Group of 'neo-Nazis' escorted from council meeting

A group of 'neo-Nazis' had to be escorted from West Dunbartonshire Council's HQ after disrupting their last full council meeting ahead of the summer recess.
During the meeting, councillor Jim Bollan presented a motion to elected members urging them to condemn the racist banners, flyers, and posters that the Patriotic Alliance had recently displayed at the Clydebank Bandstand.
Similar banners were also attached to railings in front of the council chambers in Dumbarton on Wednesday.
The organisation has been described as a far-right, fascist, neo-Nazi and white nationalist hate group, and have recently used the bandstand at the Clydebank Shopping Centre to demonstrate their views to the public.
Councillor Bollan's motion had asked the council to authorise council officials to remove any such items attached to the Council-owned Bandstand in Clydebank Shopping Centre that do not have prior written consent from West Dunbartonshire Council as soon as practical.
But as councillor Bollan tried to speak, he was interrupted by chanting from the public gallery from at least three or four protesters who kept repeating 'Scotland is for Scots'.
They were asked to sit down and be quiet by Provost Karen Murray Conaghan, who also told them to stop filming and taking pictures of the meeting, and if they couldn't, they would be told to leave.
Provost Murray Conaghan said: 'Excuse me, can I ask you to be quiet in the public gallery. It is a meeting in public not a meeting for you to contribute to.
'You sit there and be quiet during the meeting or I will ask you to leave. If you can't be quiet you will have to leave and take your hand off the barrier.'
The provost was then made aware that filming was taking place.
Councillor Murray Conaghan continued: 'There is no filming permitted. If you continue to film you will be asked to leave now. Please put your phone away.'
Councillor Bollan was able to continue speaking on his motion.
He said: 'The overt racist posters being displayed by Patriotic Alternative in Clydebank could be a precursor to the racist, violent behaviour we are seeing in Ireland at the moment, where non-whites are having their homes fire bombed because of the colour of their skin.
'Groups like Patriotic Alternative are cheerleaders for Reform, which is a racist party, and use the fact that the two larger political parties are not delivering for the policies needed by our working-class communities.
'That void is being used by extremists to blame refugees and asylum seekers as a divide and conquer tactic, commonly used by racists. By supporting this motion West Dunbartonshire Council will be sending a clear message that we are anti racist and inclusive of all races.
'Before I came into this meeting, I noticed some of the banners outside, which are overtly racist. It is unacceptable in West Dunbartonshire.'
As councillors started to discuss the motion, the meeting was interrupted again as protesters continued to cause disruption and were asked to leave as a result.
Provost Murray Conaghan told the public gallery: 'If you can't put your phone down and stop filming, I will ask you to leave the gallery.
'The recording is available at home, so you can listen to it there. You need to put your phone away. We will pause until we restore a bit of public order in the public gallery – sorry, members.'
The group was escorted out by security, and the meeting resumed.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Scottish Sun

4 hours ago

• Scottish Sun

Council staff in major Scots city could soon be doing FOUR-DAY week

She said the proposed change to working arrangements could offer a new way to help staff morale WORK IN PROGRESS Council staff in major Scots city could soon be doing FOUR-DAY week Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) WORKERS in one of Scotland's cities could soon be working just four days a week. The proposals could soon be trialled by a council meaning thousands of staff could be the first in the country to work the revamped hours. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 The City of Edinburgh Council is exploring a proposal to offer staff a four-day week Credit: The Times Councillors in the capital passed a motion lodged by the Scottish Greens' Claire Miller. She said the proposed change to working arrangements could offer a new way to help staff morale. Cllr Miller claimed that "productivity remains the same or in some cases can actually improve" with a four-day working week. She also told a City of Edinburgh Council meeting it would also assist in filling empty roles and aid poor health, as reported by BBC Scotland. Officers will now prepare a report for the local authority's finance and resources committee. The document will include information on the health of staff, productivity, recruitment and retention. Council officers will also inspect the evidence from four-day week pilots or reduced workday practices elsewhere. Ms Miller said: "The four-day week is a policy where our services remain as they are and there are no changes as far as the residents are concerned in terms of the opening hours provided to them. "Studies into a four-day week show productivity remains the same or in some cases can actually improve, and a great proportion of the working week is given back to people for their own responsibilities for rest and for leisure. "A four-day week is that rare unicorn policy, one where we can help our budgets but we would also be providing genuine benefits for our workers and through them to our residents." Scottish Conservative councillor Christopher Cowdy said that the report must be "balanced and grounded". New sinister threat issued in ongoing Scotland gang war He added that the council should be wary in interpreting limited trials and that locals should also be consulted. A number of local authorities in the UK have shown interest in trialling a four-day working week. South Cambridgeshire District Council was the first to trial it.

The National

6 hours ago

• The National

A Holyrood election in 2026 means we should jumping with excitement

Three things first: Scotland and England are different countries; every country on the planet has a right to self-determination and democracy; and in Scotland the people hold sovereignty. Surely no-one would seriously contest these truths. READ MORE: John Swinney to host independence debate at SNP National Council in Perth Yet too many of us Scots, constantly brainwashed by the massively Unionist media, seem to believe that we need a foreign country's permission to have our own parliament – even a devolved one that must conform to foreign restraints on its constitution and governance. Concomitant to that delusion there is our collusion in ensuring that the pantomime runs on. We accept a constrained, colonial-type assembly here in Holyrood and we elect and dispatch MPs to Westminster where they are virtually powerless in Scotland' s interest – and would remain so even if their number was increased fourfold. Some of the above restraints are grosser than ridiculous: a referendum here is not permitted though Northern Ireland can by that means seek popular re-unification whenever it fancies – and again every seven years. READ MORE: Westminster, not the SNP, can take credit for increased Yes support The truth is that Westminster has absolutely no right to intrude on the governance of Scotland. Nor do we Scots need a referendum to establish a birthright. It beggars belief that for hundreds of years, by delusion and collusion, we have acknowledged a phoney Westminster overlordship of our very existence as a nation. What to do about it is the hook on which hangs indy despond and frustration, yet hooks are removable. We must remember we are sovereign in our own land. And happily, there's a Holyrood election as close as next year to set us jumping with excitement, for it is a rare opportunity to broadcast our sovereign claim to a universal birthright. An election democratically demonstrates a nation's decision on its future, a vote for everyone of age, no foreign influence. Even Westminster wouldn't have the gall to contest the result of an election. READ MORE: Will a group form to take forward constitutional convention plans? The SNP and Alba and any other agency intent on restoring our national entitlements would electrify European interest in this election by declaring in manifestos that a majority vote by a sovereign people will authorise them to bin 1707 in order to form a new, free, equal, friendlier and more respectful union with England that will further our mutual interest. Implementing these aspirations will take time, so intimately are our affairs interlinked, but with goodwill and application nearly all neighbouring states learn to live together. Some things could be done or set up to do well before the 2026 rebirth. Priorities might include some positive action on the new currency issue, the setting up of a national bank, and the creation of a foreign office. Let's all forsake despond and start jumping! The choice for the stuck-spot SNP becomes clearer almost daily: jump up to the bandwagon driving seat, or down into a flushable 2026 bowl. John Melrose Peebles I THINK SNP HQ should start keeping an events diary. I would have attended this Saturday's National Council in Perth but I am already booked in for the Oliver Brown (Scots Independent) awards dinner at the Salutation Hotel, also in Perth, on the same day. That same day, there is an independence rally (AUOB) in Stirling. I can't be at all three. The organisers of all three events seem to act in opposition to each other. Why? This great cause of ours, INDEPENDENCE, needs all three events. Its not the opposition parties or Anglo/Brit rule that is preventing me from participating in all three. I think back to the Bannockburn parades of the sixties when the SNP organised such a show of strength and solidarity that the Unionist press panicked, and hid in their bubble of silence. They ignored a Bannockburn parade so long that one couldn't see the end of it. Winnie Ewing headed it, and every nationalist that could make it was there. Bring those days back. This time we have The National, which will cover our mass demonstrations and rallies. Let's show the WORLD that we mean to declare a new independent Scottish democracy. The SNP and Alba, the Greens, Scottish Republicans, The League of Celtic Nations, and AUOB must, just like separate chiltrons at Bannockburn, work together in the same army, and advance as one great phalanx to inevitable victory, liberation, and freedom. Iain Ramsay Greenock & Inverclyde COULDN'T agree more with Dianne Alexander's letter yesterday about the SNP (Party seem content to manage decline). I would add 'badly' in front of 'manage'. We know what's happening, it's crystal clear: run down Scotland to an extent where they think about ending Holyrood. So what's the way forward. We've tried the courts. So a plebiscite election? Ken McCartney Hawick

Daily Record

8 hours ago

• Daily Record

Labour Government frontbencher resigns over proposed disability benefit cuts

Vicky Foxcroft has resigned as a Government whip because she did not believe the proposed cuts 'should be part of the solution'. A Labour frontbencher has resigned over the UK Government's proposed benefit cuts. Vicky Foxcroft has resigned as a Government whip because she did not believe the proposed cuts 'should be part of the solution'. ‌ The MP for Lewisham North said: 'I have wrestled with whether I should resign or remain in the Government and fight for change from within. ‌ 'Sadly it is now (sic) seems that we are not going to get the changes I desperately wanted to see. 'I therefore tender my resignation as I know I will not be able to do the job that is required of me and whip – or indeed vote – for reforms which include cuts to disabled people's finances.' Foxcroft - who previously served as shadow minister for disabled people - is the first frontbencher to resign over the proposed benefit cuts. She is the second to go over policy issues following Anneliese Dodds' decision to quit as development minister over cuts to the aid budget. Labour MP for Alloa and Grangemouth Brian Leishman said: "Respect to her for making that decision. This vote will define an MPs career. "You have got to pick a side and the choice is simple - are you on the side of the most vulnerable people in society or not? ‌ "There will be Labour MPs that vote for these proposals and immediately regret it and I urge colleagues to think about that." Responding to Foxcroft's resignation, a Government spokesperson said: 'This Labour Government was elected to deliver change. The broken welfare system we inherited is failing the sick and most vulnerable and holding too many young people back. It is fair and responsible to fix it. 'Our principled reforms will ensure those who can work should, that those who want to work are properly supported, and that those with most severe disabilities and health conditions are protected.' ‌ Keir Starmer has faced a backlash from some Labour MPs over proposals to r eform the welfare system expected to save up to £5 billion a year. Legislation introduced into Parliament on Wednesday includes a tightening of the criteria for the main disability payment in England, personal independence payment (Pip). Ministers also want to cut the sickness related element of universal credit (UC), and delay access to it, so only those aged 22 and over can claim it. Most Scots on disability benefit are on the devolved Adult Disability Payment (ADP), but the cuts will mean the Scottish Government receives less money. SNP Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville confirmed last week that ADP will not be cut. She did not explain where the money would come from.