logo
Leading change requires a paradoxical mindset rather than either-or thinking

Leading change requires a paradoxical mindset rather than either-or thinking

Globe and Mail5 days ago

Interested in more careers-related content? Check out our new weekly Work Life newsletter. Sent every Monday afternoon.
In his 1841 essay Compensation, Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote that 'an inevitable dualism bisects nature, so that each thing is a half.' Blogger Billy Oppenheimer recently surfaced that quote and elaborated: 'Dark can't exist without light. Left can't exist without right. Hot and cold. Pleasure and pain. Up and down. Man and woman. Odd and even. In and out. In motion, at rest. Sickness, health. Peacetime, wartime. Strength, weakness. Order, chaos. More, less. Yes, no.'
They must be understood as connected and tackled together. 'What is lost in one realm is always compensated for in another,' says Mr. Oppenheimer. 'To gain something is to have given up something.'
Transformation and change are supposed to provide clarity for organizations – a mission, a path forward. But they too can be riddled by contradictions which if unaddressed might add to the reasons so many change efforts go awry. Going overboard on one element and ignoring the other element in a quest for dramatic clarity can sink your efforts.
In The Art of Change, Jeff DeGraff, a professor of management at the University of Michigan, and his wife, Staney DeGraff, a consultant, say the complexities of change demand a nuanced approach. Adaptability is key and that requires a paradoxical mindset rather than either-or thinking. You must be flexible and agile. You must understand and grapple with competing elements.
They identify seven paradoxes that crop up repeatedly and pose dangers if ignored:
Instead of rushing to solve urgent issues, they urge you to spot paradoxes you are facing and reflect on them. Look for experiments, small changes that you can learn from. 'By considering creative and hybrid solutions and implementing them with intentionality, you can effectively navigate paradoxes and drive meaningful change,' they advise.
One of the paradoxes they highlight is about transcending limits while still being within them. They note that to transcend our limits, we always have to start by acknowledging them – the limits of our knowledge, resources and time. Once we acknowledge those limits, we can facilitate lots of experiences and experiments to learn from them.
Perhaps there is another contradiction to consider there: In change, we usually think carefully beforehand, develop ideas that are really theories but become prescriptions, while in fact the learning and understanding (and best prescriptions) come after experimenting with change possibilities.
Jason Fried, chief executive officer of Basecamp, raises another duality when he observes that one of the reasons companies have a hard time moving forward is because they've tangled themselves in the near past. They trap themselves looking for certainty where there isn't any, actional advice where there are only guesses. 'Eyes aimed backwards rather than ahead, staring at the dark, feet in their own concrete,' he writes on his blog.
He stresses that isn't always wrong. If the process is highly mechanized or isolated, you can look back and find the exact moment when something went wrong. But he argues that most failed projects subject to retrospectives are searches for reasons where there are only humans to be found. We are plaintively searching for reasons where – here's another duality – there are only mysteries.
'A better path is to reflect forward, not backwards. Develop a loose theory while working on what's next. Appreciate there's no certainty to be found and put all your energy into doing better on an upcoming project,' he says.
'But how will you do better next time if you don't know what went wrong last time? Nothing is guaranteed other than experience. You'll simply have more time under the curve and more moments under tension to perform better moving forward.'
Tina Dacin, a professor of organizational behaviour at Queen's University, raised another paradox when she looked at Lady Gaga's recent Coachella performance where the singer paid homage to past greats such as Michael Jackson and Prince as well as her different past selves. Prof. Dacin's research with colleagues has found leaders involved in stewarding change and transition in organizations are 'custodians' – people with a vested interest in protecting traditions, while also reimagining and renewing them over time. 'Such custodians in workplaces or social organizations facing disruption take valued remnants from the past and curate them to be accessible and relevant for the future,' she writes in The Conversation.
But not just custodians of the past. In making change, she says, you must be custodians of hope. You must craft futures worth preserving. There's a bundle of dualities in there to consider as you reflect on the paradoxes of change.
Cannonballs
Harvey Schachter is a Kingston-based writer specializing in management issues. He, along with Sheelagh Whittaker, former CEO of both EDS Canada and Cancom, are the authors of When Harvey Didn't Meet Sheelagh: Emails on Leadership.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Things you should never put in the dishwasher
Things you should never put in the dishwasher

CTV News

time41 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Things you should never put in the dishwasher

I have a different relationship with each of my kitchen appliances. With the fridge, I feel a friendly familiarity, and with my microwave, a sort of unspoken camaraderie. I interact with both frequently, sometimes several times a day. With dishwashers, though, there is a reverence. My family didn't own one until I was much older, and it has always seemed like a mysterious invention to me. Every time I use one now, I'm worried about doing something wrong, specifically whether I'm putting in an item that I shouldn't. If you've ever had similar worries, here's what you should know. Things you should not put in your dishwasher Acrylic dishware or accessories: Crazing (small cracks through the acrylic) might occur. Brass, bronze, copper, and pewter items: High-temperature water and detergent can cause discoloration, says Larry Ciufo, who has tested hundreds of dishwashers at CR over the past 20 years. Cast-iron cookware: You risk removing the seasoning—the baked-on oil in your pan that helps prevent food from sticking—which can cause the pan to rust. Insulated mugs: Unless they're labeled as dishwasher-safe, water can get inside the seal between the inner and outer layers of these mugs, which might affect their ability to retain heat or keep drinks cold. Nonstick pans: If the manufacturer doesn't say it's dishwasher-safe, avoid putting them in the dishwasher because the washing process could wear away the coating, Ciufo says. Sharp knives: Even if they're labeled dishwasher-safe, you should wash them by hand because they can get dull after rubbing against other cutlery in the basket. Tin items: Tin will rust if washed in the dishwasher, so you should hand-wash and dry them immediately. Wood: Water and heat can result in your wooden salad bowls or cutting boards warping and cracking. Things that are generally safe, but with caveats Aluminum is usually dishwasher-safe, but minerals in the water might cause spots or darkening. To remove those, scour with a soap-filled steel wool pad. China, crystal, and stoneware are mostly safe, but if the pieces are hand-painted or fragile, wash them by hand. It's also better to hand-wash glasses or dishes with gold leaf. Milk-glass items might yellow after repeated washings in the dishwasher. Plastic items vary in their ability to withstand heat and detergents, so check whether they're dishwasher-safe and make sure to place them on the top rack—away from the heating element—and don't select cycles that use higher wash or dry temperatures. Stainless steel and silver are generally OK to put in the dishwasher, but make sure you run your rinse cycle if you're not running the wash cycle immediately, because prolonged contact with food can damage their finish. By Pang-Chieh Ho, Consumer Reports Senior Home & Appliances Writer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store