Proposed law change protects questionable pub jokes

Telling a questionable joke at a pub will not land people before an anti-discrimination complaints hearing under a territory's proposed new laws.
Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby has defended the Northern Territory government's planned anti-discrimination laws to be introduced to parliament in July.
At an estimates hearing on Monday, she rejected accusations from shadow attorney-general Chansey Paech that the planned laws "watered down" protections for people offended by comments made about them.
Ms Boothby said her government was restoring "fairness and common sense" to laws that went too far when the previous Labor government revised them in 2022.
The proposed laws remove "vague" terms such as "offend" and "insult".
They will be replaced with clearer terms to prohibit conduct that "incites hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule" based on personal attributes such as race, sexuality, gender identity, religion and more.
"It's still a strong measure of anti-vilification, so we don't put up with that kind of behaviour," Ms Boothby said.
"Any kind of hate speech is not acceptable in our community."
The attorney-general said the new laws also restored protections for religious schools, allowing them to hire staff who upheld their faith while protecting against discrimination based on race, sexuality or gender.
Territorians wanted their freedom to enjoy the territory lifestyle, she said.
"It's not just having a joke at the pub that's going to land you in front of a hearing," Ms Boothby said.
"We want something that's more serious than that.
"We still want to be able to tell a joke. We still want to have freedom of speech debates."
It was a case of restoring balance and ensuring the law did not overreach into everyday conversations, religious freedoms, or basic rights to express an opinion, Ms Boothby said.
The government consulted religious and multicultural groups, sex workers, LGBTQI groups, the anti-discrimination commissioner and others on the new laws.
The proposed legislation was in line with changes made in other Australian jurisdictions, the attorney-general said.
The estimates hearing was told the office of the NT Anti-Discrimination Commissioner had a budget cut for 2025/26 of $269,000 to $1.65 million.
Commissioner Jeswynn Yogaratnam told the hearing his office received up to 300 complaints a year but only had two complaints officers amid a large backlog of cases.
He said only three of 46 vilification complaints this financial year had been accepted in relation to race, religious belief, gender identity and disability.
Complaints were assessed as to whether they were trivial, vexatious or had no grounds, while those that proceeded were subject to a high-threshold objective standard of assessment, Mr Yogaratnam said.
"So things like your jokes at the pub would not amount to vilification in the context of the way in which we assess it.
"Clearly if that joke is one that incites hatred in relation to one of the 24 protected attributes like race, gender identity, disability, then that would be something we would need to consider."
Any other version of the NT's vilification provision "would be watering it down" because it was the strongest vilification law in Australia, he said.
Telling a questionable joke at a pub will not land people before an anti-discrimination complaints hearing under a territory's proposed new laws.
Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby has defended the Northern Territory government's planned anti-discrimination laws to be introduced to parliament in July.
At an estimates hearing on Monday, she rejected accusations from shadow attorney-general Chansey Paech that the planned laws "watered down" protections for people offended by comments made about them.
Ms Boothby said her government was restoring "fairness and common sense" to laws that went too far when the previous Labor government revised them in 2022.
The proposed laws remove "vague" terms such as "offend" and "insult".
They will be replaced with clearer terms to prohibit conduct that "incites hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule" based on personal attributes such as race, sexuality, gender identity, religion and more.
"It's still a strong measure of anti-vilification, so we don't put up with that kind of behaviour," Ms Boothby said.
"Any kind of hate speech is not acceptable in our community."
The attorney-general said the new laws also restored protections for religious schools, allowing them to hire staff who upheld their faith while protecting against discrimination based on race, sexuality or gender.
Territorians wanted their freedom to enjoy the territory lifestyle, she said.
"It's not just having a joke at the pub that's going to land you in front of a hearing," Ms Boothby said.
"We want something that's more serious than that.
"We still want to be able to tell a joke. We still want to have freedom of speech debates."
It was a case of restoring balance and ensuring the law did not overreach into everyday conversations, religious freedoms, or basic rights to express an opinion, Ms Boothby said.
The government consulted religious and multicultural groups, sex workers, LGBTQI groups, the anti-discrimination commissioner and others on the new laws.
The proposed legislation was in line with changes made in other Australian jurisdictions, the attorney-general said.
The estimates hearing was told the office of the NT Anti-Discrimination Commissioner had a budget cut for 2025/26 of $269,000 to $1.65 million.
Commissioner Jeswynn Yogaratnam told the hearing his office received up to 300 complaints a year but only had two complaints officers amid a large backlog of cases.
He said only three of 46 vilification complaints this financial year had been accepted in relation to race, religious belief, gender identity and disability.
Complaints were assessed as to whether they were trivial, vexatious or had no grounds, while those that proceeded were subject to a high-threshold objective standard of assessment, Mr Yogaratnam said.
"So things like your jokes at the pub would not amount to vilification in the context of the way in which we assess it.
"Clearly if that joke is one that incites hatred in relation to one of the 24 protected attributes like race, gender identity, disability, then that would be something we would need to consider."
Any other version of the NT's vilification provision "would be watering it down" because it was the strongest vilification law in Australia, he said.
Telling a questionable joke at a pub will not land people before an anti-discrimination complaints hearing under a territory's proposed new laws.
Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby has defended the Northern Territory government's planned anti-discrimination laws to be introduced to parliament in July.
At an estimates hearing on Monday, she rejected accusations from shadow attorney-general Chansey Paech that the planned laws "watered down" protections for people offended by comments made about them.
Ms Boothby said her government was restoring "fairness and common sense" to laws that went too far when the previous Labor government revised them in 2022.
The proposed laws remove "vague" terms such as "offend" and "insult".
They will be replaced with clearer terms to prohibit conduct that "incites hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule" based on personal attributes such as race, sexuality, gender identity, religion and more.
"It's still a strong measure of anti-vilification, so we don't put up with that kind of behaviour," Ms Boothby said.
"Any kind of hate speech is not acceptable in our community."
The attorney-general said the new laws also restored protections for religious schools, allowing them to hire staff who upheld their faith while protecting against discrimination based on race, sexuality or gender.
Territorians wanted their freedom to enjoy the territory lifestyle, she said.
"It's not just having a joke at the pub that's going to land you in front of a hearing," Ms Boothby said.
"We want something that's more serious than that.
"We still want to be able to tell a joke. We still want to have freedom of speech debates."
It was a case of restoring balance and ensuring the law did not overreach into everyday conversations, religious freedoms, or basic rights to express an opinion, Ms Boothby said.
The government consulted religious and multicultural groups, sex workers, LGBTQI groups, the anti-discrimination commissioner and others on the new laws.
The proposed legislation was in line with changes made in other Australian jurisdictions, the attorney-general said.
The estimates hearing was told the office of the NT Anti-Discrimination Commissioner had a budget cut for 2025/26 of $269,000 to $1.65 million.
Commissioner Jeswynn Yogaratnam told the hearing his office received up to 300 complaints a year but only had two complaints officers amid a large backlog of cases.
He said only three of 46 vilification complaints this financial year had been accepted in relation to race, religious belief, gender identity and disability.
Complaints were assessed as to whether they were trivial, vexatious or had no grounds, while those that proceeded were subject to a high-threshold objective standard of assessment, Mr Yogaratnam said.
"So things like your jokes at the pub would not amount to vilification in the context of the way in which we assess it.
"Clearly if that joke is one that incites hatred in relation to one of the 24 protected attributes like race, gender identity, disability, then that would be something we would need to consider."
Any other version of the NT's vilification provision "would be watering it down" because it was the strongest vilification law in Australia, he said.
Telling a questionable joke at a pub will not land people before an anti-discrimination complaints hearing under a territory's proposed new laws.
Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby has defended the Northern Territory government's planned anti-discrimination laws to be introduced to parliament in July.
At an estimates hearing on Monday, she rejected accusations from shadow attorney-general Chansey Paech that the planned laws "watered down" protections for people offended by comments made about them.
Ms Boothby said her government was restoring "fairness and common sense" to laws that went too far when the previous Labor government revised them in 2022.
The proposed laws remove "vague" terms such as "offend" and "insult".
They will be replaced with clearer terms to prohibit conduct that "incites hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule" based on personal attributes such as race, sexuality, gender identity, religion and more.
"It's still a strong measure of anti-vilification, so we don't put up with that kind of behaviour," Ms Boothby said.
"Any kind of hate speech is not acceptable in our community."
The attorney-general said the new laws also restored protections for religious schools, allowing them to hire staff who upheld their faith while protecting against discrimination based on race, sexuality or gender.
Territorians wanted their freedom to enjoy the territory lifestyle, she said.
"It's not just having a joke at the pub that's going to land you in front of a hearing," Ms Boothby said.
"We want something that's more serious than that.
"We still want to be able to tell a joke. We still want to have freedom of speech debates."
It was a case of restoring balance and ensuring the law did not overreach into everyday conversations, religious freedoms, or basic rights to express an opinion, Ms Boothby said.
The government consulted religious and multicultural groups, sex workers, LGBTQI groups, the anti-discrimination commissioner and others on the new laws.
The proposed legislation was in line with changes made in other Australian jurisdictions, the attorney-general said.
The estimates hearing was told the office of the NT Anti-Discrimination Commissioner had a budget cut for 2025/26 of $269,000 to $1.65 million.
Commissioner Jeswynn Yogaratnam told the hearing his office received up to 300 complaints a year but only had two complaints officers amid a large backlog of cases.
He said only three of 46 vilification complaints this financial year had been accepted in relation to race, religious belief, gender identity and disability.
Complaints were assessed as to whether they were trivial, vexatious or had no grounds, while those that proceeded were subject to a high-threshold objective standard of assessment, Mr Yogaratnam said.
"So things like your jokes at the pub would not amount to vilification in the context of the way in which we assess it.
"Clearly if that joke is one that incites hatred in relation to one of the 24 protected attributes like race, gender identity, disability, then that would be something we would need to consider."
Any other version of the NT's vilification provision "would be watering it down" because it was the strongest vilification law in Australia, he said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

West Australian

39 minutes ago

• West Australian

AARON PATRICK: Donald Trump tries to pull off the deal of epoch, Middle East peace

Around 6pm Friday, Australian east coast time, some half-a-dozen B-2 Spirit bombers took off from Whiteman Air Force base in western Missouri for a mission that could intensify one of history's most intractable conflicts or help resolve it. The bombers' target was not the uranium Iran's Islamist regime has been enriching for potential use in a nuclear weapon, but the facilities, equipment and scientists who survived a week-long aerial blitz by Israel, according to Ran Porat, a former Israeli military intelligence analyst who monitored the early stages of Iran's nuclear program. The six B-2s that dropped a dozen 14-tonne bunker-busting bombs on Iran's heavily fortified Fordo nuclear site and the one that bombed the Natanz enrichment plant have probably set the program back at least a year, Dr Porat reckons. 'That's how it looks now,' he told The Nightly Sunday afternoon. 'The Americans don't know for sure yet. It's too early to access the damage still under the smoke of war.' Soon, perhaps within hours, the American and Israeli intelligence services will learn what damage they have wreaked. In addition to satellite and aircraft photography and atmosphere sensors, they will likely have spies who can see where cameras in the sky can't. Only then will they know if President Donald Trump's high-risk gambit to join the war has achieved its immediate objective of preventing Iran's supreme leader, Ayotallah Ali Khamenei, getting the bomb. Like many Israelis, Dr Porat hopes the survivors of the regime, exhausted, demoralised and afraid, will sue for peace. This is how experts think it could work: the United Nations or another international body supervises the dismantling of what is left of the military nuclear program (Iran has had a civilian nuclear power station since 1967). An implicit or tacit non-aggression pact with the US and Israel includes the removal of economic sanctions, allowing Iran's economy to flourish. Iran stops financing the terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah, which are dedicated to the destruction of Israel. As tensions settle across the Middle East, other Arab countries, led by Saudi Arabia, normalise diplomatic relations with Israel, leading to trade and cultural exchanges that help foster, eventually, long-term peace. Here is what some fear will happen: Iran's religious leaders double down on the nuclear program, and use what physical and human resources they have left to cobble together a nuclear bomb. Emboldened with possession of a mass killing machine, Iran rebuilds its terror network. American civilians and military personnel across the Middle East become targets. The region becomes even more dangerous for Americans and their allies as Iran and the US engage in tit-for-tat retaliation over years, perhaps decades. Predicting with certainty what will happen is impossible. But Mr Trump's long and often-erratic public career is that of a deal-maker rather than a warmonger. For this deal — would could be the biggest of his life — Mr Trump is being predictably unpredictable. On Friday morning, Australian time, he give Iran up to two weeks to enter negotiations. US government sources told the New York Times the B-2 bombers flew 37 hours and hit Iran at 9am AEST, Sunday. The timing indicates Mr Trump ordered the attack within 12 hours of saying he had not decided to bomb Iran. 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' he said in a recorded message, flanked by Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. 'If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.' Making your actions difficult to anticipate can be an effective negotiating tactic. So too dropping the world's most-powerful non-nuclear weapon from Stealth Bombers. Mr Trump has done both. The world will now take a deep breath and wait for the response from ayatollahs, who have long celebrated the prospect of war with the 'Zionist entity' and the 'Great Satan'. They now have their wish.

7NEWS

an hour ago

• 7NEWS

World leaders react to US attack on Iran nuclear sites

World leaders are reacting after US forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites. * OFFICE OF AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER ANTHONY ALBANESE 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security. We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.' * ISRAEL PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU 'Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history ... History will record that President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons.' * UN SECRETARY-GENERAL ANTONIO GUTERRES 'I am gravely alarmed by the use of force by the United States against Iran today. This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge - and a direct threat to international peace and security. There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control - with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world. I call on member states to de-escalate and to uphold their obligations under the UN Charter and other rules of international law. At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace.' * VENEZUELA FOREIGN MINISTER YVAN GIL 'Venezuela Condemns US Military Aggression Against Iran and Demands an Immediate Cessation of Hostilities. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela firmly and categorically condemns the bombing carried out by the United States military, at the request of the State of Israel, against nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan complexes.' * MEXICO FOREIGN MINISTRY 'The ministry urgently calls for diplomatic dialogue for peace between the parties involved in the Middle East conflict. In keeping with our constitutional principles of foreign policy and our country's pacifist conviction, we reiterate our call to de-escalate tensions in the region. The restoration of peaceful coexistence among the states of the region is the highest priority.' * CUBA PRESIDENT MIGUEL DIAZ-CANEL 'We strongly condemn the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, which constitutes a dangerous escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. The aggression seriously violates the UN Charter and international law and plunges humanity into a crisis with irreversible consequences.'

Sky News AU

2 hours ago

• Sky News AU

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley expresses support for US strikes on Iran, calls for solidarity against nuclear threat

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has expressed support for US President Donald Trump's military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. President Donald Trump confirmed on Sunday (Australian time) that US forces had hit three of Iran's principal nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. While the Albanese government has called for 'de-escalation', the federal opposition has expressed strong support for the United States' military actions. 'The Coalition supports actions taken by the United States of America to ensure that the Iranian regime is stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons,' Ms Ley said. 'It was made clear by the International Atomic and Energy Agency on June 12 that Iran was in breach of its Non-Proliferation Treaty obligations.' Under the treaty, Iran was prohibited from attempting to acquire, manufacture, or otherwise obtain nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic had since stockpiled more than 400 kilograms of 60 per cent enriched uranium at the Fordow facility. This was understood to be the last step in enrichment before Iran was able to produce a nuclear weapon. 'The world can never accept a nuclear-armed Iranian regime and today the United States military has taken proactive action to ensure that we never need to,' Ms Ley said. 'A nuclear armed Iranian regime would be a serious and direct threat to world peace and stability. The Coalition stands with the United States of America today. 'We can never allow the Iranian regime the capacity to enact its objectives of the destruction of the United States and Israel.' The Albanese government also issued a carefully worded statement on Sunday calling for 'de-escalation and diplomacy'. 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programme has been a threat to international peace and security," a government spokesperson said. 'The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.' The statement also warned Australians in the region to follow public safety advice and confirmed that DFAT was providing support. Former prime minister Scott Morrison told Sky News that the US strikes were 'necessary' and accused the Albanese government of 'ambiguity' in its response. 'This was a necessary event. There were no other options available to the (US) president,' Mr Morrison said. "It's time for some clarity (from the Albanese government). I think there's been far too much ambiguity about this from Australia." Defence Minister Richard Marles had refrained from giving an explicit position on any US strikes earlier on Sunday. 'We are worried about the prospect for escalation here and we've been urging de-escalation,' Mr Marles said prior to the attack. The US strikes mark a dramatic escalation in the volatile conflict between Israel and Iran. President Trump said the attacks were 'very successful' and declared that the underground Fordow facility was 'gone' after bunker-buster bombs were dropped. 'This was an amazing success tonight… They should make peace immediately or they'll get hit again,' he said.