New R.I. program will train aspiring local real estate developers
Local Return President
Q. What is Local Return and what is the Jumpstart Rhode Island program?
David:
Local Return's mission is to build community wealth in Rhode Island neighborhoods through community ownership and investment. We're focused on closing the opportunity and prosperity gaps in communities that have experienced decades of neglect or extraction. In 2024, we launched a fundraising offering for Rhode Island's first (and only) community investment fund.
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Local Return has launched the Jumpstart Rhode Island program "to revitalize Rhode Island and build community wealth through training, mentoring, and networking for local aspiring real estate developers."
Handout
Advertisement
While we are actively raising the $3.5 million for the Local Return diversified community investment fund, we also know we need to build a strong pipeline of potential investments — which is where Jumpstart Rhode Island comes in. This program provides training, mentoring, and networking for aspiring local real estate developers. It's really intended for small-scale, neighborhood-based developers. We're starting this June with a cohort focused on Providence.
Where did you get this idea? Is something similar being done in other places?
Jumpstart was started by real estate developer Ken Weinstein from Philly Office Retail in the Germantown neighborhood of Philadelphia in 2015. Since then, the program has expanded to 15 other communities nationwide. To date, more than 2,900 people have graduated from Jumpstart programs in Philadelphia. They generously shared their curriculum and provided us with support as we adapted the program to Rhode Island.
Advertisement
What are some of the skills that people will learn in the program?
The curriculum is built around seven 'Jumpsteps' that walk through the development process, from creating a strategy and team, to doing due diligence, to leasing or selling your property. We'll cover the basics of financing, zoning, and permitting. Students will learn how to develop a pro forma [projections for the potential financial return of a proposed development], find a contractor, and manage a construction process. We are also working with a few wonderful local partners to make sure our students have opportunities to learn financial literacy and construction skills.
What is the need for this program in Rhode Island?
There's a huge need! We urgently need to create more homes for Rhode Islanders. Neighborhood-based developers are an important piece of the solution. Plus, real estate ownership is how most people in this country build wealth for their families. But we need to create more pathways for everyday Rhode Islanders to learn how to develop responsibly, so they're not risking their own financial security or the safety of future occupants. Right now, unless you're connected to someone that has experience with real estate development or have the wherewithal to learn as you go, it's not an easy field to break into.
What are the main goals you are hoping to achieve?
We love this program because it aims to accomplish several things at once: create opportunities for local residents to invest in their neighborhoods, build wealth locally, and promote diversity in real estate development. Residents know their neighborhoods best, and they have the most at stake in making their community a great place to live.
Advertisement
How and when can people apply?
Applications for our first cohort are due by 5 p.m. on Monday, May 19. Training sessions will take place on three Saturdays, June 7, 14, and 21. Providence residents and people who have a strong commitment and connection to the city are welcome to apply. To learn more about the program and submit an application, visit
The Boston Globe's weekly Ocean State Innovators column features a Q&A with Rhode Island innovators who are starting new businesses and nonprofits, conducting groundbreaking research, and reshaping the state's economy. Send tips and suggestions to reporter Alexa Gagosz at
.
Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Serving Not Selling: Why Management Consultants Shouldn't 'Sell'
Management Consultants Earn Opportunities for Serving Clients, Selling Creates Problems In 1997, I got into an elevator on the thirtieth floor of an office building in Chicago. I was in my second month at a large firm of management consultants, known for its strong organizational culture. A passer-by walks past a strong design of the front entrance of a retail shop in London. (Photo by ... More Richard Baker/In Pictures Ltd./Corbis via Getty Images) In my first week, I began working with David, a newly elected partner, on a proposal to a company in Columbus, IN. Our mission was to build the company's strategy for innovation and growth. I was more excited by the proposal than anyone else on the team. It fueled a career-long fascination with building new businesses in established organizations, has led me from this consulting firm to IBM, and later to Change Logic. When I entered the elevator, there was David. I immediately asked him, 'Hi, did we win the business?' He looked at me gravely and replied, 'No, but we do have the opportunity to serve.' Management Consultants Should be Serving Not Selling I've told this story many times over the years to illustrate how norms get passed on in strong organizational cultures. However, it makes some audiences laugh loudly. One sales leader told me: 'You are getting paid to do a job; of course, you are selling something!' It sounds like a management consultant's deceit, like saying 'synergies,' when you mean 'layoffs.' Others respond with a witty wink, 'Yes, I'll try to remember to say that next time!' However, to me, this is neither a deceit nor just a choice of words; it is one of my values. A value is something that we believe to be good and true. In most human societies, cheating and lying are considered wrong and it is a breach of values to lie or cheat. Of course, there is still plenty of both going on, but we are discrete enough to hide or camouflage these behaviors because they are socially unacceptable. This, in turn, creates social pressure that suppresses the incidence of lying and cheating. The same is true when we are talking about selling a project at my consulting firm, Change Logic. If a member of my team says that they want to 'sell' a project to client, for me that is the same as saying, 'I want to lie or cheat.' It is a breach of our values. We use the language of serving not selling as a representation of our fundamental beliefs. It is not a deceit or an optional choice of words; it is a value. Selling Assumes Management Consultants Have the Answers The value of disapproving lying and cheating is self-interested. We know that human society would struggle to operate without trust. We are still concerned about cheats, but we know that the consequences of offending the social norms are unacceptable to most people. The same is true for the value of service over selling. It serves a purpose in my business. I have the privilege of advising CEOs and senior teams in many firms on how to manage significant issues related to the future of their organizations. My colleagues and I can play this role only because the client trusts that we are motivated by a desire to see them succeed. They do not have to second guess our advice by wondering: 'Is this advice about selling me another project?' Several years ago, I received an acquisition approach from a firm that builds technology products for other companies to take to market. They knew of our work on innovation strategy and saw an opportunity to move 'upstream.' The next day I had breakfast with a client CEO. We had helped his insurance firm to build a new healthcare unit. I asked him what he thought of us expanding our capabilities so that we could offer more of a 'turnkey' solution. He was firmly against this idea. 'Andy, then you couldn't be objective in your advice. What they do is available from lots of firms, what you do is rare, and I don't want to lose it.' Trust is hard to earn. Senior executives are battle hardened. They know that professional services firms are designed to build a 'book of business' at client accounts. They use tactics like the 'diagnostic' to find all the things that are wrong with a client's organization that they can fix. Unsurprisingly, the problems identified during this 'analysis' are often much greater than the client ever imagined. This softens up the client and convinces them to pay just a fraction of the value in consultant fees. Once they have secured the new account, it is a matter of 'land and expand.' Building relationships across the organization to secure new 'mandates' and position the firm for long-term incumbency. Key to this strategy is a relentless focus on what the client cannot do, why they need help to achieve their goals. These selling oriented practices erode trust. The consultant is on a self-oriented agenda of generating revenue. Selling and Serving are Not the Same Of course, I want more revenue for my company. I think my team does amazing work that benefits a wide range of clients seeking to ignite innovation to generate growth. However, if my relationship with my clients is motivated by selling a project, then my work becomes about driving my own success. If I put that objective ahead of my client's interests, then I risk violating their trust in me and undermine my ability to do the work. A counterpoint to this logic could be this: we make sure we sell the right things and so our interests are always aligned with those of our clients. The argument goes on, 'You may not like the word selling, Andy, but it doesn't really matter as long as I do not sell the client something that they do not want.' This is a self-serving argument that betrays a lack of humility. It assumes you start with an answer to sell. That from the beginning of a relationship, a consultant already knows what the client needs, and just has to get them to 'buy' it. It changes and distorts your choices as a consultant to have a ready-made solution to sell, because you are only listening to match the client's needs with what you've got to sell. The argument that selling and serving are the same is the conceit. Serving Requires Management Consultants to be Humble I try to start with the assumption that my clients are smarter than me, know their business better, and are fully capable of achieving good outcomes. I can help them go faster, do better, and be more motivated to succeed, but that doesn't mean I know more. This opens up rich possibilities for co-creation with clients, where they are owning the work from the beginning, shaping and designing solutions to important challenges. It also means that from the start of the relationship, you assume that one day it will end. Your clients will be more capable and not need an outside firm to support them. This focuses consultants on client impact - how are we leaving them more able to achieve the results they are seeking - rather than on how we can engineer situations to extend our mandate. This sounds non-commercial logic. In fact, it is deeply commercial. I truly believe that the reason my firm is still in business after almost 20 it was founded is because of its values and how they inform behaviors. The value of serving, not selling, allows us to build long-term, trustful relationships with our clients that would be the envy of many much larger firms. Of course, we want to be commercially successful, but if we let that be our driver then we will lose our values and with it our license to serve. It is easy to check my LinkedIn profile and see that I used to work for McKinsey. They have been embroiled in a series of ethical controversies. They articulated strong values, but it proved to be incredibly hard to sustain these at scale across a global organization. There is a difference between your espoused values (what you say) and your values-in-use (what you do). You only know if you are living your espoused values when they come under pressure and there is a risk of you breaching them. If management consultants always think they are living their values, then it is likely they are not. An unexamined value is of no value at all.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Better Growth Stock: Rocket Lab USA vs. Datadog
Both companies are attacking massive addressable markets with differentiated products, but one has a clearer path to sustained hypergrowth. Wall Street's obsession with artificial intelligence (AI) monitoring may be overshadowing a bigger opportunity in the physical infrastructure of the space economy. The cheaper valuation story here isn't the bargain it appears to be when you factor in competitive dynamics. 10 stocks we like better than Rocket Lab › Wall Street loves a good David versus Goliath story. But what happens when two Davids are battling entirely different giants? That's the compelling dynamic between Rocket Lab USA (NASDAQ: RKLB) and Datadog (NASDAQ: DDOG) -- two disruptive innovators, each aiming for a trillion-dollar opportunity from opposite ends of the tech frontier. Datadog is entrenched in the red-hot world of artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and observability. Rocket Lab is scaling up in the fast-emerging space economy, building the tools -- and rockets -- for a multiplanet future. AI may be grabbing headlines, but investors might be missing a more explosive opportunity just over the horizon. Which of these high-growth stocks is the better buy? Rocket Lab reported $123 million in first-quarter 2025 revenue, reflecting 32% year-over-year growth. The company has rapidly evolved from a launch provider into a vertically integrated space systems manufacturer. Its product portfolio now includes satellite buses, solar power systems, separation stages, and flight software. In 2023, Rocket Lab components were present on approximately 38% of all orbital missions, a testament to its growing influence in the commercial space supply chain. The upcoming Neutron rocket, designed for medium-lift launches and human-rated capability, could further position Rocket Lab as a key player in the next phase of orbital access. Datadog posted $762 million in first-quarter revenue, representing 25% year-over-year growth and beating analyst expectations. The observability platform now serves 3,770 customers generating more than $100,000 in annual recurring revenue. More importantly, the company's strategic push into AI observability is gaining traction. AI-native companies now account for 8.5% of total annual recurring revenue, up from just 3.5% a year ago. This surge highlights Datadog's growing relevance as AI workloads become central to enterprise infrastructure. This is where conventional wisdom starts to break down. Datadog operates in the observability market, which is projected to grow at a steady 12.2% annually through 2030. That's impressive, but Rocket Lab is targeting a much more explosive opportunity -- the deployment of over 10,000 satellites requiring launch services by decade's end. This will support a total addressable market expected to exceed $10 billion. SpaceX currently holds a dominant position, accounting for approximately 87% of global launch mass. However, Rocket Lab's upcoming Neutron rocket could shift the dynamics. With a target launch price between $50 million and $55 million, Neutron undercuts SpaceX's $67 million Falcon 9 and is purpose-built for medium-lift missions, a segment where meaningful competition is limited. If Rocket Lab delivers on schedule and performance, it could inject long-awaited price pressure into the market and capture a significant share of future demand. Rocket Lab's recent contract wins underscore growing customer confidence and repeat business. The company completed its tenth mission for BlackSky, deploying next-generation imaging satellites. It's also executing an eight-launch agreement with iQPS, supporting the buildout of a radar satellite constellation. On the defense front, Rocket Lab is conducting hypersonic test missions for the U.S. Department of Defense under the HASTE program. These contracts reflect sustained demand and a growing role in national and commercial space infrastructure. Datadog also demonstrates strong customer traction. Companies like AppFolio, Asana, and Twilio rely on its observability platform. Its recent acquisition of AI-focused start-up Metaplane positions the company to meet rising demand for data quality monitoring as enterprises expand their use of AI. With 83% of customers using two or more Datadog products, the company continues to execute its land-and-expand strategy with precision. Datadog faces intensifying competition from Amazon's AWS, Microsoft's Azure, and Alphabet's Google Cloud, each of which bundles observability tools directly into its platform. These hyperscalers can undercut Datadog on pricing while investing heavily in research and development, backed by massive cash flow. Rocket Lab's higher valuation reflects its scarcity value. There are only two viable Western commercial launch providers, and only Rocket Lab is publicly traded. As the Department of Defense prioritizes launch diversity and commercial satellite constellations continue to expand, Rocket Lab's position as the sole investable alternative to SpaceX becomes more strategically important. While both stocks deserve spots on growth investors' watch lists, Rocket Lab emerges as the superior growth investment. The company's 32% revenue growth outpaces Datadog's 25%, and its Neutron catalyst could transform it from a small-sat specialist into a genuine SpaceX competitor. Most importantly, Rocket Lab operates in a market with insurmountable barriers to entry. Datadog remains a solid growth story, but its path involves navigating an increasingly crowded field where every major cloud provider wants market share. In the battle between monitoring software and launching rockets, physics wins. Rocket Lab's combination of proven execution, massive market opportunity, and the upcoming Neutron launch make it the more compelling growth story -- even if Wall Street hasn't fully realized it yet. Before you buy stock in Rocket Lab, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Rocket Lab wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $658,297!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $883,386!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 992% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. George Budwell has positions in Microsoft and Rocket Lab. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, AppFolio, Datadog, Microsoft, Rocket Lab, and Twilio. The Motley Fool recommends Asana and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Growth Stock: Rocket Lab USA vs. Datadog was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Business Wire
3 days ago
- Business Wire
TomaGold Set to Launch Strategic Drilling Campaign on its Chibougamau Projects
MONTREAL--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- TOMAGOLD CORPORATION (TSXV: LOT) (' TomaGold ' or the ' Company ') is pleased to announce the upcoming launch of its 2025 drilling campaign, which will focus primarily on the properties currently under option from SOQUEM and Chibougamau Independent Mines in the Chibougamau Mining Camp, as well as its wholly-owned Obalski Project (the ' Chibougamau Projects '). David Grondin, CEO of TomaGold stated: 'The Chibougamau Mining Camp has recently attracted significant exploration activity, underscoring the region's increasing potential for gold and copper discoveries. Since the beginning of the year, we have compiled project data, advanced preliminary work, identified high-priority targets, and prepared our properties to be drill-ready. Our 53-hole exploration program will focus on our key projects—Berrigan, Radar, David, Dufault, and Obalski—with the objective of uncovering new gold-copper mineralization on well-defined, strategically selected targets. We are eager to commence drilling and build on the momentum in this highly prospective region.' Drill and Work Permits Secured TomaGold has obtained all the necessary drilling and work permits, including the ATI ('Autorisation de Travaux à Impact') and forestry permits, to begin exploration activities across its Chibougamau Projects. Drill Pad Setup and Mobilization Status All access trails to the drill sites have been cleared and secured, and the drill setups are ready for immediate mobilization. A total of 53 drill targets have been identified and are fully permitted. While preparing the sites during the winter, the team also conducted limited and selective surface sampling in select areas. Analytical results from this sampling are currently pending. Geophysical Survey Work on Obalski A downhole resistivity/induced polarization (IP) logging survey was conducted in hole OBS-17-002, which intersected the newly interpreted NE-SW Zone on the Obalski Project. The objective was to determine the in-situ physical properties of this high-grade copper-gold zone to define the most effective geophysical method for the upcoming drilling campaign. The resistivity and chargeability contrasts measured between the host rocks and the NE-SW Zone are up to 10,000 times more conductive and 10 times more chargeable, respectively. To confirm these results, the geophysical properties of hole OBS-23-032 were also measured. This hole was interpreted to have intersected the same NE-SW Zone some 65 m further south. The results again confirmed similar conductive and chargeable contrasts of 25,000x and 10x, respectively. These very high contrasts suggest that electromagnetic (EM) and induced polarization (IP) methods could be successfully applied in this geological context of the Obalski project and possibly the Chibougamau Camp. 3D Modelling and Structural Reinterpretation TomaGold has completed approximately 95% of the geological reinterpretation and 3D modeling of the Obalski project. The updated model incorporates historical and recent data, providing a more comprehensive understanding of structural controls and mineralization trends. Final conclusions and visuals from the model will be presented shortly. The Company has initiated a similar modelling and reinterpretation process across its other projects, leveraging the structural insights gained from the Obalski project reinterpretation. Upcoming Geophysical Surveys (Pending Crew Availability) TomaGold has outlined a series of geophysical surveys to be conducted across its Chibougamau Projects in 2025, pending crew availability and seasonal access. These surveys are designed to refine drill targeting and enhance geological modelling across key assets. Summary of Planned Geophysical Work by Project: These surveys will complement the current structural reinterpretation work and support future drilling campaigns across the portfolio. The technical content of this press release has been reviewed and approved by Jean Lafleur, the Company's Vice President of Exploration and a qualified person under National Instrument 43-101. About TomaGold TomaGold Corporation (TSXV: LOT) is a Canadian mineral exploration company engaged in the acquisition, assessment, exploration and development of gold, copper, rare earth elements and lithium projects. Its primary goal is to consolidate the Chibougamau Mining Camp in northern Quebec. In addition to the agreements to acquire 13 properties in the camp, the Company holds interests in two gold properties in the vicinity of the camp: Obalski and Doda Lake. TomaGold also owns a 100% interest in a lithium property and in the Star Lake rare earth elements property, located in the James Bay region of Quebec, as well as a 24.5% interest in the Baird property, located near the Red Lake mining camp in Ontario through a joint venture with Evolution Mining Ltd. and New Gold Inc. Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information This news release includes certain statements that may be deemed 'forward-looking statements'. All statements in this news release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that the Company expects to occur, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words 'expects', 'plans', 'anticipates', 'believes', 'intends', 'estimates', 'projects', 'potential' and similar expressions, or that events or conditions 'will', 'would', 'may', 'could' or 'should' occur. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include the potential results of exploration and drilling activities, market prices, continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company's management on the date the statements are made. Except as required by applicable securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management's beliefs, estimates, opinions, or other factors should change.
