Swiss National Bank cuts interest rate to zero in effort to stop franc inflows
[ZURICH] The Swiss National Bank (SNB) cut its interest rate to zero, seeking to deter investors from pushing up the franc.
The quarter-point reduction on Thursday (Jun 19) is the sixth consecutive move by officials, and was forecast by most of the economists surveyed by Bloomberg after the currency's strength caused consumer prices to drop for the first time in four years. A minority anticipated an even bigger half-point step.
'With today's easing of monetary policy, the SNB is countering the lower inflationary pressure,' the central bank said in a statement. 'The SNB will continue to monitor the situation closely and adjust its monetary policy if necessary' it said, adding that it 'remains willing to be active in the foreign exchange market as necessary.'
The cut underscores just how far US President Donald Trump's disruption to global trade is impacting Switzerland. SNB president Martin Schlegel and colleagues had signalled as recently as March that they were probably finished with easing, but the currency's role as a haven from turmoil forced their hand.
The Swiss franc rose as much as 0.2 per cent to the day's high of 0.9387 versus the euro after the announcement. Since April, the haven currency has traded in range of a decade high around 0.92, benefiting from demand induced by the broad sell-off in the US dollar. Against a basket of currencies, the franc has gained nearly 2 per cent so far this year.
Investor alarm at the impact of US policies prompted such inflows in the past quarter that the franc touched a decade-high against the US dollar, pushing the inflation rate below below zero for the first time since early 2021.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The Swiss move contrasts with the wait-and-see approach taken by most global peers. On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve kept its rate unchanged, and the Bank of England may do so too later on Thursday. Officials at the European Central Bank have signalled a pause for now after a series of reductions.
By going as low as zero, SNB officials are not only ending more than 2½ years of positive rates, but also settting the lowest benchmark of any major central bank.
They are also experimenting with a specific level that the central bank never tested when it adopted negative borrowing costs, neither on the way down, nor going up again. That will challenge Swiss banks, as it eliminates income from deposits while also compressing margins on loans and mortgages.
If pressure on the franc persists, officials have the option of going below zero, which the SNB already did from 2014 to 2022. Schlegel has said that 'no one likes' such a measure but that policymakers are ready to do so if needed. A minority of economists reckon such a move could transpire as soon as this year.
The other way to weaken the franc would be to restart currency interventions, but that brings risks of its own. The US branded the Swiss a manipulator during Trump's first term, and earlier this month, the Treasury added Switzerland to a list of economies subject to monitoring for exchange-rate policies.
SNB officials have said that they will use the tool if necessary, but shirked from large-scale market action for all of last year.
For now, one source of relief for the central bank may come from the increase in crude oil costs after hostilities erupted between Israel and Iran.
Even so, its outlook still points to weak consumer-price pressures that are likely to keep officials concerned. On Thursday, they lowered their forecast for inflation this year, expecting it to average 0.2 per cent in 2025, 0.5 per cent in 2026 and 0.7 per cent in 2027, after it was previously seen at 0.4 per cent, 0.8 per cent and 0.8 per cent, respectively.
Against some expectations they kept intact their outlook for Switzerland's economy despite US tariffs. After the strongest expansion in two years last quarter due to front-loading of exports, the SNB still expects growth in a range of 1 per cent-1.5 per cent this year. Earlier this week, the government published a forecast for 1.3 per cent.
Another topic of interest could be the SNB's decision to maintain its system of remunerating reserves, in which it pays banks full interest only on deposits up to a institution-specific limit.
For parked cash above that, lenders get the policy rate minus 25 basis points, which means that there's now negative interest on such excess reserves. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Sustainable investors hold their ground as energy, defence stocks surge
[SINGAPORE] Regional wars, tariff threats and the US' pro-fossil fuel policies have sent defence and energy stocks soaring in 2025, but not all is lost for investors committed to sustainable and responsible investing, experts told The Business Times. Markets were closed on Jun 22, when US President Donald Trump ordered an attack on Iranian nuclear sites, but investors are bracing for a further spike in oil prices and rush to safe havens. The S&P 500 Energy sector index had risen 8.56 per cent month on month as at Jun 20, compared with the S&P 500's 2.11 per cent month-on-month gain. In Asia, several energy stocks rose after Israel launched air strikes on Iran on Jun 13, sending Brent futures up by US$5 to US$74 per barrel. Singapore-listed energy players such as Rex International and RH PetroGas surged more than 6 per cent at market open on Jun 16 after the strikes. The MSCI World Aerospace and Defense Index had an even larger surge, and was up 33.45 per cent year-to-date as at May 31. Comparatively, the MSCI World Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) Index has underperformed, rising 3.26 per cent year-to-date as at May 30, 2025, compared with the MSCI World index's 5.18 per cent year-to-date increase. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up More than half (56 per cent) of global investors believe that Trump's pro-fossil fuels and anti-clean energy agenda will slow the net-zero transition, indicated asset management firm Robeco's fifth annual Global Climate Investing Survey 2025 released on Jun 3, 2025. 'Clearly, the world is currently facing a tremendous amount of uncertainty, which affects both companies and investors,' Jane Wadia, London-based head of sustainability for core products and clients at AXA Investment Managers (AXA IM), told BT. US tariffs will disrupt the global trade system, she said, 'which has implications for sustainability due to the strain on supply chains'. She added: 'As a result, it may become more challenging for businesses to source materials and finance long-term projects that contribute to their sustainability efforts.' Even so, sustainability investing experts like Wadia are not too worried about the underperformance of sustainable funds or environmental, social and governance (ESG)-integrated strategies in light of these geopolitical and policy-driven uncertainties. 'We continue to see significant progress in the transition to net zero. A recent report from the International Energy Agency suggests that more than one in four cars sold globally in 2025 will be electric,' she said. 'The cost of renewable energy is falling relative to oil and gas in the long term, while demand for electricity is rising, driven by the ongoing development in China and the growth of artificial intelligence and data centres.' Despite news headlines about the ESG backlash, the undercurrents of companies' continued commitment to the energy transition and emissions reduction are still 'quite positive', said Louise Dudley, Federated Hermes' portfolio manager for global equities, who also leads ESG and responsible investment research strategy. 'We are still continuing to see opportunities around the world.' Federated Hermes managed US$839.8 billion in assets as at Mar 31, 2025. The 'green-hushing' phenomenon – where companies are removing climate goals and Web pages from the public eye but are still committed to sustainable agendas – is still alive and well, she said in an interview with BT. In addition, some of the underperforming funds could have been those that 'went quite high-risk, quite concentrated', she said, adding: 'Those types of thematic funds will have periods of underperformance as well as periods of outperformance.' A fund that is less thematic and more diversified is likely to be more resilient in the long term, she added. 'Maybe you don't get the excitement of 'Oh, we're 6 per cent ahead', but when some of these thematic trends, such as inflation, interest rates and all those things (come into play), we'll be well positioned on that,' she noted. At the core of it, measuring ESG factors is a form of risk management, she added. 'Governance, we always feel, is the backbone (of a firm), where, if a company is doing well from a governance perspective, it's going to do well… because it's going to be thinking about the right kind of risk; and it has the right people in place to manage whatever environment they go into,' she said. Responsible energy and defence investments The rise in energy and defence stocks is not necessarily incompatible with sustainable investing either, said Lucian Peppelenbos, climate and biodiversity strategist at Robeco, which had US$222 billion in assets under management and advice, of which US$216 billion is managed in ESG-integrated assets, as at December 2024. 'Within energy stocks, there are companies seriously transitioning; and also in many cases, for example, where gas replaces coal, we can see it as a sustainable transition investment,' said Peppelenbos, who is based in Amsterdam, said in an interview with BT. For instance, Norwegian oil and gas company Aker BP, which is listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange with a market capitalisation of 176.59 billion kroner (S$22.49 billion) has been viewed as an energy business with strong transition commitments, a relatively clean eco-footprint and strong fundamentals. Several other, more well-known global names such as Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell have diversified into alternative energy sources to varying degrees, although some – such as British Petroleum (BP) – have rolled back their commitments to transition away from fossil fuels. When it comes to defence stocks, Robeco makes sure there is no exposure to controversial weapons – which is against the law, as Peppelenbos reminded – and the firm calls defence investments 'responsible investing' over 'sustainable investing'. Robeco considers controversial weapons to include cluster munitions, anti-personnel mines, white phosphorus and depleted uranium ammunition, along with chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Most of these are banned under international treaties. '(Within) exposure to defence stocks more generally, for example, there are more cybersecurity-related defence stocks that are very well compatible within ESG-integrated strategies,' he said. For instance, a high-profile incident last year where Northern Korean hackers were accused of allegedly stealing over US$1 billion worth of cryptocurrency highlights how modern warfare has evolved beyond conventional wars to cyberwars. Peppelenbos also believes that ESG is a performance driver; and because sustainability risks 'can be and often are financially material', integrating those risks makes for better informed investment decisions to help risk-adjusted returns, he said. 'Our research shows, for example, that among companies across high emission sectors and low emission sectors, companies that have good transition plans in terms of climate change – meaning targets that are in line with how their sector should decarbonise over time and are reflected in a credible transition plan – those companies are outperforming the climate laggers in their sector. So that's clearly a piece of evidence where sustainability and performance can actually go hand in hand,' he added. One underappreciated aspect of clean energy is that it plays a crucial role in future geopolitical stability as conflicts historically often arise over food, resources and energy, Ulrik Fugmann, co-head of environmental strategies group at the BNP Paribas Asset Management, told BT. Clean energy solutions and environment infrastructure is growing across Asia, Europe and the US at unprecedented speed and scale, he said. This is because of its cost-competitiveness and ability to readily tackle an urgent need to address global power deficits that are accelerated by the progress in artificial intelligence and data centres, said Fugmann, who is based in London. The asset manager has 602 billion euros (S$892.9 billion) in assets under management, of which 418 billion euros is in ESG assets. 'Given recent years' rise in inflation, interest rates and uncertain policy environment that is now getting re-enforced in the US and Europe, the clean energy sector today trades at valuation levels not seen since the great financial crisis in 2008 and depths of the Covid-19 crisis – in sharp contrast to global markets and elevated valuations in the technology sector trading at all-time highs,' he said. 'The case for sustainable solutions in clean energy has rarely been this attractive – both from a top-down macro-economic perspective and bottom-up valuation point of view,' he added.
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Currency traders ditching the US dollar for euro on option bets
The euro is taking on a bigger role in the global currency options market as traders skirt around the US dollar given the risks from unpredictable US policy and a global trade war. There's been a shift in trading volumes. Around 15-30 per cent of contracts tied to the US dollar versus major currencies were switched to the euro, looking at data from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation for the first five months of this year versus the final five months of 2024. There are also signs that the euro is being used as a haven – traditionally the US dollar's role – and for bets on big moves. While deals involving the US dollar still dominate in the US$7.5 trillion-a-day currency market, this could be early evidence that the greenback is facing greater competition as the world's reserve currency. Traders are sidestepping the US dollar after its biggest slump in years, with Europe's common currency looking like a key beneficiary as the region's markets seize on billions in government stimulus spending. 'If we're moving to an environment in which the European flow story is more important, then we could be moving to an environment in which it's euro pairs which are driving everything,' said Oliver Brennan, options strategist at BNP Paribas. The growing optimism towards European assets is also seen in the stock market. Wall Street strategists expect loosening monetary policy and increased government spending to boost the Stoxx Europe 600 Index by 3 per cent by the end of the year, handing investors annual returns of about 10 per cent, according to a survey conducted by Bloomberg. The euro, in the meantime, has rallied 11 per cent against the US dollar so far this year, hitting its highest since 2021 at above US$1.16. The US dollar has slid against every major currency, with a gauge down over 7 per cent to its lowest since 2022. That's undermining trust in US assets. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up And the slump may not be over yet. Hedge fund heavyweight Paul Tudor Jones just predicted another 10 per cent drop for the US dollar over the next year. Risk reversals, a gauge of options sentiment, are becoming increasingly negative on the US dollar against the yen, whereas they are turning less bearish on euro-yen – a 'really important signal' on the euro for Brennan. As markets question the US dollar's stability, implied volatility in the euro against the yen is looking the calmest in nearly four years relative to swings between the greenback and Japanese currency. 'The market is thinking that dollar-yen will be more volatile than euro-yen in a negative market shock, which is the opposite to how the market has traded these events in the past,' said Brennan. 'If that's the thinking, then it means the market sees the euro as more of a safe haven than the dollar.' The cost of options is also a driver, said Ben Ford, currency strategist at Macro Hive. While implied volatility generally has eased after spiking in April's market chaos, it stands at nearly 11 per cent over three months for dollar-yen, compared with under 9 per cent for euro-yen. 'The market is finding cheaper ways to express its view, especially given the view is probably for euro outperformance,' Ford said. Traders also seem to be favouring the euro over the US dollar when it comes to hedging or betting on big directional moves on the yen. That's evident in so-called 10-delta fly spreads, a gauge of demand for outsized swings, where the gap between euro-yen and dollar-yen has been steadily widening since April. Of course, the US dollar has been written off many times before. Just at the start of this year, the euro was languishing near parity with the greenback, with many investors certain the common currency's value would fall below its US peer. Instead Trump's April's tariff announcements saw investors dump US dollar assets. While US stocks have recovered since then, the dollar risk premium remains elevated, and it may require a return to US exceptionalism to reverse the trend, according to Tanvir Sandhu, chief global derivatives strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence. Meanwhile, the European Central Bank's President Christine Lagarde has called on policymakers to seize the moment and increase the euro's global profile. French officials were also reported to be lobbying for additional measures aiming at raising the currency's importance. 'There's a push and a pull – the pull has been that there's potentially more safe assets to buy in Europe and more growth expectations in Europe,' said Brennan. 'And the push has been tariff uncertainty, risks to US exceptionalism, and the macro story.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
10 hours ago
- Business Times
Investors brace for oil price spike, rush to havens after US bombs Iran nuclear sites
A U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear sites could lead to a knee-jerk reaction in global markets when they reopen, sending oil prices higher and triggering a rush to safety, investors said, as they assessed how the latest escalation of tensions would ripple through the global economy. The attack, which was announced by President Donald Trump on social media site Truth Social, deepens U.S. involvement in the Middle East conflict. That was the question going into the weekend, when investors were mulling a host of different market scenarios. In the immediate aftermath of the announcement, they expected the U.S. involvement was likely to cause a selloff in equities and a possible bid for the dollar and other safe-haven assets when trading begins, but also said much uncertainty about the course of the conflict remained. Trump called the attack 'a spectacular military success' in a televised address to the nation and said Iran's 'key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated'. He said the U.S. military could go after other targets in Iran if the country did not agree to peace. 'I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher,' said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital. 'We don't have any damage assessment and that will take some time. Even though he has described this as 'done', we're engaged. What comes next?' Spindel said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'I think the uncertainty is going to blanket the markets, as now Americans everywhere are going to be exposed. It's going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil,' he added. Spindel, however, said there was time to digest the news before markets open and said he was making arrangements to talk to other market participants. Oil prices, inflation A key concern for markets would center around the potential impact of the developments in the Middle East on oil prices and thus on inflation. A rise in inflation could dampen consumer confidence and lessen the chance of near-term interest rate cuts. 'This adds a complicated new layer of risk that we'll have to consider and pay attention to,' said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer of Cresset Capital. 'This is definitely going to have an impact on energy prices and potentially on inflation as well.' While global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13. Before the U.S. attack on Saturday, analysts at Oxford Economics modeled three scenarios, including a de-escalation of the conflict, a complete shutdown in Iranian oil production and a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, 'each with increasingly large impacts on global oil prices.' In the most severe case, global oil prices jump to around $130 per barrel, driving U.S. inflation near 6% by the end of this year, Oxford said in the note. 'Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about the potential for second-round inflation effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the U.S. this year,' Oxford said in the note, which was published before the U.S. strikes. In comments after the announcement on Saturday, Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group, agreed oil prices would likely spike on the initial news. But Cox said he expected prices to likely level in a few days as the attacks could lead Iran to seek a peace deal with Israel and the United States. 'With this demonstration of force and total annihilation of its nuclear capabilities, they've lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button to a peace deal,' Cox said. Economists warn that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs. Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past prominent instances of Middle East tensions coming to a boil, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead. On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3% in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3% higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro. Dollar woes An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the U.S. dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished U.S. exceptionalism. In the event of U.S. direct engagement in the Iran-Israel war, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said. 'Do we see a flight to safety? That would signal yields going lower and the dollar getting stronger,' said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at IBKR in Greenwich, Connecticut. 'It's hard to imagine stocks not reacting negatively and the question is how much. It will depend on Iranian reaction and whether oil prices spike.'
