Immigrant rights groups sue to invalidate Trump administration's El Salvador prison deal

A coalition of immigrant rights groups on Thursday sued to invalidate the Trump administration's deal to house detainees in a notorious prison in El Salvador, saying the arrangement to move migrant detainees outside the reach of U.S. courts violates the U.S. Constitution.
The lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C., notes that the administration has argued that those sent to El Salvador are beyond the reach of U.S. courts and no longer have access to due process rights or other U.S. constitutional guarantees.
The deal, the plaintiffs allege, 'is contrary to law. And it was entered into without any legal basis.'
The administration has sent hundreds of migrants to El Salvador, including some it accuses of being members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
The administration in March agreed to pay $6 million for El Salvador to house 300 migrants. President Donald Trump has said he'd like to eventually send U.S. citizen criminals to the Salvadoran prison, though that'd likely be unconstitutional.
The lawsuit notes that the State Department has reported that inmates in El Salvador's prisons may be subject to 'harsh and life-threatening' conditions, torture and lack access to reliable food, water and medical care. The prisons are run by the government of El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, who once called himself 'the world's coolest dictator' and has posted images of detainees sent from the U.S. getting marched into his centerpiece prison, the Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT.
The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In one notorious case cited in the lawsuit, the Trump administration has not returned Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man it deported to El Salvador in violation of a judge's order, saying the man is no longer in its custody.
That was the administration's argument when another judge ordered it to halt deportations under an 18th century wartime act — that the deportees were on a plane to El Salvador and outside the legal reach of federal judges.
The suit was filed by Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Immigrant Equality, the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice and Democracy Forward, which is co-counsel in a separate lawsuit over the initial flights to El Salvador.
Thursday's lawsuit says the deal violates the Administrative Procedures Act, which prevents agencies like the State Department, which reached the deal with El Salvador, from undertaking unconstitutional or otherwise illegal acts. In addition to violating the constitution, the suit notes that housing prisoners in El Salvador violates the First Step Act, a law requiring federal prisons to try to house inmates close to home. That law was signed by Trump in 2018.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

19 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Did he casually use 'N' word? Trump slams Medvedev over Iran nuke comments

US President Donald Trump has hit out at former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for suggesting that some countries may be ready to supply nuclear warheads to Iran in response to recent American airstrikes. In a strongly worded post on Truth Social, Trump said: "Did I hear Former President Medvedev, from Russia, casually throwing around the 'N word' (Nuclear!), and saying that he and other Countries would supply Nuclear Warheads to Iran? Did he really say that or, is it just a figment of my imagination? If he did say that, and, if confirmed, please let me know, IMMEDIATELY," he wrote. "I guess that's why Putin's 'THE BOSS,' he added. Trump also highlighted the technological edge of the United States in nuclear weaponry. He said US nuclear submarines are '20 years advanced over the pack' and expressed gratitude to the submarine crews involved in the recent strikes on Iranian nuclear targets. 'Russia has no intention of supplying nuclear weapons to Iran' Responding to Trump's concern, Medmedev, in a post on X, said, "Regarding President Trump's concerns: I condemn the US strike on Iran – it failed to achieve its objectives. However, Russia has no intention of supplying nuclear weapons to Iran because, unlike Israel, we are parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty." — Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) June 23, 2025 He added, "I know quite well what this would entail, having overseen our nuclear forces as president. But other countries might – and that's what was said. And we definitely shouldn't be arguing over who has more nukes. All the more so because the New START treaty, which I once signed with a US president, is still in force — for now. The question is: what comes next?" Strikes failed to damage Iran's nuclear programme: Medvedev The Trump-Medvedev comes after a series of posts by Dmitry Medvedev on X (formerly Twitter), where he claimed that the US-led strikes failed to cause serious harm to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. He argued that the attacks might have strengthened Iran's position and escalated tensions in the Middle East. 'Critical infrastructure of the nuclear fuel cycle appears to have been unaffected or sustained only minor damage. The enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue. A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads,' Medvedev wrote. 'US now entangled in new conflict' Medvedev painted a grim picture of the situation in the region: 'Israel is under attack, explosions are rocking the country, and people are panicking. The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon.' In his posts, Medvedev blamed Trump for pushing the US into yet another war and mocked any chances the American president might have had of receiving international recognition for peace efforts. 'Iran's political regime has survived — and in all likelihood, has come out even stronger. The people are rallying around the country's spiritual leadership, including those who were previously indifferent or opposed to it. Donald Trump, once hailed as 'president of peace,' has now pushed the US into another war,' he stated. 'The vast majority of countries around the world oppose the actions of Israel and the United States. At this rate, Trump can forget about the Nobel Peace Prize — not even with how rigged it has become. What a way to kick things off, Mr. President. Congratulations!' Medvedev added.

India Gazette

30 minutes ago

• India Gazette

India-US trade deal to increase US' exports to India: Crisil

New Delhi [India], June 23 (ANI): Given that India has much higher tariffs than those imposed by the US, the impending bilateral trade agreement (BTA) -- that would reduce tariffs-- is set to increase the US's exports to India more than vice versa, according to an analysis by Crisil. India would be able to import more energy products, certain agricultural products, and defence equipment, among others, from the US, Crisil said in a 'Quickonomics' report. India, according to Crisil, should be prepared to see more imports from the US under the bilateral trade agreement (BTA). A lowering of tariffs under the BTA would make US goods more competitive in India, it argued. 'This is because India's tariffs are much higher than those of the US, and bringing these down would be advantageous to exporters in the US,' Crisil said. India's exports, however, are unlikely to see a major spike because the focus of the President Donald Trump administration is to reduce its trade deficit with India, and most of India's top exports to the US are already duty-free (before the application of baseline 10 per cent, which is applicable since April 10). Besides, the export potential would also depend eventually on the amount of tariff India faces when compared with other competing nations, Crisil noted. The US has categorically said that it wants to reduce its trade deficit with India (among other nations) and has complained that India's high tariffs and non-tariff barriers have been a hindrance for American companies looking to increase their exports. Even as India had shown its discomfort in allowing US agriculture products to be exported to India, imports of certain agriculture products such as walnuts, pistachios and cranberries could get a fillip as India's share in US exports of these items was relatively low -- at 19.4 per cent, 5.0 per cent and 3.1 per cent, respectively -- in 2024. This contrasts with almonds, where India's share was a hefty 70.5 per cent in 2024 -- one of the US's top agricultural export items to India. Further, with India's aviation sector growing, there is scope to increase imports of civilian aircraft, engines, and parts. According to Crisil, there also seems to be good complementarity in the energy space as the US is a large exporter and India is a large importer of energy commodities. Even though India has a huge opportunity to import crude oil from the US, Crisil said the prospects of increasing crude oil imports from the US would have to be viewed against challenging factors -- such as higher cost of transportation, including the longer transit time. 'The US is a large exporter and India a large importer of LNG, providing a mutually beneficial ground. Here, the synergy seems to be much better than that in crude petroleum as the US is already among the top three suppliers of LNG to India,' Crisil said. 'With favourable factors such as US natural gas prices being more stable than those in the Middle East (India's largest LNG import partner) and long-term contracts being signed between Indian entities and US suppliers, there has been an increase in the import of this commodity from the US,' it added. Defence imports into India could see a rise under the bilateral trade agreement. 'Even as India is trying to increase its defence production and export capabilities, it remains one of the largest arms importers. At the same time, the US is the world's largest arms exporter. While Russia has been India's largest arms supplier traditionally, its share in India's arms imports has come down in recent years. This has created space for western suppliers, led by the US, to step up their sales,' the report said. In fact, in 2023, the US and India launched a bilateral Defence Acceleration Ecosystem (called INDUS-X) to facilitate defence collaboration between the countries. Combining all these opportunities, India's trade surplus with the US is expected to come down -- a major ask of the US, as it has implemented reciprocal tariffs on countries in proportion to the trade surplus. On the contrary, India may see some gains in exports of smartphones, certain pharmaceuticals and labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and gems and jewellery. The US announced reciprocal tariffs on India and a host of other nations on April 2, and then paused the increase for 90 days from April 10 to negotiate trade deals with these countries (for India, the reciprocal tariff was 26 per cent, lower than the tariff on many other Asian peers). During the pause period, a 10 per cent base tariff remains applicable (over and above the existing tariffs) on all countries, including India. India is negotiating a trade deal with the US, called the bilateral trade agreement (BTA) -- the first tranche of which is targeted to be completed by the fall of 2025. (ANI)

Time of India

32 minutes ago

• Time of India

'Entirely illegal and criminal act...': Iran foreign ministry reacts to Trump's 'unjust war'

Iran's foreign ministry spokesman, Ismail Baghaee, said on Monday (June 23), during a weekly press briefing in Tehran, that the country is focused on defending itself a day after the United States joined the war by blasting nuclear sites. Iran repeated earlier threats to retaliate against the United States. But it had yet to so in a meaningful way more than 24 hours after U.S. bombers dropped 30,000 pound bunker-busters on its underground nuclear sites, while US President Donald Trump openly mused about overthrowing the Iranian government. Show more Show less