Senedd members demand action on nature loss in Wales
Llŷr Gruffydd, who chairs the Senedd's climate change committee, criticised the pace of change with biodiversity targets 'unlikely to be in place much before 2029'.
Leading a debate on May 7, the Plaid Cymru politician said it is difficult to reconcile the time frame with Welsh Government claims that addressing nature loss is a priority.
The committee's inquiry heard Wales is 'nowhere near' the key international '30 by 30' target of protecting 30 per cent of land and sea for nature by 2030.
Mr Gruffydd said: 'Work to scope out the targets started over two years ago. It seems inconceivable that it will take another four years.'
The Senedd's climate change committee called for a more ambitious timeframe in its report , a recommendation that was rejected by Welsh ministers.
'The Welsh Government said this would be simply impossible to do,' said Mr Gruffydd, pointing to similar UK and Scottish Government proposals taking around a year.
He warned the 2023 'State of Nature' report showed Wales' biodiversity, and wider environment, continuing to decline and degrade.
'That report details the devastating scale of nature loss across the country,' he said. 'Welsh wildlife has decreased on average by 20 per cent since 1994 and one in six Welsh species are under threat of extinction.'
Mr Gruffydd acknowledged the Welsh Government was quick to sign up to global biodiversity targets and declare nature loss as a priority.
'But, to use an old adage, actions speak louder than words,' he said.
Mr Gruffydd raised concerns about the Environment (Wales) Act 2016 having 'little material impact' on reversing the decline in biodiversity – a finding echoed by an Audit Wales report .
Plaid Cymru's Delyth Jewell warned: 'I'm concerned that our society and the world has become used to the destruction. That's the frightening reality.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
34 minutes ago
- Sky News
MPs back legalising assisted dying in England and Wales after historic Commons vote
MPs have voted to approve a historic bill that would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales. After months of deliberation, the bill - which would give some terminally ill adults the right to end their lives - was approved by 314 votes to 291 - a majority of 23. The controversial legislation passed its third reading in the Commons and will now go to the House of Lords, where it will face further scrutiny. Speaking ahead of the vote, the bill's proponent, the Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, said she was "confident" the bill would pass, despite the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych), the Royal College of Pathologists and the Royal College of Physicians all raising concerns about the proposals. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill passed its first parliamentary hurdle in November by a majority of 55 votes. It would allow terminally ill adults with fewer than six months to live to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs have brought about historic societal change A chain of events that started with the brutal murder of an MP almost 10 years ago has today lead to historic societal change. The like of which many of us will never see again. Assisted Dying will be legalised in England and Wales. In four years' time adults with six months or less to live and who can prove their mental capacity will be allowed to choose to die. Kim Leadbeater, the MP who has made this possible, never held political aspirations. Previously a lecturer in health, Ms Leadbeater reluctantly stood for election after her sister Jo Cox was fatally stabbed and shot to death in a politically motivated attack in 2016. And this is when, Ms Leadbeater says, she was forced to engage with the assisted dying debate. Because of the sheer volume of correspondence from constituents asking her to champion the cause. Polls have consistently shown some 70% of people support assisted dying. And ultimately it is this seismic shift in public opinion that has carried the now follows Canada, the USA, Belgium, Switzerland, The Netherlands and Australia. All countries with sophisticated health systems. Nowhere has assisted dying been reversed, once introduced. The relationship between doctor and patient will now also change. The question is being asked: Is an assisted death a treatment? There is no decisive answer. But it is a conversation that will now take place. The final answer could have significant consequences, especially in mental health settings. There are still many unknowns. Who will be responsible for providing the service? The NHS? There is a strong emotional connection to the health service and many would oppose the move. But others will argue that patients trust the institution and would want to die in its arms. The challenge for health leaders will be to try and reconcile the bitter divisions that now exist within the medical community. The Royal Colleges have tried to remain neutral on the issue but continued to challenge Ms Leadbeater until the very end. Their arguments of a failure of safeguards and scrutiny did not resonate with MPs. And nor did concerns over the further erosion of palliative care. Ms Leadbeater's much repeated insistence that "this is the most scrutinized legislation anywhere in the world" carried the most weight. Her argument that patients should not have to fear prolonged, agonising deaths or plan trips to a Dignitas clinic to die scared and alone, or be forced to take their own lives and have their bodies discovered by sons, daughters, husbands and wives because they could not endure the pain any longer was compelling. The country believed her. Since then, it has undergone some significant changes - the most notable being the requirement for a High Court judge to approve assisted dying applications, which was replaced by the expert panel. Please refresh the page for the latest version.
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Assisted dying bill: what happens next?
The draft law that would legalise assisted dying in some circumstances in England and Wales has cleared all of its initial stages in the House of voted in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in principle back in November by a majority of after many hours of sometimes fractious debate about the details of the bill, it has been passed by 314 votes to 291, a majority of 23. But that does not mean it will immediately become now has to go through all the stages it went through in the Commons in the House of Lords - and then MPs will get a final say when they have looked at any changes suggested by peers. This is the point the bill will officially become law - unless it runs out of Parliamentary time or peers opposed to it find a way of blocking it. Will peers vote in favour of the bill? Like MPs, peers will get a free vote, meaning they are allowed to follow their conscience rather than orders from party BBC understands supporters of the bill feel there's a majority in favour in the Lords. But until peers actually vote, that's just an informed is certain that the many experts on the Lords benches, which includes doctors, lawyers, disability rights activists and Bishops, will want to have their say on it - both for and against. Could peers block the bill altogether? The House of Lords does not normally block government bills from becoming law - but assisted dying is not a government is a private members' bill, sponsored by a backbench Labour MP, Kim Leadbeater. The government is officially neutral on the bill, although it will try to ensure Parliamentary time is made available to debate Falconer, a long time campaigner for assisted dying who was justice secretary under Tony Blair, is hoping to shepherd the bill through the says he is sure peers will "respect the views taken by the Commons on this"."Ultimately it is for the Commons to decide on whether we should have an assisted dying law, and what its shape will be," he told a press conference on Thursday. "And we in the Lords will do what we do best, which is scrutinise the details, but leave the main decisions to the Commons."Baroness Finlay, who is a palliative care doctor and who is against the Bill, told the BBC that "our role is not to rubber stamp whatever has happened in the Commons, particularly when we know that so many amendments put down in the Commons that would have improved the Bill have gone undebated." Could the bill run out of time? One of the biggest worries, for supporters of assisted dying, is that the Bill could run out of time is divided into what are known as sessions. These tend to be around a year long - although this can vary greatly. Bills generally have to complete all their stages within one session. Government bills can be "carried over" to a second session, but because the assisted dying bill is a private members' bill it can't bill took almost seven months from its first debate to completing its steps in the Commons. Supporters of the Bill expect it to take several months to pass the current session began 11 months ago, which would suggest there won't be enough time to get the bill through the Lords and it would "fall" before becoming doesn't look like the current session is ending any time soon however. It's the government's choice when to start a new session and it still has lots of its own legislation to get supporters of the bill believe the new session will start in December at the earliest, which would provide more than enough time for it to pass both Houses of Parliament. Alternatively, if the next session were to begin in the autumn, that would give the bill a few weeks after the summer recess to get through the Lords - although it would be tight. Could too much disagreement stop it? Peers who are strongly against assisted dying could try and stop it through tabling lots of the Commons, a hundred MPs can over-ride such tactics, if they support a "closure motion" which allows a bill to be forced to a vote - but it doesn't work like that in the could also decide to reject any amendments peers make to the Bill. That would see it go back and forth between the two Houses of Parliament, known as ping MPs and peers keep disagreeing this would mean it takes the Bill even longer to become law, and a much greater chance of it running out of rules dictate that private members' bills are only debated on a Friday. There are currently only two Fridays left to debate them, meaning the government would have to schedule more. When could we see the first legal assisted deaths? The bill says that the implementation of assisted dying will take up to four years. Depending on how long the Lords takes to pass the bill (if they do at all), that means it could be late 2029 by the time a terminally ill person would be able to legally access an assisted initial plan was that the bill would take two years to implement, which would have put the first potential legal assisted deaths in late changes made to the bill during committee stage will take longer to put into place in practice, according it sponsor is most notably the replacement of the role of a high court judge with a panel of experts in signing off an assisted possible the bill could be implemented more quickly than four years. A spokesperson for Leadbeater has previously said that "the four year limit is not a target, it's a backstop".
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Chris Mason: Profound social change that is now likely to become law
Take a step back, and it has been quite a few has been a week at Westminster that has seen two decisions that point to a profound, socially liberal a few days ago, MPs voted to change abortion legislation to stop women in England and Wales being prosecuted for ending their now, the Commons has backed a change in the law in England and Wales to allow assisted dying, or, as some opponents call it, assisted vote doesn't guarantee this will happen - it will head next to the House of Lords - but it is now likely, even highly is a colossal social change, compared by many to the Abortion Act of 1967, the abolition of capital punishment, the decriminalisation of homosexuality and the introduction of gay marriage. MPs had a free vote in both of this week's it is also true that the change in the composition of the Commons at the general election - and, in particular, the arrival of hundreds of new Labour MPs - has created the climate and the mood in parliament that has allowed both these votes to polls have consistently pointed to significant public support for a change in the law.A YouGov poll earlier this week suggested over seven in ten Britons supported these assisted dying MPs today were conscious of stepping beyond a discussion of the principles of this idea to scrutiny of the practicalities of this particular of opponents told the Commons they believed in a change in the law in principle, but were opposed to this particular yet, in the end, MPs have said yes to this change in the law - and so this is a hugely significant, unprecedented 2015, the Commons rejected changing the did so in 1997 this arguments were no less the terminology is fought plenty use the shorthand of "assisted dying," for some opponents this is a should, instead, they argue, be called "assisted suicide" or "assisted killing".Those arguments will continue, but what will now happen is this bill will head to the House of been endorsed by the Commons, proponents believe that while peers will scrutinise and likely amend this bill, they are confident it will now become law, in time. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
