India and Pakistan are both claiming victory after Wednesday's clash. Will cooler heads prevail?
CNN —
A tense silence settled over India and Pakistan as millions woke Thursday: no more missiles had been fired, schools in most areas had reopened and both sides appeared to be claiming victory.
It was a stark difference to the day prior, when palpable panic rocked both nations after New Delhi launched targeted military strikes on its neighbor, while Islamabad claimed it had shot down its rival's fighter jets.
'Strokes of justice,' ran an editorial from one of India's leading English newspapers commending the country's 'sharp' and 'resolute' response to the massacre of 26 people in Indian-administered Kashmir, at the hands of militants. A headline from The Indian Express echoed a similar tune: 'Justice Served' it said across the front page.
In Pakistan, the response from Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif was more bellicose.
He has vowed to 'avenge' the deaths of 31 people Pakistan says were killed in India's strikes but still appeared to declare triumph for its apparent shooting of India's airplanes.
'It only took a few hours for the enemy to fall on its knees,' he said in a late-night address to the nation.
India says it struck 'terrorist infrastructure' belonging to two Islamist groups – Lashkar-e-Tayyiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed – who have been accused of being behind some the deadliest militant attacks on the country. Wednesday's strikes did not target military infrastructure and didn't kill civilians, New Delhi said, potentially giving India and Pakistan an opportunity to find a way to avoid an all-out war.
One location India struck was deep in Pakistan's Punjab province, the deepest attack in Pakistan's undisputed territory since both countries fought a major war in 1971. It also targeted multiple other locations in Punjab – the heartland of the powerful military and home of the Sharif government – and hit a mosque, according to Pakistani officials, angering millions in the Muslim-majority nation.
What happens now, analysts say, mostly depends on Islamabad's next move.
'All eyes are on Pakistan,' said Washington-based South Asia analyst, Michael Kugelman. 'If it decides to save face and claim victory — perhaps by pointing to the downing of Indian jets (which New Delhi has not confirmed) — and call it a day, an off ramp could be in sight.'
But he warned 'all bets would be off' should Pakistan decide to strike back.
Most analysts agree the nuclear-armed neighbors cannot afford another battle.
India and Pakistan have already fought three wars over Kashmir, a contested region they both claim in its entirety and each control a part of. Another conflict could have catastrophic consequences.
Since its birth seven decades ago in the partition of what was British India, Pakistan – now home to 230 million people – has faced mounting challenges, from political instability to an alarming militant insurgency, climate catastrophes and economic disarray.
India is seemingly in a stronger position; its military is seen as superior in any conventional conflict based on number alone and it boasts an economy more than 10 times the size of Pakistan's. But it too would have something to lose should the conflict escalate, according to Tanvi Madan, a senior fellow in the Foreign Policy program at the Brookings Institution.
'Largely on the basis of what we've seen in previous times, these are two rational actors who don't want a broader war,' Madan said.
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi has vowed to elevate India's status on the global stage, bidding to host the Olympics and seeking to overtake China as the world's manufacturing hub.
Not to mention, India already faces security threats on multiple fronts — particularly along contested borders with China.
Analysts say there are signs both countries are serious about de-escalation. But any further retaliation from either side could quickly spiral into an all-out conflict. Both sides, for example, have continued to exchange fire across the de factor border in Kashmir.
India was quick to project that its response to the April 22 massacre was 'focused, measured and non-escalatory' and make clear that they were in response to the tourist's massacre.
Top officials in New Delhi reached out to key counterparts in the United States, Middle East and Russia, among others, 'presumably to encourage international pressure for Pakistan to avoid escalation,' said Nisha Biswal, Senior Advisor at The Asia Group.
In a sign of a return to normalcy after the strikes, Pakistan said it reopened its airspace and schools across the country, and it appeared to be business as usual on the streets in the capital Islamabad on Thursday morning.
Pakistan's leaders touted a victory by the country's air force, saying five Indian fighter jets were shot down during an hour-long battle fought at ranges over 160 kilometers (100 miles).
India's leaders have said little in response to those claims and have not acknowledged any aircraft losses. The Pakistanis have yet to show any evidence proving they downed fighter jets, but a French Defense Ministry source said at least one of India's newest and most-advanced warplanes – a French-made Rafale fighter jet – was lost in the battle.
If there have indeed been losses for India, Pakistan could claim victory 'even if the circumstances are murky,' said Milan Vaishnav, a senior fellow and director of the South Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
'This would allow Pakistan to claim it has imposed costs on Indian military targets.'
Yet, amid the fog of war, Pakistan's powerful army general Asim Munir had already vowed to match any aggression from India.
And Munir, who is known for his hardline stance on Hindu-nationalist Modi, has a reputation of being more assertive than his predecessor Qamar Javed Bajwa.
Meanwhile there have been many voices within Modi's Hindu nationalist party pushing for a decisive blow against Pakistan for years.
Kugelman, the South Asia analyst, said the US, which has historically interceded in these crises, could try to defuse the tension, but it's unclear how much bandwidth the Trump administration is willing to allocate.
'China has called for de-escalation, but its fraught ties with India rule it out as a viable intermediary. The top mediator candidates are the Arab Gulf states, especially Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates,' he said, given their strong ties with both nations.
Qatar was quick to urge diplomacy in the hours after Wednesday's strikes.
While most analysts think there is an off-ramp for both nations, they all agree the situation remains fluid and tense.
'This crisis is as unpredictable as it is dangerous—an unsettling combination,' Kugelman added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Syria: 22 killed after suicide bomber opens fire at church - and then detonates explosive vest
At least 22 people have been killed after a suicide bomber opened fire at a church in Syria - and then detonated an explosive vest. This is the first such incident since Bashar al Assad was toppled in December, and officials claim the attacker was a member of Islamic State. It happened at a Greek Orthodox church in Damascus, with estimates suggesting that 350 worshippers were praying there at the time. Witnesses said the perpetrator had his face covered when he began shooting - and blew himself up as crowds attempted to remove him from the building. A security source told Reuters that two men were involved in the attack, with a priest saying he saw a second gunman at the entrance. Officials say 63 people were injured, and children were among the casualties. Syria's information minister, Hamza Mostafa, condemned the terrorist attack - writing on X: "This cowardly act goes against the civic values that bring us together. "We will not back down from our commitment to equal citizenship... and we also affirm the state's pledge to exert all its efforts to combat criminal organisations." Read more world news: Reports suggest that IS has attempted to attack several churches in Syria since Assad fell, but this is the first time they have succeeded. Footage filmed by Syria's civil defence, the White Helmets, showed scenes of destruction inside the church - including bloodied floors and shattered pews. The Greek foreign ministry says it "unequivocally condemns the abhorrent terrorist suicide bombing", and called on Syria "to guarantee the safety" of Christians with new measures.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Syria Suicide Bomber Kills at Least 20, Injures Dozens More During Church Attack: 'Cowardly Act'
At least 20 people were killed after a suicide bomber opened fire and detonated explosives inside a Greek Orthodox church in Damascus, Syria, on Sunday, June 22 At least 53 others, reportedly including children, were injured in the attack "This cowardly act goes against the civic values that bring us together," Syrian Information Minister Hamza Mostafa wrote on social media, calling the incident a terrorist attackA suicide bomber attacked a church in Syria, killing at least 20 people, including several children, and injuring more than 50 others. According to Reuters, the Associated Press and Al Jazeera, Syrian state media reported that an attacker opened fire inside a busy Greek Orthodox church in Dweil'a — located in the outskirts of Damascus — before detonating an explosive vest on Sunday, June 22. Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) reported that the country's Health Ministry said at least 20 people were dead and 53 others were wounded inside Mar Elias Church, per the outlets. Local media outlets also reported that children were among the dead. Syrian Information Minister Hamza Mostafa condemned the bombing, calling it a terrorist attack, per AP. 'This cowardly act goes against the civic values that bring us together,' he wrote on X. 'We will not back down from our commitment to equal citizenship … and we also affirm the state's pledge to exert all its efforts to combat criminal organizations and to protect society from all attacks threatening its safety.' No group immediately claimed responsibility for the bombing, per AP, but Syria's interior ministry has said that the suicide bomber was a member of the Islamic State (sometimes known as ISIL or ISIS). Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases. According to Reuters and AP, the attack came amid statements from interim Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa that he will act to protect minority groups in the country, after former President Bashar al-Assad's government was overthrown in December 2024. One witness who spoke to AP and a Syrian security source who spoke to Reuters said that a second man was believed to have been involved in the attack. The Greek foreign ministry also condemned the attack, telling Reuters in a statement: "We unequivocally condemn the abhorrent terrorist suicide bombing at the Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church in Damascus, Syria." "We demand that the Syrian transitional authorities take immediate action to hold those involved accountable and implement measures to guarantee the safety of Christian communities and all religious groups, allowing them to live without fear," the statement continued. Witnesses who spoke to AP said the gunman entered the church during mass with his face covered and first began firing a gun. People inside the church charged at the shooter to try and force him outside, and he then detonated his explosives near the entrance of the building. "People were praying safely under the eyes of God," Father Fadi Ghattas told the AP, adding that he saw at least 20 people killed. "There were 350 people praying at the church." Photographs taken in the aftermath of the attack show emergency personnel with the Syrian Civil Defense — whose emergency teams are widely known as the White Helmets, according to the BBC — helping the injured into ambulances. A bystander named Issam Nasr, who was praying at the church, told the outlet that he saw people "blown to bits." "We have never held a knife in our lives. All we ever carried were our prayers," he said. Read the original article on People
Fox News
6 hours ago
- Fox News
‘Open borders' under Biden could help Iran retaliate with US terror sleeper cells: former FBI boss
United States officials are sounding the alarm regarding the threat of terror-backed sleeper cells within the country just hours after President Donald Trump successfully ordered the elimination of key nuclear facilities within Iran. Just hours after Trump addressed the nation on U.S. military strikes on the Iranian nuclear sites, the DHS released a new memo sounding the alarm to a "heightened threat environment in the United States." The bulletin from the National Terrorism Advisory System did not cite any specific threats but comes as Iranian officials have threatened retaliation. With the regime's nuclear program severely set back, and its infrastructure bombarded during Israel's operation, one former FBI boss told Fox News Digital that Iran and its proxies could resort to their original tactic -- terrorism. And the border crisis under the Biden administration only exacerbates the threat of terror cells in the U.S. activating to harm Americans at home. "The likelihood of violent extremists in the Homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if the Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland," the bulletin states. "It is our duty to keep the nation safe and informed, especially during times of conflict," the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "The ongoing Israel-Iran conflict brings the possibility of increased threat to the homeland in the form of possible cyberattacks, acts of violence, and antisemitic hate crimes." The bulletin points to law enforcement within the U.S. disrupting "multiple potentially lethal Iranian-backed plots" since 2020, while noting the Iranian government's unsuccessful attempts to target critics of its regime. Iran previously vowed to retaliate if the U.S. became involved in Israel's attack, which began after Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian military and nuclear facilities on June 13. Prior to the attack, Trump issued a warning to Iran against retaliating, while encouraging the country's leaders to come to a peace deal with Israel. Immediately following the strikes, Trump vowed to target additional sites within Iran "if peace does not come quickly." The advisory comes after Trump ordered military strikes on Iran's key nuclear facilities in what officials are calling "Operation Midnight Hammer," prompting law enforcement to be on high alert regarding the threat of foreign adversary operatives conducting an attack on U.S. soil, with thousands of Iranian nationals previously crossing over the border. "Because of the open borders, we are at a serious catch-up phase" Former FBI assistant director Chris Swecker told Fox News Digital. "We don't know where those thousand Iranians are and who knows how many others got across the border. We missed an opportunity when they caught and released those thousand. We missed the opportunity to gather intel by interviewing them and thoroughly vetting them. We just simply let them go, which is gross negligence on the part of the Biden administration." U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. "We don't know where those thousand Iranians are and who knows how many others got across the border." Over 1,200 Iranian nationals reportedly entered the U.S. during former President Joe Biden's time in office, White House border czar Tom Homan told Maria Bartiromo on "Sunday Morning Futures." The threat of foreign nationals flowing into the U.S. raises concerns regarding possible domestic sleeper cells driven by foreign terrorist organizations, according to national security experts. "The challenge that the United States has had after a very long period of time, [is that] we had an open border," Michael Balboni, former Homeland Security advisor for New York state and a cybersecurity expert, told Fox News Digital. "Tens of millions of people came across and we don't know who they are, where they came from, what their capabilities are or their intentions." Swecker indicated the FBI has primarily focused its attention on homegrown attackers as foreign adversaries flowed into the country. "There's a certain population of Iranians in the U.S. that we know about, but there's thousands and thousands that we don't know about because of the open border situation," Swecker said. "The Bureau was concentrating their resources on so-called domestic terrorists like white supremacists and right-wing extremists, and calling them the most serious terrorist threat to this country when it was absolutely the international terrorists that should have been the focus of the bureau's efforts." The FBI declined Fox News Digital's request for comment. The possibility of foreign cells carrying out a domestic terror plot was pushed into the national spotlight last year after federal prosecutors announced a member of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and two U.S.-nationals were arrested for allegedly plotting to murder then-President-elect Trump and a U.S. citizen critical of the Iranian regime. "The Iranians have shown a pretty good capability in terms of their intelligence apparatus and their operatives being able to work clandestinely," Balboni said. "They are fairly sophisticated when it comes to that, very determined. The question is how many are in the country and the answer is we don't know." The U.S. possesses a wide range of attractive targets, with national security concerns spiking after Trump ordered the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in January 2020. "They're not going to quit," Swecker said. "They will never quit. And this was the right thing to do to take out their nuclear capabilities." Additionally, critical infrastructure within major cities remains a prime spot for cells to carry out destructive terror plots, with Iranian officials likely turning to proxy groups to sow fear within the population. "Electrical grids, perhaps medical facilities, transportation hubs," Balboni said. "Those types of things that have been a part of the playbook when you have these insurgencies that happened within the nation." Balboni points to instances of terror cells conducting pre-operational surveillance within the U.S., adding satellite mapping websites provide adversaries with a birds-eye view of key infrastructure. "Law enforcement and security personnel are really focused now on trying to prevent anything from happening," Balboni told Fox News Digital. "But the problem is if you've had tens of millions of people come across the border, you really don't know where they are and what their capabilities are." As tensions between the Middle East and the U.S. continue to spiral toward a breaking point, the National Terrorism Advisory System warns of U.S.-based individuals "plotting additional attacks" against pro-Israel targets, and U.S. government and military officials. "This is a time for calm, professionalism, information sharing and heightened awareness," Balboni said. "This will not be the first time we face a challenge like this. But certainly because of the hostilities, there is a heightened fear, concern and awareness that these types of attacks could happen in the United States."
