Gerry Adams' defamation case against BBC a 'cynical attempt to launder' his reputation, court told
Gerry Adams' defamation case against the BBC is a cynical attempt to launder a reputation he was in the Provisional IRA, and sat on its army counsel, a barrister has told the High Court.
Paul Gallagher SC, for the BBC, made the remarks in his closing address to the jury in the former Sinn Féin leader's action.
Mr Adams claims a BBC Spotlight programme and a related article published in 2016 defamed him by falsely accusing him of sanctioning British agent Denis Donaldson's killing at a cottage in Glenties, Co Donegal, in 2006.
Mr Adams' lawyers argue his reputation is that of a 'peacemaker', and the allegation represents an 'unjustified attack' on his reputation. He insists he had no involvement with the death, for which dissident republicans claimed responsibility in 2009.
The BBC denies it defamed Mr Adams.
Mr Gallagher on Thursday told the jury the case was about Mr Adams's reputation, to be considered in deciding if the BBC acted fairly and reasonably in publishing the allegation, and — if the jury finds Mr Adams' was defamed — assessing damages to be awarded.
The BBC argues the publication was fair and reasonable and in the public interest, a defence against a defamation action outlined in the Defamation Act 2009. This defence falls under a constitutional protection of free speech — the jury's decision may have consequences for freedom of expression, Mr Gallagher said.
The broadcaster also says the Spotlight programme and related article did not mean the BBC said Mr Adams was responsible for sanctioning the murder of Mr Donaldson, that the claim was presented as an allegation.
Mr Gallagher said the case was a cynical attempt by Mr Adams to "launder" his reputation.
Counsel said Mr Adams was attempting to say his reputation is different to what he effectively acknowledged in evidence, that people have repeatedly said he was a member of the IRA and its army council.
"You don't have to decide if he was in that position, this is about reputation," he said.
Mr Gallagher said if you have a reputation of being in the IRA and on its army council — as, he said, Mr Adams does — that is the reputation you have. 'It's not just a label, it is a reality,' he said.
'Somebody can't shed that reputation and come into court and give evidence suggesting that it's not there, and present a picture of events that just ignores that reality,' he said.
Mr Gallagher said the statements in the Spotlight programme were presented as an allegation, and should not be taken to mean — as Mr Adams pleads — that the BBC said he sanctioned the murder of Mr Donaldson. He said the words cannot be taken in isolation, but rather in the context of the programme.
He said there could not be a situation where people in the media were afraid to speak, because of the consequence of being sued.
Counsel said 'if we want the society that I believe all of us want', then we depend on the 'Jennifer O'Learys of the world' — referencing the journalist behind the programme — to have the courage and persistence to stand by what they have unearthed, and put before the public to form their own views.
Mr Gallagher reiterated Ms O'Leary's evidence she had multiple sources corroborating the allegation against Mr Adams. He said the defence's assertion it was based on a single sources was 'completely wrong'.
Mr Gallagher argued there was a strong public interest in the story. He said it was not a 'tittle-tattle story' of disputable public interest, and asked how the BBC could not have published the allegation.
He said the story was motivated by good faith. 'This was done not to make an allegation against somebody for the sake of it,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
32 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Omagh inquiry told pace of disclosure ‘must increase'
The speed of disclosure to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry 'must increase', counsel to the proceedings has said. The Omagh Bombing Inquiry, chaired by Andrew Turnbull, is hearing opening statements from core participants including representatives of bereaved families, victims, the PSNI, and the secretary of state for Northern Ireland. The Real IRA bomb in the County Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the British authorities. The opening statement section of the inquiry will take place over Monday and Tuesday. Earlier this year the inquiry heard personal statements from those affected by the massacre. Prior to the opening statements on Monday, Paul Greaney KC, counsel to the inquiry, told Mr Turnbull that the legal team had hoped that disclosure from relevant bodies would have been more advanced than it currently is. The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the British authorities. Here, Paul Greaney arrives at court. He further argued that there would be value in having at least one hearing to discuss progress of disclosure in September or October. 'The understandable consequence of the level of disclosure to core participants is that the opening statements of the bereaved families and survivors cannot be as detailed or evidence focused as they would have wished,' he said. Noting that the next stage of the inquiry will commence in March, he said: 'That gap of nine months between Chapter Two and Chapter Three is unfortunate, in our view.' He added: 'The simple fact is that the speed of disclosure to the inquiry by material providers must increase, and that is why we repeat the need for the state core participants and indeed all material providers to work at pace to fulfil the requirements of the inquiry and to ensure that the necessary resources, both human and financial, are dedicated to that work.' Mr Greaney noted that many documents exist only in hard copy and – even when held digitally – may take time to review and be disclosed. He offered three further general observations on proceedings. Mr Greaney stressed that the inquiry was not constrained by any other previous proceeding, investigation or review in its eventual findings. That comment came in advance of the written submission on behalf of Northern Ireland secretary Hilary Benn which contained a reference to the judicial review which led to the formation of the inquiry. 'Preventable' At that time, a judge accepted that four of 10 grounds under consideration gave rise to a plausible argument that the bombing was preventable. Addressing concerns raised by survivors and victims that relevant documentation will be declared 'missing', Mr Greaney said any such claim 'will be subject to the most intense scrutiny by the inquiry', including demands around information on the search efforts and expectations of material being recovered. He added that the inquiry would use its powers to ensure the fullest possible levels of disclosure. On the subject of candour, Mr Greaney said the inquiry expects openness and transparency from state core participants He said state core participants have not made any such concessions in their written opening statements and reminded them that they would be subject to scrutiny. Fiona Fee KC, for the Northern Ireland secretary, told the inquiry that 'a significant volume of work' has been undertaken in relation to inquiry disclosure. 'To explain the scope of the efforts, it's crucial to understand the extent of the materials involved,' she said. 'There is a vast volume of material which must be collated, carefully reviewed and provided to the inquiry. This process is not simply a matter of gathering readily available paperwork, it's an immense logistical undertaking requiring meticulous attention to detail, thorough analysis and a strategic, organised approach. Ms Fee said the Northern Ireland Secretary had offered sincere condolences to all those who had suffered as a result of the 'horrific terrorist atrocity' at Omagh. A number of organisations fall under the remit of the NI secretary as a core participant, including the UK Intelligence Community (UKIC), the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Northern Ireland Office (NIO), the Cabinet Office (CO) and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). Ms Fee said the scale of the work involved in seeking information on the 31 historic incidents identified by the inquiry is 'extraordinary'. She noted that there will be variations on what is disclosed across the Secretary of State grouping, adding that there will 'inevitably' be material that cannot be disclosed in open but will still be provided to the inquiry chairman. In particular, she said there will only be a 'very limited amount' that UKIC can say in open. However, Ms Fee said the intelligence sector was 'engaging meaningfully' with the inquiry and undergoing 'an extremely difficult disclosure' exercise. She added that the Secretary of State grouping is not in a position to make an assessment on whether any concession is appropriate as the overall disclosure process and evidential picture is at 'an early stage'. 'The available information would result in an incomplete picture, and the risk of error is significant,' she said.
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
'Trump's gamble risks all-out war': Irish and global newspapers react to the US bombing Iran
THE ESCALATING CONFLICT between Israel and Iran reached new heights over the weekend as the United States got involved in the war. The US struck three nuclear facilities with bunker-buster bombs on Saturday night, with president Donald Trump insisting the attack had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear capabilities, though other officials said it was too soon to determine the impact. All eyes are now on Iran to see how it will respond to the attack, after it warned over the weekend that the development would have 'everlasting consequences'. Newspapers in Ireland and abroad have been reacting to the US bombing Iran on their front pages this morning. The Irish Independent says 'Trump's gamble risks all-out war as Iran vows revenge', accompanied by a picture of the US President in a meeting in the White House's Situation Room on Saturday ahead of the imminent attack. Many of the other newspapers feature the same photograph on their front page. The Irish Times leads with the same picture on its front page with the headline 'Middle East on edge as US enters war with Iran'. Advertisement Meanwhile, The Herald's headline says Trump is 'taking the peace' by entering the conflict. The UK front pages are also dominated by the Middle East. A satellite image showing the impact of the US's bombs targeting Iran's underground uranium enrichment facility takes up a large part of The Times's front pages under the headline 'Iran vows revenge on US'. The Guardian also features Iran's vow of revenge against the US in its headline. The front page of the paper features an image of Trump announcing the airstrikes on Saturday while flanked by US vice president JD Vance, secretary of state Marco Rubio and defence secretary Pete Hegseth. 'Stop now' is The Mirror's headline, as it claims British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is leading calls for calm following the US's escalation. Scotland's Daily Record goes with a more chilling headline as it hints at the world being on the brink of war, claiming Trump has the 'whole world in his hands'. Related Reads 'There are many targets left': How Trump announced to the world that the US had bombed Iran Iran targets 30 sites in Israel after US nuclear site strikes, including international airport US bombs three nuclear sites in Iran, a major escalation in the war between Israel and Iran Meanwhile, newspapers in the US are also unsurprisingly leading with the conflict. The New York Times highlights the hypocrisy of the US's move in its headline, featuring the Pentagon's statement that the US strikes had inflicted 'severe damage' on Iran's facilities against its warning to Tehran not to strike back. The paper's front page also states that by entering the war, Trump is testing the unity of his coalition and runs the risk not only of miring the US deeper into the conflict, but also of splitting his MAGA fanbase, which is divided on the issue . The New York Post, which endorsed Trump ahead of last year's presidential election, focuses on the US warning Iran against retaliation with the headline 'Don't even think about it'. USA Today's front page says US troops are on high alert following the strikes, with officials warning of potential retaliation. Below a photo of Trump announcing the bombing, it questions if his gamble is 'a threat erased, or yet another 'endless war'?'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Who was Helen Smith and how did the British nurse die in Saudi Arabia?
MYSTERY still surrounds the deaths of nurse Helen Smith and tugboat captain Johannes Otten after they 'fell' from a balcony in Saudi Arabia more than 46 years ago. Here's everything we know about Helen and the suspicious circumstances surrounding her passing, which are investigated in a new C4 documentary. 3 Nurse Helen Smith fell to her death from the balcony of Richard and Penny Arnot's (pictured) flat in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in May 1979 Credit: Shutterstock Editorial 3 Helen had relocated to Saudi Arabia to take up a nursing post the year before she deid Credit: Alamy Who was Helen Smith? Helen Linda Smith was a 23-year-old nurse from Yorkshire. In 1978, she moved to Helen was enjoying her new home, writing home about her positive experiences in the Arab state. However, her life was cut tragically short on May 20, 1979, in circumstances that would become one of Britain's most controversial international cases. more unsolved mysteries Suspicious circumstances Helen Smith died after allegedly falling from a sixth-floor balcony during a party at the home of Richard and Penny Arnot in Jeddah. Her body, along with that of Dutch tugboat captain Johannes Otten, was found in the street below. She was discovered lying dead fully clothed, aside from her underwear, which was partly removed. He was impaled on spiked railings with his underpants around his thighs. Most read in The Sun The party had been attended by several expatriates, including a diver from New Zealand named Tim Hayter, marine biologist Jacques Texier and four German salvage operators. The party itself was Sexual encounter Testimony from Jacques Texier indicated that a sexual encounter between Mr Hayter and Mrs Arnot was taking place at the time of the deaths, further complicating the investigation. This led to the prosecution of Mrs Arnot for "unlawful intercourse" and a sentence of eighty lashes for Richard Arnot for supplying alcohol — though the sentences were never carried out. Official explanation Supported by British diplomats, Saudi authorities quickly ruled the deaths as accidental, stating Helen and Johannes fell from the balcony while drunk, possibly during or after a sexual encounter. However, Helen's father Ron Smith, a former policeman, immediately doubted this explanation. 3 Ron Smith, the father of Helen Smith, didn't believe the official explanation Credit: Alamy He traveled to Saudi Arabia to examine his daughter's body and became convinced that she was murdered. Ron believed there was a cover-up to protect diplomatic relations and the reputations of those involved. His campaign for justice lasted decades — he refused to allow Helen's burial, keeping her body in a Leeds mortuary for 30 years in the hope of uncovering new forensic evidence. His efforts led to a 15-day inquest in 1982, which returned an open verdict. Ron's persistence even contributed to changes in UK law regarding inquests into the Key changes include: Duty for inquests on repatriation: Coroners in England and Wales are now required to investigate deaths that occurred abroad if the body is repatriated and the death appears violent, unnatural, or the cause is unknown. This is set out in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, Chapter 1, which obligates coroners to hold inquests in such cases, regardless of where the death took place, as long as the body is brought back to their jurisdiction. Clear criteria for inquests: The law now specifies that an inquest must be held if the death was violent, unnatural, or the cause is unknown, or if the person died in custody or state detention—even if the death occurred overseas. Comprehensive investigations: These inquests can involve extensive investigations, including witness and expert testimony, to establish who died, and how, when, and where the death occurred. Consistency Across the UK: While the process differs slightly in Scotland and Northern Ireland, similar reforms have ensured that coroners (or the Lord Advocate in Scotland) can investigate deaths abroad when the body is repatriated. Some expert testimony at the inquest suggested Helen's injuries were not consistent with a simple fall, raising further suspicions of foul play. Her body was finally cremated in 2009, three decades after her death, following her parents' decision to allow burial before their own passing. Helen Smith's death remains officially classified as accidental Death in the Desert: The Nurse Helen Mystery Channel 4 has made a documentary about the death of Helen Smith. It looks into the suspicions of Helen's family and investigates whether new information can help shed any light on the case. Death in the Desert: The Nurse Helen Mystery airs on Channel 4 at 9pm on Monday, June 23, 2025.
