US deports two Palestinians who landed with valid visas for an interfaith mission
Two Palestinian peace activists who were detained upon landing in the US during a trip sponsored by a synagogue were deported from San Francisco on Friday, friends and fellow activists have told Middle East Eye.
Eid Hathaleen and Awdah Hathaleen, cousins from the Masafer Yatta village of Umm al-Khair in the occupied West Bank, possessed valid visas and, after being detained, had their visas revoked upon landing in the US on Wednesday.
Eid, an artist and photographer, and Awdah, an English teacher and contributor to Israeli magazine +972, landed in San Francisco on a flight from Doha, Qatar, on Wednesday.
The trip was sponsored by Kehilla Community Synagogue in Piedmont, California. The cousins were scheduled to speak at churches, synagogues, and other establishments as part of an interfaith humanitarian mission that was supposed to take them from California to Washington, DC, and then Boston.
Eid had been to the United States multiple times on the visa he held. Awdah had been issued a visa in May and was going to the US for the first time. But the two were detained on arrival, had their visas summarily revoked, and were informed that they would be deported in 24 hours.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Phil Weintraub, lead organiser of a Palestinian solidarity committee at the Kehilla Community Synagogue in Piedmont, which sponsored the trip, told MEE: 'We are heartbroken that our friends were denied entry for their humanitarian mission. They came to thank us and raise funds for their village's summer camp. The Trump regime cancelling their visas was an act of cruelty and nothing else.'
The two landed back in Qatar on Friday. They are currently stuck there, with no flights onwards to Jordan because of Israel's attack on Iran.
'Non-violent peace activists'
US authorities have so far provided no explanation for their actions, despite a Bay Area congressional delegation that includes senior Democrat Nancy Pelosi issuing a statement demanding a justification for the deportations.
Erin Axelman, co-director of the documentary Israelism, who has seen Eid speak on numerous occasions and is a supporter of his work, told MEE the cousins were 'profoundly important Palestinian peace activists who travelled to the US legally at the invite of progressive Jewish communities, for a speaking tour about peace and justice in Palestine.'
'The Trump administration detained them, and now deported them, solely because they are Palestinian,' Axelman said.
'Detaining Eid and Awhad does nothing to advance Jewish safety, saying so is a horrible joke, and is offensive to Jewish Americans'
- Erin Axelman, filmmaker and activist
Ben Linder, co-chair of the Silicon Valley chapter of J Street and the organiser of Eid and Awdah's first scheduled speaking engagement, which was supposed to take place at a Methodist church on Thursday, told MEE that friends and sponsors of the Palestinians had similarly been kept in the dark.
Linder, who has known the cousins for ten years, described them as "true non-violent peace activists".
"They came here on an interfaith peace-promoting mission. Having the US government revoke already granted, already screened visas, to crack down on peace activism is a new chapter," Linder said. "That peace activism by Palestinians is verboten is a scary, scary thought."
According to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, since October last year, the US has "removed" 157,948 people from the country, which includes 72,179 done during the first 100 days of Trump's administration. The administration claims it has removed double that figure, but those numbers have not yet been verified.
Many of those removed from the country had valid visas or permanent residency and are part of a mass deportation plan pledged during Trump's presidential campaign.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he has revoked thousands of visas, primarily from students. The administration says it has also arrested over 158,000 "illegal aliens".
A large number of the deportations or revocations of visas have been done on the basis of people's views or protests related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, and people with pro-Palestinian views have been targeted and punished for those views. The administration routinely equates pro-Palestinian activism with antisemitism.
"Detaining Eid and Awhad does nothing to advance Jewish safety, saying so is a horrible joke, and is offensive to Jewish Americans who see similarities between how Palestinians are being treated, and how Jews were treated in Europe for so many centuries,' Axelman, the filmmaker, who is Jewish, said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
22 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
Qatar shuts down airspace temporarily amid regional developments
23 June 2025 19:46 (Reuters)Qatar said it has shut down airspace temporarily as part of measures taken amid developments in the region, a statement by the Qatari foreign ministry said on X. It said the move comes to ensure safety of residents and visitors. Israel-Iran Conflict Continue full coverage
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Turkey rejects open-door policy for refugees if Iran falls apart
Israeli and US attacks on Iran risk sparking a regional war or even triggering regime change in the country, a development that has concerned Turkish officials in Ankara since September. The Israeli strikes that began earlier this month initially targeted Iran's nuclear infrastructure and air defence systems. Over time, however, Israel shifted its focus toward the Iranian government's command structure and later moved on to domestic security buildings. For example, on Monday, Israeli forces reportedly targeted the internal headquarters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as well as the notorious Evin prison, where political prisoners are held. One Israeli minister even suggested that Israel was cooperating with the Iranian opposition, reinforcing Defence Minister Israel Katz's public statements that Israel seeks regime change or at least aims to undermine the Tehran government. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters That is a prospect that US President Donald Trump tried to normalise on Sunday night with a post on Truth Social. 'If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' he asked. The Turkish government is acutely aware of the repercussions of regime-change operations and wars, having experienced the destabilising effects of the 2003 US-led Iraqi invasion and, more recently, the 2011-24 Syrian civil war. These conflicts have often resulted in hundreds of thousands of refugees crossing into Turkey and have disrupted key sectors such as energy and trade. Turkish society remains highly sensitive about the presence of refugees, notably the 2.7 million Syrians, many of whom are now returning to Syria after the fall of Bashar al-Assad's government. Experts and officials emphasise that there is currently no new wave of refugees. However, several sources familiar with the issue told Middle East Eye that as early as September, the Turkish government conducted in-depth studies on potential migration scenarios. They estimated that a full-scale war between Israel and Iran could push up to one million Iranian refugees towards the Turkish border. 'Ankara would fulfil its obligations under humanitarian law, but it would not implement an open-door policy' Serhan Afacan, president, Center for Iranian Studies Turkey has the experience. In 2012, then-foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu attempted to control the influx of Syrian refugees by capping their number at 100,000 and threatening to establish a safe zone in northern Syria. However, the number of refugees quickly surpassed three million in the following years, which taught Ankara a difficult lesson. Now, sources say Ankara is unlikely to accept any refugees except those in urgent need of emergency assistance. 'If the worst-case scenario were to occur and there was a mass migration from Iran to Turkey, whether permanent or in transit, Ankara would fulfil its obligations under humanitarian law, but it would not implement an open-door policy,' Serhan Afacan, president of the Center for Iranian Studies in Ankara, told Middle East Eye. A Turkish official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that Ankara would no longer apply an 'open door' policy toward any neighbouring country in the event of a refugee wave. Iranians currently can enter Turkey without a visa. An elite influx? Many Turkish citizens are particularly wary of the possible arrival of the 4.5 million Afghans currently living in Iran. However, Afacan noted that millions of Turkish-speaking ethnic Azerbaijanis also live in Iran. He said that if they were to gather at the border, it could shift the debate in Turkey and stir nationalistic sentiments. 'But at present, there are no indications that Turks in Iran are planning to migrate,' Afacan added. Last week, sources from the Turkish defence ministry told journalists there is currently no sign of a refugee influx into Turkey. Why has Turkey stopped short of condemning the US strikes on Iran? Read More » One source stated that additional security measures have been implemented along all borders, including with Iran, and there is no uncontrolled migration. The Turkish Armed Forces are said to be prepared for all possible scenarios arising from regional developments. This raises the question of whether Turkey would allow Iranian elites, including government officials, to enter if their government collapses. Many Iranians have already bought homes or acquired Turkish citizenship through investment in recent years. According to interior ministry data released this year, 76,000 Iranians hold residence permits in Turkey. At least 35,000 have purchased homes since 2019, according to the Turkish Statistical Institute data released in 2024. It is unclear whether all these purchases were made to obtain Turkish citizenship, but a naturalisation consultancy expert told MEE that Iranians are among the top nationalities seeking Turkish citizenship. Between 2012 and 2024, a total of 384,000 homes were sold to foreigners. Afacan said many Iranian officials and military officers already own property in Turkey. For instance, during the emergency elections following President Ebrahim Raisi's death in a helicopter crash last year, there was a major controversy over claims that Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and his family owned several luxurious apartments in an upscale Istanbul residence. Afacan added that, as in the aftermath of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, albeit on a much smaller scale, a significant number of Iranian government officials would likely head to Turkey if the government were to fall. 'I do not believe that Turkey would close its doors to such individuals in that kind of scenario,' he said.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Exclusive: UK privately says attacks on nuclear facilities not illegal
The British government has carefully refused to publicly reveal whether it supported the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday, and even whether it deems the attack to be lawful. On Monday morning in an interview with BBC Radio 4, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy repeatedly declined to say whether he believed the US strikes were legal. Now numerous diplomatic sources with knowledge of the matter have told Middle East Eye the UK's private stance is that attacks on nuclear facilities are not illegal and should not be banned by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). "The UK has taken the view that attacks on nuclear facilities are not by themselves illegal," said one British diplomat at the UN with knowledge of the matter who asked to remain anonymous. "This has put it at odds with the approach of most UNSC member states, which oppose such attacks outright." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Another diplomat with knowledge of the matter, also speaking on condition of anonymity, told MEE: "Most Security Council member states take the view that strikes on nuclear facilities should be prohibited, but Britain opposes that. Iranians say their hopes of peace have been buried by US bombs Read More » "The British view is that these attacks are not illegal in and of themselves, and so they shouldn't be prohibited. This is the position conveyed to diplomats but it isn't said in public statements." One diplomatic source confirmed this but stressed that "while it may be a minority position in the Security Council, it isn't a unique view and the Russians take the same approach, although they've criticised this particular US attack." MEE asked the Foreign Office and Ministry of Defence to confirm whether the UK believes that attacks on nuclear facilities are not illegal. The Foreign Office did not respond directly but pointed MEE to Lammy saying on Monday morning that "questions of legality are for the Americans to discuss themselves". "We wanted to get the Iranians back to the table, there is still an off-ramp. I was discussing that with the Iranian foreign minister on the phone yesterday." The Foreign Office also denied Iranian reports that Lammy expressed regret over the US strikes to his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, in a phone call on Sunday. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon' After the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities - Fordow, Nantaz and Isfahan - which the UK did not participate in, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on X that "Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat." Notably, Starmer stopped short of endorsing the attack. "We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis," he said. The Security Council met on Sunday to discuss the US strikes, which UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said "marked a perilous turn". Guterres said at the meeting: "We must act – immediately and decisively – to halt the fighting and return to serious, sustained negotiations on the Iran nuclear programme." The UK's permanent representative to the UN, Barbara Woodward, echoed Starmer in her public statement at the meeting, saying that the US "took action last night to alleviate" the "serious threat" of Iran's nuclear programme. "My prime minister has been clear," she added. "We urge Iran now to show restraint, and we urge all parties to return to the negotiating table and find a diplomatic solution, which stops further escalation and brings this crisis to an end." Pakistan announced on Sunday that it would present along with Russia and China a joint UNSC resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. Palestine Action to be proscribed as a terror group after break-in at UK's largest airbase Read More » The draft resolution condemns the US attack on "peaceful nuclear sites and facilities under the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] safeguards in the Islamic Republic of Iran". Britain is unlikely to vote in favour of the resolution. The Starmer government is attempting to perform a delicate balancing act in softly endorsing the outcome of the US attack on Iran while refusing to explicitly express support for the strikes themselves. When Israel launched its first wave of attacks against Iran, the UK was quick to announce that Britain played no role in the offensive or in helping to defend Israel against the retaliatory Iranian drone attacks, in contrast to previous episodes. Starmer has consistently made it clear that his government has no appetite for entanglement in the conflict, and is instead bent on promoting diplomacy. UK-Israel relations are increasingly strained, particularly after Britain sanctioned Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir nearly two weeks ago. Last week it was reported that Attorney General Richard Hermer, the UK government's top legal adviser, privately raised questions over whether Israel's bombing in Iran, which has killed at least 430 civilians, was lawful. Hermer reportedly said the UK should not be involved in the conflict "unless our personnel are targeted".
