logo
Gold prices fall over 1% as strong US jobs data clouds outlook for rate cuts

Gold prices fall over 1% as strong US jobs data clouds outlook for rate cuts

Economic Times07-06-2025

Gold prices saw a decline following a robust U.S. jobs report. This dimmed hopes for Federal Reserve rate cuts. Silver prices, however, surged to a multi-year high. The U.S. Labor Department revealed an increase in non-farm payrolls. Platinum and palladium also experienced gains. Trade policy uncertainties continue to influence market dynamics. Investors are closely monitoring economic data and geopolitical developments.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Gold prices slipped more than 1% on Friday after a stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs report dampened hopes for imminent Federal Reserve rate cuts this year, while silver soared to its highest level since 2012.Spot gold fell 1.1% to $3,316.13 an ounce, as of 02:28 p.m. ET (1828 GMT), but rose 0.8% for the week so far.U.S. gold futures settled 0.8% lower at $3,346.60.A U.S. Labor Department report showed non-farm payrolls increased 139,000 in May, compared with estimates for a rise of 130,000, according to economists polled by Reuters. The unemployment rate stood at 4.2%, in line with estimates.Data came in line with estimates, which is a negative for gold as the data suggests that the Fed is going to stay on hold for a little while, Marex analyst Edward Meir said.Fed policymakers are seen as waiting until September to cut rates, with just one more cut in view by December, based on trading in short-term interest-rate futures, which also showed traders backing away from bets that would pay off if the U.S. central bank delivered a third rate cut by the end of the year.Gold is considered a hedge against inflation and geopolitical uncertainty. But higher rates reduce the appeal of bullion as it yields no interest.On the trade policy front there was little clarity after the highly anticipated call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday."These are very difficult negotiations and they're not going to be solved just on the phone. If the tariff headlines become negative, that's bullish for gold," Meir added.Spot silver fell 0.5% to $35.96, after hitting a more than 13-year high earlier.Gains in silver "look like were driven by speculative flows seeing it is way too cheap versus gold, the break above the $35/oz mark amplified the move," said Giovanni Staunovo, UBS analyst.Platinum rose 2.5% to $1,158.20, highest since March 2022, while palladium was up 3.9% to $1,045.45. Both the metals were on track for weekly gains.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Step Back on Iran Pacifies Nervous Market
Trump Step Back on Iran Pacifies Nervous Market

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trump Step Back on Iran Pacifies Nervous Market

India's equity indices rebounded 1.3% on Friday, recouping losses made in the last three sessions on a relief rally sparked by US President Donald Trump putting on hold a plan that may have led to American involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. The rebound helped the Sensex and Nifty erase all recent losses and notch up gains for the week. The Nifty closed above a key level at 25,112, up 1.3% or 319 points over Thursday's close. The BSE Sensex closed at 82,408, up 1.3% or 1,046 points. Both indices, which fell about 0.6% over the past three trading sessions, gained 1.6% for the week. 'In the past two to three days, there hasn't been any significant escalation in the Iran-Israel conflict that could choke global trade,' said Siddarth Bhamre, head of institutional research at Asit C Mehta Intermediates. 'Receding concerns prompted some buying interest in the markets.' Elsewhere in Asia, South Korea gained 1.5% while Hong Kong and Taiwan rose 1.3% and 0.2%, respectively. Japan ended 0.2% lower after the country's core inflation hit a two-year high, boosting the chance of interest rate increases. China declined 0.1%. Trump said he will decide on US participation in the Iran-Israel conflict in two weeks. This was seen as the US President taking a step back from recent remarks that indicated the US was likely to take military action against Iran. It came as a relief to markets that were nervous about the likelihood of a wider conflict. Back home, the Volatility Index ( VIX )—the market's fear gauge—fell 4.1% to 13.67 on Friday, indicating traders expect lower risks in the near term. All sectoral indices closed higher on Friday. The Nifty Realty gained 2.1%, and the PSU Bank Index rose 1.6%. The Bank Nifty moved 1.2% higher while private bank, auto and metal indices advanced over 1% each. 'Given that the benchmark was closing lower in the past three sessions and the fall in the broader market yesterday, a rebound was likely, which pushed the market higher,' said Vikas Jain, head of research at Reliance Securities. The benchmark Nifty is holding at the support level of 24,700 and is expected to test 25,200 in the next few weeks. The Nifty Mid-cap 150 and the Small-cap 250 indices rose 1.3% and 0.6%, respectively. In the past week, the mid-cap index shed 0.7% while the small-cap index fell 1.7%. Of the 4,094 shares traded on the BSE, 2,463 advanced, while 1,484 declined. Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) bought shares worth a net Rs 7,941 crore on Friday. This included purchases by global passive funds on account of FTSE rebalancing and a Sensex rejig. Their domestic counterparts sold shares worth Rs 3,050 crore. In June, overseas investors bought shares worth Rs 7,060 crore. 'The markets have not delivered any meaningful gains so far this year, so index-based returns are expected to be sluggish. However, it is seen to be a stock-pickers market,' said Bhamre of Asit C Mehta. 'Investors should be wary of buying, and not chase stock at any value.' Bhamre said timewise consolidations are expected to continue, with bouts of buying and selling activity and Nifty is facing a hurdle at 25,100-25,200 levels. Even if it crosses this threshold, a big surge is not likely as gains might come off amid ongoing geopolitical tensions.

Harvard Nears ‘Mindbogglingly' Historic US Deal, Trump Says
Harvard Nears ‘Mindbogglingly' Historic US Deal, Trump Says

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Harvard Nears ‘Mindbogglingly' Historic US Deal, Trump Says

President Donald Trump said his administration has been holding talks with Harvard University and may announce a deal over the next week, potentially ending a standoff that has jeopardized billions of dollars of the school's funding and ignited a rollicking legal fight. 'They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations, and appear to be committed to doing what is right,' Trump said Friday on Truth Social. 'If a Settlement is made on the basis that is currently being discussed, it will be 'mindbogglingly' HISTORIC, and very good for our Country.' Trump's upbeat tone signaled a major potential shift in one of the defining controversies of his term so far as he accused US colleges of fostering antisemitism and slammed them for what he called their liberal bias. Harvard, the oldest and richest US university, has borne the biggest attacks, with Trump canceling more than $2.6 billion in research funding, threatening the school's tax-exempt status and seeking to prevent it from enrolling foreign students. Harvard has fired back, questioning the administration's interest in working together to confront antisemitism and accusing it of 'unconstitutional demands' that would devastate academic freedom. The university has sued the government for freezing federal funding and trying to ban foreign students at Harvard. The White House declined to comment beyond the president's post. Harvard didn't immediately respond to a request for comment, and it was unclear how far apart the two sides are in the talks. Trump has also gone after other schools, freezing federal money at other selective institutions including Northwestern University, Cornell University and Columbia University. Columbia had been negotiating with the administration to address the funding and in March agreed to a list of demands, including expanding campus police powers, tightening rules over protests and restricting masks used to conceal identities. While those moves angered some faculty and students, US officials signaled that Columbia was on track for the federal money to be unfrozen. But the deal fell apart after Columbia's former interim president, Katrina Armstrong, infuriated some of the school's critics following reports that she downplayed the changes in a zoom meeting with faculty. The White House has signaled optimism about a Harvard deal in recent weeks. Trump told reporters on June 5 that Harvard was 'starting to behave,' and Education Secretary Linda McMahon said at a Bloomberg News event last week that officials had been 'making progress in some of the discussions' with the school. McMahon added that consent decrees have been floated as one way to resolve the Trump administration's issues with universities. Consent decrees are binding legal agreements that could subject schools to a court-ordered monitor. Last month, Harvard Corp., the powerful body that oversees the university, selected a conservative lawyer, Kannon Shanmugam, to serve as a member amid the unprecedented attacks from the Trump administration. Harvard Corp. and its chair, former US Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker, have been under intense scrutiny since the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas against Israel and the Jewish state's retaliatory response in Gaza. Harvard produced reports on antisemitism and anti-Muslim bias on campus in the wake of the attacks. In issuing the reports, Harvard President Alan Garber apologized 'for the moments when we failed to meet the high expectations we rightfully set for our community.' He has also acknowledged recently experiencing antisemitism at Harvard himself. Garber has said the Trump administration's demands represent an unacceptable government intrusion. Harvard has said in two separate lawsuits that the government's efforts are retaliatory and mark unlawful infringement on the university's autonomy. US District Judge Allison Burroughs on Friday ordered the government to allow Harvard to continue enrolling foreign students while their legal fight proceeds, after the administration revoked the university's right to do so in in May. She didn't discuss Trump's separate June 4 proclamation denying Harvard's foreign students and scholars entry to the US, though her previous block to that entry ban remains in effect until Monday. Burroughs will hear oral arguments in a separate case about Trump's funding cuts at Harvard on July 21. In that case, 24 other universities and more than 12,000 Harvard alumni are among the groups that have submitted legal filings in support of the school. In addition to scrapping federal research money and some contracts with Harvard, the Trump administration has said that the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university won't be able to receive new funding. The president has also repeatedly called for the school to lose its tax-exempt status, which would have significant financial implications, even with the school's $53 billion endowment. The White House's actions have upended the lives of Harvard's students, faculty and staff. The funding freeze has hammered research on diseases including cancer and AIDS and led to layoffs on campus. Harvard announced last month that it would put an extra $250 million of its own money toward research to plug at least some of the gap. Some research has also been halted at Boston hospitals affiliated with and funded by the university. Harvard is a key cog in the broader Massachusetts economy, and its clash with the Trump administration has threatened the health-care, life sciences and technology industries that depend on the talent and startups that come out of the school. The university has about 6,800 students from other countries, amounting to 27% of the student body. Those students are an important financial resource for Harvard, with many paying full tuition. Even with the favorable court rulings so far, international enrollees at Harvard are still facing visa issues and face substantial uncertainty about whether and when they will make it back to campus. With assistance from Akayla Gardner. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

ICICI sought to acquire HDFC, reveals chairman Deepak Parekh
ICICI sought to acquire HDFC, reveals chairman Deepak Parekh

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

ICICI sought to acquire HDFC, reveals chairman Deepak Parekh

Former HDFC chairman Deepak Parekh and ICICI Bank chief Chanda Kochhar MUMBAI: Former HDFC chairman Deepak Parekh, in a candid disclosure, said that then ICICI Bank chief Chanda Kochhar had proposed a merger between the two lenders - well before HDFC's eventual reverse merger with its banking subsidiary. During an interaction with Kochhar on her channel, Parekh said: "I remember you talking to me once. I remember it very clearly. It's never been talked about in public, but I'm willing to share it now. You said that ICICI started HDFC. 'Why don't you come back home?' That was your offer." Parekh said he declined the offer, saying "it won't be fair" or "proper with our name and the bank and all". Parekh said the eventual merger with HDFC Bank, completed in July 2023, was driven mainly by regulatory pressure. RBI had classified NBFCs like HDFC, then holding assets over Rs 5 lakh crore, as systemically important, breaching the Rs 50,000-crore threshold. "RBI supported us and they pushed us into it to some extent and they helped us," he said. However, he added that there were "no concessions, no relief, no time, nothing". Describing the day the merger concluded, Parekh called it "a sad day and a happy day". He said, "It's good for the institution. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 180k traders turn to IC Markets for optimum CFD trading conditions IC Markets Sign Up Undo It's good for the country to have large banks. Look at how large Chinese banks are. We have to be bigger, larger in India." Parekh believes that Indian banks must grow through acquisitions to become stronger in future. On broader economic concerns, Parekh cited persistent uncertainty in supply chains, trade policy, and export conditions as top CEO concerns. Calling insurance the "least understood product", Parekh criticised "mis-selling by banks" driven by high upfront commissions. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store