Hong Kong – Canary in a goldmine
THE perception of Hong Kong's decline as a financial hub and desirable place to live is both understandable yet overstated. During a recent business trip to Europe, one consistent reaction stood out: Clients' faces flashed with concern and sympathy when I mentioned I was based in Hong Kong.
I get it. For years, the narrative around Hong Kong has been relentlessly downbeat: falling property prices; the 2019 protests; Covid lockdowns; expat departures; strained US-China relations; and renewed worries about the stability of the HKD-USD peg. The concerns are valid but, as I argue below, also misplaced.
Which major equity market has outperformed most others in 2025? Which market ranks fourth globally by capitalisation, trailing only the United States, mainland China, and Japan? Which market raised more in IPOs than Europe's exchanges combined this year? And which economy welcomed more tourists than Japan from January to May 2025? If you answered Hong Kong to all, you're absolutely correct. Surprised? Let me explain.
Golden goose
My optimism about Hong Kong's future hinges on its currency: the Hong Kong dollar (HKD). Within the Greater China region, no other city matches its currency's liquidity and convertibility (with apologies to Macau's pataca). Corporate China's unquenchable demand to recycle hard currency is well known, and until the renminbi becomes convertible – likely a distant prospect – Hong Kong's role as China's premier funding conduit remains secure.
But what about the HKD-USD peg's vulnerabilities? Recent media reports have highlighted pressures on the peg, and these concerns are reasonable. Yet, the strain isn't from capital flight; it's the opposite. Inflows from IPOs, dividends, and investment opportunities are so robust that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) had to sell some HK$47 billion (S$7.6 billion) in May 2025 to temper HKD appreciation.
Of course, an appreciating currency is a nice problem to have, as are interest rates at – or close to – record lows. But, either way, both are still problems if allowed to endure, potentially distorting the allocation of capital.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
To be fair, the allure of a USD carry trade (selling HKD and investing in US money market funds for example) has seen the HKD's value normalise. But even two weeks on from the last mega-IPO, the monetary system remains awash with liquidity, allowing banks to reset mortgages rate lower and allowing refinancing opportunities for the beleaguered commercial real estate sector.
Local hero
With roughly comparable populations, land mass, and economic size, the friendly competition between Hong Kong and Singapore as rival business centres is as storied as it is long-running. Anyone who has recently visited Singapore will have been mightily impressed by the energy, opportunity, and confidence that the city state currently exudes; and might conclude – reasonably – that Hong Kong has (temporarily) lost its mojo to its ascendent challenger.
Yet, Hong Kong's role as China's financial gateway also gives it both a role and an edge, certainly in the ability to offer local companies liquidity for financing purposes. For example, Hong Kong's stock market has a total market capitalisation of US$6.3 trillion, entirely dwarfing Singapore's at merely US$0.5 trillion, a 13-fold difference. As China corporates consider delisting from the US or dual list in Hong Kong, one can assume Hong Kong's market capitalisation may likely increase.
Admittedly something of a stealth rally, the Hang Seng Index (HSI)'s year-to-date performance – largely complementing and reflecting renewed interest in China – may also have attracted international investors. At time of writing, the HSI was up 21 per cent on the year, outperforming the majority of competitor markets. My sense is as investors rotate thematically from US exceptionalism to – among other things – (China-centric) emerging market opportunities, local equities may further benefit in the months and quarters to come.
Canary's fragility
Yet for all Hong Kong's recent positives, as a financial entrepot it is both sensitive and vulnerable to the volatilities of global trade. And that is unlikely to change anytime soon. Thus, strained trade relations between the US and China – and the risk of high tariffs being imposed by the former on the latter – will negatively impact the city's fortunes.
Inevitably, Hong Kong reliance on mainland inflows – with some 80 per cent of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's market cap tied to Chinese firms – exposes it to China's economic slowdown risks. Escalating geopolitical tensions or a faltering Chinese economy could trigger occasional liquidity shocks, potentially derailing Hong Kong's markets for a while.
At Lombard Odier, we are overweight equities, including those in emerging markets. Our preferred way to access China risk is via Hong Kong's H Share market. Thus far, it has been a satisfactory trade. But Hong Kong's East-West history positions it – somewhat uniquely – in the crosshairs of tensions between the world's two great superpowers. Hong Kong's resilience is well known and well regarded; but shouldn't be taken for granted.
The writer is chief investment officer, Asia, at Lombard Odier
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
Central banks in Asia are becoming wary of currency intervention
Some of emerging Asia's biggest central banks look to be dialling back their interventions in the currency market. The central banks of India and Malaysia have reduced the size of some derivatives positions they use to weaken their currencies. Taiwan has allowed its currency to surge against the US dollar in recent weeks and dropped hints that it would be comfortable with more if the moves were 'orderly'. South Korea's giant national pension fund has ended its five-month support of the won. A major reason for these moves is a simple change in the market landscape: The US dollar has tumbled more than 7 per cent this year, easing pressure on emerging market currencies. But strategists and investors also point to the risk of a backlash from US President Donald Trump, amid rising speculation that currency policies will be on the table during a series of ongoing – and high stakes – trade negotiations. 'The threat of being labelled a currency manipulator by the US, especially during this period of tariff negotiations, will act as a deterrent to further heavy FX intervention in local markets,' said Rajeev De Mello, a Geneva-based portfolio manager at GAMA Asset Management. The shifting approach of Asia's central banks to defending their currencies underscores the sweeping changes in global markets since the election of Trump, whose on again-off again tariff threats have roiled asset prices and raised once unthinkable questions about the US dollar's place in the global trading system. South Korea confirmed last month that it had held currency talks with the US, sending the won higher amid talk that Trump wants a weaker US dollar. But White House chief economist Stephen Miran has denied the idea that Washington is working on secret deals to depreciate the greenback, saying the US continues to have a strong US dollar policy. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The greenback has plummeted against major currencies this year, suffering drops of around 10 per cent against the euro and the Swiss franc. Traders are now trying to game out which currencies have the most to gain from a period of reduced intervention. The South Korean won and the Malaysian ringgit are two obvious candidates, since both countries have large trade surpluses, said Gautam Kalani, portfolio manager for BlueBay fixed income, emerging markets, at RBC Global Asset Management. Reduced intervention will speed up the appreciation of these currencies, he said. The Taiwan dollar is also being hotly tipped by strategists. Although Taiwan's central bank is still likely to use intervention to keep volatility in check, most market participants think it will allow the local currency to appreciate further even after hitting multi-year highs. That suggests room to build on what has already been a widespread rally against the US dollar: Taiwan's currency has surged 11 per cent against the greenback this year, making it the region's best performer. The South Korean won is up almost 8 per cent, while the Malaysian ringgit is around 5 per cent higher. The retreat from intervention isn't unanimous across Asia. Bank Indonesia pushed back against volatility on Thursday (Jun 19) as Middle East tensions hit emerging market currencies. The Philippines' central bank has sent mixed messages, calling intervention futile but also saying it might have to do so 'more seriously' if a current slide in the peso continues. The People's Bank of China continues to keep its currency under a tight leash. But for some of emerging Asia's most interventionist central banks, the calculus appears to have shifted in favour of a less hands-on approach. The US Treasury refrained from labelling any country a currency manipulator in its latest foreign-exchange report, released in June. However, it said China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam all met two out of three of its criteria. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
Markets set for rocky opening after Trump's plunge into Middle East war
[SINGAPORE] When the major markets reopen on Monday (Jun 23), investors in Asia and other parts of the world will be bracing themselves for a volatile few days ahead, with oil prices likely to surge and inflation forecasts coming under renewed scrutiny. This after US President Donald Trump's stunning U-turn from his earlier position that he would keep the United States out of Middle Eastern wars. On Saturday, he ordered a strike against three Iranian nuclear facilities, giving a boost to Israel's efforts to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. His decision has already prompted analysts to describe it as Trump's biggest foreign-policy gamble of his two presidential terms. In a televised address from the White House, Trump called the strikes a 'spectacular military success' and warned Teheran against any retaliation, adding that Iran would face more attacks if it did not agree to peace. 'This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' said the president. Terence Wong, the chief executive officer of investment fund Azure Capital, expects the markets to be choppy on Monday. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Given Trump's generally anti-war stance and opposition to overseas defence spending, this was a surprising move and definitely marks a significant escalation in the Middle East conflict. The big question is how Iran will react,' he told The Business Times. Vasu Menon, managing director of investment strategy at OCBC, expressed some optimism that things may not turn out as bad as others fear. He said the 'unfazed response' from markets in the Middle East that were open on Sunday offers hope that the fallout for other global markets when they start trading on Monday may not be dramatic. 'Even if there is a sharp pullback among global markets on Monday, they may not be down and out. The response may be temporary and a rebound could materialise eventually,' he noted. 'Much depends on what Iran will do next, but the shock and awe of the US attack and the warning from Trump not to retaliate or suffer significant consequences, may prevent Iran's leaders from responding aggressively.' How Iran reacts over the next few days or even weeks 'may keep investors nervous' and markets volatile in the short term, he added. 'Of greater consequence to markets may be the reciprocal tariffs that Trump will decide on by Jul 9. Trade concerns have taken a back seat due to the developments in the Middle East, but could re-emerge to the forefront in the coming weeks.' Higher risk premium for oil As for oil, prices are likely to go up by between US$3 and US$5 per barrel when trading resumes, said market analysts on Sunday, with the gains expected to accelerate only if Iran – the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries' (Opec) third-largest crude producer – retaliates in a major way and causes a major disruption to oil supply. Jorge Leon, the head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy and a former Opec official, said: 'An oil-price jump is expected. Even in the absence of immediate retaliation, markets are likely to price in a higher geopolitical risk premium.' UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said that such risk premiums typically fade when there are no supply disruptions. 'The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions – which would likely result in higher prices – or if there is a de-escalation in the conflict, resulting in a fading risk premium,' he explained. In an extreme scenario in which the Strait of Hormuz ends up being shut, the price of oil could even go above US$130 a barrel, weighing on global growth and driving consumer prices higher, according to a Bloomberg Economics analysis. The Strait of Hormuz is a crucial choke point between Iran and Oman through which about 20 per cent of global oil and gas demand flows. Flight disruptions Singapore Airlines (SIA) said on Sunday that it had cancelled two flights between Singapore and Dubai – SQ494 and SQ495 – following a 'security assessment' of the ongoing situation in the Middle East. The carrier added that it would be reaching out to all affected customers, with those impacted to be put on alternative flights or given the option to seek a full refund of the unused portion of their ticket. Other SIA flights between Singapore and Dubai may also be affected as the situation remains fluid, the airline said. British Airways cancelled several flights to Dubai and diverted two planes bound for Doha on Sunday, according to data from Flightradar24. The flight-tracking website noted that most airlines have maintained their flight diversions around the region due to recent missile exchanges. The website showed that airlines were not flying in the airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. Many carriers have opted for other routes such as north via the Caspian Sea or south via Egypt and Saudi Arabia, even if these mean higher fuel and crew costs and longer flight times. Operation Midnight While the rest of the world continues to make sense of the US attacks and the fallout, senior figures from the Trump administration said the ball was now firmly in Iran's court and that it should make peace. All in, the US strikes involved 14 bunker-buster bombs, over two dozen Tomahawk missiles and more than 125 military aircraft. General Dan Caine, the nation's highest-ranking military officer, said the strike was named 'Operation Midnight Hammer'. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a briefing at the Pentagon that the US 'devastated' the Iranian nuclear programme, adding that the operation 'did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people'. '(Trump) seeks peace, and Iran should take that path. This mission was not, and has not, been about regime change,' he noted.
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Cambodia PM orders halt to fuel imports from Thailand
Cambodia PM Hun Manet said energy companies would be able to 'import sufficiently from other sources to meet domestic fuel and gas demands' in the country. PHOTO: AFP – Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said on June 22 that the country would halt all fuel imports from neighbour Thailand, as tensions escalate over an ongoing border dispute. The nations have been at loggerheads since a Cambodian soldier was killed in May as troops exchanged fire in a disputed area known as the Emerald Triangle, where the borders of both countries and Laos meet. 'Starting from midnight tonight, all fuel and gas imports from Thailand will be halted,' he said in a Facebook post. He said energy companies would be able to 'import sufficiently from other sources to meet domestic fuel and gas demands' in the country. Thailand has placed restrictions on several border checkpoints citing 'national security', and on June 22 Cambodia closed two crossings in retaliation. The border spat has triggered political turmoil in Thailand after a phone call between leaders was leaked, prompting domestic criticism of Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's conduct. The ruling Thai party's biggest coalition partner withdrew earlier this week as calls grew louder for her to step down, and she was forced to apologise over her phone conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen. Thailand was Cambodia's third-biggest trading partner in 2022, according to the World Bank, with imports reaching US$3.8 billion (S$4.89 billion), of which fuels accounted for 27 per cent. Earlier on June 22, Cambodia's defence ministry accused the Thai army of violating an agreement by escorting some 150 cyclists to visit a disputed temple near the border. The Thai army denied any violation, saying there had been a 'misunderstanding'. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
