Russia's VTB still plans to open a branch in Iran but will wait for hostilities to end first, CEO says
ST.PETERSBURG, Russia, June 19 (Reuters) - Russia's second largest lender VTB still plans to open a branch in Iran, but will wait for hostilities between Israel and Tehran to end and is analysing the situation, VTB CEO Andrei Kostin said on Thursday.
VTB, which is under Western sanctions, opened a representative office in Iran in 2023 and has applied for a banking licence.
Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran on Thursday and Iranian missiles hit an Israeli hospital overnight, as the week-old air war escalated with no sign yet of an off-ramp.
"We do not know, nobody knows how the situation will develop there. We are analysing the situation," Kostin told reporters on the sidelines of Russia's biggest economic forum in St. Petersburg.
"We applied for a licence, now we will wait, we will not take any action," Kostin said. "We are not in a hurry, let the shooting stop first."
Kostin said that Iran had become a significant trading partner for Russia in recent years, but that doing business there was difficult.
"We saw that there is a substantial business there, but it is not an easy place for business. The currency regulation there is very complex," Kostin said.
A Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) free trade deal with Iran took effect in May. Iran's Oil Minister Mohsen Paknejad, who visited Moscow in April, said that the free trade deal would increase bilateral trade to $6 billion.
Iran was the third-largest buyer of Russian wheat in 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Are the Maga isolationists losing influence over Trump's Iran deliberations?
The Trump administration is managing internal dissent over deliberations on whether to launch a strike against Iran, breaking what many supporters saw as a campaign pledge not to involve the US in new conflicts in the Middle East. Trump for the second time this week disregarded testimony by his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, that Iran had not been seeking to build a nuclear weapon as of March this year. 'She's wrong,' Trump said, then added: 'My intelligence community is wrong.' In a striking about-face, Gabbard late on Friday said her March testimony had been taken 'out of context' by the media and claimed there was no difference between her opinion and Trump's. 'The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division,' she said in a post on X. 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' Gabbard was nominated to her position in large part because of her skepticism of the US intelligence community and its role in the US involvement in a series of 'forever wars' in the Middle East, especially the Iraq war. Her transition from Democrat to Trump supporter is indicative of the broad coalition that Trump has united under his America First movement – and the potential for a schism as the US grows closer to launching an attack on Iran. Steve Bannon, an influential advisor who has been critical of the potential for a US-Iran war, was seen having lunch at the White House with Trump this week, following a series of podcast episodes in which he and other popular MAGA pundits criticised what they saw as preparations for a preemptive US strike against Iran. Bannon came to lunch armed with talking points that the Iran strike would be a bad idea and the massive 30,000lb bunker-buster bombs that could target the Iranian uranium enrichment facility at Fordow may not destroy the target. The Guardian previously reported that Trump was not fully convinced the bombs would destroy the target, and has held off authorising strikes as he also awaits the possibility that the threat of US involvement would lead Iran to talks. Others close to the administration have pushed back forcefully in support of a strike on Iran. Republican congressmen including Mitch McConnell and Tom Cotton have lashed out against the isolationist wing of Trump's support; the radio host Mark Levin has personally spoken with Trump in support of stronger backing for Israel; and other top members of the administration – including secretary of state Marco Rubio – are avowed Iran hawks. Others, such as vice-president JD Vance, are public anti-interventionists but have limited their criticism of potential strikes to allow Trump the space to make a decision. But Bannon is believed to have an outsized influence on Trump's decision-making on the war. According to US media, he has warned Trump he shouldn't trust Israeli intelligence that the Iranian government was seeking a nuclear weapon imminently. Others in the MAGA wing of Trump's support have sought to rebuild ties after sharply criticising Trump's positioning on the Israeli strikes against Iran. Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host, had called Trump earlier this week in order to apologise after blasting those advising Trump to launch strikes against Iran as 'warmongers.' 'Tucker is a nice guy,' Trump said from the Oval Office on Wednesday. 'He called and apologised the other day because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciated that.'
The Sun
35 minutes ago
- The Sun
This NATO summit is a defining moment for our alliance and for Britain's security – we must spend more on defence
The Middle East is on the brink. Homes, hospitals and schools in Israel are under bombardment. The crisis in Gaza continues. Millions of people across the region live in fear of what comes next. 2 This government will always back Israel's security and will never allow Iran to get its hands on a nuclear weapon. But we are urging restraint on all sides. As Defence Secretary, my top priority is the protection of our armed forces in the region. It's why we moved at pace to deploy extra military assets when the conflict broke out. The additional Typhoon jets promised by the Prime Minister have now arrived in the region. Force protection for our bases and personnel is at the highest level and I won't rule out sending more capabilities if needed. Because Britain stands ready. Let's not forget that Iran's race to build a bomb is what dragged the Middle East into this crisis. Britain is a nuclear power. Last week, I visited the brilliant British scientists and engineers working on our next-generation nuclear deterrent – the ultimate guarantee of our national security. But we are a responsible nuclear power. Iran would not be. It's a nation committed to the destruction of Israel, whose Supreme Leader described as a 'cancerous tumour' that should be 'removed and eradicated'. 2 The instability in the Middle East, and continued war in Ukraine, shows why this week's NATO Leaders' Summit in the Netherlands matters. We're living in a more dangerous and unpredictable world. This Summit is a defining moment for our alliance and for Britain's security. It's a moment where NATO allies will pledge to step up on defence spending to boost our collective security. President Trump and NATO chief, Mark Rutte, are right: the current NATO spending pledge – to spend at least 2 per cent of GDP on defence – is a relic of a past era. We are now in a new era of threat. And as threats increase, defence spending must too. That's why our government is already one of the biggest spenders in NATO. It's why we've announced the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War, funded by switching spending from overseas aid – and we urge NATO allies to match that pace. It's why this week, at NATO we will discuss a new, higher spending target. And Britain is up for that discussion. This debate is not just about getting hard military kit and capabilities into the hands of our outstanding British troops. Not just about investment in housing and pay to fix forces morale and boost recruitment. We are ramping up all these things. It's also about the investment in the security of the British people with the infrastructure, the energy security, the industry and the innovation needed to help harden Britain in a more dangerous world where have seen increasing 'grey zone' threats: cyberattacks, sabotage and more. Sun readers know that investing in defence doesn't just make Britain safer, and back our British troops – it makes British workers better off, too. Our world leading defence industry is an engine for economic growth creating jobs, skills and pride – the foundation of our government's Plan for Change. Last week, I was in Sheffield opening a new artillery factory for British firm BAE Systems, 200 new, skilled jobs. This week, in Aldermaston I saw how our £15bn investment in a new nuclear warhead for our UK nuclear deterrent is supporting 9,500 jobs in Berkshire and doubling the number of apprenticeships. New investment. New jobs. New opportunities for young people. Our government's boost to defence spending will bring more of this good, well-paid work to the places that need it most across the UK. Now and in the coming years, more and more communities will benefit from this 'defence dividend'. And as we boost British jobs, we will make Britain safer. Secure at home, and strong abroad.
The Sun
35 minutes ago
- The Sun
West MUST neuter nuclear Iran before it gets bomb… alternative is arming regime that would rejoice in our extermination
SAY it loud – if the Islamic Republic of Iran has nuclear bombs, it is very bad news for this country, the free world and the human race. We are right to be wary of western intervention in the Middle East. 10 The invasion of Iraq eventually gave birth to Islamic State. Western intervention in Afghanistan left the women-hating Taliban in power. But all arguments for appeasement return to one question. Can the free world live with nuclear -armed Mullahs? The Islamist fanatics in Tehran shout the rhetoric of extermination — against Israel, the Great Satan (the US) and Little Satan (us). We have no choice but to take them seriously. Iran's leaders are in the last- chance nuclear saloon. President Trump has sensibly given them two weeks to stop building nuclear weapons. All of Trump's instincts are to avoid armed conflict. 'Going into the Middle East is the worst decision ever made!', he raged in 2019. Trump campaigned for his second term as a deal-maker, a peacemaker, an America-Firster more at home on the golf course than the battlefield. Missiles streak into downtown Israeli city as Iran breaches Iron Dome defences But sometimes we must fight for our freedom — and survival. If Iran cannot be persuaded to give up their nukes peacefully, then conflict can't be avoided. Unless we are prepared to see nukes in the hands of a regime that would rejoice to see us exterminated. Even Trump supporters are against the idea of the US once again playing Earth's policeman. 'Drop Israel,' urges Tucker Carlson, traditionally Trump's greatest cheerleader. 'Let them fight their own wars.' This is the MAGA line — abandon old allies, step away from NATO, let the freeloading foreigners fight their own wars. Don't get involved, dude! But all the experts agree that Israel simply does not have the firepower to eradicate Iran's nuclear weapon programme. Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment plant is inside a mountain. Destroying it requires American hardware. Specifically, it requires American Stealth bombers carrying 30,000lb bunker-busting bombs. Right to worry And even that may not be enough. Trump has given Iran's Mullahs every chance to abort their plans. They should take it. As the world steels itself, it is worth stating — the Iranian people are not our enemy. Iran has been a sponsor of global terror, but nobody has suffered more under Tehran's religious fanatics than the people. Iranian women have been beaten to death for daring to remove their hijab. Any military intervention should be a last resort to remove the possibility of Iran ever having nuclear weapons. It should not be the start of a war against the Iranian people. We are right to worry about bombs falling on the nuclear facility. Europe does not want to see millions more refugees on the move. Or a Chernobyl -like disaster. But what should we fear more? Bombs dropped on fanatics who would dance on our graves — or a nuclear-armed Iran? Rachel a streetwise Eva Peron AT 9pm sharp every night on London's Argyll Street, the strolling West End crowds are greeted by an astonishing sight. Rachel Zegler, radiant Hollywood superstar, appears on a balcony dressed as Eva Peron and belts out a version of Don't Cry For Me Argentina that is so damn good you hope Madonna and Elaine Paige never hear it. 10 What a voice. What a performance. And what a shock to the system if you have been doing a spot of late-night shopping. Rachel – star of Snow White and Spielberg's West Side Story reboot – is playing Argentina's Eva Peron in Evita at the London Palladium until September. And for the show's defining moment, every night, she comes off the Palladium stage, on to that balcony overlooking Argyll Street, and she sings – like a cross between Aretha Franklin and an angel. Ticket holders who have paid to see the show watch Zegler's performance on a TV monitor. One punter wrote: 'Sorry – are you saying I've paid £350 for two tickets and she's singing the biggest number outside at people who HAVEN'T paid?' Er, yes. Like so many current West End shows, Evita has trigger warnings – telling fans not to be alarmed by loud music and flashing lights. But the greatest shock is that anyone expecting to see Rachel Zegler belt out Don't Cry For Me Argentina should not be sitting in the Palladium. They should be standing in the street outside. Do not Tipp-ex truth DOES the English language contain a more pathetically inadequate euphemism than ' Asian grooming gang '? Somehow that does not cover the worst sexual abuse scandal in British history. Asian – you mean Chinese? Or Indian? No, we don't mean that at all, do we? And grooming gang – what a criminally pitiful understatement for the systemic mass rape of white working-class girls. Why do we struggle to get our heads around the enormity of what has happened in Bradford, Rotherham, Manchester and a dozen other northern cities? Why do we find it so hard, even now, to look the truth in the eye? Because the truth is unbearable. Baroness Casey's report is devastating. In 200 searing, traumatic pages, one paragraph screams for attention. In the report of one child victim, the word 'Pakistani' was Tipp-Exed out. The announcement of an inquiry into over-whelmingly Pakistani gangs abusing vulnerable white children is long overdue. Let us – finally – hear the truth about how thousands of girls were failed by cops, Labour councils and social workers. No more turning away for fear of looking racist. No more whitewashing. And no more Tipp-Ex. Heely idiotic EYEBROWS are raised at the sight of Balenciaga's highly impractical high-heel trainers – yours for £820. But doesn't every generation wear unfeasible footwear? I can vividly remember the numerous occasions during the glam rock days when Billericay High Street chuckled as I fell from my platform boots like some kamikaze member of the Glitter Band. Mind you, my platform boots did not cost 820 quid. Rock on, Rod GEARING up for Glastonbury next week, Sir Rod Stewart – 80-and-a-half years old – reveals that he has had a sprint track installed in his Essex back garden. 'I keep myself very fit,' he says. 'I have an indoor pool. 'Frank Sinatra once said to me, 'Rod, the secret of being a great singer is having powerful lungs. Do lots of underwater swimming'.' We can't all have a sprint track in our back garden and health tips from Sinatra. But we can all be inspired by remarkable Rod, who says he still loves a drink. Rod Stewart once showed us how to be young. Now he is showing us how to grow old. Oasis fans quite something LIAM GALLAGHER bristles at an Edinburgh council official referring to Oasis fans as 'fat, drunk and rowdy'. Liam – mate – do you really want an Oasis crowd to be svelte, sober and polite? Even in middle age, Oasis fans always are mad for it. And never slightly sensible for it. Reign man Cruise TOM CRUISE is to be awarded an honorary Oscar after being nominated four times. He was nominated for Best Actor twice, for Born On The Fourth Of July and Jerry Maguire, Best Supporting Actor for Magnolia and Best Picture for Top Gun: Maverick. For my money, Cruise deserved an Oscar for his career-defining performance opposite Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man, playing a spoilt brat on the skids who learns to love because of his relationship with his disabled brother. If you doubt that the Cruiser is a great actor, have another look at Rain Man. If Tom Cruise had a face like the back of a number 73 bus, he would have half a dozen Oscars by now. End is nigh street ONE of the UK's oldest shops, W.H. Mogford & Son in Bristol, a beautiful and beloved hardware store, is closing its doors this September. It is a miracle that it has survived for 160 years. 10 Around 13,500 high street retailers closed their doors for ever last year, at a cost of 169,000 jobs. Our high streets have been battered by online shopping. Car-hating councils. And apathetic police forces who stand aside for brazen shoplifters, as passive as gendarmes on the beaches of northern France. Shop local when you can. Spend your money in your community. The British high street is dying. And our lives will be diminished when it has gone.
