Russia Is On 'Brink Of Going Into Recession', Warns Economy Minister

St Petersburg:
Russia's economy is "on the brink of going into a recession," the country's economy minister said Thursday, according to Russian media reports.
Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov delivered the warning at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, the annual event in Russia's second largest city designed to highlight the country's economic prowess and court foreign investors.
Russian business news outlet RBC quoted the official as saying "the numbers indicate cooling, but all our numbers are (like) a rearview mirror. Judging by the way businesses currently feel and the indicators, we are already, it seems to me, on the brink of going into a recession."
The economy, hit with a slew of sanctions after the Kremlin sent troops into Ukraine in February 2022, has so far outperformed predictions. High defense spending has propelled growth and kept unemployment low despite fueling inflation. At the same time, wages have gone up to keep pace with inflation, leaving many workers better off.
Large recruiting bonuses for military enlistees and death benefits for those killed in Ukraine also have put more income into the country's poorer regions. But over the long term, inflation and a lack of foreign investments remain threats to the economy, leaving a question mark over how long the militarized economy can keep going.
Economists have warned of mounting pressure on the economy and the likelihood it would stagnate due to lack of investment in sectors other than the military.
Speaking at a forum session, Reshetnikov said Russia was "on the brink," and whether the country would slide into a recession or not depends on the government's actions.
"Going forward, it all depends on our decisions," Reshetnikov said, according to RBC.
RBC reported Russia's Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and Central Bank Gov. Elvira Nabiullina gave more optimistic assessments.
Siluanov spoke about the economy "cooling" but noted that after any cooling "the summer always comes," RBC reported.
Nabiullina said Russia's economy was merely "coming out of overheating," according to RBC.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

an hour ago

• Indian Express

‘Dictator Approved': a golden thumbs-up crushing Statue of Liberty sculpture appears on National Mall

A new 'art' sculpture has appeared in the heart of Washington appearing to mock US President Donald Trump. Atop the replica of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-California) desk on the National Mall, stands a work of art called 'Dictator Approved,' an 8-foot-tall sculpture showing a gold-painted hand with a distinctive thumbs-up squashing the sea-foam green crown of the Statue of Liberty. The artwork's creator intended Dictator Approved as a response to the June 14 military parade and authoritarianism, according to a permit issued by the National Park Service, as reported by The Washington Post. The parade, the creators wrote in the application, 'will feature imagery similar to autocratic, oppressive regimes, i.e. North Korea, Russia, and China, marching through DC.' The purpose of the statue, they said, is to call attention to 'the praising these types of oppressive leaders have given Donald Trump.' Plaques on the four sides of the artwork's base include quotes from world leaders including Russian President Vladimir Putin ('President Trump is a very bright and talented man.'), Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban ('The most respected, the most feared person is Donald Trump.'), former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro ('We do have a great deal of shared values. I admire President Trump.') and North Korea's Kim Jong Un ('Your Excellency.' A 'special' relationship. 'The extraordinary courage of President Trump.'). No individual or group has taken responsibility for the statue; however, Mary Harris is listed as the applicant for the permit, but no contact information for her was provided. The permit allows the statue to be in place from 7 am, June 16, until 5 pm, June 22. This isn't the first time a sculpture has appeared at the same location. In October last year, a 'brass-coloured 'poop statue' was placed on the National Mall in mock tribute to the January 6 rioters who stormed the US Capitol in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election. A sign below the desk read: 'This memorial honours the brave men and women who broke into the United States Capitol on January 6th, 2021 to loot, urinate, and defecate throughout those hallowed halls in order to overturn an election.' There is no confirmation if the artist group involved in the poop statue is the same involved here, given that the Dictator Approved statue is very similar in style and materials to the poop statue and several protest artworks placed in the District, Philadelphia, and Portland, Oregon, last fall. However, no individual or group has publicly claimed responsibility for those pieces. A White House spokeswoman, Abigail Jackson, lashed out at the claims of Trump leading an 'authoritative' regime, saying, 'If these Democrat activists were living in a dictatorship, their eye-sore of a sculpture wouldn't be sitting on the National Mall right now.' 'In the United States of America, you have the freedom to display your so-called 'art,' no matter how ugly it is,' she said in an email statement to The Washington Post. Social media users were in a frenzy on seeing the 'Dictator Approved' statue. On Instagram, many users shared their views, with some saying, 'That's what we call free speech, with a side of humour. Keep it coming.' Some also thanked the creator of the statue, calling it 'legendary'. 'Thanks to whoever did this,' the comment read. Another user said, 'National Park Service fires back with a permit. Love it!' However, not everyone welcomed the piece of art. 'So when the majority of people vote someone using their rights, it is frowned up and then called a dictatorship. When woke people with a pink and yellow hair do, its called sovereignty. Make it make sense!, a user wrote on Instagram. 'The hateful rhetoric of the left,' another user said. Some tourists who stopped by to see the statue told The Washington Post that they were surprised that it was allowed to be placed where it was. An 80-year-old from Australia, who didn't share his last name, said, 'I'm amazed that whoever dreamed this up could put this here,' adding, 'It reminds me of Animal Farm.' 'I actually love it,' said a District resident, who also didn't share his name. Abigail Martin, 21, visiting from Cleveland said, 'At first I was confused, but then I figured it out. I think it's beautiful.' (With inputs from The Washington Post, Reuters)

Indian Express

an hour ago

• Indian Express

Why Trump's ‘two weeks' timeline for a decision on Iran is déjà vu for many

US President Donald Trump says he will be ready to make his decision about bombing Iran or not 'within the next two weeks'. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt offered this new timeline during her Thursday afternoon briefing, but some in the room couldn't help but feel a sense of déjà vu, as the phrase sounded more than a little familiar. 'I have a message directly from the president, and I quote,' Leavitt said. ''Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.'' As The New York Times noted, 'two weeks' is one of Trump's most favoured and most ambiguous units of time. Sample this. Trump was asked eight weeks ago whether he could trust Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump replied: 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' Over the years, the same timeframe has been deployed for tax plans, health care policies, evidence of conspiracy theories, the fight against ISIS, the reopening of coal mines, and infrastructure announcements — all of which he promised to clarify 'in about two weeks.' As NYT puts it, 'It is a slippery thing, this two weeks — not a measurement of time so much as a placeholder. Two weeks for Trump can mean something, or nothing at all. It is both a yes and a no. It is delaying while at the same time scheduling. It is not an objective unit of time, it is a subjective unit of time. It is completely divorced from any sense of chronology. It simply means later. But later can also mean never. Sometimes.' The pressing question now is whether the US is going to bomb Iran? No one knows and we may have to wait two weeks to find an answer to that question. A reporter tried to pin down the timeline, reminding the press secretary of Trump's repeated 'two-week' promises, particularly in relation to Russia. 'How can we be sure he's going to stick to this one on making a decision on Iran?' Leavitt's answer? Essentially, that one situation can't be compared with another. As NYT says, 'This was really a question of metaphysics more than anything else.'

First Post

an hour ago

• First Post

'Accept our terms or face total surrender': Russia gives ultimatum to Ukraine

Russia has given an ultimatum to Ukraine: either accept Vladimir Putin's terms or be ready for full surrender. In Ukraine, however, there are barely any takers for Putin's maximalist terms as the terms mean the end of Ukraine as they have known it for generations. read more Russia's President Vladimir Putin meets with representatives of the Russian business circles in Moscow on May 26, 2025. (Photo: AFP) Russia has issued an ultimatum to Ukraine: either accept President Vladimir Putin's terms or be ready for full surrender. The ultimatum has come at a time when Russia has increased the pace of its offensive against Ukraine and the world is distracted by the ongoing war between Israel and Iran. Even as Ukraine has scored many substantial hits inside Russia in recent weeks, including the drone attack on June 1 in which it took down a third of Russian long-range bomber and surveillance fleets, Russia advance has picked up pace on the ground. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Amid such circumstances, Andrei Kelin, the Russian Ambassador to the United Kingdom, told CNN that Ukraine could either surrender now or 'we will continue this drive and Ukraine will have to surrender under much worse conditions'. Kelin said, 'We are now on the offensive and Ukraine is in retreat. In May alone, we took about 600 square kilometers (230 square miles) of Ukrainian territory and we continue to gain more ground. For Ukraine, there is a choice: either they will take our conditions right now, a permanent ceasefire and a comprehensive settlement of the situation, or we will continue this drive and Ukraine will have to surrender under much worse conditions." ALSO READ: Russia-Ukraine talks: What terms and conditions Putin and Zelenskyy want to apply to peace In the direct talks in Turkey, Russia had conveyed Putin's maximalist demands to Ukraine. If implemented, the demands would end the Ukrainian nation as generations have known it. The demands understandably have few takers in Ukraine. Putin seeks Ukraine's surrender, not peace With his maximalist demands conveyed in Turkey, Putin made it clear that he is seeking Ukraine's subjugation, not a peace deal. Putin has not just sought the recognition of Ukrainian territories that Russia has occupied since 2014, but has also sought Ukraine's surrender of all territories it claims but not currently occupies. In provisions similar to those imposed on defeated Germany after the World War I in the Treaty of Versailles, he has also sought restrictions on the size, deployment, and equipment of the post-war Ukrainian military. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD ALSO READ: Ukraine and beyond: 25 years on, Putin is still fighting Cold War In addition to complete occupation of five Ukrainian provinces (Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia) even beyond what Russia currently occupies, Putin has also sought the creation of a buffer zone of an unspecified length on the Ukrainian side of the new border. The buffer zone would essentially further reduce Ukraine's territory. In what break change the character of the Ukrainian nation, Putin has sought to insert the Russian language into formal business, restore the pro-Russia Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and ban so-called Ukrainian 'nationalist formations'.