
Is Warfare the most realistic war film ever made?
Warfare, Alex Garland and Ray Mendoza's assiduous new film on a single episode of the American war in Iraq, opens with a title card typical to a war picture: date, location, barebones summary – 11 November 2006, in Ramadi, Iraq. Navy SEAL team alpha one is supporting Marines in insurgents' territory. And then one final, unusual detail in place of the standard 'based on a true story' – 'This film uses only their memories.' The 'only' is an ominous indicator: this is a film working against the Hollywood tide to gloss, simplify or narrativize. Warfare, based primarily on Mendoza's memories of that day as a former SEAL, as well as those of fellow soldiers and civilians present, is as much an experiment of translation as a cinematic achievement, a movie defined by both what it shows and what it does not.
Much of the press surrounding Warfare has focused on this exacting verisimilitude, its mission to create the 'most accurate war film possible'. If something could not be double-checked by another account, it was not included. The intricate, fully immersive soundscape, designed by Glenn Fremantle, encompasses the vast volume spectrum of conflict – civilian chatter, a hand grazing a windowsill, burps of radio, destabilizing patters of gunfire and the sonic boom of a 'show of force' military flyover that had nearly the same fetal-position effect on the theater audience as it did the characters. With the exception of a first scene observing the soldiers raucously dancing to the erotic music video for Eric Prydz's Call On Me – underscoring just how young they are, how much pressure must be released – the movie proceeds in more or less real time. Ninety-ish minutes at a house the soldiers picked because one said 'I like it', at first tracking and then fighting nameless insurgents, with dialogue primarily in undiluted military jargon.
At every turn, Warfare resists the conventions of a typical war picture, especially for the small handful of films dealing directly with the aftermath of 9/11. From Black Hawk Down to Zero Dark Thirty, even the most technically proficient and subtly critical films boast a certain Hollywood sheen, with clear acts, story structure and legible characters for viewers to latch on to (and if not an outright satire a la Three Kings, an obligatory baseline reverence for the US military). Warfare does cast a slew of good-looking actors on the rise, including Charles Melton, Kit Connor, Joseph Quinn, Cosmo Jarvis, Noah Centineo, Will Poulter and Reservation Dogs' D'Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai as Mendoza. But clad in camo and wraparound goggles, caked in dirt and blood, waiting in indecipherable roles or whirring in annihilating chaos, they are largely indistinguishable from the group. No backstories, no side plots, little banter. The main character is the unit itself.
But perhaps what is most striking about Warfare is not its adroit simulacra of battle, but its commitment to uncinematic truth: war is hell, and also a lot of waiting around. Nearly half the movie proceeds before the firefight, the camera lingering in the dull, paranoia-inducing fact that there isn't much to talk about when something could go wrong at any minute. When it does – a grenade tossed through a window from an unseen insurgent – it is almost comically understated, though no less deadly. The violence is arhythmic, staccato outbursts of deafening noise. But once a soldier is gravely injured, Garland and Mendoza do not provide a reprieve from the agonized screaming.
This is not Garland's first attempt at a hyper-realistic, anti-war war film. Civil War, released last year with Mendoza as a military consultant, imagined a fictional future civil conflict in the US with same detached, cool-headed commitment to realism, through the eyes of neutral military journalists trying to record the facts themselves. The film marked an achievement in unrelenting sound design and immersive combat cinema, but was undercut by a strange incuriosity as to the politics and partisan divide that would lead to war in the first place.
Warfare suffers no such blurriness, though no explicit political dogma. It doesn't need to – by adhering strictly to memory, thus acknowledging the limitations therein, Warfare circumvents the expectation of message that dogs the handful of films forming the 'war on terror' canon. The vast majority of these, even Kathryn Bigelow's Oscar-winning The Hurt Locker, imbued some moral ambiguity into the conflict, though focused primarily on the haunting effects of war on its American participants, and made little at the box office. Only American Sniper, Clint Eastwood's 2014 film on the real-life sniper Chris Kyle, was a genuine hit, grossing $547m; not coincidentally, it pitted Good Americans v Bad Terrorists, any shades of grey subsumed by belief in the justness of the war.
I could imagine these critiques while watching Warfare – that to focus on the US military is to inherently glorify it, that Garland and Mendoza hewing so close to the soldiers as to leave the forcibly displaced family, cowering in fear in a single bedroom under threat of a US gun, provides too limited a picture. But that would underestimate an audience's ability to read between the lines. The fact that some of the soldiers forgot the family was even there, the fact that the Iraqi scouts were forced to evacuate first and thus died, that the family was left behind in wreckage without a word, says volumes about the entire ethos of the conflict. I cannot imagine walking away from this exquisitely rendered, fastidious account of modern warfare with an impression other than that the American invasion was an incomprehensibly costly exercise in needless violence and futility.
The fact that Warfare pins its frame on the statement of memory – that this is what happened, unvarnished, these were the patterns and the suffering – is itself instructive to an American public with fewer and fewer direct ties to its military. There's an educational undercurrent to the enterprise, a tacit understanding that most Americans know very little about the war outside of media portrayals, if they know anything at all. Less than 1% of the US population served in the armed forces during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, compared with roughly 10% in the second world war – not a value judgment, but a fact on personal connection. The US government was at constant war for 15 years; the vast majority of the US public was not. My understanding of the ethics and justification (or extreme lack thereof) of the invasions that began in my childhood have shifted and clarified with age, yet it was still cathartic – in a horrifying, skin-shedding way – to see a recreation, to feel closer to understanding the experience of many veterans increasingly alienated and disillusioned by the US government, disproportionately pulled to extremism.
That Warfare does not introduce the other side, that the Iraqi family and scouts are even blanker to us than the soldiers, feels both unfair and refreshingly honest – acknowledgement of a failure of imagination on a grand and horrifying scale, and of the brain-shredding effects of combat on the personal level. The film ends with a jarring concession to convention and internet curiosity, presenting side-by-side photos of the real SEALs with the actors. But before that, it visits, just briefly, the scene the soldiers just left – Iraqi insurgents appear on the streets as the tanks roll out; the family takes in the shattered remnants of their home. It could feel tossed-off, insufficient, but I read it as a tantalizing possibility – what would their perspective look like in real time? There are other stories not within Garland and Mendoza's scope that we, too, should know – if only Hollywood would let someone tell them.
Warfare is out in US cinemas now and in the UK on 18 April
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Live
23 minutes ago
- North Wales Live
The American diner serving burgers bigger than Llandudno's Great Orme
Towering high above Llandudno, the Great Orme, occupies one of North Wales most spectacular sites and views. I was hoping to find a similar rugged, foreboding pinnacle on Gloddaeth Street in Llandudno, as someone had told me that Dinos, served mountains of meat, which were just as difficult to conquer? Dinos Llandudno is a big and brash American diner and takeaway, which offers deluxe burgers bigger than your head. So, if your eyes are bigger than your stomach, then this could be the place for you. Dinos ranks high in the Trip Advisor ratings, but surprisingly has no American stars and stripe's theme with the inside décor. Instead, it is simply decorated with basic turquoise and pink walls. Despite its central location, the venue was relatively quiet when we visited. Dinos is obviously burger barmy but the saliva-inducing menu has various other options from across the pond such as chicken wings, shakes and pizza. There are lots of turkey rashers and barbeque sauce on the menu as you might expect, with toppings drawing largely on American Ranch influences, with enough cheese to sink a ship. Every type of burger is listed here. From, simple American style burgers with gherkins and American mustard for £11, to a massive Welsh dragon burger, food challenge, which involves two x 16oz Welsh lamb burgers and enough chili sauce to blow your socks off for £34. There were about twenty-three burgers listed on the menu, with all kinds of strange names such 'Heart Attack' 'Angry Bird' 'King Kong' or the patriotic 'Snowdon Mountain' burger. There were charcoal cooked chicken burgers such as the 'Bob Marley' burger or Cajun spiced and even a tandoori version. Although, I still think they were missing a trick by not having a 'Great Orme' burger. When it comes to burgers, there are some who think, less is more, and even though I didn't see any 'Smash Burgers' on the list? I did notice that there were a couple of Welsh Lamb burgers, which didn't include any sauces or cheese, so that you could get the full taste of the meat. The pizza list was just as big with over twenty-four choices such as 'Cajun sizzler' 'Hot Mexico' or 'Spicy Italian', all fairly self-explanatory with their ingredients. Grilled meals included various versions of chicken and there were a few healthy salads on offer for people who were counting the calories. I decided to leave the diet until tomorrow and went for the 'King Burger', which was an 8oz cheese burger with Parmesan cheese and a Caesar dressing. We were told by the waitress that we could add a meal deal, which meant French fries or Potato Wedges with a can of pop for £5 extra or you could add a fresh milkshake and your choice of fries or wedges for £7 extra. I couldn't resist and it was good to have an attentive service from a waitress, who didn't judge us for our guilty food choices. The burger was a plump, well- shaped pillow and the seeded bun was sturdy enough not to fall apart in my hands. There were three extra crunchy onion rings placed on the top of a skewer, which was delicately holding the whole thing together. The burger was smoothed in cheese with a primal, charred exterior but was soft and succulent inside. My wife went for her cheese burger to be concealed in a wrap. The results were surprisingly different and delicious, with her version tasting a bit like a big juicy burger kebab. The burger was cut into half and squeezed into the wrap with some salad and a burger sauce. The fries were presented in a mini chip pan fryer and were very morish indeed. The milkshake section was also extra-large and included all the usual suspects along with flavours such as Kinder Bueno, Peanut Butter, Oreo and Nutella. I completed my American dream with a thick and delicious snickers version, which tasted like caramel, peanut butter and chocolate at the same time. Desserts included USA inspired things like New Yorker Cheesecake, Chocolate Fudge Cake or Cookie Dough ice cream. We also saw a fine-looking Chocolate Pizza, which I am sure the kids would enjoy. Talking of big kids, I was still slurping my thick milkshake, topped with a flake, long after the burger had been digested whilst my more sensible wife sipped her simple Americano. Dinos food is also available for takeaway via the just eat app, and there is just as much choice on there, including melting meatballs, dirty fries, and various chicken bites, nuggets and strips. We decided to walk off our burgers with a stroll along the prom and the pier and by vowing not to eat again for at least 24 hours. Dinos Llandudno offers an American dining experience that keeps customers coming back for more. How can you resist a big plate of delicious carbs and sugar? If you like American classics, such as sloppy burgers, loaded fries and pizzas bigger than a dustbin lid, then you certainly won't be disappointed eating at Dinos. The Facts King Burger £11.00 (Milkshake meal deal) £7 Flake 50p Cheese Burger wrap £11.00 Americano £3.00 Total £32.50 Opening Times: Monday\u00094pm–9:30 pm Tuesday\u0009Closed Wednesday\u00094pm–9:30 pm Thursday\u00094pm–9:30 pm Friday. 4pm–10 pm Saturday\u000912pm–10 pm Sunday\u00094pm–9:30 pm Atmosphere- Despite its central location, the venue was relatively quiet. Car Parking- Some limited street parking nearby. Disabled Access- Some steps into venue and toilet. Plenty of room inside. Service- Attentive service from a waitress who didn't judge us on our guilty food choices. Overall- The American diner serving burgers bigger than the Great Orme, Llandudno. Dinos Llandudno 5 Gloddaeth Street , Llandudno, LL30 2DD


STV News
7 hours ago
- STV News
Alan Cumming to receive honorary degree from University of St Andrews
Actor Alan Cumming is to receive an honorary degree from the University of St Andrews during a week of graduations for students from almost 90 countries. More than 2,200 students will gather at the University of St Andrews from June 30 for summer graduation ceremonies. Graduates from 88 different countries, including Canada, Australia and Nepal will receive their awards in the Younger Hall from June 30 to July 4. The graduation ceremony season will include nine 'distinguished individuals' honoured for their contributions to sport, politics, science, medicine and the arts. Marvel actor and The Traitors US presenter Alan Cumming will receive an honorary degree on Thursday July 3, while BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner will be presented with one on Friday July 4. Sustainability campaigner Sara Parkin and US golfer Judy Rankin will also receive the accolade during the week. Also recognised will be Russian-American scientist Eugene Koonin and political theorist and feminist writer Professor Cynthia Enloe. There is one ceremony on June 30 at 2pm, while the other ceremonies will occur twice in one day. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Watch the moment Love Island feud explodes as Toni slams horrified rival in sweary rant
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) IN a teaser clip for tonight's episode, American Islander Toni could be seen exploding into a sweary rant. Things are set to get tense in the Love Island villa as Toni and Emily clash. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 3 Toni exploded when ranting about Emily Credit: ITV 3 Emily clocked the tension Credit: ITV Toni seemingly accuses Emily of being nosey, with the two women going head to head. "There's a storm brewing between Emily and Toni," the Love Island Instagram page penned alongside the teaser clip. They explained further: "Harry pulls Shakira and says he wants to start spending more time with her, plus Emily catches a scent of tension after Toni calls her nosey." In the clip, Toni can be seen chatting to Meg saying: "I can't listen to her. 'Little Miss Sunshine' all the time." It then cut to Toni doing her makeup with Emily in the same room. Emily asked Toni how she was and she told her that she was in a "bad mood". Speaking to Meg and some of the other girls, Emily said she wanted to have chat with Toni. BOMBSHELL RIVALS Meg then warned her about what Toni had said earlier. Toni then said "Emily's just f**king nosey," in a clip that didn't show who she was saying it to. Reacting to the clip, one person said: "Emily is sweet but I agree with toni it can be too much sweetness sometimes." Love Island first look: Are Harry and Shakira back on the cards? "Toni has not been wrong yet……TEAM TONE," said another. A third agreed: "Toni is so right about emily bc she joined that mean girl trio of the megans and helena so quickly to pick on yasmin." "Emily latched on mean girls just be part of it. Go. Toni," added a fourth. But some other fans disagreed. "Starting to not like Toni," penned one. "Knew Toni was a mean girl," added a second. "Pure jealousy from Toni, no bad vibes from Emily, one of the kindest, most genuine girls around," declared a third. TONI'S NIP SLIP This comes after Toni suffered a rather awkward wardrobe blunder. Showing off to her fellow Islanders during Thursday night's episode, the American beauty, 24, did a handstand into a cartwheel as her boob fell out of her bikini. Toni did the flexible act while donning a skimpy bathing suit, which would later have consequences. As she did the move, her boob seemingly fell out of her swimsuit. The wardrobe blunder left her co-stars in hysterics, with one of the hunks begging her to cover up quickly. Dejon was shouting: "Tone, the boob is out," repeatedly, as she failed to pay attention.