European Ministers Set For Nuclear Talks With Iranians This Week
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The foreign ministers of Germany, France, and Britain plan to speak with their Iranian counterparts later this week with a goal to sit down on Friday in Geneva, according to Reuters, who cited a German diplomatic source.
Newsweek reached out to the French Embassy to the United States, the German Federal Foreign Office, the British Foreign Ministry, and the European Union External Action Office by email Wednesday for comment.
Why It Matters
Israel last week struck Iran with a wave of airstrikes, which it described as a "preemptive" offensive based on "high-quality intelligence" that Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon.
The strikes hit a variety of Iranian targets, including military personnel and nuclear scientists, in what Israeli leadership has called "Operation Rising Lion." Iran quickly retaliated, setting off six days of exchanges that has left Iran and Israel bloodied.
Israel's strikes have killed at least 585 people in Iran - including 239 civilians - and wounded another 1,300, according to a human rights group that has long tracked the country, Washington-based Human Rights Activists.
Iran's government has not offered overall casualty figures. Israel has said 24 people have been killed since Friday and 500 more have been wounded, according to Israeli officials.
Israel has also attacked Iran's state-run television network and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu refused to rule out killing Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Both developments further fueled concerns among those on the left and the right that Israel is aiming for regime change in Iran, a charge Netanyahu has denied, though he's said Israel would welcome a collapse.
A view of the ruins in Bnei Brak on June 17, 2025, where an Iranian ballistic missile landed Monday. INSET: German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul gives a press conference with his Jordanian counterpart (not in...
A view of the ruins in Bnei Brak on June 17, 2025, where an Iranian ballistic missile landed Monday. INSET: German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul gives a press conference with his Jordanian counterpart (not in picture) at the Foreign Office in Berlin on June 18, 2025. More
Dima Vazinovich / Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images // John MacDougall/ AFP via Getty Images
What To Know
The meeting will follow another planned meeting with the European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas at the German permanent mission in Geneva.
The source said the talks are not happening in a vacuum but will take place in coordination with the United States with the goal of convincing the Iranians to provide concrete guarantees that the regime will only seek "civilian purposes" for its nuclear energy program.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz earlier this week said the Israeli attacks on Iran had significantly weakened Iranian leadership and may have undermined any chance to regain its former strength, leaving the country's future "uncertain."
Merz had also underscored his nation's commitment to a diplomatic solution even as the conflict between Israel and Iran continues to escalate, saying: "If a new situation were to arise, we would again be prepared to provide diplomatic assistance, as we were until last Thursday."
German Foreign Minister Johan Wadephul also appealed to Iranian leadership to end the conflict and assure that Tehran will not seek nuclear weapons, saying that it's "never too late to come to the negotiating table."
Brad McGurk, a former Middle East & North Africa coordinator for the National Security Council, told CNN's Anderson Cooper that he has "low expectations" that the meeting between European and Iranian officials will produce a result, but he urged Iran's leadership to find a "diplomatic offramp" for the conflict.
What People Are Saying
President Trump to reporters on Wednesday in part: "Maybe we won't have to fight. I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between fighting and them having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do."
He added that had "ideas" about what to do regarding Iran, saying: "I like to make the final decision one second before it's due ... Things change with war."
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a national address in part: "We warn America of the consequences of engaging in war, because it will suffer severe damage if it decides to do so. War is met with war, bombing with bombing, and strike with strike."
What Happens Next
Trump has indicated he is weighing potential U.S. involvement in the conflict, to which Iranian officials have pledged retaliation. Meanwhile, Russia has warned the U.S. against getting involved at the risk of prompting a wider regional conflict.
This article includes reporting by The Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Iran rulers' playing for time is one big reason Trump shouldn't give them any
Hmm: Hours after the world learned that President Donald Trump would take 'up to two weeks' to decide whether to send in US warplanes to drop bunker-busters on Fordow, Tehran's last main nuclear site, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi vomited up some fresh bluster. That makes it obvious the regime intends to just string this out for as long as possible, hoping that Europe and/or Congress will somehow get Trump to tell Israel to stop its campaign. Which means the president needs to pay even more heed to the risks of holding off on a decisive intervention. That includes not just the possible loss of public support that's built over the last week, but the chance that some unforeseen development will raise the stakes beyond a straightforward strike on a single nuke site. To be clear, Trump can still hope for a negotiated end to Iran's nuclear program, but Araqchi's ploy reeks of the same bogus game that Hamas has been playing ever since the end of the Gaza ceasefire the prez imposed as he was taking office. A game the Iranian was plainly pushing as he met Friday in Geneva with a passel of European diplos trying to 'de-escalate' the conflict. Meanwhile, some in Congress are maneuvering to tie Trump's hands, insisting he shouldn't act without votes in the House and Sente explicitly authorizing any strikes — a precedent that would likely permanently limit not just this president, but all future holders of the Oval Office. For what it's worth, Trump plainly isn't holding off only because the ayatollah might see reason: He's also considering the full impact of a US strike, and seeing what else may develop. For example: Maybe Israel can take out Fordow without our help, whether with repeated waves of smaller bombs or (conceivably) the most ambitious commando raid ever. He's reportedly also worried about Iran descending into total chaos, as Libya did after President Barack Obama arrogantly decided he could show the world how 'regime change' should be done. Yet that raises another angle that argues against Trump taking his time: Israel's ongoing total humiliation of the Islamic Republic's rulers (and its killing of many of them) could trigger a Libya-style 'regime collapse' even without a Fordow takeout. So a fast elimination of all Tehran's nuclear assets, allowing Israel to stand down, is arguably the best hope for the region to stabilize. Khamenei and his advisers care only about protecting their own power, so they'll use every hour Trump gives them searching for some way out of the trap they put themselves in by ignoring Trump's last deadline. Trump has to look at the bigger picture, including the risks (seen and unseen) of letting Tehran keep playing games.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Proud Boys Say Trump Will Lose Their Support If He Goes To War With Iran
Turns out, there's a line the Proud Boys say they won't cross for President Donald Trump. The extremist group said on social media this week that it wouldn't be able to support the president if the U.S. were to become involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran. 'If the United States gets directly involved in the Israel-Iran conflict, the voters that voted for Trump because there was a hope that Trump was America First can no longer support Trump,' the Proud Boys account posted to Telegram on Wednesday. 'America First does not mean war for Israel. Donald Trump, focus on the health of our nation, period. We are crumbling. We are crippled with debt with no plan for a solution. Be the President you ran as.' Trump has approved attack plans for Iran but is withholding a final order to join Israel in the strikes, The Wall Street Journal reported first this week. We were made for this moment. HuffPost will aggressively, fairly and honestly cover the Trump administration. But we need your help. . The president said Thursday that he would have a decision within two weeks on whether the American military will directly attack Iran after Israel issued strikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites. Trump claimed his decision would be based on whether negotiations with Iran over the 'near future' of its nuclear program would occur. Historically, the Proud Boys have been among some of Trump's most fervent supporters. Many members endlessly promoted or repeated Trump's lies about the 2020 election being rigged, and some members carried banners bearing his name during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Trump was asked on the presidential debate stage in 2020 if he would condemn white supremacists and, in particular, Proud Boys after a summer of clashes and violence involving the group. Trump instead told Proud Boys to 'stand back and stand by.' Trump's hawkish stance toward Iran has opened a schism among some conservatives. Even some of Trump's most vocal advocates, including former Fox News mouthpiece Tucker Carlson, have suggested that Trump and the United States at large were complicit in Israel's attacks on Iran. 'Years of funding and sending weapons to Israel, which Donald Trump just bragged about on Truth Social, undeniably place the U.S. at the center of last night's events,' Carlson wrote in a newsletter last week. Trump has said he isn't 'looking to fight.' 'But if it's a choice between fighting and them having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do,' he said from the Oval Office on Wednesday, the same day the Proud Boys put out their warning on Telegram. The Proud Boys' opposition to American involvement in foreign war isn't a concept outside of their wheelhouse: Members consider themselves ultra-nationalist, so-called 'western chauvinists' who believe it is their responsibility to preserve 'western' values. As noted by the Anti-Defamation League, the group has long embraced ideologies that reject women, immigrants and members of the LGBTQ+ community, often aligning itself with white nationalist values. This emphasis on the preservation of 'traditional' American values and a rejection of the 'Deep State' often returns to criticism of the military industrial complex. Many Proud Boys are also veterans; nearly all of the Proud Boys who were charged and convicted of seditiously conspiring to stop the certification of the 2020 election when attacking the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, served in the military except for the group's leader, Henry 'Enrique' Tarrio. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday. Trump Escalates His Feud With Tucker Carlson Over Israel And Iran Israeli Strikes On Iran Have Killed At Least 639 People, Rights Group Says Proud Boys' $100 Million Lawsuit Puts Trump In A Lose-Lose Position
32 minutes ago
No major breakthroughs in Geneva as Iran FM signals open to discussions
Officials from the United Kingdom, Germany and France said there were no major breakthroughs in the talks with the Iranian foreign minister in Geneva Friday.
