Gensol misses May payment for loan on BluSmart cabs: Report
Gensol Engineering, promoted by two of the founders of electric mobility firm BluSmart, has missed a payment of about Rs 4 crore to its pass-through certificate (PTC) holders this month, reported The Economic Times (ET). The last successful repayment was made in April, said people familiar with the matter. Gensol had raised funds by issuing PTCs, which were offered to retail investors on the online platform Grip Invest. PTCs are loans given in exchange for an underlying asset, in this case, vehicles that run on the BluSmart platform.The loans were to be repaid using the cash earned by these electric cabs. But after BluSmart shut down its cab services and ongoing talks with Uber and other fleet operators failed to move ahead, repayments became uncertain.Grip Invest founder Nikhil Aggarwal confirmed the missed payment as quoted in the report. He said Gensol had raised a total of Rs 5.6 crore through the PTCs. So far, 56% of the principal has been repaid, but an amount of Rs 4.04 crore is still pending.The loans were secured against 76 electric vehicles. These vehicles are no longer in operation, as BluSmart has stopped its services.On May 29, the Delhi High Court passed a final order, giving possession of these vehicles to the lessor, Vriksh Advisors, a subsidiary of Grip Invest. The court also allowed Vriksh to sell, operate or lease the vehicles. Aggarwal told ET that the vehicles have been inspected and found to be in good condition.He said Vriksh Advisors is now working on setting up charging stations and is in talks with fleet operators to re-deploy these vehicles on ride-sharing platforms.However, an industry insider pointed out that even if the vehicles begin running again, the terms of the original PTC agreement may change. He explained that revenues, commissions and pricing would differ on other platforms, and so the repayment plan would also need to be adjusted.Sources told ET that Vriksh Advisors is trying to find the best buyer or operator for the vehicles, in the hope that proceeds from the lease or sale will help repay the pending loan amounts.'People invested in BluSmart bonds and PTCs because they believed in the cab service, which had a good brand image, and they were also drawn by the high returns,' one investor told ET.According to a credit rating report issued by Care Edge Ratings on Tuesday, the bonds were issued in 2023, were due to mature in 2027, and offered a return of 13.6%.ET had earlier reported on April 21 that many BluSmart investors were expecting defaults on the bonds they had purchased through platforms like Yubi and Centricity. BluSmart had issued over Rs 100 crore worth of bonds over the past year. Of this, investors said that more than Rs 80 crore worth of non-convertible debentures (NCDs) are still due for repayment.These troubles come as Gensol Engineering's promoters, brothers Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi, are under investigation. They are accused of diverting company funds for personal use. BluSmart has already stopped operations, and Gensol's bank accounts have been frozen following orders from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Ahmedabad.The Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (Ireda), a government-run lender, said last week that it has moved the Debt Recovery Tribunal in Delhi against Gensol Engineering and its arm Gensol EV Lease, over a default of about Rs 729 crore. Ireda had earlier also filed an insolvency case against Gensol.This crisis began after market regulator Sebi launched a probe into Gensol Engineering following a stock manipulation complaint it received in June 2024. Sebi's investigation revealed that the Jaggi brothers had allegedly used loans meant for buying electric vehicles for personal expenses.Tune In
advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Credit rating firms seek govt intervention over regulatory void on ₹1 L cr unlisted debt
Mumbai: Credit rating companies have sought the intervention of ministries of corporate affairs and finance amid an uncertainty over the future ratings of more ₹1 lakh crore of unlisted securities . The rating of these instruments, like corporate bonds and securitised papers, which comprise an integral part of the financial market for debts, has fallen between the cracks of two regulatory authorities. The ambiguity stems from the fact that the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), the primary regulator for the credit rating agencies (CRAs), has jurisdiction over only listed securities while unlisted debts raised by corporates, including company fixed deposits, are outside the domain of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). SEBI had last year told rating firms to get a non-objection certificate from RBI for rating the unlisted papers. Since then, the central bank has allowed CRAs to rate certificates of deposits (CDs) - instruments floated by banks to raise short-term funds. But, there is no clarity on ratings of securitised papers like pass through certificates (PTCs) and unlisted corporate bonds . This is where CRAs want the ministries to step in. Issued against a basket of loans and the interest flows from them, PTCs enable lenders like non-bank finance companies as well as banks to convert relatively illiquid loans into marketable papers and create headroom to lend more while letting investors - like corporate treasuries, financial institutions, and fund houses - hold a diversified pool of assets and sometimes generate a higher return. A predominant portion of the outstanding PTCs are unlisted. Under the circumstances, the CRAs are awaiting a signal from the corporate affairs ministry that they can follow the SEBI guidelines on listed securities while carrying out the rating of unlisted securities. Thus, CRAs want to know whether they can continue to use the same rules of default recognition, application of grading scale, disclosures, and issue of press release for unlisted papers as well. The ministry is yet to respond to the letter from the rating industry body. With New Delhi is yet to give the go-ahead, some of the CRAs, in the course of various meetings, have sensitised issuers of unlisted securities as well as some of the investors that ratings of these instruments may have to be withdrawn in the absence of any clarity from the government or regulators. "More so, with SEBI reminding CRAs a few months ago that the issue needs to be sorted out. This could well be a nudge from SEBI to list more securities and thereby promote transparency. However, many issuers refrain from listing either to avoid the compliance and reporting that come with it or strike bilateral deals with investors and do not feel the urgency to list," said an industry official. Many institutional investors may keep away from unrated securities, including banks who save on capital as unrated loans and investments carry higher risk weights. But while there are takers for unrated instruments, rating helps in investment decision making by capturing the risk and pricing of an instrument. "Some are expecting RBI to clear the air for PTCs which are mostly issued by NBFCs (entities regulated by RBI). If RBI gives a green signal for PTCs, then the issue related to rating of unlisted corporate bonds has to be resolved. Company FDs are a small market," said another official. Earnings from ratings of unlisted papers, said an analyst, is a small slice of CRAs' earnings, but a lack of rating can have some implications for the wholesale debt market. For instance, CRAs' periodic reports on the PTC market are closely tracked by investors. "There are adequate regulations on investments in these unlisted securities but there is not enough regulation about their rating. SEBI understandably wants rating of any instrument to be cleared by some authority. It doesn't want to be blamed for a big loss or default which inevitably raises questions on ratings," said the person. "The market too is evolving. The assets of Alternative investment funds have surged in the last 5 to 6 years and many of these funds put money in unlisted papers," she said. Earlier, CRAs could choose on what it would rate, but those days are long over with the role and rules agencies coming under scrutiny since the IL&FS default in 2018.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru Metro's loss is BMTC' gain on NICE Road
Bengaluru: With the long-delayed Yellow Line of Namma Metro to Electronics City still not open to public, thousands of commuters are turning to BMTC's NICE Road express bus services, which have seen a sharp rise in ridership and earnings in recent months. Launched in Dec 2023, BMTC services along NICE Road corridor began with 62,000 passengers. Today, they attract more than 4 lakh commuters each month. The corporation is now operating 53 buses across 17 routes on NICE Road, with daily ridership exceeding 13,000 passengers. Revenue has also seen a notable jump, with earnings per kilometre doubling in just over a year to Rs 58.8 from Rs 26.1. Among the services gaining traction is the recently introduced non-stop express route covering 48km between Madavara and Electronics City. BMTC chief traffic manager (operations) GT Prabhakar Reddy said the services have outpaced other major corridors within city limits in terms of popularity. "...Responding to this demand, we've added more routes and buses. We've also introduced a direct link from Tavarekere to Electronics City and are planning to roll out 10 AC buses on this route," he said. NICE Road buses now connect key IT hubs via routes originating in Madavara, Vijayanagar TTMC, Bidadi, Kengeri, Banashankari, Basaveshwara Nagar, and other residential areas. Commuters cite reduced travel time and avoidance of city-centre congestion as key reasons for choosing NICE corridor. A one-way ticket from Madavara to Electronics City costs Rs 76, including a Rs 30 toll charge levied by NICE. Although BMTC had earlier requested the toll be reduced or waived for public transport buses, the proposal did not receive any favourable response from NICE authorities. Several passengers also use Metro to reach Madavara before switching to buses to complete their journey to Electronics City. This seamless multimodal shift has become increasingly necessary, as BMRCL continues to miss deadlines for the Yellow Line, connecting RV Road and Bommasandra. Despite spending nearly Rs 7,000 crore on the 19-km elevated stretch, the Metro line — initially expected to launch in June with three trains — is yet to receive third-party safety clearance for its signalling system. With no official launch date in sight and repeated delays, public confidence in BMRCL's timeline continues to erode. Meanwhile, BMTC's efficient operations along NICE Road are proving to be a lifeline for daily commuters to the city's IT corridor. Box Rising demand NICE Road bus service launches in Dec 2023 Starts with 62,000 passengers Currently, route caters to 4 lakh commuters a month BMTC now operates 53 buses across 17 routes on NICE Road Daily ridership exceeds 13,000 passengers Earnings per km doubles in over a year from Rs 26.1 to Rs 58.8 Recently introduced non-stop express route, covering 48km between Madavara and Electronics City, gains traction
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC junks Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority order to cancel land for project
Noida: The Allahabad high court has quashed a 2022 decision by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) to cancel land allotted to Royal Golf Link City Projects Pvt Ltd, calling the move "arbitrary and illegal". The court struck down restoration charges, time extension penalties, and penal interest imposed by GNIDA, asking the Authority to restore the plot and revalidate the project map. The court was hearing a petition filed by Royal Golf Link in April, challenging a UP govt order that restored the land allotment but levied several charges. On May 27, Justice Pankaj Bhatia of the Lucknow bench of the HC struck down the state govt's order, nullified the penalties, and granted a three-year extension to the developer to complete the project without extra cost. The court said GNIDA had no valid reason to deny relief to Royal Golf Link when similar reprieve was given to other developers. "Thus, for all the reasons above, the impugned order insofar as it denies the benefit of restoration charges, the extension of time without payment of charges, non-charge of penalty interest and zero period benefit is wholly unjustified and the order to that effect is bad in law. Thus, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no 3 (GNIDA) to recalculate the dues as indicated in the cancellation order dated July 20, 2022 without charging the restoration charges, grant the benefit of time extension without any charges and calculate the interest without charging any penal interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR + 1," the court order read. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The case revolves around a 36.4-hectare land parcel allotted in 2014-15 for developing a recreational park in Sector 27. Initially allocated to a consortium led by Ultra Homes Construction (part of the Amrapali Group), the project was later transferred to Royal Golf Link City Projects, a special purpose vehicle. The total land premium was Rs 298 crore, of which Rs 59.6 crore was paid when the lease was signed. The dispute emerged when GNIDA failed to provide full physical possession of land, with 13,517sqm under encroachment, including a pond and connecting pathway. The situation was further complicated when the then DM asked the developer to leave this area for public access, necessitating a project redesign. The Authority also recorded the presence of farmers on a part of the land and deferred the next premium instalment by six months. The Amrapali case in the Supreme Court further complicated the progress, as the company declared an investment in Royal Golf Link in 2018. The SC ruled that leaseholder dues should be calculated at SBI's MCLR + 1. Royal Golf Link sought recalculation of dues and an 18-month zero-period benefit from the start govt, saying it hadn't received full possession. Instead, GNIDA cancelled the lease on July 20, 2022, citing unsettled dues of Rs 360 crore. The developer moved HC, claiming that GNIDA ignored the SC ruling on interest. Homebuyers also intervened, arguing that the additional charges would be passed on to them. They also claimed that most of the project was ready, but was stuck due to GNIDA's disputes. Royal Golf Link insisted that the restoration fees were unjust since the cancellation was ruled illegal. The court accepted the developer's request for zero-period relief, waiving penalty interest and dues for the Covid pandemic period and from July 20, 2022, to June 12, 2024. The court ruled that the developer must pay 25% of the revised amount — after adjusting Rs 5 crore already paid — within 60 days of receiving the demand. The project Royal Golf Link is building is known as 'The Hemisphere', which includes 1,300 flats, villas, and shops. The developer has claimed to have offered fit-out possession to around 900 buyers.
