Afghanistan: Kabul racing against time as water decreases 'day by day'

The Taliban authorities have launched projects ranging from recycling water to building hundreds of small dams across the country, but larger interventions remain hampered by financing and technical capacity read more
Afghans fill canisters with water from a potable tanker on a hillside in Kabul. AFP
Every week, Bibi Jan scrapes together some of her husband's meagre daily wage to buy precious water from rickshaw-drawn tankers that supply residents of Afghanistan's increasingly parched capital.
Kabul faces a looming water crisis, driven by unruly and rapid urbanisation, mismanagement over years of conflict, and climate change, meaning people like Bibi Jan are sometimes forced to choose between food and water.
'When my children have only tea for a few days, they say, 'You bought water and nothing for us',' the 45-year-old housewife told AFP, describing reusing her supplies for bathing, dishes and laundry.
Experts have long sounded the alarm over Kabul's water problems, which are worsening even as many international players have backed off big infrastructure projects and slashed funding to Afghanistan since the Taliban government took power in 2021.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'There could be no ground water in Kabul by 2030' without urgent action, the UN children's agency UNICEF warned last year.
Other experts are more cautious, citing limited consistent and reliable data, but say the situation is clearly deteriorating.
A 2030 cliff is a 'worst-case scenario', said water resources management expert Assem Mayar.
But even if slated development projects are completed in a few years, it 'doesn't mean the situation would become better than now', Mayar said.
'As time goes on, the problems are only increasing,' he added, as population growth outstrips urban planning and climate change drives below-average precipitation.
'Decreasing day by day'
The Taliban authorities have launched projects ranging from recycling water to building hundreds of small dams across the country, but larger interventions remain hampered by financing and technical capacity.
They remain unrecognised by any country since they ousted the Western-backed government and imposed their severe interpretation of Islamic law, with restrictions on women a major sticking point.
They have repeatedly called for non-governmental groups to reboot stalled projects on water and climate change, as Afghanistan faces 'some of the harshest effects' in the region, according to the United Nations.
The water and energy ministry wants to divert water from the Panjshir river to the capital, but needs $300 million to $400 million. A dam project near Kabul would ease pressures but was delayed after the Taliban takeover.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
For now, Kabul's primary drinking water source is groundwater, as much as 80 percent of which is contaminated, according to a May report by Mercy Corps.
It is tapped by more than 100,000 unregulated wells across the city that are regularly deepened or run dry, the NGO said.
Groundwater can be recharged, but more is drawn each year than is replenished in Kabul, with an estimated annual 76-million-cubic-metre (20-billion-gallon) deficit, experts say.
'It's a very serious problem… Water is decreasing day by day in the city,' said Shafiullah Zahidi, who heads central Kabul operations for the state-owned water company UWASS.
Water systems designed decades ago serve just 20 percent of the city's population, which has exploded to around six million over the past 20 years, said Zahidi.
'Use less water'
At one of Kabul's 15 pumping stations, maintenance manager Mohammad Ehsan said the seven-year-old well is already producing less water. Two others nearby sit dry.
'The places with shallower water levels are dried out now,' said 53-year-old Ehsan, who has worked in water management for two decades, as he stood over an old well.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It once produced water from a depth of 70 metres (230 feet), but a newer well had to be bored more than twice as deep to reach groundwater.
At one of the two large stations in the city, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) recently procured four new pumps where only one had been functioning.
'If that pump collapsed for any reason, that means stopping the service for 25,000 beneficiary households,' which now have uninterrupted water, said Baraa Afeh, ICRC's deputy water and habitat coordinator.
Everyone in Kabul 'should have 24-hour service', said Zahidi, from the state water company.
But in reality, Bibi Jan and many other Kabulis are forced to lug water in heavy jugs from wells or buy it from tankers.
These suppliers charge at least twice as much as the state-owned utility, with potable water even more pricy in a country where 85 percent of the population lives on less than a dollar a day.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Bibi Jan said she has to police her family's water use carefully.
'I tell them, 'I'm not a miser but use less water.' Because if the water runs out then what would we do?'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mint

41 minutes ago

• Mint

Israel-Iran war: Hours post US strike, blasts heard at Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear plant — ‘Nuclear disaster' imminent?

Israel-Iran war: Explosions boomed Sunday afternoon in the Iranian port city of Bushehr, three semiofficial Iranian media outlets reported. It was not immediately clear what caused the blasts. Bushehr is home to Iran's only nuclear power plant, which is run with Russian assistance. Iranian authorities, however, have not reported any problem at the plant. Earlier, the UN Nuclear Chief had warned of a 'nuclear disaster' if Israel hits Iran's Bushehr plant. (This is a developing story. Keep checking for more updates)

First Post

an hour ago

• First Post

Netanyahu often gets what he wants despite clashes with US presidents

A little over a month ago, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to have been shunted to the shadows by U.S. President Donald Trump, who hopscotched the Middle East without visiting Israel, traditionally Washington's closest regional ally. read more Just over a month ago, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared increasingly sidelined by US President Donald Trump, who toured the West Asia without stopping in Israel, long considered Washington's closest ally in the region. To Netanyahu's dismay, Trump lifted sanctions on neighbouring Syria and expressed interest in reviving nuclear negotiations with Iran, moves the Israeli leader has consistently opposed. But five weeks later, the narrative has flipped: U.S. bombers have struck Iran's nuclear sites—realising a decades-long goal of Netanyahu, who has long urged Washington to take military action against Tehran's atomic programme. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The episode underscores a defining trait of Netanyahu's political career: despite strained ties with successive US presidents, he often prevails in shaping U.S. policy to align with his own objectives. Over more than 30 years, Netanyahu has locked horns with American leaders—publicly challenging, defying, and sometimes even embarrassing them. Yet through both Republican and Democratic administrations, US military and diplomatic support for Israel has remained steadfast. Washington continues to be Israel's primary arms supplier and diplomatic protector. 'He probably has concluded that he always gets away with it,' said a senior UN official in Jerusalem, speaking anonymously. 'It's hard to argue otherwise.' Just weeks ago, opposition leader Yair Lapid accused Netanyahu of wrecking U.S.-Israel relations. Now, the recent strikes represent perhaps the closest military coordination yet between the two countries against a shared adversary. Clashes with US presidents Netanyahu's resistance to U.S. pressure has deep roots. Just a month into his first term in 1996, his blunt manner irked then-President Bill Clinton. 'Who the f— does he think he is? Who's the f—ing superpower here?' Clinton reportedly asked aides after their meeting. Nevertheless, vital U.S. military aid continued to flow. When Netanyahu returned to power in 2009, relations with President Barack Obama turned frosty, particularly over Israeli settlement expansion and the Obama administration's pursuit of a nuclear deal with Iran. In 2015, Netanyahu addressed the U.S. Congress—without informing the White House—warning that the Iran nuclear accord would pave the way for an atomic bomb. Though Obama was reportedly furious, Washington still finalised the largest-ever U.S. military aid package to Israel the following year: $38 billion over a decade. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Many analysts believe Netanyahu relies on the enduring support of US evangelical Christians and Jewish Americans to ensure continued aid—regardless of political turbulence. Trump, Gaza and Iran When Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel in October 2023, then-President Joe Biden rushed to Israel to express solidarity and authorised large-scale arms transfers. But tensions between Biden and Netanyahu mounted as the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsened. Biden eventually paused some weapons shipments and imposed sanctions on Israeli settlers accused of violence. Netanyahu welcomed Trump's return to the presidency following last November's election. But Trump, too, initially showed frustration with the prolonged Gaza war and even initiated diplomatic outreach to Iran during a meeting with Netanyahu in early April. Although Trump never publicly endorsed Israel's military strategy, he also didn't oppose it. According to US and Israeli sources, Netanyahu used the window of ambiguity to press ahead. On June 13, Israel launched a major air assault on Iran. Behind the scenes, Israeli officials pushed Trump to join, urging him to 'finish the job.' 'Mr President, Finish the job!' read large billboards across Tel Aviv. On Sunday, when U.S. bombers struck Iran's heavily fortified nuclear facilities, the moment marked a dramatic turn in the conflict—and a personal victory for Netanyahu. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Congratulations, President Trump,' Netanyahu said in a video statement. 'Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history.' 'May God bless our unshakeable alliance, our unbreakable faith,' he concluded. Trump's intervention – despite his past pledges to avoid another 'forever war' – threatens to dramatically widen the conflict, after Israel launched an unprecedented bombing campaign on Iran last week, with Tehran vowing to retaliate if Washington joined in. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the United States of sabotaging diplomacy after talks with European powers. 'This week, we held talks with the E3/EU when the US decided to blow up that diplomacy,' he wrote on X. Aragchi later told reporters in Istanbul the United States and Israel had 'crossed a very big red line', asserting Iran would continue to defend itself 'by all means necessary'. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the US strikes, saying Trump's decision to 'target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In response to the US attack, Iran's armed forces said they targeted multiple sites in Israel including Ben Gurion airport, the country's main international gateway near Tel Aviv. With inputs from agencies

India.com

an hour ago

• India.com

Full Responsibility Lies With US...: Iran Reacts To Nuclear Facility Strikes

New Delhi: Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the US airstrikes on nuclear sites have fundamentally changed the situation, rendering diplomacy insufficient for now. "It's good to keep the door of diplomacy open, but today, the situation has fundamentally changed. My country has come under direct attack. In this moment, diplomacy alone is no longer sufficient; our priority must now be self-defense." According to the media reports, Araghchi emphasized that the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities is a direct assault on national integrity and a violation of global norms. "The most dangerous escalation occurred last night. A red line was crossed when our nuclear facility was attacked. This was not just a provocation; it was a direct assault on our national integrity and a violation of global norms." Given this development, it's unclear how much room remains for negotiations. The minister asserted Iran's commitment to defending its sovereignty and protecting its people under international law. "Iran will take all necessary steps to defend its sovereignty and protect its people in accordance with international law and its right to security." He criticized the US, saying they don't understand diplomacy and the UN has failed to uphold respect for the Iranian Charter. Araghchi questioned the effectiveness of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in protecting non-nuclear states like Iran. "Despite being a non-nuclear state, Iran has remained a committed member of the NPT. Yet, the NPT has failed to protect us. Why should Iran - or any other non-nuclear nation - continue to rely on a framework that offers no real security guarantees?" According to media reports, the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs held the US "fully responsible" for the consequences of the airstrikes, calling them a "grave crime". "The world must not forget that it was the United States, in the middle of a diplomatic process, that betrayed diplomacy by supporting the aggressive and lawless actions of the genocidal Israeli regime." In response to the airstrikes, US President Donald Trump demanded Iran make peace, warning of more devastating attacks if they refuse. "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier." Trump also referenced decades of tensions between the US and Iran, stating, "For 40 years, Iran has been saying, 'Death to America, Death to Israel'. They have been killing our people... I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen. It will not continue".