Germany's Pfandbriefbank withdraws guidance as it winds down US business
GDANSK:
Deutsche Pfandbriefbank
, one of
Germany
's top property financiers, said on Wednesday it was withdrawing its full-year guidance amid extraordinary expenses from discontinuing its business in the United States.
In the longer term, "the freed-up capital shall be used to accelerate the bank's transformation," the lender said in a statement.
PBB
said in May that it would not take on new business in the United States as it considered the country too volatile under President Donald Trump.
Analysts at AlphaValue said this announcement was not a complete surprise. "Our forecasts are under review with a downgrading tendency at least for 2025," they added in an email to Reuters.
Shares were down 12% at 0820 GMT and on track for their biggest fall since March 2020.
U.S. and woes
Wednesday's decision marks a major strategic shift for PBB.
The U.S. is its second biggest market, making up 14% of its loan portfolio.
The bank in recent years has bet heavily on the U.S. market by offering commercial real estate loans, which across the industry have succumbed to pressure from high office vacancies and falling property prices following interest rate hikes and a trend towards home-working since the pandemic.
In February, PBB forecast new business volume of between 6.5 billion and 7.5 billion euros for the 2025 financial year and said it expected its Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio to exceed 15.5%. A CET1 ratio is a metric that measures a bank's liquidity to its risk exposure.
In a separate statement on Wednesday, PBB said it was in advanced negotiations to acquire a majority stake in a real estate investment manager that it did not name, with the euro price expected to be in the "mid-double-digit millions".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Gold price outlook: MCX gold rate falls to ₹99,000 per 10 grams amid Israel-Iran war. What should be trading strategy?
Gold prices on Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX) ended flat on Friday, tracking a muted trend in the international bullion prices, after US President Donald Trump delayed a decision on entering the Israel-Iran war. Advertisement MCX gold rate ended marginally lower by ₹13, or 0.01%, at ₹99,096 per 10 grams on Friday. During the session, gold prices hit an intraday high of ₹99,198, and touched a low of ₹98,431 level. For the week, MCX gold price declined over 1%. MCX silver prices gained ₹51, or 0.05%, to close at ₹1,06,275 per kg. Silver rates hit an intraday high of ₹1,06,695, and a low of ₹1,05,053. In the global markets, spot gold prices fell 0.2% to $3,365.51 an ounce, while the index was down 1.8% for the week. US gold futures shed 0.7% to $3,385.50. Spot silver prices fell 1.1% to $35.98 per ounce, and were down 0.9% for the week. Advertisement 'Gold prices dropped as investors balanced expectations of US Federal Reserve rate cuts against escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. A firm US dollar and elevated bond yields continue to pressure gold,' said Jigar Trivedi, Senior Research Analyst at Reliance Securities. President Trump is expected to decide within the next two weeks whether the United States will intervene in the ongoing Israel-Iran air conflict, the White House stated on Thursday. Gold, traditionally regarded as a safe-haven asset, often gains during periods of heightened geopolitical and economic uncertainty. Meanwhile, US Fed policymakers project a total of 50 basis points rate cuts for 2025. However, they have slightly moderated the trajectory of easing, now expecting just one 25-basis-point cut in both 2026 and 2027. A high interest rate environment tends to weigh on gold prices, as the metal does not offer any yield. Advertisement 'While Fed Governor Christopher Waller opened the door to potential rate cuts as early as July, Fed Chair Jerome Powell maintained a cautious, data-driven stance. This divergence has created uncertainty, limiting gold's upside even amid geopolitical stress,' Trivedi said. Gold Price Outlook Next week, focus will remain on the Israel-Iran conflict, particularly any signs of US military involvement. Moreover, Fed Chair Powell's testimony before Congress will also be on investors' radar along with a slew of macroeconomic data that will influence the gold prices. Also Read | Equally at sea: The US Federal Reserve has no more clarity than we do 'While geopolitical tensions support gold in the short term, markets may remain reactive and headline-driven. Investors will look for any shift toward a more dovish or hawkish tone, especially in light of recent mixed comments from Fed officials,' said Jigar Trivedi. Advertisement Additionally, any sustained strength in the greenback could keep bullion prices under pressure, despite safe-haven flows, he added. 'MCX Gold August futures find immediate support near ₹97,000 per 10 grams. With macro headwinds in play, we maintain a sell-on-rise strategy, especially around technical resistance zones,' said Trivedi. Gold prices remain caught between opposing forces: geopolitical risks providing support, and robust US data along with Fed policy uncertainty capping gains. Trivedi advises traders to stay cautious ahead of key economic events, with the potential for breakout or consolidation depending on how these narratives unfold. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions. Advertisement
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Everyone thinks the S&P 500 is too expensive. Maybe it's too cheap.
People are growing afraid of buying into the S&P 500, which appears expensive right now. A deeper look at the index shows that it could be undervalued. The fears are understandable. The index has soared, regardless of considerable economic and policy risks. The S&P 500, now a bit below 6000, is well above its level just before April 2, when President Donald Trump announced 10% tariffs on all imports, plus higher levies on many of the U.S.'s most important trading partners. Tariffs are still a danger, even though the president has suspended most of the country-specific levies until July 9. Investors are monitoring whether potential price increases from companies will bring more inflation, higher interest rates, and slowing economic growth. The Trump administration's tax and spending bill, as approved by the House of Representatives, would mean an even larger federal budget deficit, which could both add to inflation and send bond yields higher. Those concerns, for now, are on the back burner. Inflation has remained close enough to the Federal Reserve's 2% target for the market to bet that the central bank may cut interest rates this year, fueling expectations that the economy and corporate earnings will continue to grow. As a result, traders and investors have bid the S&P 500 upwards, leaving naysayers in the dust. Now, the index appears expensive at about 22 times the aggregate per-share earnings that analysts forecast for the coming 12 months, according to FactSet. That is close to the highest multiple in the past 3½ years, a period when rates have risen and growth has slowed a bit. As a result, the view that the market is vulnerable to sliding in response to any economic disappointment has become more widespread. But the most fundamental analysis of companies indicates that as long as the economy avoids major trouble, the S&P 500 is mildly undervalued. Dennis DeBusschere, veteran strategist and founder of 22V Research, did the work. He assumes S&P 500 earnings will grow at 8% annually for the next five years, a standard forecast period for valuing stocks. That call looks reasonable, or even conservative, because it is three percentage points below the consensus call among analysts tracked by FactSet. That type of growth is nothing investors can't imagine. The economy is still expanding, and profits for Big Tech, which account for a double-digit percentage of earnings for the index, are expected to grow just over 15% annually for the next two years, partly as a result of increasing demand for artificial intelligence. For the long term, beyond the next five years, he assumes a constant growth rate of 4%, which means earnings would increase slightly faster than growth in gross domestic product, at 2.8% in 2024. That too is reasonable, given Big Tech's presence in the index. The cash companies return to shareholders via dividends and stock repurchases should grow at roughly the same pace, assuming companies maintain the percentage of their earnings they pay out to stockholders. DeBusschere discounts the current value of those future cash flows by about 8%—four percentage points more than the roughly 4% yield he expects on safe 10-year Treasury debt—arriving at a value of 6170 for the S&P 500. If it traded at that level now, it would be valued at 23 times the next 12 months' earnings. At a glance, that looks too expensive, but it makes sense. Maybe the market really is worth that much. Big Tech's AI adventure is just beginning, and if the economy avoids recession, earnings will grow at companies in other sectors, too. That is a big 'if," and the pessimists are afraid that earnings will disappoint. But if they don't, the S&P 500 isn't actually that expensive. It might even be underpriced. Write to Jacob Sonenshine at
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Giving them two weeks': Donald Trump's timeless countdown returns; this time with Iran
US President Donald Trump is expected to decide within the next two weeks whether to launch a military strike on Iran, according to the White House, a familiar timeline Trump has leaned on since his first term in office. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' she said in a statement issued through White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday. Later on Saturday Trump again reiterated his 'two-week' timeline: "I'm giving them (Iran) a period of time- and I would say two weeks would be the maximum." Two-week a similar troupe Trump has pledged to make announcements or decisions 'in two weeks' more than a dozen times over the past two months, according to an NBC News analysis, a pattern that mirrors his tendency during his earlier presidency. Asked eight weeks ago if he could trust Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump replied, 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' During his first term, Trump frequently invoked the 'two weeks' timeline for a range of major promises, from tax reform and health care policy to infrastructure plans and the fight against ISIS. Many of these proposals, including claims related to conspiracy theories and coal mine reopenings, were repeatedly touted as imminent but ultimately failed to materialize. Trump's repeated use of the 'two weeks' promise has surged in recent weeks, applied to everything from trade negotiations and tariff decisions to the Russia-Ukraine war. Yet, many of these pronouncements have failed to materialize. The phrase 'two weeks' under Trump has become less a literal timeframe and more a rhetorical device, a vague, elastic placeholder that can mean anything or nothing at all, to signal action while delivering delay. In Trump's lexicon, 'two weeks' doesn't measure time; it simply means 'later'. Will the United States bomb Iran? It's unclear. Will we get a definitive answer in the next two weeks? That's just as uncertain.
