Supreme Court judgement against ‘bulldozer justice' upheld socio-economic rights: CJI B R Gavai
Chief Justice of India B R Gavai said Wednesday the executive can't become 'the judge, jury, and executioner' as he referred to the Supreme Court's 2024 judgement against alleged bulldozer justice which held that 'arbitrary demolitions, which bypass legal processes, violate the rule of law and the fundamental right to shelter under Article 21.'
Chief Justice Gavai was speaking in Italy on the topic 'Role of Constitution in Delivering Socio-Economic Justice in a Country: Reflections from 75 Years of Indian'.
'The Court examined the decisions of the state authorities to demolish homes and properties of an accused, as a punishment even before they were convicted by a court of law. Here, the Court held that such arbitrary demolitions, which bypass legal processes, violate the rule of law and the fundamental right to shelter under Article 21. The executive cannot become judge, jury, and executioner all at once,' said CJI Gavai.
Quoting the top court's judgment, CJI Gavai said, 'In doing so, it was noted with empathy, and I quote, 'that the construction of a house has an aspect of socio-economic rights. For an average citizen, the construction of a house is often the culmination of years of hard work, dreams, and aspirations''.
CJI Gavai said that socio-economic justice 'is not merely a matter of redistribution or welfare'. 'It is about enabling every individual to live with dignity, to realise their full human potential, and to participate as equals in the social, economic, and political life of the country. For any country, socio-economic justice is a crucial aspect of national progress. It ensures that development is inclusive, that opportunities are equitably distributed, and that all individuals, regardless of their social or economic background, can live with dignity and freedom.'
'Without addressing the structural inequalities that marginalise large sections of society, no nation can claim to be truly progressive or democratic. Socio-economic justice, in other words, is a practical necessity for achieving long-term stability, social cohesion, and sustainable development.'
CJI Gavai recalled that the tensions that arose in the early years between the judiciary and Parliament unfolded against the backdrop of efforts to realise socio-economic rights and led to the landmark judgement in the Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala case, wherein it was held that the basic structure of the Constitution cannot be altered.
In subsequent years, he pointed out, the Supreme Court in its judgements 'acknowledged that formal equality alone is insufficient, and that substantive measures are necessary to realise the Constitution's promise of justice and dignity for all'.
He said the nuanced approach to achieving socio-economic justice 'was …strengthened both by Parliament through its legislative powers and by the Supreme Court through its constitutional interpretation.' 'Both Parliament and the judiciary have expanded the scope of socio-economic rights in the 21st century.'
The Chief Justice said Parliament enacted a wide range of legislation aimed at advancing socio-economic justice. 'These include laws prohibiting socially oppressive and discriminatory practices, such as the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Each of these statutes represents a conscious effort to address historical injustices and structural inequalities, and to build a legal framework that upholds the dignity and rights of all citizens.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
Special Flight With 290 Indian Students Evacuated From Iran Under Operation Sindhu Lands In Delhi
This specific flight, an Iranian airline charter coordinated by Indian authorities, arrived at Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport at around 11.30 pm on Friday In the thick of intensifying hostilities between Israel and Iran, the Indian government has initiated Operation Sindhu, a crucial mission to evacuate its nationals from West Asia. A significant milestone in this operation was achieved late on Friday, June 20, when a special flight from Mashhad, Iran, carrying 290 Indian students, primarily from Jammu and Kashmir, safely landed at the Delhi airport. This specific flight, an Iranian airline charter coordinated by Indian authorities, arrived at Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport at around 11.30 pm IST. The successful arrival provided immense relief to the students and their worried families, who had been stranded amid the worsening security situation in Iran due to recent large-scale aerial bombings and retaliatory missile attacks between Iran and Israel. The overarching goal of Operation Sindhu is to repatriate approximately 1,000 Indian nationals from Iran, including many students pursuing professional courses and religious pilgrims. In a notable display of cooperation, Iran made an exception to its airspace closure—imposed due to the ongoing conflict—allowing India's evacuation flights. This facilitated the direct flight from Mashhad to Delhi. Earlier in the week, students were relocated from Tehran to safer cities like Qom and then to Mashhad to facilitate their departure. This flight was not the first under Operation Sindhu. On Thursday, June 19, an initial group of 110 Indian students, predominantly from Urmia University, had already arrived in Delhi. These students were evacuated via a land route to Armenia, then flown from Yerevan to New Delhi. Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah had been actively monitoring the situation, confirming that more students, primarily from his state, were being evacuated via land routes to Armenia before being airlifted. The ministry of external affairs has stressed that the Indian government prioritises the safety and security of Indian nationals abroad. They continue to monitor the situation closely and maintain constant communication with the Indian community in Iran. Additional flights are scheduled for Saturday, including one from Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, and another from Mashhad, to bring back more Indian nationals under Operation Sindhu. First Published: June 21, 2025, 02:19 IST
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Centre increased reservation for minorities: Hebbalkar
Udupi: "The central govt has increased the reservation for minorities in the housing scheme by 5%. The state govt has only approved this. In this matter, BJP members are unnecessarily finding fault," said Laxmi Hebbalkar, minister of women and child development. Speaking to reporters on Friday, the minister said there are no other issues left before the BJP for political debate. Initially, they criticised the guarantee schemes, claiming they would not succeed. Even after we won 136 seats, they said the govt wouldn't last six months, she said. Responding to the NSUI's objection to Hindutva orator Chakravarthy Sulibele's lecture in Kundapura, the minister said, "Chakravarthy Sulibele is a king of lies. He speaks of the Ramayana, Bhagavad Gita, and Mahabharata, but everyone in Karnataka knows the extent of his lies. He is adept at turning black into white and vice versa." "The Congress party has provided all kinds of freedoms, including freedom of speech. In the history of the country, Congress is the party that upheld the Constitution," the minister remarked. "We do not need lessons from Chakravarthy Sulibele. It was learnt from police that Sulibele will be in Udupi for three days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo He is certainly free to travel, but should refrain from making hate speeches, spreading lies, or sowing seeds of discord," said Hebbalkar. Reacting to BJP MLAs' criticisms, the minister said that on one hand, the BJP incites communalism, while claiming they do not. "On the other hand, they oppose the anti-communal forces. When you see BJP legislators with such a mindset, the people of Udupi can understand their mentality," the minister criticised the district's BJP legislators. 'District is prepared' Since there are signs that this year will see more rain than usual, I have instructed to take precautionary measures to control any rain-related incidents, she said. The minister stated that the government is prepared, regardless of the amount of rain. Minister Hebbalkar performed the groundbreaking ceremony for the construction of a new vaccine storage building on the premises of Udupi District Hospital. Udupi MLA Yashpal Suvarna, District Guarantee Scheme Implementation Committee chairman Ashok Kodavoor, Udupi block Guarantee Scheme Committee chairman Ramesh Kanchan, Udupi City Municipal Council president Prabhakar Poojary, deputy commissioner Swaroopa TK, ZP CEO Prateek Bayal and DHO Dr Basavaraj Hubballi were present.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC rejects plea by IAS officer, kin seeking quashing of CBI probe into graft charge
1 2 Cuttack : The Orissa high court on Friday dismissed a writ petition filed by senior IAS officer Bishnupada Sethi, his wife and daughter seeking to quash a CBI investigation into alleged corruption. The court ruled that the petition was "premature and not maintainable", as the investigation was still at a nascent stage. The case stems from the arrest of a PSU executive on Dec 8 last year for allegedly accepting a Rs 10 lakh bribe from a Bhubaneswar-based real estate firm. During interrogation, Sethi's name emerged, prompting a CBI search at his residence on Feb 18 this year. The petitioners alleged procedural violations and harassment, and sought the return of seized materials. Justice S K Panigrahi, however, rejected these claims, emphasising that the extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution cannot be misused to derail legitimate investigations. "Higher the office, greater the responsibility," he observed, noting that Sethi, as a senior bureaucrat, is expected to uphold legal integrity, not evade scrutiny. The court stressed that no chargesheet had been filed yet, and interference at this point would undermine both investigative processes and public interest. It criticised the petitioners' approach as "forum-shopping" and warned against setting a precedent that powerful individuals can shield themselves from legal accountability. The court clarified that its refusal to intervene does not equate to a presumption of guilt, and the petitioners retain full rights to defend themselves during trial. However, it maintained that mere status or reputation cannot justify halting a probe into serious allegations of public corruption. On Feb 25, Justice Panigrahi had ordered, "As an interim measure, it is directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners till the next date." The interim restriction was extended from time to time and was in force till the petition was dismissed on Friday.
