E-books Access: Libraries cutting back on staff, services after Trump's order to dismantle small agency, ETHRWorld
Advt
Advt
Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis.
Download ETHRWorld App Get Realtime updates
Save your favourite articles
Scan to download App
Libraries across the United States are cutting back on e-books, audiobooks and loan programmes after the Trump administration suspended millions of dollars in federal grants as it tries to dissolve the Institute of Museum and Library Services. Federal judges have issued temporary orders to block the Trump administration from taking any further steps toward gutting the agency.But the unexpected slashing of grants has delivered a significant blow to many libraries, which are reshuffling budgets and looking at different ways to raise money.Maine has laid off a fifth of its staff and temporarily closed its state library after not receiving the remainder of its annual funding. Libraries in Mississippi have indefinitely stopped offering a popular e-book service, and the South Dakota state library has suspended its interlibrary loan program.E-book and audiobook programmes are especially vulnerable to budget cuts, even though those offerings have exploded in popularity since the COVID-19 pandemic."I think everyone should know the cost of providing digital sources is too expensive for most libraries," said Cindy Hohl, president of the American Library Association . "It's a continuous and growing need."Library officials caught off guard by Trump's cutsPresident Donald Trump issued an executive order March 14 to dismantle the IMLS before firing nearly all of its employees.One month later, the Maine State Library announced it was issuing layoff notices for workers funded through an IMLS grant programme."It came as quite a surprise to all of us," said Spencer Davis, a library generalist at the Maine State Library who is one of eight employees who were laid off May 8 because of the suspended funding.In April, California, Washington and Connecticut were the only three states to receive letters stating the remainder of their funding for the year was cancelled, Hohl said. For others, the money hasn't been distributed yet. The three states all filed formal objections with the IMLS.Rebecca Wendt, California state library director, said she was never told why California's funding was terminated while the other remaining states did not receive the same notice."We are mystified," Wendt said.The agency did not respond to an email seeking comment.Popular digital offerings on the chopping blockMost libraries are funded by city and county governments, but receive a smaller portion of their budget from their state libraries, which receive federal dollars every year to help pay for summer reading programs, interlibrary loan services and digital books. Libraries in rural areas rely on federal grants more than those in cities.Many states use the funding to pay for e-books and audiobooks, which are increasingly popular, and costly, offerings. In 2023, more than 660 million people globally borrowed e-books, audiobooks and digital magazines, up from 19 per cent in 2022, according to OverDrive, the main distributor of digital content for libraries and schools.In Mississippi, the state library helped fund its statewide e-book programme.For a few days, Erin Busbea was the bearer of bad news for readers at her Mississippi library: Hoopla, a popular app to check out e-books and audiobooks had been suspended indefinitely in Lowndes and DeSoto counties due to the funding freeze."People have been calling and asking, Why can't I access my books on Hoopla?'" said Busbea, library director of the Columbus-Lowndes Public Library System in Columbus, a majority-Black city northeast of Jackson.The library system also had to pause parts of its interlibrary loan system allowing readers to borrow books from other states when they aren't available locally."For most libraries that were using federal dollars, they had to curtail those activities," said Hulen Bivins, the Mississippi Library Commission executive director.States are fighting the funding freezeThe funding freeze came after the agency's roughly 70 staff members were placed on administrative leave in March.Attorneys general in 21 states and the American Library Association have filed lawsuits against the Trump administration for seeking to dismantle the agency.The institute's annual budget is below USD 300 million and distributes less than half of that to state libraries across the country. In California, the state library was notified that about 20 per cent, or USD 3 million, of its USD 15 million grant had been terminated."The small library systems are not able to pay for the e-books themselves," said Wendt, the California state librarian.In South Dakota, the state's interlibrary loan programme is on hold, according to Nancy Van Der Weide, a spokesperson for the South Dakota Department of Education.The institute, founded in 1996 by a Republican-controlled Congress, also supports a national library training programme named after former first lady Laura Bush that seeks to recruit and train librarians from diverse or underrepresented backgrounds. A spokesperson for Bush did not return a request seeking comment."Library funding is never robust. It's always a point of discussion. It's always something you need to advocate for," said Liz Doucett, library director at Curtis Memorial Library in Brunswick, Maine. "It's adding to just general anxiety."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Midnight Hammer' to Strait of Hormuz: 10 new developments after US bombs Iran's nuclear facilities
Tensions between the United States, Iran, and Israel escalated dramatically on Sunday after US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, which President Donald Trump claimed had 'completely and fully obliterated' key sites. The attacks have triggered a deadly wave of retaliatory strikes, international condemnation, and fears of a wider regional war. On Saturday night, US President Donald Trump confirmed that the US military had struck three of Iran's nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Trump declared the facilities 'completely and fully obliterated." Senior Pentagon officials on Sunday detailed a highly secretive and coordinated military operation against Iran, calling it a demonstration of American air and naval power at its most effective. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, both spoke publicly, though neither could confirm whether Iran retained the ability to produce a nuclear weapon. Hegseth reiterated President Trump's claim from the previous night that the nuclear sites had been 'obliterated.' General Caine did not. Caine said a final battle damage assessment was still pending, but initial reports indicated that all three targeted Iranian nuclear sites had sustained 'severe damage and destruction.' A US official has confirmed that B-2 bombers flew non-stop for 37 hours from Missouri to carry out the strikes. The global nuclear watchdog, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has said that there has been 'no radiation leak' from any nuclear facility in Pakistan after the escalated military engagement with India. The Vienna-based global nuclear watchdog's reply, to a query from The Indian Express, ties in with the earlier response by the Indian Air Force that India has not hit any target in Pakistan's Kirana Hills, which is reported to house some nuclear installations. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced on Sunday that he will travel to Moscow later in the day to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday morning. In a post on X, Araghchi condemned the United States, accusing it of a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law, and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) by attacking Iran's nuclear facilities. A representative of Iran's Supreme Leader said it is now Iran's turn to respond. He called for missile strikes on US naval forces in Bahrain and closure of the Strait of Hormuz to Western vessels. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned, 'They crossed a very big red line… We have to respond based on our legitimate right for self-defence." Several areas in central and northern Israel, including Nes Ziona, Rishon Lezion, Haifa, and a neighbourhood in Tel Aviv, were struck by Iranian missiles, according to Israeli state media and Fars News Agency. Videos show significant destruction in Tel Aviv. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps warned the US to 'expect regrettable responses' in response to its strikes on Tehran's nuclear sites, state TV reported. Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump, calling the strike 'a pivot of history.' UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned of 'a dangerous escalation,' and Pakistan condemned the US strike. Oman, previously mediating talks, called the attack a 'serious violation of international law. Iran's ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, has also called for an emergency Security Council meeting. In a letter to the UN, he described the US strikes as 'heinous attacks and illegal use of force.' Russia has "strongly condemned" bombings, calling the attacks "irresponsible" and a "gross violation of international law". Iran's Parliament has approved the closing of the Strait of Hormuz, though the final decision will be taken by the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's Press TV reported. The Strait is in the territorial waters of Iran and Oman, and accounts for a big bulk of the world's oil trade. Iran has in the past threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz on multiple occasions, but has never actually done it. The heightened risk of the closure is bound to raise concerns globally, including in India, particularly with regard to oil and gas supply security, and could lead to a jump in energy prices. India is the world's third-largest consumer of crude oil and depends on imports to meet over 85 per cent of its requirement. Israel closed its airspace as a precaution after the US strikes, though land crossings into Egypt and Jordan remain open, according to the Israel Airports Authority. Trump, speaking Sunday, said no military 'could have done what the US military has done.' He warned Iran of 'far greater' future attacks if it does not choose peace. 'There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran,' he said, adding that he acted 'as a team' with Netanyahu. The 'bunker buster' MOP is designed to attack 'deeply-buried facilities and hardened bunkers and tunnels' and is meant to destroy targets in well-protected facilities. Israel, or any country other than the US, does not have any non-nuclear weapon systems that can penetrate a site as deep as Fordow. A never-before-used American bomb — the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP — which is extremely heavy and can only be dropped using the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber aircraft of the US Air Force was used for the bombing. The latest strike seems to have achieved that target, even though the extent of damage at Fordow is still under speculation, primarily because of the depth of the enrichment site.
India.com
35 minutes ago
- India.com
Why Netanyahu Thanked Donald Trump in English After US Bombed Irans Nuclear Facilities?
New Delhi: On Sunday morning, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the nation not in Hebrew but in English. The unusual choice was not accidental. His message was meant for more than just Israelis. Netanyahu was delivering an update on the latest developments in the conflict between Israel and Iran. And during that address, he praised U.S. President Donald Trump for authorising the bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. There was a noticeable sense of triumph in Netanyahu's voice. A faint smile lingered on his face. And perhaps it was fitting. He has spent much of his political life warning the world that Iran poses an existential threat to Israel. For over 15 years, he has lobbied U.S. presidents, diplomats and defense chiefs to consider military action as the only real answer to Iran's nuclear ambitions. Now, he stood before cameras as American B-2 bombers struck Iranian facilities. And he called Trump's decision 'historic' and 'bold'. He may as well have congratulated himself. After all, Netanyahu had managed to shift the stance of Trump, who had long campaigned against foreign military entanglements and whose conservative voter base had shown little enthusiasm for any war involving Israel. This moment did not arrive without internal resistance. U.S. intelligence agencies had long questioned Israel's claim that Iran was racing toward a nuclear bomb. They had not seen concrete evidence that Tehran had made that decision. And yet, despite these doubts, American warplanes were now targeting Iranian facilities. From the beginning of this conflict, now entering its second week, Israeli officials repeatedly insisted that they could handle Iran alone. But behind closed doors, it was clear that only American weaponry could breach the kind of hardened underground bunkers where Iran had placed its key nuclear assets. Especially in Fordow, the site buried deep within a mountain. If the sites bombed on June 22 morning are truly out of commission, Netanyahu will feel he has reached a turning point. For him, this may be the closest moment yet to declaring victory in a long battle. However, Iran claims it had already removed its nuclear material from the sites before the strikes. That claim will be hard to verify anytime soon. Without U.S. involvement, Israel would have continued chipping away at targets across Iran, its military leaders, nuclear scientists, infrastructure and enrichment sites. But there was never going to be a moment of closure. Unless, perhaps, regime change happened in Tehran. 'America Will Hit Back With Full Force' The B-2 jets may have changed the shape of this conflict. But whether this becomes an ending or a deeper escalation now depends on Iran and its allies. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had warned last week that any U.S. involvement would trigger retaliation. 'Americans must understand that any interference by their forces will lead to irreparable damage,' he said. His words may soon be tested. On June 21, Yemen's Houthi rebels, staunch allies of Tehran, threatened to attack U.S. vessels in the Red Sea if Washington escalated its role in the war. With that, U.S. troops, embassies and civilians across the Middle East could all become potential targets. Iran has a variety of options. It could strike U.S. bases in the Gulf. It could disrupt oil shipping routes – spiking global fuel prices. Or it could activate proxy groups across Syria, Lebanon, Iraq or beyond. The United States, for now, says its military operation is over. There is no appetite in Washington for toppling the Iranian government. That message could be a quiet invitation for Iran to keep its response limited. Tehran might choose symbolic retaliation – strikes that send a message without triggering a full-scale war. That is how Iran responded back in 2020, when Trump ordered the killing of General Qassem Soleimani. Iran launched a barrage of missiles at U.S. bases, but casualties were minimal. Still, on June 21 night, Trump issued a fresh warning, saying any retaliation from Iran would be met with overwhelming force. And now, on June 22 morning, the Middle East holds its breath – wondering whether this was the beginning of a resolution, or just the calm before a more devastating storm.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump held off giving final go-ahead to attack Iran until Saturday, seeking two weeks time was diversion
Trump could have called off the Operation Midnight Hammer but he chose to go ahead with it. Inside reports claimed that though the planes, part of the Operation Midnight Hammer started moving Friday midnight, President Donald Trump held off giving a final go-ahead until Saturday. On Friday evening, he hosted OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman at an event -- exactly 24 hours before he launched the controversial attack on Iran and claimed that all three nuclear plants in Fordown, Natanz and Isfahan have been destroyed. Trump retained the ability to call off the strikes 'until the very last minute' Vice President JD Vance said Trump retained the ability top call off the strikes "until the very last minute" but he chose to go ahead. The administration officers, CNN reported, went to great lengths to conceal their planning. The announcement that he will take two weeks time to decide on whether to join Israel in attacking Iran was a diversion tactic, insiders said. By the end of the week, US officials came to believe that Iran was not ready for negotiations. 'This is a plan that took months and weeks of positioning and preparation so that we could be ready when the president of the United States called,' Hegseth said alongside Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Вот что поза во сне говорит о вашем характере! Удивительные Новости Undo Dan Caine. 'It took a great deal of precision. It involved misdirection and the highest of operational security.' 'Only if bunker buster bombs can destroy nuclear plants' In his back-to-back high-level meetings in the Situation Room, Trump asked his aides to ensure that the bunker buster bombs were guaranteed to destroy the nuclear plants. Since the bunker-busters had never been deployed before, the officials were not certain about whether they could completely destroy the plants. The Pentagon claimed that the initial assessment showed "extremely severe damage and destruction" to Iran's three nuclear sites though he said it will take time to determine the ultimate impact. Vice President JD Vance said the US is not in a war with Iran. 'I think the president has been very clear that we are not interested in protracted conflicts in the Middle East,' Vance told ABC News' 'This Week' in an interview that aired on Sunday. 'But there's a question about how do you achieve peace? And we believe the way that you achieve peace is through strength,' Vance added, addressing a question about Trump supporters who are uneasy with the intervention. 'The president, more than anybody, is worried about protracted military conflicts. That is not what we're getting ourselves involved in,' Vance said.
