Minister hails ‘remarkable turnaround' of renationalised train operator

A train operator renationalised two years ago has performed a 'remarkable turnaround', the rail minister said.
Lord Hendy described TransPennine Express (TPE) as 'the blueprint for Great British Railways (GBR)'.
The Labour Government began renationalising all remaining franchised train operators in Britain on Sunday, by bringing South Western Railway under public control.
The process is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2027.
TPE, which runs trains across northern England and into Scotland, was renationalised under the Conservative government in May 2023 because of poor performance.
Its reliability was badly affected by drivers no longer volunteering to work paid overtime shifts.
Britain's train services were privatised in the mid-1990s.
Services now under public control are owned by DFTO (Department for Transport Operator) until GBR is established.
DFTO said TPE has reduced cancellations by 75% and recorded a 42% growth in passenger journeys over the past two years.
It added that the operator generated £1.4 billion in 'economic value' during the 2023/24 financial year.
TPE launched an improvement plan in October 2023 which prioritised stabilising operations.
Lord Hendy said: 'TransPennine Express's remarkable turnaround shows exactly why we're bringing our railways back into public ownership as part of our plan for change.
'These impressive results demonstrate what happens when we put passengers and communities first rather than private profit.
'This is the blueprint for Great British Railways: a reliable, accessible and value for money railway that serves the public and drives economic growth not only across the North but the whole country.'
TPE managing director Chris Jackson said: 'Public ownership gave us the space and stability to reset.
'Our focus has been on people, our passengers, our colleagues and the communities we serve.
'Two years on, we're proud to be delivering a better, more reliable railway for the North.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News

33 minutes ago

• Sky News

Hundreds of jobs at risk as River Island takes axe to store base

Hundreds more high street jobs are being put at risk as part of a sweeping overhaul of the family-owned fashion retailer River Island. Sky News has learnt that the clothing chain, which trades from about 230 stores, is proposing to close 33 shops in a restructuring plan which will be put to creditors in August. The fate of a further 70 stores is dependent upon agreements being reached with landlords to slash rent payments. Confirmation of the plans comes less than a month after Sky News revealed that the company, which was founded in 1948 by Bernard Lewis, was working with PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) on a restructuring plan. In a statement issued on Friday, Ben Lewis, River Island's chief executive, said: "River Island is a much-loved retailer, with a decades-long history on the British high street. "However, the well-documented migration of shoppers from the high street to online has left the business with a large portfolio of stores that is no longer aligned to our customers' needs. "The sharp rise in the cost of doing business over the last few years has only added to the financial burden. "We have a clear strategy to transform the business to ensure its long-term viability. "Recent improvements in our fashion offer and in-store shopping experience are already showing very positive results, but it is only with a restructuring plan that we will be able to see this strategy through and secure River Island's future as a profitable retail business. "We regret any job losses as a result of store closures, and we will try to keep these to a minimum." The company declined to comment on how many jobs would be put at risk by the initial 33 shop closures, or on the scale of the rent cuts being sought during talks with landlords. In total, it is understood to employ about 5,500 people. Sources said that new funding will be injected into River Island if the restructuring plan is approved in August. Previously named Lewis and Chelsea Girl, the business, it adopting its current brand during the 1980s. Accounts for River Island Clothing Co for the 52 weeks ended 30 December 2023 show the company made a £33.2m pre-tax loss. Turnover during the year fell by more than 19% to £578.1m. A restructuring plan is a court-supervised process which enables companies facing financial difficulties to compromise creditors such as landlords in order to avoid insolvency proceedings. An identical process is being used to close scores of Poundland shops and slash rents at hundreds more. In its latest accounts at Companies House, River Island Holdings Limited warned of a multitude of financial and operational risks to its business. "The market for retailing of fashion clothing is fast changing with customer preferences for more diverse, convenient and speedier shopping journeys and with increasing competition especially in the digital space," it said. "The key business risks for the group are the pressures of a highly competitive and changing retail environment combined with increased economic uncertainty. "A number of geopolitical events have resulted in continuing supply chain disruption as well as energy, labour and food price increases, driving inflation and interest rates higher and resulting in weaker disposable income and lower consumer confidence." Retailers have complained bitterly about the impact of tax changes announced by Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, in last autumn's Budget. Since then, a cluster of well-known chains, including Lakeland and The Original Factory Shop, have been forced to seek new owners.

The Guardian

35 minutes ago

• The Guardian

We're on the brink of a disastrous, illegal conflagration in the Middle East. Trump must be stopped

Like the US-led invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003, Israel's war on Iran is neither legal nor just. It is a war of choice, not of necessity – and should the US or its European allies, particularly Britain, join in, they risk being dragged into another disastrous and unlawful conflict in the Middle East. A US military intervention would be in direct contravention of international law. Already, the US, once the architect and guardian of the international order, is now among its chief violators. Instead of pressuring Benjamin Netanyahu to end his siege and destruction of Gaza, Donald Trump has fully sided with Netanyahu and called Israel's attacks on Iran 'excellent'. He has demanded Iran's 'unconditional surrender'. Trump is considering military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Doing so is explicitly prohibited under article 56 of the additional protocol to the Geneva conventions because of the danger of nuclear contamination. Britain, meanwhile, must tread carefully. The attorney general has reportedly warned that any UK military involvement beyond defensive support would be illegal. Richard Hermer, the government's top legal adviser, is said to have raised internal concerns about the legality of joining a bombing campaign. The foundation of Israel's justification for launching pre-emptive strikes and of Washington's quiet complicity is alarming. The core claim is that Iran was rapidly taking steps to 'weaponise its uranium', with Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, repeatedly warning that Tehran is approaching a point of no return in developing a nuclear bomb. But Netanyahu's narrative flatly contradicts the US intelligence assessment, which found that not only is Iran not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon, it remains at least three years away from having the capability to do so. The CIA disputes the Israeli claim that Iran is close to crossing a nuclear threshold. Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, testified in March that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and that the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, had not authorised a nuclear programme, one that was in fact suspended in 2003. Even if Iran was making a bomb, international law doesn't give Israel and the US the right to bomb Iran. The UN charter is clear on the use of force in international relations. Yet, when pressed about this contradiction, Trump dismissed the intelligence outright. 'I don't care what she said,' he told reporters. 'I think they were very close to having it.' Netanyahu and Trump's narrative also stands in direct opposition to findings by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), whose director general, Rafael Grossi, confirmed on 17 June that there was 'no proof' Iran was systematically developing nuclear weapons. Set against this backdrop, US military intervention would rupture the rules-based international order further and make future conflicts more unpredictable and dangerous. Other powerful states could launch offensive wars under the pretext of pre-empting real or imagined threats to their national security. Today, it's Israel and the US. Tomorrow, China could use the same rationale to justify attacking Taiwan. The echoes of the Iraq war should also raise alarm bells. Then, as now, war was sold on manufactured intelligence. Netanyahu was a vocal supporter of the neoconservative movement that led the Bush administration's invasion of Iraq and justified it with claims about Saddam Hussein's possession of weapons of mass destruction and ties to terrorism. George W Bush sold that war with the now-infamous line about Hussein's 'massive stockpile' of biological weapons, despite the CIA stating it had 'no specific information' on quantities or types. Bush went further, claiming: 'We do not know whether or not [Iraq] has a nuclear weapon,' contradicting his own intelligence. He knew, and he lied. Trump, for his part, publicly criticised that very deception, saying Bush's decision to invade Iraq was 'the worst decision any president has made in the history of this country [the US]', adding: 'There were no weapons of mass destruction, and they knew there were none.' Yet Trump today appears to borrow a page from Bush's playbook. Although there is no plan for a US ground invasion of Iran, any attack on Tehran risks spiralling into a full-blown regional war. Iran has repeatedly threatened to retaliate against US bases in Iraq, Bahrain and the wider Gulf. A mission creep could easily escalate, triggering a cycle of strikes and counterstrikes. For example, Iran could mine the strait of Hormuz, a critical choke point for global energy flows. The effects could reverberate globally, hitting energy markets and causing an inflationary cycle, weakening confidence in the US dollar, and potentially plunging the US economy into stagflation. Even the Houthis, with far fewer military capabilities than Iran, have managed to severely inflict damage and disrupt shipping in the Red Sea. If the US joins Israel's war, Iran could cripple global trade routes and send oil prices soaring. If the US joins Israel's war on Iran, it could backfire spectacularly, and potentially strengthen the regime rather than weakening it. One likely outcome is that the clerics will dash forward towards making a nuclear bomb, pointing to Israel's attack and attempt at regime change as justification. Meanwhile, in the UK, Keir Starmer would do well to remember the bitter legacy of Tony Blair, who led Britain into Iraq alongside the US. Fawaz Gerges is professor of international relations at the London School of Economics. His most recent book is The Great Betrayal: The Struggle for Freedom and Democracy in the Middle East

BBC News

an hour ago

• BBC News

Highland councillors oppose hydro project on Loch Ness

Councillors have objected to plans for a new hydro scheme that would draw water from Loch Ness to generate Energy's pumped storage hydro project would involve constructing a power station and tunnels at Loch Kemp near Whitebridge, about 10 miles (16km) north of Fort Scottish government, which has a say on whether it eventually goes ahead or not, has consulted Highland Council on the local authority's south planning applications voted 8-2 in favour of a motion opposing the project due to a number of concerns, including impacts on wildlife and tourism. Highland Council officials had recommended councillors raised no Energy has been approached for comment. Aird and Loch Ness councillor Chris Ballance, who put forward the motion, said ancient woodlands along the loch's shores could be adversely affected by changes in water said wildlife, such as otters, and the "special qualities" of Loch Ness could be put at Ballance also argued that a tourism impact assessment had not been carried out, and his motion also raised concerns about construction traffic on local and Strathspey councillor Bill Lobban tabled an amendment supporting the officials' recommendation. The amendment was defeated in the District Salmon Fishery Board, which opposes new pumped storage hydro on Loch Ness, welcomed the committee's Brian Shaw said: "This was absolutely the right decision. "The councillors rejected out of hand the planning officer's conclusion that this was the 'right development in the right place'." What is pumped storage hydro? Pumped storage hydro involves two bodies of water at different water flows from one to the other through tunnels, passing through a power station to generate there is low demand for electricity from consumers and/or when surplus power is available from wind farms, electricity is used to pump water from the lower level to fill a reservoir further up the water can then be released from the upper reservoir, flowing down the tunnels to drive turbines which generate hydro-electricity. This happens at times of high demand, or when there is not enough wind to power wind Kemp Storage Ltd, which is owned by Statera Energy, has proposed damming Loch Kemp, the upper reservoir of its scheme, to raise water also plans to construct an underground waterway systems and tunnels, and powerhouse on the shores of Loch Ness. The south planning applications committee granted consent for a separate electricity-related approved plans SSEN Transmission's plans to replace three 1960s-built substations at Deanie and Culligran in Glen Strathfarrar, and at Kilmorack.