See the hidden shortcuts to winning the apartment race
At 25 years old, pharmacist Amelia Wootten managed to secure an apartment of her own – but with an increasingly competitive market and rising prices, it took a little help to get one she could afford.
Having moved back to Brisbane in 2024 after several years in Rockhampton, Ms Wootten said she was eager to find a home without the constant presence of housemates or family.
But when she started to look for apartments, she found she was competing with too many people to find an affordable home in an area close to her job.
'There was a super original place in Nundah, and that had, I reckon, 40 or 50 people going through it,' she said. 'It felt very disheartening, I think, for a young buyer to be looking at how many people were going through and going, 'I'm just not going to get anything'.'
Ms Wootten's search came as apartment price growth across Brisbane was found to vastly outpace that of houses, according to research from Nuestar and Hotspotting.
The research found 76.3 per cent of apartments across the city were showing stronger growth than houses over the 12 months preceding June.
'I think that with the rate going down and everything, it got a little bit more competitive,' Ms Wootten said. 'I think there's a lot more people looking for apartments rather than houses.'
'A lot of the [Rockhampton] houses were priced at what apartments would be here … what you're getting for 500k is a lot more, but obviously it's living in a regional area.'
Place New Farm agent Karen McBryde, who was able to find Ms Wootten a Stafford apartment off the plan, said she could see the gap between house and unit prices in the suburb 'already closing'.
'Amelia paid $500,000 for a one-bedroom unit,' she said. 'An entry level, very basic post-war house in the area is a minimum of about $900,000. So even just that comparison alone, it appears to me like a one-bedroom unit is fairly unaffordable still.'
'My biggest piece of advice would be to communicate with the agents that you're dealing with, so that you can find what options are available,' she said. 'When you make an inquiry, do include your phone and your email address in your inquiry. Make sure you're providing the agent the information to send you back any listings that they have.'
Ms Wootten said communicating with agents and family, and getting the chance for private opportunities, was what finally allowed her to get the unit she dreamt of having.
'It's helpful having people around you that have done it, or that know what they're doing,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
19 minutes ago
- ABC News
Mount Isa faces uncertain future, with imminent closure of copper mine
Mount Isa is set to lose a major industry by the end of July, with Glencore set to close its underground copper mine. The North West Queensland city is bracing for the impact of the closure on the mining community.
ABC News
20 minutes ago
- ABC News
Copper mining and Mount Isa go hand-in-hand. Can one survive without the other?
Dotted along an outback Queensland horizon, mining stacks rise from the red dirt below. Marking the epicentre of one of the richest mineral deposits in the world, these towering cylinders bear the residue of more than 100 years of blood, sweat and tears. For all that time, mining has sustained the city at its doorstep — Mount Isa. Eighteen months ago, Swiss commodity trader Glencore announced it would close a significant portion of its Mount Isa Mines complex — the underground copper operation — by July this year. In that time, the company has reduced the expected redundancies from 1,200 to 500. But that hasn't eased the next big threat: to shutter other key assets if government doesn't intervene. Separated only by the width of a rail track, it's hard to distinguish where the Mount Isa Mines (MIM) complex ends and the community begins. It's always been that way. Prospector John Campbell Miles stumbled upon the rocky outcrops that would become the city in 1923. A year later, Mount Isa was born. "From those days, Mount Isa has always been fighting for our existence," local historian Kim-Maree Burton said. From company takeovers to stock market turmoil to industrial disputes, the local community has weathered each storm in its path. "It's our character, regardless of the parental ownership, MIM is part and parcel of this city," she said. "Could we have a city without the mine? I don't think so. Could we have the mine without the city? I don't think so. "We're two peas in a pod, we need each other." That's a sentiment shared by many of the 19,000 residents who call the place home. A born and bred Mount Isan, former local business owner Brett Peterson wasn't surprised when Glencore announced it was ceasing operations at the underground copper site. Threats to shutter other key assets like the copper smelter in Mount Isa and copper refinery in Townsville have stoked fears far and wide. "I don't want Mount Isa to end up as a small town, there's too much happening here," he said. Mount Isa is home to one of only two copper smelters in Australia and is the only one that can process third-party product. In countries like China and Indonesia, treatment costs are heavily subsidised by local governments. In a statement, Glencore interim chief operating officer Troy Wilson said the company could not keep up. "Smelters and refineries like those in Mount Isa and Townsville must be able to compete internationally to survive," Mr Wilson said. The company admitted these assets could close "this year if we cannot reach an agreement with the Queensland or federal governments." Four-yearly maintenance on the copper smelter to the tune of $30 million is due in 2026. But Glencore is seeking a much larger bailout, making a pointed comparison to the Whyalla Steelworks, which received a $2.4 billion package in February. Queensland Premier David Crisafulli has been vocal on the need for these assets to stay operational, but neither the state nor federal government has promised any solid funding yet. "Mount Isa's been pretty good to Glencore over a long period of time, I think Glencore needs to be pretty good to Mount Isa now because that is a city on its knees," Mr Crisafulli told the ABC earlier in June. In a statement, a spokesperson for federal Minister for Industry and Innovation Tim Ayres said the Australian government was monitoring the situation and discussions were continuing. "Closure of the smelter would have downstream impacts for a number of facilities … the Australian government will work with the Queensland government on the path ahead." You only have to look at the remnants of once-bustling mining towns nearby to know what's at stake. The town of Mary Kathleen 50 kilometres from Mount Isa was born off the back of the uranium boom of the 1950s. At its peak, the community was entirely self-sufficient, with homes, a school, cinema, even an Olympic-sized swimming pool. But by 1982, when the ore deposit was exhausted, the town was stripped bare and sold off at auction. Mount Isa's population is already projected to decline, and the city council is preparing for a worst-case scenario of 50 per cent if no other projects start up. But long-time residents are confident Mount Isa won't suffer the same fate as its neighbour. "Mary Kathleen was totally different, it was a company town," Ms Burton said. President of Commerce North West Johno Neilsen points to Mount Isa's critical role as a service hub in the outback as proof the city will survive. "We've got the largest hospital in the region; health is a major employer. "That's the saving grace; there's a lot of industries that are still prevalent in town." For Mr Peterson, the looming threat of further closures isn't enough to make him pack up and abandon the city he's lived in all his life. "But we need to see some change on the horizon," he said.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
West Australian marine business actively considering bid for Darwin Port
The business behind two major new West Australian marine infrastructure projects is considering a bid for the Darwin Port, as the federal government seeks a buyer to get it "back under Australian control". The Darwin Port was controversially leased by the Northern Territory government to Chinese-owned firm Landbridge for 99 years in 2015, and since then the facility has been a lightning rod for national security debate. Although no security risks have ever been proven regarding the port's lease, both Labor and the Coalition promised to return the port to Australian operation during the recent federal election campaign. The Australian government has said it is negotiating with parties over the port's future, but it has not yet revealed exactly which companies or consortiums could be in the running to bid for the lease. Founder of the Kimberley Marine Support Base in Broome and the Onslow Marine Support Base in the Pilbara, Andrew Natta, said the private Australian business was actively considering a bid for the Darwin Port. While the Onslow and Kimberley projects exist as separate entities, they share a common founder in Mr Natta and overlapping shareholders. "If you look at what our business has done in Western Australia … it makes sense for us to consider the opportunity, for sure," Mr Natta said. "If you look at our history and you look at what we're investing in in Broome, the piece of infrastructure [Kimberley Marine Support Base] that we're building now is almost $250 million. Mr Natta said he had not yet met with representatives from the federal or NT governments over his business' potential ambitions to take on the Darwin Port, but that it was likely on the cards for the near future. "At this point in time we're definitely saying that there is interest, and more than likely, yes, we would go forward and [meet with government]," he said. Both the Kimberley and Onslow port infrastructure projects have been vocally supported by the West Australian government, which has praised their potential to build capacity across multiple industries. Mr Natta said the aim would be to bring a similar ethos to "enhancing" the Darwin Port. "If we were to consider Darwin Port, we would be investing in a way that is very generational, very patient, but at the same time, enhancing," he said. He did not weigh into the controversy surrounding Darwin Port's current leaseholder, Landbridge, but said he believed there was merit in having the facility back in Australian hands. "I don't have a comment on the current ownership other than I think that it works very well when we have an all-Australian partnership, and that we can help facilitate those that need a port," he said. While the federal government has not yet revealed who it has been speaking to regarding the Darwin Port's future, a number of companies have reportedly shown interest. US private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management, which has strong links to the Trump administration, has reportedly been working towards a joint bid for the port with Australian-registered firm Toll Group. Neither company has confirmed if that bid is going ahead. The federal government has also said it has been speaking with superannuation firms over the port's future. Landbridge Group has repeatedly said it is not searching for a buyer. Earlier this month, Landbridge's non-executive director for Australia, Terry O'Connor, told 7.30 he believed the company had been subjected to a campaign of "myths and mistruths", including by ministers in the Australian government, over the port's lease. Federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said in a statement on Friday that "the Australian government is working closely with the Northern Territory government on next steps". "It would not be appropriate to comment further on matters that may be the subject of commercial negotiations," she said. The ABC understands the federal government has been approached by a number of interested parties. NT Treasurer Bill Yan said the territory government was "working alongside our Commonwealth counterparts in the best interests of Australia and the NT". "We will not pre-empt that work," he said.
