As allies turn on B.C. NDP, house leader Farnworth celebrates ‘great session'
VICTORIA – Can a government have a 'great session' if its flagship legislation draws condemnation from a coalition of historical allies?
B.C. NDP house leader Mike Farnworth thinks so, celebrating the end of the legislature's spring sitting that culminated Wednesday night with the passage of two controversial bills that fast-track infrastructure projects, thanks to rare tiebreaking votes from Speaker Raj Chouhan.
'Yeah, Bill 14 and Bill 15 were controversial,' Farnworth said Thursday after the final question period of the session.
'There were a lot of people opposed and a lot of people in favour, but we made it clear that we want to get things done in this province. The public expects us to be doing that.'
The bills had become a flashpoint for the government, attracting criticism from the First Nations Leadership Council, environmentalists and some business groups.
They said the fast-track bills undermined environmental standards and constitutional obligations to consult First Nations.
Farnworth said the federal government and other provinces have been grappling with the same issues of how to expedite big projects amid a trade war with the United States.
'At the end of the day, we made it clear that these bills were going to get through, our agenda was going to get through this session and that is what happened.'
To the very end, the bills came under fire.
As legislators were sitting down to vote on Wednesday night, Farnworth's former cabinet colleague Melanie Mark added her voice to the chorus.
Mark, the first First Nations woman elected to B.C.'s legislature, called the government's behaviour 'astounding and disheartening' as she accused Eby and his cabinet of 'turning their backs' on First Nations, local governments and environmentalists.
'Politics should not stand in the way of progressive policies,' Mark said in a statement. 'Trampling on Indigenous rights just ends up getting reversed in the highest courts — taxpayers will end up paying for this oversight.'
Bill 14 speeds up renewable energy projects and transmission lines, while Bill 15 speeds up public and private infrastructure projects like hospitals, schools and mines.
'Former minister Mark has an opinion,' Farnworth said. 'The Nisga'a Nation came out very much in favour of the legislation. This is one of the things, where government makes decisions … there are going to be people who are not happy and people who are going to be happy.'
The Nisga'a Nation is one of the few Indigenous groups to back the legislation.
Among the unhappy was Chief Don Tom of the Tsartlip First Nation, who declared an end to the 'era of trust' with the government. Grand Chief Stewart Phillip of the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs called the bills 'unilateralism.' Terry Teegee, a B.C. Assembly of First Nations regional chief, said the bills were 'regressive.'
Mark said the government should reconsider the bills, saying the province had walked back plans in the past.
She pointed to a controversial $789-million plan to rebuild the Royal B.C. Museum under former premier John Horgan that the government ultimately suspended after intense criticism.
'It didn't go over as planned but former premier John Horgan had the fortitude to recalibrate, pause the project and mandate more meaningful consultation,' Mark said.
Mark said Eby can do the same in this situation, which would show the government honours the Crown's duty to consult with Indigenous people.
'It's never too late to do the right thing,' she said.
But Eby said Wednesday that both bills were 'critically important' because they respond to a 'rapidly evolving situation.'
He said B.C.'s largest trading partner, the United States under President Donald Trump, was attacking the provincial economy in the 'name of annexing' Canada as the 51st state.
And Farnworth predicted British Columbians would come to see government's perspective.
'As time goes by, people will see how it's intended to work, and a lot of the fears will, in fact, be unfounded,' Farnworth said.
Stewart Prest, a political science lecturer at UBC, said Eby's government seemed 'hell-bent on being able to demonstrate vigorous action' to move the economy forward.
'But I think in doing so, they're placing a number potential landmines in their path,' he said. While they might be able to avoid them, they are already taking a toll, he added.
Prest said the passage of the bills 'fragments' Eby's coalition, mobilizing groups that had broadly supported his government to instead act against it in a 'significant' way.
He said the bills could potentially pit First Nations supporting particular projects against those opposed to the government granting itself additional powers through the bills.
'We are showing those divisions show up already,' Prest said, pointing to Mark's reaction.
Farnworth quoted one of the bills' critics to argue that the relationships would withstand the current furor.
'Grand Chief Stewart Phillip once said that 'reconciliation is not for wimps,'' Farnworth said. 'It's not an easy road, and there will be bumps along the way, and there will be disagreements along the way. But reconciliation is a key cornerstone of our government, our party's values, and it's going to continue to be that.'
Overall, the session saw the passage of 11 government bills and two private member's bills, one from the NDP, one from the Opposition Conservative Party of B.C.
Eby acknowledged that government 'reduced the overall legislative agenda' during this spring session while adding more hours for debate.
Farnworth said he did not see that as a failure. 'One of my key roles is to ensure, that we can come back in the fall, we have got work to do, that we have got bills ready to debate right away,' Farnworth said.
B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad was, naturally, less generous in his assessment.
'What we have seen from the government, is scrambling from crisis to crisis, and if that is what he (Farnworth) calls a great session, oh my gosh, I'm really looking forward to next spring.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 29, 2025.
Note to readers:This is a corrected story. A previous version said Bill 14 passed by four votes. In fact, it passed by one vote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
6 hours ago
- Global News
Iranian Canadians and others watch and worry after U.S. strikes on nuclear sites
Iranian Canadians and Jewish groups turned worried eyes to the Middle East on Sunday, as U.S. strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites raised fears of escalating violence. Nimâ Machouf, a member of a Montreal Iranian women's association, said family members in Iran are living 'from one bomb to another.' 'I'm very worried because this will only accelerate the violence in the region,' she said in a phone interview. 'It will further aggravate the problem and take us further away from peace.' Machouf, who is also an epidemiologist and former NDP candidate, believes the strikes will only hurt the people who are fighting to free themselves from Iran's repressive regime. Attacks from other countries means that Iran's people 'are not protected by their government, nor protected by others, by the international community,' she said. 'So people feel abandoned by everyone, everywhere.' Story continues below advertisement 0:50 Iran's UN envoy accuses Netanyahu of 'hijacking' U.S. foreign policy The United States inserted itself in Israel's war against Iran early Sunday as it launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Police in Toronto and Vancouver have published messages on social media platform X, confirming an increase in police presence in both cities while authorities monitor the situation in the Middle East. The Toronto police post said that more police presence 'can be expected wherever necessary,' while Vancouver police said more officers and resources will be deployed to 'certain places of worships, cultural and community centres, and diplomatic buildings.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Conflicts in the Middle East are thousands of kilometres away, but they reverberate closely in our diverse community and impact many peoples' sense of safety,' the post from Vancouver police said, adding that more officers have also been deployed to make sure protests 'remain lawful.' Story continues below advertisement 'We're listening to local faith leaders and community representatives from countries impacted by the conflicts … Our priority is your safety.' Prime Minister Mark Carney wrote on social media that U.S. military action was designed to alleviate the 'grave threat' Iran's nuclear program represents to international security. 'Canada has been consistently clear that Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon,' he wrote. 1:42 Israel says world should 'thank' U.S. after strikes on Iranian nuclear sites But Carney said the situation in the Middle East was 'highly volatile,' and urged the parties to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution. The interim president of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs described Iran's nuclear program on Sunday as a 'grave danger to global peace and security.' 'Eliminating this threat is an essential step toward achieving a safer Middle East and a more secure and peaceful world,' wrote Noah Shack, who urged the federal government to 'stand strong against the Iranian threat.' Story continues below advertisement Kaveh Shahrooz, a lawyer and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said many Iranians are worried about the impact the U.S. decision will have on civilians. 'I think there's quite a bit of (concern) simply because there's a lot of unknowns,' he said. Shahrooz said Iran's regime offers virtually no protection to its own citizens in the form of air raid sirens or shelters, and internet has been cut off. 'So there's a lot of fear about what we will find out once internet connection is restored and we're able to talk to our families again,' he said. Shahrooz said feelings among Canada's Iranian diaspora vary, from anger at the strikes to support for U.S. actions. 'Among the people who are not supportive of Iran's regime, I think there are some who are cheering and who are saying this was long overdue,' he said. 'And they're happy to see the Iranian regime's nuclear program effectively dismantled and to see that regime humiliated.' On the other hand, Machouf called any suggestion that Israel will 'liberate' Iran's people a 'masquerade' and said regime change must come from within. Gur Tsabar, a spokesperson with Jews Say No to Genocide, said a rally called 'Hands Off Iran' was organized for Sunday afternoon in Toronto to demand sanctions on Israel and a two-way arms embargo. He described recent Israeli and American actions in Iran as 'beyond disturbing.' Story continues below advertisement Tsabar said the rally scheduled for Sunday afternoon is co-organized by 16 groups, including the Iranian Canadian Congress, Palestinian Youth Movement, Jews Say No to Genocide and a number of labour unions.
Winnipeg Free Press
12 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Iranians in Canada watch and worry after U.S. strikes on nuclear sites
MONTREAL – Iranian-Canadians say they fear an escalation of violence in the Middle East after the United States carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites. Nimâ Machouf, a member of a Montreal Iranian women's association, says family members in Iran are living 'from one bomb to another.' The epidemiologist and former NDP candidate worries the strikes will only lead to more violence and hurt the people who are fighting to free themselves from Iran's repressive regime. Kaveh Shahrooz, a lawyer and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, says many Iranians are worried about the impact the U.S. decision to join Israel's war on Iran could have on citizens. But he says some opponents of the regime are celebrating the U.S. strike, happy to see Iran's nuclear program 'effectively dismantled.' The interim president of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs called eliminating Iran's nuclear program an 'essential step' toward a safer Middle East, and urged the Canadian government to stand strong against Iran. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025.
Global News
15 hours ago
- Global News
‘There's no protection': Canadian Sikh leaders face threats, organization says
The World Sikh Organization says multiple Sikh leaders in Canada have received notice from the RCMP that their lives could be in imminent danger. But WSO spokesperson Balpreet Singh told The West Block's Mercedes Stephenson that the national police force shared few details about who was behind the threats — and little in terms of protection or assistance. 'What happens is that you're approached by law enforcement and they give you a piece of paper that says that your life is in imminent risk of being targeted, that you could be killed,' Singh said in an interview. 'They take that paper back and then they ask you, 'Well, where do you think this threat is coming from?' And it's really surreal to think that the police have approached you, and now they're asking you, 'Where do you think the threat is coming from?' You're not provided any real supports.' Story continues below advertisement Singh said some were told to change their routines and think about spending time away from their families and friends, but were otherwise 'left to (their) own devices.' 'It's really an odd situation where you just don't know where to go. And, you know, people that have had to leave their homes, have to leave their families. And there's no end to it,' Singh said. 'Someone approached the police six months after receiving one of these (warnings) and was told, well, there's no foreseeable end because this is a decades-long conflict. So we don't know when this threat will end.' Global News reported earlier this month the RCMP put former NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh under tight security in late 2023 after the national police force assessed the then-NDP leader's life was in imminent danger. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Singh and his family were protected by armed police, including at a hospital in December 2023 when Singh's wife was giving birth. His senior staff were also forced to incorporate more stringent security plans for their leader's public appearances. The new revelations come as Prime Minister Mark Carney has attempted to patch up relations with India and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in an effort to diversify Canada's trade partnerships amid tumult with the Trump administration. Canada's relationship with India – the world's fifth largest economy – have been severely strained since former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau publicly said there was 'credible' intelligence linking the Indian government to the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a B.C. Sikh leader and Khalistan activist, who was killed on Canadian soil in 2023. Story continues below advertisement The NDP's Singh received a top-secret briefing on the intelligence related to Nijjar's murder, and told reporters there was 'clear evidence' that the Indian government was involved — a claim Indian officials dismissed as 'absurd.' In the months that followed, Singh was to find himself targeted. Citing unnamed sources, Global reported on June 12 that information about Singh's movements, family and travel schedule were being closely watched by an agent suspected of ties to the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, a transnational crime syndicate linked to murders, extortion and drug crimes. The Government of India has been accused of using Bishnoi gang members to commit violence in Canada. Sources said the agent in question has also allegedly been connected to activities directed by the Indian government. India has long accused Canada of not addressing Khalistani activists, some of whom New Delhi considers 'extremists,' living and working in Canada. The Khalistan movement agitates for an independent Sikh state in India's Punjab region. Responding to criticism over inviting Modi to the G7 Summit in Alberta last week, Carney noted that the Indian prime minister has been invited to every G7 since 2018 and called his bilateral meeting with Modi as a 'necessary first step' to rebuilding the relationship between Ottawa and New Delhi. 'I think the meeting today was important, but I would describe it as foundational… An agreement to provide the necessary foundations to begin to rebuild the relationship, based on mutual respect, sovereignty and trust,' Carney told reporters last week. Story continues below advertisement Carney said he and Modi had a 'frank, open exchange,' which included discussions of issues such as law enforcement and transnational repression. The recent federal inquiry into foreign interference named India as the second-most active player in that space, behind only the People's Republic of China. When asked how he would describe Carney's invitation to Modi to join world leaders in Alberta last week, Balpreet Singh with the WSO said 'the word that comes to mind is 'betrayal.'' 'We're not against dialogue, but it's got to be principled,' Singh said. 'But here it was a complete display of appeasement … India has still not acknowledged any role in foreign interference or transnational oppression in Canada.'
