UPS to cut 20,000 jobs on reduced Amazon deliveries, as US tariffs weigh, ETHRWorld

Advt
Advt
Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis.
Download ETHRWorld App Get Realtime updates
Save your favourite articles
Scan to download App
By Abhinav Parmar, Lisa BaertleinUnited Parcel Service said on Tuesday it would slash 20,000 jobs and shut 73 facilities as part of a planned reduction in deliveries for Amazon.com, and amid U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs that are roiling global trade.A UPS spokesperson said the layoffs are due to shedding 50% of shipping volume from Amazon.com, its largest customer, as well as ongoing cost-cutting and efficiency projects under a major operational restructuring.An Amazon spokesperson said, "Due to their operational needs, UPS requested a reduction in volume and we certainly respect their decision." The move comes as Trump's aggressive trade policies have begun slowing economic growth and increasing expectations for a possible recession.UPS is contractually obligated to create 30,000 jobs under its current national master agreement with Teamsters, the union's general president Sean O'Brien said. "But if the company intends to violate our contract or makes any attempt to go after hard-fought, good-paying Teamsters jobs, UPS will be in for a hell of a fight."UPS, in response, told Reuters that it plans to adhere to its contract. The company has a U.S. workforce of 406,000 workers, with more than 75% of them represented by unions, according to its latest annual filing."The world hasn't been faced with such enormous potential impacts to trade in more than 100 years," CEO Carol Tome said on the company's earnings call. As the world's largest parcel delivery firm, UPS touches a broad swath of industries and is seen as a gauge for the global economy. FedEx, its top rival, signaled a slowdown in March.UPS aims to shelter profits by cutting $3.5 billion in 2025 with its latest overhead reductions. UPS also said a big percentage of the volume reduction from Amazon is money-losing work moving goods from fulfillment centers.For the second quarter, UPS forecast a total-company operating margin of about 9.3% - below the double-digit margins investors like.Its largest and most important U.S. business could see a roughly 9% drop in average daily packages handled and a low-single-digit percentage drop in revenue.Shares in UPS closed down 0.4% on Tuesday, while rival FedEx closed off 0.8%.QUICK RESOLUTION OR SUPPLY SHOCK?Earlier this month, President Trump slapped new 145% tariffs on many Chinese goods - escalating the standoff between the world's two largest economies.U.S. import volume is roughly 400,000 pieces per day at UPS, less than 2% of the global average daily volume.Still, the China to U.S. trade lanes are the most profitable for UPS and accounted for about 11% of UPS international revenue last year, Tome said.UPS already is seeing an uptick in volume from Europe and other Asian countries including Vietnam and Thailand, UPS executives said.Still, China is the factory of the world. If Trump's hefty China tariffs stick, fully replacing trade with China will take years.Trump's current China tariffs could further slow already sluggish shipments between businesses. And, the small- and medium-sized business that UPS has targeted to offset that weakness could get hit particularly hard, since some of them source 100% of the goods they need from China, Tome said.UPS is also reliant on deliveries for retailers, many of whom are heavily reliant on China.Amazon itself sources from China, and 40% or more of the online retailer's marketplace sellers are based in that country. If U.S. consumers buy fewer goods from Amazon because tariffs make prices too high, UPS would suffer.UPS also faces a sharp downturn in volume from China-linked bargain e-commerce sellers Temu and Shein because the U.S. plans in May to end duty-free status for most of their packages coming to the United States. Temu already is tacking on an import charge at checkout, while Shein has added the tariffs to the price of goods.Meanwhile, UPS and its retail customers have started planning for the vital peak winter holiday season, when daily deliveries can more than double.In the best case scenario, the U.S. and China will soon come to an agreement that normalizes trade, UPS executives said.In the worst case, the tariff fight continues, resulting in a supply shock, Chief Financial Officer Brian Dykes said. (Reporting by Lisa Baertlein in Los Angeles, Abhinav Parmar and Shivansh Tiwary in Bengaluru; Editing by Arun Koyyur, Nick Zieminski and Alan Barona)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

17 minutes ago

• Time of India

No more TACO? What happens to Trump's tariffs after US attack on Iran? From ‘World Chickening Out' to ‘No One Chickens Out' - here's what may happen

Donald Trump's decisions on tariffs have become more crucial than ever. (AI image) US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities have had one important consequence - globally markets are aware that Donald Trump will not always 'chicken out'! US President Donald Trump's military strike on Iranian nuclear installations, alongside Israel's ongoing conflict with Iran, has introduced additional geopolitical uncertainties into an already unstable global economic landscape. In this backdrop, Trump's decisions on tariffs have become more crucial than ever. Prior to the weekend attacks, financial markets and America's trading partner were possibly operating under the principle that "Trump Always Chickens Out, or TACO". This notion suggested that each severe threat, including that of high reciprocal tariffs, would ultimately be watered down Trump's implementation of tariffs risks elevating prices and hampering economic growth. However, the prevalent belief suggested these effects would manifest as mild economic discomfort rather than severe financial distress. The widespread acceptance of "TACO" has encouraged market optimism, despite economists' warnings about the impending effects of Trump's tariffs on domestic and international economies. Also Read | Nightmare scenario: How Iran, hit by US & Israel strikes, may choke world's oil supply via Strait of Hormuz - explained This belief has also strengthened the resolve of nations in negotiations with the president, who has openly expressed his eagerness for agreements and established a July 9 deadline through a 90-day postponement of his most severe tariff measures. Some countries have questioned the necessity of yielding to Trump's demands when retreat appears inevitable. But, that may change now! Operation Midnight Thunder The US president's decision to strike Iran, contrary to advice from his closest allies, demonstrates his unpredictable leadership style. His willingness to take action where previous administrations hesitated shows a departure from conventional diplomatic approaches. According to a Bloomberg report, the global economic impact of "Operation Midnight Thunder" hinges on Iran's response. Should tensions escalate, leading to Iran blocking the Strait of Hormuz and causing oil prices to rise, it would create additional strain on an already vulnerable global economy weakened by existing trade tariffs. The situation might prompt international markets and policymakers to reassess their interpretation of Trump's warnings. This military action proves his readiness to follow through on serious threats when diplomatic negotiations fail to achieve his desired outcomes, the report said. What will happen to Trump's tariffs ? 4 scenarios to consider It's important to note that whilst economic conflicts typically cause less devastation than military ones, every conflict impacts the economy. This situation will likely follow the same pattern. 'The World Chickens Out': The first possibility involves other nations interpreting Trump's actions as a serious warning sign, whilst viewing the strikes as an isolated incident that temporarily halts the Middle East tensions. This prompts countries to offer substantial compromises to Washington, hastening to finalise trade agreements before Trump's Liberation Day tariffs deadline of July 9. This represents the White House's likely preferred outcome: "The World Chickens Out", according to Bloomberg. 'Trump Chickens Out Rationally': The subsequent scenario suggests that the weekend military action intensifies the ongoing conflict, triggering elevated oil prices, worldwide economic disruption and volatile financial markets throughout summer. Trump responds by postponing his tariff implementation. However, the economic consequences remain significant, whilst continued trade uncertainty creates additional challenges. This represents: "Trump Chickens Out Rationally". 'Trump Holds Hands With the World': The third possibility envisions an unexpected global unity, including the US, to counter economic repercussions. A unified approach to stabilise oil prices and financial markets, coupled with renewed international cooperation, results in minimal global economic disruption. This could be termed: "Trump Holds Hands With the World." 'No One Chickens Out': The fourth and most concerning scenario suggests Trump, encouraged by his initial actions, pursues an aggressive strategy. Iran responds by blocking Gulf oil shipments. Despite soaring oil prices and market downturns, Trump intensifies his tariff policies. As the Liberation Day duties suspension ends, American trade barriers reach levels unseen since the 1800s. Major economies implement countermeasures, leading to worldwide trade disruption. Both global and US economies enter recession. Trump maintains his stance as international tensions escalate, potentially leading towards widespread conflict. This scenario could be labelled: "No One Chickens Out." Alternative outcomes or combinations of these scenarios might prove more realistic. Also Read | Iran-Israel war & US bombings: Should possible Strait of Hormuz closure worry India about its oil supply? Explained in 10 points Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Business Standard

17 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Apple's China supply chain remains strong despite focus on India, SE Asia

China still enjoys dominance in Apple's key supply chain segments, even as the global tech giant's share of electronics manufacturing in the country has dropped from around 70 per cent to 50 per cent over the last seven years amid increasing focus on India and Southeast Asia, a report by a US-based public policy think-tank American Enterprise Institute (AEI) said. According to the report, key supply chain segments, such as printed circuit boards, printing and packaging, molded and mechanical components, and especially precision manufacturing remain predominantly in China, leaving scope for policymakers in countries like India to focus on attracting investment from its suppliers in such manufacturing capabilities. Interestingly, despite this dominance, Chinese-owned firms generally only play a role in lower-value segments of the supply chain. Many of the higher-value components— even those made in China— are produced in factories owned by Japanese, Taiwanese, or US firms, the report said. It indicated that the monopoly of China in electronics manufacturing for Apple is declining over the years. The assembly of all components into a device— the final step in the production process— is referred to as electronics manufacturing or assembly. 'Beginning in 2018, Apple began to shift its electronics manufacturing footprint, presumably driven by the 2018 US tariffs on China. Before 2018, around 60–70 per cent of electronics manufacturing locations were in China, including nearly all final assembly of key devices like iPhones. Today, by contrast, around 50 per cent of Apple facilities are in China, with increased factory share in India and Southeast Asia,' the report said. Of the 17 companies conducting electronics manufacturing in Apple's supply chain, only two are Chinese. Of the 34 electronics manufacturing facilities reported in China, only three are operated by Chinese firms. The report suggests that policymakers in India and countries in Southeast Asia seeking to attract investment and upgrade their manufacturing capabilities have substantial scope to continue attracting suppliers of companies like Apple, in not only basic assembly, but also some of the other component categories. 'The fact that many of these China-based factories are owned by foreign firms facilitates potential supply chain shifts. Moreover, as western electronics firms face higher tariffs, they are looking for more diversified production locations,' it said. The report is authored by Chris Miller, a non-resident senior fellow at the AEI, and Vishnu Venugopalan, a fellow at Harvard University and an Indian Administrative Service officer. It added that the assembly process for devices like phones often only cost around $10, a tiny fraction of its price. Hence, if tariffs lead to a shift in electronics manufacturing, shifting final assembly from China to a different country — without any other changes in its supply chain – will have minimal impact. Interestingly, the US major has diversified the battery ecosystem, which was solely dependent on China and South Korea till 2018, to multiple other countries. 'Today, however, it procures battery components from five different regions, including India and Southeast Asia. While over half of Apple's battery component sourcing locations remain in China, more than 40 per cent of locations are now outside China, representing a significant shift in Apple's production footprint. Notably, the concentration of China-based manufacturing facilities is greater than the share of Chinese firms. As of 2023, there were firms headquartered in Taiwan, South Korea, and Germany in Apple's battery supply chain—more non-Chinese firms (five) than Chinese (four)," it stated. The connectors and cables category involve some low-end products and some that require more high-end, specialty chemicals. 'The enduring position of Japan-based manufacturing in this category illustrates the higher-end manufacturing involved in certain components. Other segments, however, have seen a substantial shift from China to India and the 'other' category, mostly Southeast Asian countries,' it added. Of the nine companies producing products in this category, only one is Chinese. Other firms in this category with China-based manufacturing are American, Taiwanese, or Japanese — companies like Amphenol (US), Japan Aviation Electronics Industry (Japan), Furukawa Electric (Japan), and Hirose Electric (Japan).

NDTV

20 minutes ago

• NDTV

"Keep Oil Prices Down. I Am Watching": Trump Amid Middle East Tension

US President Donald Trump expressed a desire on Monday to see oil prices kept down amid fears that the aftermath of the attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities could cause them to spike. "Everyone, keep oil prices down, I'm watching! You're playing into the hands of the enemy, don't do it," Trump wrote in all caps on his Truth Social platform. Trump followed up with another post addressed to the US Department of Energy, encouraging it to "drill, baby, drill" and saying, "I mean now." US Energy Secretary Chris Wright responded, "We're on it!" in a post on X. It was not immediately clear what the energy department could do to boost oil and gas drilling, which hit record highs during the previous administration of former President Joe Biden and which Trump wants to take even higher. The Energy Department did not immediately respond to a question on Wright's comment. Global benchmark Brent oil prices oscillated on Monday, touching a five-month high before falling more than 1% to $76.10 a barrel as oil and gas transit continued on tankers from the Middle East after US air strikes against Iran over the weekend. [O/R] The United States could tap the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the world's largest emergency crude oil stash, in the case of severe interruptions. But the Trump administration has criticized Biden's use of the SPR after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.