Oil extends rally as escalating Israel-Iran conflict stokes supply disruption fears

An oil storage facility in Iran burns after being hit by Israeli airstrikes on June 15, 2025. PHOTO: ARASH KHAMOOSHI/NYTIMES
TOKYO - Oil prices climbed in early Asian trade on June 16 after Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on June 15, heightening fears that escalating battle could trigger a broader regional conflict and widely disrupt oil exports from the Middle East.
Brent crude futures were up US$1.70, or 2.3 per cent, to US$75.93 a barrel by 6.53am Singapore time, while US West Texas Intermediate crude futures gained US$1.62, or 2.2 per cent, to US$74.60. They had surged more than 5.5 per cent earlier in the morning.
Both benchmarks settled 7 per cent higher on Friday (June 13), having surged more than 13 per cent during the day, the most in three years.
The latest developments have stoked concerns about disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping passage. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait, or some 18 to 19 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil, condensate and fuel.
A closure of Hormuz could propel international prices to as high as US$130, JPMorgan Chase & Co. has predicted. A jump in oil would add to inflation pressures around the world.
Widely watched market metrics are pointing to panic over prompt supply risks, as well as growing fears of a protracted conflict in the Middle East. The gap between the grade's two nearest December contracts – a key indicator on long-term balances – rose by as much as US$1.29 a barrel to US$3.48.
Israel temporarily knocked out a natural gas processing facility linked to the giant South Pars field, Iran's biggest, in an attack on June 14, and targeted fuel storage tanks during strikes as part of its campaign against Tehran's nuclear programme.
While the attack was concentrated on the Islamic Republic's domestic energy system rather than exports to international markets, oil traders and analysts are preparing for more turmoil.
'Now that threshold has been crossed, there will be questions about whether Israel is going to target more Iranian energy infrastructure,' said Richard Bronze, head of geopolitics at consultant Energy Aspects. 'We appear to be in an escalatory cycle.'
Despite US sanctions, Iran remains the third-biggest producer in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opes. Its allies in Yemen, the Houthi militants, have harassed ships in the region and Tehran has in the past threatened to halt the Strait of Hormuz, a critical transit point in the Persian Gulf. It has, however, never blockaded the key maritime chokepoint.
If oil supplies are disrupted, President Donald Trump will likely call on the Opec+ alliance led by Saudi Arabia to tap its considerable spare production capacity, Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, and a former CIA analyst, said in a note on June 13.
But it's unclear whether the Opec could offset a severe and prolonged outage in Iran, which pumps around 3.4 million barrels a day.
The attempt alone could put the energy infrastructure of the Saudis and the United Arab Emirates into the cross-hairs. After Riyadh backed Mr Trump's earlier crackdown on Tehran during his first term, its critical oil-processing installation at Abqaiq was blown up by the Houthis in 2019.
'Opec spare capacity could be brought online to offset a reduction in Iranian barrels,' said Clay Seigle, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC. 'But it would be politically dicey for Saudi Arabia and UAE to benefit in this way at Tehran's expense.'
The fact that major oil facilities have so far been spared in the current tumult may offer markets some reassurance.
'We would probably need to see evidence of an intensifying war – with far more widespread damage and mass civilian casualties – for that expectation to change and the risk premium in crude to spike further,' said Vandana Hari, founder of Singapore-based energy consultancy Vanda Insights.
The International Energy Agency, the Paris-based watchdog set up by consuming nations, said that global oil markets are well supplied amid slowing fuel demand and recent production increases by Opec+. The agency said it's prepared to tap emergency stockpiles if necessary.
On June 15, President Trump said in a Truth Social post that the two belligerent countries should and will make a peace deal. Mr Trump had said before Israel's attacks that he was dissatisfied with rising oil prices.
Fears over the Strait of Hormuz are probably excessive too, Ms Hari added. Such an extreme step would cut off Iran's own export route and alienate its biggest customer, China.
'Iran has never actually blocked the channel despite many threats to do so down the years and I don't expect it will do so now,' she said. BLOOMBERG, REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNA

33 minutes ago

• CNA

Oil prices slip as US sanctions ease fears of escalation in Iran

HOUSTON :Oil prices slipped on Friday as the U.S. imposed new Iran-related sanctions marking a diplomatic approach that fed hopes of a negotiated agreement, a day after President Donald Trump said he might take two weeks to decide U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. Brent crude futures were down $2.27, or 2.9 per cent, to $76.58 a barrel by 11:48 a.m. EDT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude for July - which did not settle on Thursday as it was a U.S. holiday and expires on Friday - was down 21 cents or 0.3 per cent at $74.93. The more liquid August contract was down around 0.1 per cent, or 5 cents, to $73.45. Brent was on track to rise 3.2 per cent on the week, while front-month U.S. crude futures were set to increase by 2.7 per cent. President Donald Trump's administration has issued fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on two entities based in Hong Kong, and counter-terrorism-related sanctions, according to a notice posted to the U.S. Treasury Department website. The sanctions target at least 20 entities, five individuals and three vessels, according to Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control. "Those sanctions are cutting both ways, they may be part of a broader negotiation approach towards Iran. The fact they are undertaking this is a signal they are trying to resolve this outside of conflict," said John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital in New York. Prices jumped almost 3 per cent on Thursday after Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran, while Iran - OPEC's third-largest producer - fired missiles and drones at Israel. Neither side showed any sign of backing down in the week-old war. Brent prices retreated after the White House said President Donald Trump would decide whether the United States would get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks. 'Although a major escalation is yet to occur, risks to supply from the region remain high, still hinging upon the potential for U.S. involvement,' said Russell Shor, senior market analyst at Meanwhile, Israel seeks genuine efforts on Iran's nuclear capabilities from Friday's meeting between European and Iranian ministers, not just another round of talks, Israel's UN ambassador said. "However, while Israel and Iran carry on pounding away at each other, there can always be an unintended action that escalates the conflict and touches upon oil infrastructure," PVM analyst John Evans said. Iran has in the past threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for Middle East oil exports. However, oil exports so far have not been disrupted and there is no shortage of supply, said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS. "The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions." An escalation of the conflict in such a way that Israel attacks export infrastructure or Iran disrupts shipping through the strait could lead to $100 per barrel of oil being a reality, said Panmure Liberum analyst Ashley Kelty.

Business Times

43 minutes ago

• Business Times

Four candidates assessed for Fu Yu's board, with no findings against suitability

[SINGAPORE] Four proposed directors for Fu Yu Corporation have been assessed by an independent party, with no findings made against their suitability for the role, said the company on Friday (Jun 20) evening. Fu Yu currently only has one director – chief executive David Seow – after all three of its independent directors resigned on Jun 15. The company has since appointed Asian Corporate Advisors (ACA) to assess four candidates proposed as independent directors: Gilbert L Rodrigues, Ralf Pilarczyk, Yang Zhenrong and Haytham Al Essa. In its bourse filing, Fu Yu said that 'nothing has come to (ACA's) attention that the proposed new independent directors may not be deemed suitable', and that its board 'sees no reason to disagree'. 'To the best of the current board's knowledge, the proposed new (directors) are not involved in matters relating to FYSCS,' the company added, in reference to its unit Fu Yu Supply Chain Solutions, which has been under investigation. The update comes ahead of Fu Yu's annual general meeting (AGM) on Jun 27. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In an earlier filing on Friday, the company addressed questions from the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias, as well as shareholders. Fu Yu said that its 'day-to-day operations and decision-making processes remain unaffected' by the resignation of all its previous independent directors – Royston Tan, Christopher Huang and Daniel Poh. It also addressed queries on its ongoing investigations into FYSCS – relating to Fu Yu's acquisition of the unit, purported misuse of the FYSCS' resources and a pre-paid commission. 'Currently, no fraud (in the legal sense) has been uncovered,' said Fu Yu, adding that there was no potential liability arising from the transactions in question, 'as well as FYSCS in general'. Asked by Sias if it would release findings by Rajah & Tann and PwC Risk Services ahead of the AGM, Fu Yu said that it would first conduct a 'full Maxwellisation process' relating to the people mentioned in the report, which could take between four to six weeks. Maxwellisation is a legal procedure in which those subject to potential criticism are given an opportunity to respond. 'The company (will) seek legal advice and will deliberate on its next steps after considering the information obtained through the Maxwellisation process, and will update shareholders thereafter,' said Fu Yu. In June last year, FYSCS also received a letter of demand for US$925,773.57 in compensation from another company, Evertree Hongkong. On Jun 5 this year, an arbitral tribunal ruled in favour of Evertree, with Fu Yu required to pay S$1.67 million. Asked about the matter, Fu Yu said that FYSCS had fulfilled its payment obligations on Jun 9 and is solvent. Fu Yu ended Friday at S$0.09, down 4.3 per cent.

Independent Singapore

an hour ago

• Independent Singapore

Where NUS and NTU outshine Oxbridge in global rankings

One in three students at the National University of Singapore (NUS) and Nanyang Technological University (NTU) is a foreigner. The attraction is clear: NUS ranks fourth globally—behind only the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Stanford, and Carnegie Mellon—in computer science and information systems in the 2025 QS World University Rankings By Subject. In electrical and electronic engineering, both NUS and NTU share the fourth spot with Harvard, trailing just MIT, Stanford, and the University of California, Berkeley, according to the same source. Either or both of the universities excel in other fields as well, including law, medicine, and architecture. With their strong showing in the 2026 QS World University Rankings, could NUS and NTU be seen as the Oxford and Cambridge of Asia? Sticklers may disagree, and not without reason. For one, NUS and NTU are located far closer together than the dreaming spires of Oxford are to Cambridge. More importantly, they cannot yet rival the rich Oxbridge tradition in the arts and humanities. Still, in many other fields, they are catching up—or have already overtaken—and that progress is clearly reflected in the rankings. NUS and NTU are ranked eighth and 12th respectively, just behind Oxford and Cambridge, which come in at fourth and sixth. The strong performance of Singapore's universities is no longer a novelty. This marks the third consecutive year NUS has held eighth place. NTU, which ranked 15th in 2025, has returned to 12th, a position it surpassed in 2018 and 2020 when it ranked 11th. Splitting the two Singapore institutions in this year's rankings is the University of Hong Kong at 11th. See also Singapore experts weigh in on the Covid-19 situation NUS is the only Asian university in the global top 10. The only other non-Anglo-American presence is ETH Zurich of Switzerland, in seventh. The broader Asia-Pacific region has a growing presence in the top 20: China's Peking University and Tsinghua University are ranked 14th and 17th, while Australia's University of Melbourne and the University of New South Wales are 19th and 20th. NUS, NTU: Areas of excellence The Singapore universities are no longer known solely for their engineering prowess. NUS ranks 10th globally in law—making it the only non-Anglo-American university in the top 10 for legal studies. NTU stands at 82nd. In medicine, NUS ranks 18th—the highest for any Asian university—while NTU is 84th. NTU, however, shines in communication and media studies, coming in fourth behind the University of Amsterdam, Harvard, and the University of Texas at Austin. NUS ranks 14th in this field. While Oxford and Cambridge still reign supreme in the arts and humanities, NUS is gaining ground. It ranks second globally in art history, eighth in linguistics, ninth in architecture, 15th in English language and literature, and 17th in history. See also SATIRE: Pokemon GO releases sad news for its Singapore fans This academic success is underpinned by scale and diversity. With over 33,000 students, NUS has the second-largest student body among the top 10 universities—trailing only University College London, which has over 45,000 students. NTU has more than 25,000 students. International students and staff International students and staff contribute significantly to the success of both institutions. Foreigners make up 36% of the student body at NUS and 33% at NTU. The faculty is even more international, with 65% of staff at both universities coming from overseas. In comparison, Harvard has around 24,300 students, including 6,700 international students, and over 4,400 faculty and staff, only 27% of whom are international. Oxford has over 22,000 students, more than 9,000 of them from abroad, and 6,500 faculty and staff, with 44% from overseas. The international students and staff carry weight in the QS World University Rankings. QS applies the following weightage when ranking universities: Academic reputation: 30% Citations per faculty: 20% Employer reputation: 15% Employment outcomes: 5% Faculty-student ratio: 10% International faculty ratio: 5% International research network: 5% International student ratio: 5% International student diversity: 0% See also SP overcharges bill, claims they 'overestimated' $1500 There's an old story about Benjamin Jowett, the 19th-century Master of Balliol College, Oxford, who once declared, 'I am the Master of this College; what I don't know isn't knowledge.' Today, such a claim would be inconceivable. From NUS to NTU, Oxford to Harvard, the global groves of academe are constantly striving for the next breakthrough, the next frontier of knowledge. Top 20 in QS World University Rankings 2026: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Imperial College London Stanford University University of Oxford Harvard University University of Cambridge ETH Zurich National University of Singapore University College London California Institute of Technology (Caltech) University of Hong Kong Nanyang Technological University University of Chicago Peking University University of Pennsylvania Cornell University Tsinghua University University of California, Berkeley University of Melbourne University of New South Wales