the change, announced by the NSF in May, was arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law. An email Saturday to the NSF was not immediately returned. At issue are 'indirect' costs, expenses such as building maintenance and computer systems that aren't linked directly to a specific project. Currently, the NSF determines each grant recipient's indirect costs individually and is supposed to cover actual expenses. The Trump administration has dismissed indirect expenses as 'overhead' and capped them for future awards by the NSF to universities at 15 % of the funding for direct research costs. The University of California, one of the plaintiffs, estimated the change would cost it just under $100 million a year. Judges have blocked similar caps that the Trump administration placed on grants by the Energy Department and the National Institutes of Health.
CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
Trump administration's National Science Foundation research funding cuts blocked by judge
A federal judge has blocked President Trump's administration from making drastic cuts to research funding provided by the National Science Foundation. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston struck down on Friday a policy change that could have stripped universities of tens of millions of dollars in research funding. The universities argued the move threatened critical work in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, semiconductors and other technology fields. Talwani said the change, announced by the NSF in May, was arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law. An email by the Associated Press on Saturday to the NSF was not immediately returned. At issue are "indirect" costs, expenses such as building maintenance and computer systems that aren't linked directly to a specific project. Currently, the NSF determines each grant recipient's indirect costs individually and is supposed to cover actual expenses. The Trump administration has dismissed indirect expenses as "overhead" and capped them for future awards by the NSF to universities at 15 % of the funding for direct research costs. The University of California, one of the plaintiffs, estimated the change would cost it just under $100 million a year. Judges have blocked similar caps that the Trump administration placed on grants by the Energy Department and the National Institutes of Health. In a recent interview on "CBS Mornings Plus," Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors — whose organization sued the Trump administration over federal funding cuts to Columbia University — said examples of research that has been cut includes a research project that looks at discerning when AI is making fake videos or a project that examines when people start to believe lies that are repeatedly told. "We are losing all the critical research that helps us understand truth and fiction in our social media platforms, whether it's Facebook or X or any other platform," he said.
