Newsmax once courted Tucker Carlson. Now they say he's irrelevant after Trump-Iran criticism.
It was just two years ago that Newsmax shamelessly tried to make a play for Fox News' much larger audience by publicly courting Tucker Carlson after the conservative cable giant unceremoniously fired the far-right star.
Now that Carlson is leading a MAGA insurgency against Donald Trump amid the ongoing crisis in the Middle East, however, Newsmax is telling its audience – and one viewer in particular – that the former Fox News primetime host has 'jumped the shark' and is no longer relevant.
In fact, the network's guests have even gone so far as to float the notion that Carlson is getting paid by foreign adversaries to oppose America's involvement in the burgeoning war between Israel and Iran.
As you may recall, Carlson was the top-rated personality in cable news in April 2023 when Fox shockingly dumped him just a week after the Murdoch-owned channel paid $787.5 million to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems.
Though it still isn't clear exactly what led to the network parting ways with its biggest star, the timing of his departure so soon after Fox essentially admitted to peddling pro-Trump election lies sparked a MAGA revolt against the network – leading to a short-lived ratings slump. Newsmax, meanwhile, brazenly looked to take advantage in an effort to peel away some of Fox's conservative cable market share.
In the days after Carlson's termination, Newsmax mentioned his name on the air hundreds of times and devoted dozens of segments to the situation, which generally featured conservative guests railing against Fox News for letting him go. With Newsmax suddenly seeing a spike in ratings, the network even ran an 'urgent poll' asking viewers if 'it was right for Fox News to fire Tucker Carlson' and whether they 'want Tucker back on cable TV.'
The implication, of course, was clear. And behind the scenes, the network's CEO and founder Chris Ruddy was apparently making a full-court press to get Carlson on Newsmax's airwaves.
According to TMZ, Ruddy wasn't just offering Carlson his own primetime show, but he also floated the idea of having the nationalist commentator program the entire channel in order to sweeten the deal. TMZ added that the network's executives made it clear to Carlson's people that 'they would basically give him a big say in rebranding their channel.'In the end, nothing came to fruition as Carlson decided to launch his own right-wing media company, which largely revolves around his successful podcast. In this role, he also found himself – especially during the 2024 presidential campaign – part of Trump's inner circle, and was influential in getting Trump to choose JD Vance as his running mate.
Despite no longer hosting a cable news show, Carlson's influence in the right-wing media ecosphere makes him a direct competitor to television networks like Newsmax, which has staked its entire business model and identity around Trump's cult of personality.
This brings us to the present, which sees Carlson – the undisputed leader of MAGA's isolationist wing when it comes to foreign policy – at loggerheads with the president over the specter of the United States directly involving itself in yet another Middle Eastern war that could have lasting impacts in the region and world.
Having warned Trump for months about bombing Iran and raging against 'crazy' former Fox News colleagues for egging the president on, Carlson blasted the president as being 'complicit' in Israel's strikes on Iran while saying a war could 'end Trump's presidency' and the 'American empire.' He also took aim at Fox News for 'turning up the propaganda hose to full blast' in pushing for war and regime change in Iran.
With other MAGA luminaries like Steve Bannon and Marjorie Taylor Greene siding with Carlson, the president eventually returned rhetorical fire, labeling his longtime ally as 'kooky Tucker' while mockingly dismissing the ex-Fox star's opinions due to him no longer being on cable news.
'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying,' Trump seethed at this week's G7. 'Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen.'
Newsmax hosts and pundits, meanwhile, have rallied around the president while taking potshots at Carlson, insisting that the former Fox News primetime anchor is uneducated about the conflict and is just searching for relevancy by attacking Trump.
'I think Tucker Carlson has now jumped the shark,' conservative radio personality Jeff Kuhner declared on Newsmax's morning show The National Report on Monday. 'The big distinction, and I think Trump made it very clear, is that Israel is at war with Iran – not the United States.'
Throughout the day on Monday, former Fox News reporter James Rosen – who now serves as Newsmax's chief White House correspondent – delivered lengthy on-air reports laying out the back and forth between the president and Carlson. These dispatches would then lead into panel discussions, which featured the network's personalities and guests criticizing Carlson.
'People trying to stay relevant, perhaps,' anchor Bianca de la Garza said on her program Newsline. 'I mean, let's just be clear, President Trump is not a warmonger. He has given Iran so many olive branches, and he is seeking to end wars.'
Newsbusters editor Tim Graham, a frequent contributor on Newsmax, added that while Carlson ripped his former Fox News colleagues like Sean Hannity and Mark Levin for consistently being 'warmongers,' Carlson 'hasn't been consistent on anything' before suggesting that is why Fox got rid of him.
'It is kind of befuddling, and maybe this is why he got driven out of Fox in the first place,' he declared while de la Garza wondered if 'this is why' the Dominion texts that found Carlson blasting Trump in private 'surfaced in the first place.'
Later that afternoon, de la Garza would join four other hosts and pundits to once again discuss the Carlson-Trump feud, and this time around her criticism was far more strident, especially when anchor Krysia Lenzo said Carlson 'appeared to have flip-flopped' on his anti-war position with Iran.
'It's also all about Fox people, a lot of this, where he used to work. So it could be a combination of that and also, we talked about this earlier on Newsline, maybe just to stay relevant,' de la Garza asserted. 'President Trump is not a warmonger! Everything happening right now… is going to ensure peace in the world!'
After she claimed it was likely just 'sour grapes' on Carlson's part, Rick Leventhal – another former Fox News reporter turned Newsmax host – continued the pile-on. 'I'm surprised Tucker has taken this position, first and foremost,' he said, adding: 'Tucker's entitled to his opinions, of course, as everyone else, but in this case I think the president made his position pretty clear.'
While other pundits insisted that 'Trump is the only one who defines America First and MAGA at the end of the day,' de la Garza claimed that Carlson 'maybe just needs a little time to catch up' on the current situation between Israel and Iran.
Though the network's primetime slate essentially took a more hands-off approach, mostly sticking with promoting the president's clapbacks at Carlson, host Rob Finnerty did bring on Daily Wire podcaster Andrew Klavan to react to the intra-MAGA feud. Klavan, a fervent pro-Israel conservative, suggested that there could be some ulterior motives at play for Carlson.
'It's strange that it hasn't happened before since we know that Tucker Carlson was secretly sending in-house emails at Fox, calling Trump virtually demonic and saying he has no power to do anything but destroy,' Klavan said. 'I want to know at this point, and I…don't want to sound conspiratorial, but I want to know exactly who pays people to say that we should not be involved in any way in any fight that supports Israel, and we should put Israel and Iran on some kind of moral parity.'
Asked for clarity about his accusation, Klavan conceded that he didn't have any confirmation that Carlson was getting compensated to criticize Israel before doubling down on the suggestion anyway.
'I don't know, it's just a guess,' Klavan chuckled. 'Well, I'm not saying I have any information about it, but I'm starting to wonder about it because it doesn't make any sense, and it does not support America First.'
He concluded: 'It just doesn't make any sense. So I want to know what sense does it make. I'm not making an accusation because I don't have the facts, but I have begun to wonder because it just doesn't hold together.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
10 minutes ago
- Reuters
Toyota to raise US auto prices by more than $200 from July, Bloomberg News reports
June 20 (Reuters) - Japanese carmaker Toyota Motor Corp (7203.T), opens new tab will raise prices of some vehicles it sells in the U.S. by more than $200 from July, Bloomberg News reported on Friday. Some Toyota- and Lexus-branded models will have their prices increased by an average of $270 and $208, respectively, the report said, citing Nobu Sunaga, a spokesman for the company. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rhode Island lawmakers pass bill to ban sales of assault weapons
Rhode Island's Democratic-controlled state House on Friday approved legislation that would ban the sale and manufacturing of many semiautomatic rifles commonly referred to as assault weapons. The proposal now heads to the desk of Democratic Gov. Dan McKee, who has said he supports assault weapons bans. If the bill is signed into law, Rhode Island will join 10 states that have some sort of prohibition on high-powered firearms that were once banned nationwide and are now largely the weapon of choice among those responsible for most of the country's devastating mass shootings. Gun control advocates have been pushing for an assault weapons ban in Rhode Island for more than a decade. However, despite being a Democratic stronghold, lawmakers throughout the country's smallest state have long quibbled over the necessity and legality of such proposals. The bill only applies to the sale and manufacturing of assault weapons and not possession. Only Washington state has a similar law. Residents looking to purchase an assault weapon from nearby New Hampshire or elsewhere will also be blocked. Federal law prohibits people from traveling to a different state to purchase a gun and returning it to a state where that particular of weapon is banned. Nine states and the District of Columbia have bans on the possession of assault weapons, covering major cities like New York and Los Angeles. Hawaii bans assault pistols. Critics of Rhode Island's proposed law argued Friday during floor debates that assault weapons bans do little to curb mass shootings and only punish people with such rifles. 'This bill doesn't go after criminals, it just puts the burden on law-abiding citizens,' said Republican Sen. Thomas Paolino. It wasn't just Republicans who opposed the legislation. David Hogg — a gun control advocate who survived the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida — and the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence described the proposed ban as the 'weakest assault weapons ban in the country.' 'I know that Rhode Islanders deserve a strong bill that not only bans the sale, but also the possession of assault weapons. It is this combination that equals public safety,' Hogg said in a statement. Elisabeth Ryan, policy counsel at Everytown for Gun Safety, rejected claims that the proposed law is weak. 'The weakest law is what Rhode Island has now, no ban on assault weapons,' Ryan said. 'This would create a real, enforceable ban on the sale and manufacture of assault weapons, just like the law already working in Washington state, getting them off the shelves of Rhode Island gun stores once and for all.' Nationally, assault weapons bans have been challenged in court by gun rights groups that argue the bans violate the Second Amendment. AR-15-style firearms are among the best-selling rifles in the country. The conservative-majority Supreme Court may soon take up the issue. The justices declined to hear a challenge to Maryland's assault weapons ban in early June, but three conservative justices — Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas — publicly noted their disagreement. A fourth, Brett Kavanaugh, indicated he was skeptical that the bans are constitutional and predicted the court would hear a case 'in the next term or two.' ___ Associated Press writers David Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri and Lindsay Whitehurst in Washington, D.C. contributed to this report.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Amanda Bynes looks downcast on rare solo outing after joining OnlyFans
Amanda Bynes looked downcast as she was seen on a rare solo outing after joining X-rated subscription site OnlyFans. The 39-year-old actress was seen looking rather despondent as she hit luxury grocery store Erewhon in Calabasas on Thursday. Bynes kept her look simple as she sported a light grey full zip hoodie with skinny black jeans and matching Vans Old Skool high-top sneakers. She had her hands full as she carried a brown paper bag from the celebrity-favorite organic supermarket along with a pink Elfbar vape. Her blonde locks were worn down as the sides were pinned up to resemble a mullet style haircut as she wore minimal make-up. This comes weeks after it was revealed that Bynes is seeing her OnlyFans venture as a 'career renaissance' and wants to use it to divulge stories from her time at Nickelodeon, a year on from an explosive documentary which exposed the 'toxic environment' at the TV network. Bynes announced her foray into the X-rated subscription site in April, telling fans she was using it merely to communicate with them, and insisted she will not be sharing anything 'sleazy.' Now, a source close to the former child star has claimed the move will not only afford her the opportunity to make money, share her fashion designs and provide a potential springboard into reality TV, but will also be a safe space to reveal 'what happened from her past at Nickelodeon.' 'Amanda was looking into making money and is convinced that OnlyFans will bring some serious cash her way,' the insider told 'Her intentions are to do this before she seeks any reality show opportunities. 'She understands the stigma around OnlyFans, but she is determined to make this very safe – nothing naughty. She wants to share some of her future designs with her fans, collaborate with them and she also wants to tell stories to people who don't know everything about what happened from her past at Nickelodeon. 'She wants to make it a spot where fans can go and treat it like a meet and greet.' She pursued fashion and art at the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising, graduating with an Associate's of Art degree in 2014. The insider said she 'doesn't care if friends won't like that she is doing this' as she is 'looking to change course on how she has lived her life the last few years.' They added: 'She is seeing OnlyFans as a bit of a career renaissance.' Bynes announced her OnlyFans debut on Instagram, 15 years after quitting the entertainment business. Bynes, 39, announced her foray into the X-rated subscription site on Tuesday, telling fans she was using it to communicate with them, and insisted she will not be sharing anything 'sleazy' 'I'm doing onlyfans to chat with my fans through dm's,' she wrote alongside a screenshot of her new profile. 'I won't be posting any sleazy content. Excited to join.' She is charging fans more than $50 per month to access her page which currently has mirror selfies. Bynes has maintained a relatively low profile since quitting Hollywood in 2010. In December 2024, she hosted a pop-up art show that was attended by celebrities including Miley Cyrus' younger sister, Noah. It followed a tumultuous time for the troubled star who suffered a highly publicized breakdown in the early 2010s before being placed under a legal conservatorship by her parents for nine years back in 2013. Her downward spiral hit the headlines again last year after the release of Discovery documentary Quiet On Set: The Dark Side Of Kids, which shone a light on the 'close' relationship that producer Dan Schneider had with the teenage star. Schneider – who helped create some of the network's most popular shows like All That, Drake & Josh, Henry Danger, Kenan & Kel, Sam & Cat, The Amanda Show, Victorious, Zoey 101, and iCarly – was accused of being overtly inappropriate with Bynes, who is 20 years his junior, as well as with other employees. In the wake of the documentary a video circulated of a bikini-clad Bynes, who was a child at the time, sitting in a hot tub with a fully clothed Schneider. The clip was taken from Bynes' recurring sketch, Amanda's Jacuzzi, which saw the young star interview guests in the bubbling pool. Commentators recalled Schneider and Bynes being 'very close' – including 'physically.' Karyn Finley Thompson, who worked as an editor on several Nickelodeon shows, said: 'There were many times that I saw Amanda sitting behind him, hugging him or giving him like a neck massage or whatever. 'Dan and Amanda had a close relationship, and I didn't think anything different than that. The hot tub scene though I always thought was a little odd.' Schneider departed from the network in 2018 amid numerous allegations of misconduct. At the time, Nickelodeon said it had performed an internal investigation and found that evidence to back up the allegations was 'non-existent.' Schneider, who joined the network in 1993, responded to the allegations made on the documentary in a 19 minute YouTube video in which he admitted that he 'regretted' his past actions and that he owed 'some people a pretty strong apology.' He said he was 'embarrassed' by his behavior in the writer's room and also apologized for his frequent requests for massages from female members of staff while in the studio. But he denied he was involved in any sort of sexual abuse either on the set of, or behind the scenes. In May, two months after the documentary was released, he filed a defamation legal case against the producers, branding the show a 'hit job.' Quiet On Set: The Dark Side Of Kids TV described Nickelodeon in the early 2000s as an 'insidious environment rife with allegations of abuse, sexism, racism and inappropriate dynamics with its underage stars and crew.'
