What's the difference between earned wage access and a loan? How to know which is right for you
What's the difference between earned wage access and a loan? How to know which is right for you
When you're hit with a surprise cost like a car repair or medical bill, waiting for payday can be challenging. But sometimes, you don't have to.
Enter earned wage access (EWA), which goes by numerous nicknames - on-demand pay, daily pay, instant pay, same-day pay, instant payroll, and accrued wage access among them - and allows you to snag the money you've earned early. Some companies offer EWA as a company perk, but there are also third-party services that bring it directly to consumers.
With roughly a quarter of households living paycheck-to-paycheck according to a Bank of America report published last year, it's no surprise that some people are flocking to EWA services that can help them cover the cost of groceries, utilities and more. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found that the market for earned wage products is growing, with the share of workers using the products at least once a month jumping from 41% in 2021 to nearly 50% in 2022.
But it's important to fully understand how these services work before you take the leap. Consumer banking platform Current explains.
What is earned wage access?
Earned wage access programs allow workers to pocket a portion or all of their paycheck outside their typical payroll cycle. The exact process will vary by program, but here's an example: Say you are usually paid out for your work weekly or bi-weekly. Instead of having to wait until the next day for your money to hit your bank account, you can request to have some of the money come through now (or within a few days, depending on the service) and see the remainder of the paycheck on payday.
Employer-sponsored services require that your employer offer EWA as a benefit, and will use your payroll records to track your earnings and pay out the remainder of your payment on time. Companies that offer EWA - including Uber, Walmart, and McDonald's - often have hourly workers. Direct-to-consumer products determine your EWA limit by analyzing your earnings history.
How is earned wage access different from a loan?
While loans are a way to borrow money and pay it back with interest over a set period of time - from a few months to years - EWA is early access to money you have already earned without having to pay interest. When you use an EWA you're tapping money that is yours, but just doing so before payday. The funds you get early are then excluded from your paycheck.
If you're looking for extra funds to help cover a big expense, like a car repair, "it's probably best to go the loan route," says Ben Loughery, a certified financial planner and founder of Lock Wealth Management. EWA will typically have maximums for how much you can access at once, like $500.
When you borrow money via a personal loan, you'll owe the lender an annual percentage rate (APR) - and those can take a chunk out of your wallet. As of June 11, the average personal loan interest rate was 12.65%, according to Bankrate. The rates can be especially steep for payday loans: Typical two-week payday loans with a $15 fee for every $100 borrowed come out to an APR of almost 400%, the CFPB points out. Plus, if you don't pay back the loan as promised, your credit score can take a hit. That's not a concern with EWA.
Should you choose earned wage access or a loan?
In an ideal world, you have an emergency fund available for when surprise costs arise, and you're managing your cash flow in such a way that you don't need to turn to a loan or EWA, explains Catherine Valega, financial advisor and founder of Green Bee Advisory. But that's not always the case.
"If you have access to earned wage access, it is much better than a payday loan," Valega says. She adds that because many people are more familiar with payday loans, they tend to seek those out first and "shoot themselves in the foot" because they then face high interest rates that take a huge chunk out of the money that should hit their accounts. "With earned interest rates, there's a fee, not an interest rate, and you've completed the work so you have earned that money … I would absolutely start there first."
Loughery says to take caution, especially if you're not good with managing your cash flow. You shouldn't rely on EWA as a long-term fix.
"But if you are in a bind, it could be a great solution," he adds.
How to find an earned wage access product
If your employer offers EWA, there's likely already a service for you to select. But if you're going the third-party route, assess the following features:
Fees. Some services charge subscription fees, fees for accessing your money and/or a fee for accessing your money instantly. Some even ask for an optional tip. Ideally, you'll want to go with a service that provides low or no fees for accessing your money early - it's money you've already earned, after all.
Fund timing: How long will you have to wait for your money? In most cases, you'll see the money hit your account within a few business days. But if you need the money instantly and there's a high fee for receiving the money at a moment's notice, you may want to look elsewhere.
Deposit limit: The amount of your paycheck you can tap early will vary by service. One may allow you to gain access to half your paycheck early, while another could offer to send you just a portion of your daily earnings or set a daily dollar amount limit. Before you choose to go with a EWA service, make sure you will actually be able to get what you need if you're in a tight spot.
This story was produced by Current and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Why Bank of America's (BAC) Bold Leap for Digital Dollars Could Benefit Shareholders
Legacy banks are beginning to embrace digital assets, and Bank of America (BAC) is the latest to prepare for a potential U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, pending regulatory clarity. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter The timing aligns with growing momentum behind the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins) in Washington. As Bank of America signals caution about the macroeconomic outlook for the rest of 2025, this strategic move reflects both a necessary shift to keep pace with peers and a bold step into uncharted territory. While the risks are real and the implications far-reaching, I remain cautiously bullish about BAC's forward-looking approach. Joining Forces for a Unified Digital Dollar Network Bank of America is planning to join major peers, such as JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Wells Fargo (WFC), and Citigroup (C), in developing a stablecoin network modeled after Zelle. The initiative would leverage existing infrastructure—specifically, Early Warning Services and The Clearing House—to create a unified, fiat-backed stablecoin designed for retail and cross-border payments. The goal is to streamline traditional systems, such as ACH, by offering faster and more cost-efficient transactions. Bank of America has also floated the idea of launching its own 'Bank of America Coin', but for any of this to move forward, it will depend on the passage of favorable legislation. Washington Paves the Way with the GENIUS Act This is where the GENIUS Act comes into play. Just days ago, the Senate passed the crypto regulation bill with strong bipartisan support in a 68–30 vote, sending it to the House for further consideration. The bill includes key provisions like 1:1 reserve backing, segregated customer funds, and strict anti–money laundering standards. Regulation has always been an inevitable and necessary step for digital assets, and now that more explicit rules are emerging, traditional banks are finally feeling confident enough to get involved. Costs and Benefits for BAC Shareholders There are clear incentives for banks to enter the stablecoin market. It offers potential cost savings, new revenue streams from transaction processing, and opportunities to develop innovative financial products. At a broader level, it could help reinforce the U.S. dollar's dominance as the global reserve currency. However, stablecoins carry real risks. Though more 'stable' than unbacked cryptocurrencies, they are still vulnerable to collapse, as seen with TerraUSD in 2022, and pose potential systemic threats. Critics warn that the failure of a major issuer could have a ripple effect across the financial system. Some advocacy groups argue the GENIUS Act lacks sufficient consumer protections and could shift the burden of failure onto taxpayers. Building a Zelle-style stablecoin alliance also presents challenges. Banks must align on key features and governance—a challenging task given differing priorities. Even if the network succeeds, it will face competition from established players like Circle's USDC, Tether (USDT), and PayPal (PYUSD). Retail giants like Walmart and Amazon are also eyeing the space, potentially bypassing card networks like Visa by tapping into their massive customer bases. Bank of America's Strong Q1 Amidst Macroeconomic Caution Still, this transformation will take time to unfold. In the meantime, Bank of America's Q1 2025 earnings were largely positive. The bank posted a solid EPS beat at $0.90, driven by a 9% year-over-year rise in sales and trading revenue and 4% growth in consumer spending. Perhaps most notably, Bank of America's capital position is stronger than ever, with total assets climbing to $3.35 trillion. However, the outlook isn't as rosy as its first quarter results. The company expressed uncertainty over the macroeconomic outlook due to potential tariffs and their impact on the economy. For example, if retailers raise the price of a television due to tariffs, fewer Americans will use their Bank of America cards to process the transaction. So, banks are quite vulnerable to economic stagnation. This, combined with the risky pivot into digital currencies, may be 'cause for pause' among investors. Is Bank of America a Buy, Sell, or Hold? On Wall Street, BAC earns a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 18 Buy, two Hold, and zero Sell ratings in the past three months. BAC's average price target of $49.38 implies an upside potential of almost 10% over the next 12 months. Recently, Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo issued a Buy rating on BAC, noting the bank's 'strategic focus on expanding its consumer deposits and wealth management services, along with international commercial expansion, positions it for long-term growth.' BAC Positioned for a Win in Ongoing Stablecoin Shift Bank of America's move into digital currencies reflects a clear shift in the financial landscape—an uncertain but necessary step that no major bank can afford to ignore. While details are still being finalized and collaboration among competing banks will be crucial to building a stablecoin network, Bank of America's core business remains solid, consistently exceeding expectations. With its strong balance sheet and operational scale, the bank is well-positioned to lead innovation in this emerging space. One thing is sure: the GENIUS Act favors large institutions, and Bank of America is well placed to capitalize on it.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Over 200 Central Banks Reportedly Dump $48 Billion In US Treasuries Amid Concerns Over Dollar's Stability: 'The Drop Is Unusual'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. More than 200 Central banks and foreign entities have withdrawn a substantial amount of U.S. Treasuries from the New York Federal Reserve, signaling potential concerns over the stability of the U.S. dollar. What Happened: The New York Fed's custody holdings of U.S. Treasuries and other assets have seen a significant decline. The holdings dropped by $17 billion last week and have plummeted by $48 billion since late March, coinciding with the onset of the trade tensions sparked by President Donald Trump's tariffs, reported Fortune Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Bank of America's managing director and U.S. rates strategist, Meghan Swiber and fellow strategist, Katie Craig, expressed significant concern over the withdrawal of foreign private investors from the Treasury securities market. Swiber and Craig commented, 'This drop is unusual.' Typically, the cash generated from the sale of U.S. debt is placed in the New York Fed's reverse repurchase facility, where it is exchanged for Treasuries as collateral. However, that trend has recently reversed, with foreign participation in the facility declining by $15 billion since late March. This points to a notable reduction in U.S. assets held by foreigners at the Fed — roughly $63 billion in just over two months. Swider told Fortune, "We're of the view that deficits are going to continue to climb higher in the coming years, and what we struggle with is, 'Who is going to help support that higher level of supply?' As per Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, foreign buyers constitute about 30% of the U.S. Treasury market, and any decrease in their participation could compel the Treasury to offer higher yields to attract buyers, affecting interest rates across the economy, reported It Matters: The recent withdrawal of U.S. Treasuries by central banks and foreign entities adds to the growing concerns about the stability of the U.S. dollar and the potential impact on the global economy. This trend has been accompanied by a rise in Treasury yields, which could signal a weakening of foreign demand for U.S. debt, further exacerbating the situation. These developments are particularly noteworthy given the historical relationship between the U.S. dollar and Treasury yields. However, this pattern has seen a significant divergence since April 2025, potentially indicating a shift in global confidence in U.S. assets. As the U.S. dollar's status as the world's reserve currency and the confidence in the U.S. government's ability to meet its financial obligations are called into question, the U.S. may face increased borrowing costs, potentially impacting various sectors of the economy. On a year-to-date basis, iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NASDAQ:TLT) fell 1.05%, while iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NASDAQ:IEF) climbed 2.21%. Read Next: Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Back a bold new approach to cancer treatment with high-growth potential. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Image via ShutterstockThis article Over 200 Central Banks Reportedly Dump $48 Billion In US Treasuries Amid Concerns Over Dollar's Stability: 'The Drop Is Unusual' originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bank of America Stock (BAC) Nears Record High as Pivotal Earnings Report Looms
Bank of America (BAC) is scheduled to report its Q2 2025 earnings on July 16, with analysts forecasting $0.90 per share, reflecting modest 8% year-over-year growth. I believe BAC is well-positioned to beat expectations, supported by conservative loan loss provisioning, ongoing share buybacks, strength in its Global Markets division, and higher net interest income amid slower-than-expected Federal Reserve rate cuts. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter BAC stock currently trades at $45, within striking distance of its all-time high of $47 per share. With resistance clearly set, BAC stock will need a strong catalyst to make further headway beyond $50 per share. Given the lack of clear catalysts, I remain Neutral on BAC stock. It currently trades at 1.66x tangible book value and 12.6x 2025 earnings—a valuation that's lower than peers like JPMorgan Chase (JPM), but still richer than that of many U.S. regional banks. Heading into Q2 2025, Bank of America's provisioning appears notably conservative. The bank's macroeconomic outlook assumes an unemployment rate of just below 5% by the end of 2025, remaining at that level through 2026, which is slightly more pessimistic than the Federal Reserve's projection of 4.5% for both years. Similarly, Bank of America forecasts 1% GDP growth in Q4 2025, undercutting the Fed's more optimistic estimate of 1.4%. In short, Bank of America's current reserves already reflect a cautious economic view, making it unlikely to build a significant provision in Q2 2025. The bank appears to have already accounted for a moderate economic slowdown later this year and into 2026. Analysts expect Bank of America to deliver earnings of $0.90/share in Q2 2025, up 8% year-over-year. This would represent a marked slowdown from the 18% annual increase observed in the first quarter of 2025. I believe the projected 8% EPS growth is overly conservative. Based on my estimates, share repurchases alone could contribute around 5% EPS growth. Additionally, Bank of America is likely to raise its net interest income (NII) guidance, as the Federal Reserve is now expected to deliver only two rate cuts in 2025, compared to the four cuts the bank had initially anticipated in its own outlook. I also expect slightly stronger performance from the Global Markets division, supported by heightened market volatility early in Q2 2025, which could contribute a paltry $0.02 per share to earnings. In summary, I expect Bank of America to modestly beat consensus earnings estimates, driven by conservative provisioning, upward NII revisions, and a slight lift from trading activity. My forecast is EPS of approximately $0.92 for Q2 2025. Based on my projections, Bank of America is on track to deliver earnings of approximately $3.57 per share in 2025, assuming consistent 8% growth in both Q3 and Q4 of 2024. This would translate to a return on tangible book value of around 13% for the year. However, this solid profitability appears to be largely priced in, with BAC stock trading at 1.66x its tangible book value of $27.12 per share. Its 2025 P/E multiple of 12.6x is more attractive than that of large peers like JPMorgan Chase (14.6x), but still above the average for regional banks, which trade closer to 10.7x forward earnings. Looking ahead to 2026, earnings growth is expected to moderate, with no repeat of the Global Markets tailwind and potential pressure from anticipated Fed rate cuts. Given this outlook, I believe a Hold rating is appropriate for BAC at current levels. This cautious stance is also supported by Berkshire Hathaway's ongoing reduction in its BAC stake, despite the stock remaining the firm's fourth-largest holding, which comprises 10.19% of Buffett's portfolio. The limited upside potential suggests it's wise to stay neutral for now. Turning to Wall Street, Bank of America earns a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 18 Buy and 2 Hold ratings over the past three months. Notably, not a single analyst is bearish on Bank of America. The average BAC stock price target is $49.38, implying a 9% potential upside. Bank of America's macroeconomic outlook remains more conservative than the Federal Reserve's, which suggests its earnings are better insulated in the event of a slowdown in U.S. economic activity later in 2025 and into 2026. I expect BAC to slightly beat Q2 2025 earnings estimates, supported by stronger net interest income, continued share repurchases, and a modest profitability boost from the Global Markets division. That said, I remain neutral on the stock. Like Warren Buffett, who has recently trimmed Berkshire's position in BAC, I believe the bank's solid profitability is already reflected in the stock's price, which trades at 1.66x tangible book value. Lastly, while Wall Street analysts maintain a Strong Buy rating, the implied upside of just 9.59% suggests limited near-term reward for new investors at current levels. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
