She's the reason my parents fell in love – and Trump's idol. That's the part which breaks my heart
I was unhappy to learn recently that the woman who played a central role in my parents' relationship, and by extension my creation, is an inspiration to both Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
Since the woman in question is Ayn Rand, author of The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged and chief apostle of 'ethical selfishness', perhaps I should not have been surprised. She is someone viewed as anything from the godmother of libertarianism to an enabler of sociopaths.
In my family home, she was very much the former. When my parents met, my mother was an objectivist, as Rand's most ardent followers call themselves. She was drawn to the philosophy by its moral code, its emphasis on reason over emotion and its rejection of guilt. My father soon signed on; he has often said that Rand's prime contention that people deserve to be happy changed his life. Objectivism became a shared passion that eventually led to the marriage that led to, well, me.
I've always thought I had one of the better childhoods, and at least some of this was down to Rand. Objectivists, or at least the ones I knew, don't do indoctrination, but are big on honesty, reliability, encouraging curiosity and letting children make their own choices. It made for a golden combination of security and freedom. Which is not to say things were entirely conventional. Out and proud atheists were rare in 1970s Queensland, as were 'Taxation is theft' bumper stickers.
The hands-off approach meant I didn't read Rand until my late teens, by which time my mother had parted ways with Rand's philosophy. I liked many of her ideas: that integrity is important, that people like and need to feel productive, and that those who crave power should be feared and distrusted. I never thought of myself as an objectivist, though; her vision of a society based on undiluted capitalism and rampant individualism seems foolish at best and repulsive at worst.
Something I didn't understand then was quite how differently others saw Rand. It was, of all things, the cheesy/sleazy 1987 romance Dirty Dancing that opened my eyes, in the scene where Max Cantor's odious, preppy character justifies himself by brandishing The Fountainhead and saying: 'Some people count. Some people don't.' It left me sputtering with outrage and wondering how anyone could form such a perverted version of the book's message.
Now, it is no mystery at all. Rand's heroes are, without exception, egotistical geniuses who triumph over the ignorance and envy of the mob. It's a short step from there to contempt for that mob. When Trump said in an interview before his first term that he identified with Howard Roark, hero of The Fountainhead, you could only imagine that 'some people count' is exactly what he took from it.
As mentioned, I should not have been surprised to find Trump nodding to Rand. Correctly or not, she is said to be a major influence on right-wing thought. While you'd struggle to find a Republican who'd endorse her atheism or support of abortion rights, her antipathy to government regulation was an inspiration for the Tea Party movement that preceded MAGA, and she has been name-checked by Trump-backing tech moguls such as Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen, not to mention quoted by Musk in his war on the US government. More than 40 years after her death, Rand's voice is still heard.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
16 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Obama tweets haunt Trump, fury in the US
Donald Trump's past commentary on his predecessors has come back to haunt him, while some MAGA loyalists have shown open dissent since the decision to bomb Iran. Tweets posted by the US President between 2011 and 2013, when Barack Obama was in office, resurfaced over the weekend after Mr Trump ordered strikes on Iran's nuclear program. In the old posts, he repeatedly claimed Mr Obama would 'start a war with Iran' saying it would be done 'in order to get re-elected'. 'Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiation properly – not skilled!' he wrote on November 11, 2013. These posts have gone viral on X in the wake of Mr Trump's shock military move on Sunday, AEST, which he claimed had 'totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear sites. The President has since faced criticism from within his on base, due to his campaigning on a platform of 'peace through strength' and for no new wars if he was elected. Sunday's operation followed eight days of warfare between Israel and Iran, in the latest tit-for-tat conflict sparked by Israel's 'pre-emptive' attacks on June 13. Senator Marjorie Taylor-Greene, known as a staunch MAGA supporter, wrote a message of dismay on X after news broke of the American strikes on Iranian soil. 'Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war,' she said. 'There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first. 'Israel is a nuclear armed nation. 'This is not our fight.' She doubled down on Monday morning, AEST, sharing another tweet in which she said Americans were 'exhausted' by foreign interventions. 'I can also support President Trump and his great administration on many of the great things they are doing while disagreeing on bombing Iran and getting involved in a hot war that Israel started,' she said. 'That's not disloyalty. Critical thinking and having my own opinions is the most American thing ever. 'Because contrary to what brainwashed Democrat boomers say, Trump is not a king, MAGA is not a cult, and President Trump has surrounded himself with people who once disagreed with him and even ran against him for President.' Mr Trump has also called Republican Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie a 'pathetic loser' after the latter led the charge against war in the Capitol. 'I'm here to represent the base of the MAGA party that got Trump elected,' Mr Massie told CNN. 'Most of us were tired of the wars in the Middle East and eastern Europe, and we were promised that we wouldn't be engaging in another one, yet here we see this happening.' Mr Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton, who has became an outspoken critic, praised the attack as 'the right decision for America'. 'I think we're on the verge of potentially seeing regime change in Iran as part of that,' he told CNN. Vice President JD Vance has tried to downplay fears of the US becoming more involved in the war, saying the 'goal' of Sunday's attack had been achieved. 'We're not at war with Iran,' he replied. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' But Mr Trump, writing on Truth Social on Monday, was not so diplomatic. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' he wrote. 'MIGA!!!'
Perth Now
33 minutes ago
- Perth Now
‘Irrelevant:' Fears for Aus amid Trump strikes
Australia's former ambassador to Israel and Liberal senator Dave Sharma says Anthony Albanese has made Australia 'irrelevant' after the US launched strikes on Iran, after the Prime Minister failed to secure a meeting with Donald Trump. Speaking to Sky on Monday, Senator Sharma said while Australia never had a 'huge' amount of influence, 'we've largely made ourselves irrelevant through this conflict'. 'I mean, look, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese didn't have a meeting with Trump where this would have obviously come up if he'd had a discussion,' he said. 'We had Richard Marles on the television yesterday calling for de-escalation at the very same time, almost, that US B-2 bombers (were) flying from Missouri (and) were striking nuclear targets in Iran.' He said Labor had 'dealt ourselves out of a traditional role' as being a contributor and 'major player' in international discussions. 'No one listens to our views seriously anymore in the on these issues, particularly in the Middle East,' he said. Liberal senator Dave Sharma says Australia has made itself 'irrelevant'. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia '(On) Israel, the relationship with this government is very bad. 'The United States, we don't yet seem to have a relationship with the new Trump administration, or at least key parts of it.' Nationals leader David Littleproud and independent Jacqui Lambie have also called on Mr Albanese to address Australia's stance on the conflict and US involvement. Mr Littleproud labelled Mr Albanese's not having made a public statement as of Monday morning a 'deathly silence'. 'This was a decisive, strategic act that will make the world safer,' Mr Littleproud said. 'Now, we don't want to see a protracted conflict. And it sounds as though the United States doesn't want to be involved in a protracted Middle East conflict. 'There's no way in the world that we could get ourselves involved in that. 'We do need to be able to defend ourselves first when we've got Virgin pilots finding Chinese ships in our waters. There is an underinvestment here that needs to be rectified.' Mr Littleproud claimed the move showed the government was trying to 'sit on the fence' due to domestic politics. Senator Jacqui Lambie believes it'll be 10 years before Australian troops are ready for to be sent to the middle east. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: NewsWire Senator Lambie urged against committing Australian forces that were 'not ready'. 'What I do know is that Trump said, 'You've got two weeks', and within 48 hours you took them out,' she said. 'So if there was any sort of relationship still ongoing there that is now gone, that's the first thing. 'I think the other thing is that you Americans said you weren't going back into a war in the Middle East. Well, you just went back in.' 'But what I will say is that we certainly can't back you up this time, and we don't owe you anything.' 'I say this to (Mr Albanese) – we are not fit for purpose to be involved in any war. The most that you can offer anywhere around the world right now is peacekeepers. 'Do not follow the USA into this war for 20 years – [Our troops] are not ready.' On Sunday, former prime minister Scott Morrison accused the Albanese Labor government of not showing enough 'clarity' on the Israel-Iran conflict. 'I think there's been far too much ambiguity about this from Australia, far too much ambiguity, and it's time for clarity,' Mr Morrison said. 'And the clarity is we were dealing with a theocratic authoritarian state that had sponsored an attack on close friends in Israel back on the seventh of October, and they have shown their true colours, and Iran is not a friend of Australia.' Mr Morrison echoed these sentiments while speaking to 2GB's Ben Fordham on Monday morning, saying the evening news was the time to 'ensure that response was made clear'. 'When things are as they are, Australia 'When things are as they are, Australia needs to know where it stands and its allies need to know where Australia stands. I think that's why clarity is so important,' he said. Following reports Mr Albanese would give comment after a national security cabinet meeting on Monday, Mr Morrison said it could have met earlier but hoped they would 'come out with a very strong statement in support of our allies'. More to come
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Iranian people ‘desperate' for a regime change
Republican Strategist Amanda Makki says the general Iranian population is 'desperate' to see a regime change. 'Well, certainly no Iranian wants to see their fellow country mates, their relatives, their friends, their family, their loved ones be affected by this,' Ms Makki told Sky News Australia. 'But if I could tell you how many times I've heard … how desperately the Iranians would to see a regime change, to go back to how their homeland was, or to even leave their country if they could, they would be willing to do it in a heartbeat.'
