Billions risked on 'unproven' green tech, MPs warn
The government is committing billions of pounds to an "unproven" green technology for reducing planet-warming gases without considering the impact on consumers' bills, MPs have warned.Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) facilities prevent carbon dioxide, produced by industry, being released into the atmosphere by capturing and storing it underground.In October, the government pledged nearly £22bn for CCUS facilities and three quarters of the money will be raised from consumer bills.But on Friday, the House of Commons' Public Accounts Committee raised serious concerns that the government had not properly assessed the financial impact on households and businesses.
"It is an unproven technology, certainly in this country. And we are concerned this policy is going to have a very significant effect on consumers' and industry's electricity bills," said Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, a cross-party group of MPs which scrutinises public spending.The government said that it would formally respond to the committee, but that CCUS was a "necessity not an option" for reaching its climate goals.It said in a statement that this type of technology would make Britain's energy system secure, something that would lower electricity costs and bills. The UK has a target to reach "net zero" - meaning no longer adding to the total amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, by 2050. As the country switches to renewable energy and away from fossil fuels for heating homes and running cars, greenhouse gas emissions like carbon dioxide, also known as CO2, will fall.But a small amount of gas will still need to be used to maintain electricity supply and there are some industries such as cement where there are few green alternatives. Carbon capture could prevent the CO2 produced by these processes from entering the atmosphere - and the government has bet achieving its climate goals on it.Both the UK's independent climate watchdog and the UN's climate science body, the IPCC, agree that CCUS will be needed if countries want to reach net zero and avoid the worst impacts of climate change.By 2050, the government wants carbon capture and storage to prevent the emitting of 50 million tonnes of CO2 - more than 10% of what the country currently releases - and has committed £21.7bn to achieving this goal.The funding, announced in October, will go towards clusters of carbon capture projects in Merseyside and Teesside, which it said would create thousands of jobs and attract private investment.Dr Stuart Jenkins, research fellow at the University of Oxford, pushed back on the committee's assessment of the technology."I really don't like the phrase "unproven" technology, it is not representative of the status of the technology as an engineering problem," he said.Although there are no commercial CCUS sites in the UK, there are 45 commercial facilities already operating globally capturing around 50 million tonnes of CO2, and there are more than 700 being proposed or developed, according to the International Energy Agency.But Dr Jenkins did agree with the Public Accounts Committee that there were questions about whether the government's current funding model was sustainable.The committee have recommended that the full financial impact of the programme on consumers be properly assessed, taking account of cost-of-living pressures.
The committee did recognise the importance of early government support for novel technologies like CCUS to give confidence to the industry.But it added it "was surprised" to discover that the government had signed two contracts with CCUS developers last year and not guaranteed that if the projects were successful that the government - and the public - would receive profits or benefits such as lower energy bills."If you were a venture capitalist investing this sort of sum of money, which is effectively what the taxpayers are doing here, you would expect to have a big equity stake in this whole thing," said Sir Clifton-Brown.His committee recommended that any future contracts be changed to include profit-sharing mechanisms.The government said that it expected the £21.7bn funding for CCUS to unlock £8bn in private sector investment over the next 25 years.
Mirte Boot, co-founder of Carbon Balance Initiative and research associate at University of Oxford, said her team's research suggests a better long-term model for financing could be introducing a carbon storage mandate - placing a legal obligation on fossil fuel producers to store a share of the CO2 they produce, or face a financial penalty."We argue that carbon storage mandates on fossil fuel producers are fair whilst also providing the kind of investment certainty that companies need," she said.
Sign up for our Future Earth newsletter to get exclusive insight on the latest climate and environment news from the BBC's Climate Editor Justin Rowlatt, delivered to your inbox every week. Outside the UK? Sign up to our international newsletter here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Bullying claims in Parliament up 40pc in a year
Bullying complaints in Parliament have increased by 40 per cent in a year, with MPs most likely to be accused of misconduct. The Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme (ICGS), which investigates bullying, harassment and sexual wrongdoing in Parliament, said it had seen a spike in complaints in the year to this April, which encompassed the general election. The body's annual report, published on Monday, said it had investigated 69 cases in the year, up from 47 the previous year. The cases were the result of 50 'disclosures' from parliamentary staff, some of which related to multiple individuals. The number of disclosures also increased by 25 per cent, and they were investigated at a total cost of almost £2 million. The ICGS said all but three of the complaints were of bullying and harassment, with the remainder relating to sexual misconduct including assault, harassment, stalking and voyeurism. Only four were upheld, with the remainder withdrawn, found to be out of scope or not completed by the end of the year. The report, which did not give details of individual cases, said the presence of alcohol in Parliament was 'a factor in almost one out of every five complaints investigated' and was 'notably prevalent' in sexual misconduct cases. MPs were the largest group of alleged perpetrators of either bullying, harassment or sexual misconduct, followed by House of Commons employees, staff working for MPs and members of the House of Lords. The ICGS did not explain the reason for the uplift in the number of complaints, which came after more than half of MPs were replaced at the general election. But it said that some of the bullying cases were caused by a 'power imbalance' in the workplace, where managers had 'abused their authority by publicly humiliating staff' or being 'openly critical and dismissive'. 'This behaviour caused complainants to feel insecure about their job stability and created an intimidating work environment,' it said. 'Additionally, it was alleged that managers assigned tasks that were excessively challenging or impossible to complete within the given timeframe, making the complainants feel as though they were being set up to fail.' Criticism over speed of investigations The ICGS was established in 2018 in response to the #MeToo movement and complaints that sexual misconduct was prevalent among MPs and their staff. But it has been criticised for the speed at which it can conduct investigations, with some dragging on for more than a year and involving multiple rounds of analysis by officials. In one case, a complaint was upheld by the ICGS and passed to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, which investigates the conduct of MPs. The commissioner rejected the complaint, resulting in an appeal to another body, the Independent Expert Panel, which returned it to the commissioner. The appeal was ultimately not upheld. Thea Walton, the director of the ICGS, said: 'During the reporting period, we experienced a notable increase in the number of people contacting the ICGS. We received 25 per cent more disclosures in 2024-25 than in 2023-24. 'Unfortunately, this increase, the complexity of cases and the introduction of new processes and ways of working has contributed to longer timescales for completing cases. Over the next 12 months, the team will be working hard to reduce these timescales while bedding in our new processes and continuing to deliver a high-quality service for the parliamentary community. 'I am encouraged to see that awareness of the ICGS remains high across Parliament and more people are coming forward to use the scheme to seek redress when they feel they have experienced poor behaviour.'
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
How will Iran's embattled Supreme leader respond to US strikes?
Hiding in a secret bunker, speaking indirectly to commanders through a handful of trusted aides, naming a string of successors to his increasingly battered military command — and significantly, to his own position— and avoiding anything trackable or electronic. This is said to be the shrinking world of Iran's supreme leader, who has ruled the country with an iron fist for nearly four decades, as the nation buckles under the largest attacks on its soil since the war with Iraq in the 1980s. According to US officials, Donald Trump has vetoed Israeli plans to take out Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But the danger of death significantly spiked when the US entered the fray yesterday, unleashing the biggest conventional bombs in its arsenal on Iranian nuclear facilities — including, according to UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi, causing 'very significant' damage to the Fordow uranium enrichment plant, dug into the side of a mountain. There have been unconfirmed rumours swirling inside Iran that its Assembly of Experts — the body empowered to appoint a supreme leader — held an emergency session. The New York Times, citing Iranian officials, reported that Khamenei has even named three senior clerics as candidates to succeed him, in a telling indication of just how much his rule — and even his life — is under threat. You could also read into the fact that Ayatollah Khamenei has not spoken publicly since the US attacked Iran directly. He last addressed the world five days ago, telling the US president: 'It isn't wise to tell the Iranian nation to surrender.' 'The harm the US will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily,' he warned. But the question remains: what options do the Iranian regime — or more specifically, the supreme leader - actually have? Particularly given the external threat from Iran's skies (which Israel now claims it controls) and the internal threat from powerful factions within the country's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps? American outlets have reported that Iran threatened to activate sleeper cells in the US in messages to Trump if Washington entered the melee. In the past, there have been numerous attacks by Iran-backed groups on US bases and positions in countries like Iraq and Syria — while the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen have also fired missiles at Israel. But surely the loudest noise across the Middle East — rocked by daily explosions — is the deafening silence in recent days these proxies and allies, including the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF) in Iraq, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Houthis in Yemen. Once thought to be the powerful, long-fingered, and unshakeably loyal defenders of Iran against its Western foes, these groups have been so quiet they have inspired a slew of memes comparing them to puppies, boyfriends that ghost, and Homer Simpson disappearing into a hedge. Reports from within Iran, shared with The Independent, indicate Tehran has been penning directives to these allies to activate against the US. Iran-aligned Iraqi armed group Kateab Hezbollah had warned it would resume attacks on American troops in the region if the United States intervened. On Monday Reuters reported that oil majors including Eni, BP, and Total Energies operating in Iraqi oilfields have evacuated a number of their foreign personnel possibly preempting an attack. But experts question whether groups like Kateab Hezbollah or the PMF would be willing to really go all out and attack US or western assets in this environment. Last year, Israel's unprecedented assault on Lebanon took out the most senior leadership of Hezbollah, including its previously untouchable leader Hassan Nasrallah, gutting the group's capabilities. The various Iran-backed armed factions in Syria, reeling from Hezbollah's defanging, were later sent packing — or into the shadows — when their ally, former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, was ousted by Islamist-led Sunni opposition groups that now rule most of the country. In Iraq, despite US intelligence reports suggesting Iran-backed militias are preparing attacks on US bases, nothing concrete has so far materialised. These forces will no doubt have watched with horror as Iran's most senior military commanders have been eliminated — including newly appointed successors, one just four days into his new job as chief of staff. '[Iran's allied militias] want to stay out,' says Bronwen Maddox, CEO of the think tank Chatham House, speaking from Jordan — where missile fire between Iran and Israel crosses overhead. 'I think the US has a separate deal with the Houthis, and the others are not very effective anymore,' she added. Maddox believes that Ayatollah Khamenei might want to wait and see if Israel de-escalates - and may even try to renegotiate with the US. In a worst case scenario he has some very alarming alternatives, including the quite literal nuclear option. The biggest fear, she adds, is the deployment of a dirty bomb, given Iran reportedly has enough enriched uranium to build around nine weapons. There is also the possibility that Iran strangles the strategic Strait of Hormuz, that is the world's busiest oil shipping channel. At its narrowest point, the strait's shipping lanes lie entirely within Iran and Oman's territorial waters, giving Tehran a considerable hold. Blocking it would have profound consequences for the global economy. Whatever happens, Israel - and possibly Donald Trump - appears to be pushing for regime toppling, even if it's unclear how that could be achieved through airstrikes alone. Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly called on Iranian civilians to rise up against their leaders — most recently last week, telling Iranians in English that Israeli airstrikes were 'clearing the path to achieve your objectives, which is freedom.' That said even if all of Iran's military leaders were wiped out, there is no effective opposition poised and prepared to take over all arms of the state. But for Israel, full regime change, in the traditional sense, may not be entirely necessary. For Israel, ousting, destroying, or defanging the current leadership—and allowing a messy vacuum to follow—may be just as effective if the only goal is to prevent Iran's nuclear programme from continuing. Chaos is a win.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Zelensky welcomed to No 10 for meeting with Starmer ahead of Nato summit
The Ukrainian president arrived in Downing Street where he was expected to discuss Britain's ongoing support for his war-torn nation on Monday afternoon, after being welcomed to Windsor Castle for lunch with Charles. Mr Zelensky, who is usually seen wearing military fatigues, wore a black blazer and trousers throughout his Monday visits. He and Sir Keir embraced on the doorstep of No 10, where a red carpet had been rolled out for the Ukrainian leader. Speaker of the House of Commons Sir Lindsay Hoyle with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Lord McFall at Speaker's House in the Palace of Westminster (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Charles and Mr Zelensky were earlier pictured chatting as they made their way through Windsor Castle, and smiling as they shook hands in the Grand Corridor. During his visit to London, the Ukrainian leader was also welcomed to the Palace of Westminster and met Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle and his Lords counterpart, Lord McFall of Alcluith. His arrival in the UK follows reports that Russia fired 352 drones and 16 missiles at Ukraine overnight, killing at least 10 civilians including seven in Kyiv. Mr Zelensky said preliminary reports indicated Russia had used North Korean missiles to attack Kyiv and described those two countries, and Iran, as a 'coalition of murderers'. His visit to London takes place the day before Nato leaders are set to meet in The Hague for a two-day summit, with increased defence spending top of the agenda. The King with Volodymyr Zelensky at Windsor Castle (Jonathan Brady/PA) Mr Zelensky has been invited to the summit but will not take part in its main discussions, and it is still unclear whether he will attend at all. Ahead of the visit, a Downing Street spokesman said Sir Keir would 'reiterate our steadfast support for Ukraine' during his meeting with Mr Zelensky.
