Disgraced US congressman defends social media tirade in fraud case
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here George Santos is defending his recent social media tirade to a federal judge who will be sentencing the disgraced former New York congressman later this week on fraud charges. In a lengthy letter ahead of the Friday court date, Santos, 36, said he remains 'profoundly sorry' for his crimes but protests that the seven-year prison sentence sought by prosecutors as 'ridiculous' and overly harsh. 'Every sunrise since that plea has carried the same realisation: I did this, me. I am responsible,' wrote the former Republican lawmaker, who pleaded guilty last summer. George Santos is defending his recent social media tirade to a federal judge who will be sentencing the disgraced former New York congressman. (AP) 'But saying I'm sorry doesn't require me to sit quietly while these prosecutors try to drop an anvil on my head.' Prosecutors, in a filing last week, argued Santos 'remains unrepentant' and has not shown genuine remorse, as his lawyers have claimed in their own filing seeking a lighter, two-year prison stint. They cited a series of posts on X, formerly Twitter, in which he disparaged the US Department of Justice as a 'cabal of pedophiles' and cast himself as a victim of prosecutorial overreach. Santos, who admitted he deceived donors and stole the identities of nearly a dozen people to fund his congressional campaign, countered that his 'colourful' posts are being wrongly 'repurposed as a sword against me' by prosecutors. 'Contesting the severity of a proposed sentence is not the same as contesting guilt, and punishing protected speech because it questions punishment should trouble anyone who values fair prosecution over personal vindication,' he wrote. Prosecutors, in a filing last week, argued Santos 'remains unrepentant' and has not shown genuine remorse. (Getty) Santos said calling himself the 'scapegoat' in social media posts was in reference to prosecutors claiming he was the 'organiser/leader' of his campaign's financial fraud and warranted a stiffer sentence. He argued his former campaign treasurer, Nancy Marks, who has also pleaded guilty and faces sentencing next month, shares equal part in the blame. 'If I were the criminal mastermind they portray, I would be the clumsiest in modern memory: leaving a trail of screenshots pointing directly back to myself,' he wrote in the Saturday letter. Santos also pushed back at prosecutors' claims that he has not made efforts to pay the roughly $580,000 owed as part of his plea deal, saying he's 'liquidated personal assets, reduced my living expenses, and tried as hard as I could to raise some money for restitution". He added that he has not asked any of his friends or family to write letters to the court on his behalf, nor did he expect any supporters to attend Friday's sentencing in Long Island federal court out of embarrassment and shame. Santos also pushed back at prosecutors' claims that he has not made efforts to pay the roughly $580,000 owed as part of his plea deal. (AP) 'I don't want to bring anyone else in my life into this mess,' Santos wrote. 'This is mine to deal with and mine alone.' The US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York's office, which is prosecuting the case, declined to comment. Santos was elected in 2022 to represent parts of Queens and Long Island but served barely a year before being ousted by his House colleagues. Santos fabricated much of his life story, leading to questions about how the political unknown had funded his winning campaign. World
USA
courts
Politics
crime CONTACT US
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 News
11 hours ago
- 9 News
The Republicans voicing dissent against Trump's strikes on Iran
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Before yesterday's military operation targeting nuclear enrichment sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, rifts were beginning to form within the party over the prospect of the US joining Israel to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Trump had campaigned for his second term opposing US involvement in the Middle East, promising to adopt an "America first" approach if elected for a second term. President Donald Trump speaks after the US military struck three Iranian nuclear and military sites. (AP) He had also previously criticised the then-president Barack Obama, posting to social media that he would start a war with Iran because of his "inability to negotiate properly" and to "save face". Last week, Trump indicated Iran would have two weeks before he decided on whether to support Israel's efforts in Iran, but broke his own deadline after announcing the US had completed a "spectacular military success" in Iran. Within minutes of the news, strong condemnation began to roll in. Kentucky Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, who has been leading a War Powers Resolution to prevent the US from becoming involved in another Middle East war in a rare cross-party alliance with California Democrat Congressman Ro Khanna, criticised the strikes as unconstitutional. "Congress has the sole authority to authorise war. Speaker Mike Johnson should bring our resolution to the floor for a vote immediately," he said on X. Georgia's Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a far-right conservative and staunch Trump supporter, opposed the country's involvement. "Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war," she said on X. "There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first. Israel is a nuclear-armed nation. Ohio Republican Warren Davidson said it was "hard to conceive a rationale that's constitutional". He later questioned when Congress would be weighing in on the matter. Trump, however, insisted he had the full support of the Republican Party. "Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before," he said on Truth Social. Thomas Massie (left) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (right). (AP) Democrats have condemned the President for ordering the strikes without approval from Congress, which they say went against Article I of the Constitution. "President Trump came into office promising to 'end the endless foreign wars.' Tonight, he took steps that could drag the United States into another one, without consulting Congress, without a clear strategy, without regard to the consistent conclusions of the intelligence community, and without explaining to the American people what's at stake," Democratic Virginia Senator Mark Warner said on X. "The Constitution makes clear that the power to authorise war lies with Congress." New York Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went further to claim that Trump's strikes were "grounds for impeachment". But one of the top Republicans in Congress, House Speaker Mike Johnson, said Trump had evaluated that the "imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act". "The President fully respects the Article I power of Congress, and tonight's necessary, limited, and targeted strike follows the history and tradition of similar military actions under presidents of both parties," he said on X. Donald Trump USA World Israel Iran nuclear Politics CONTACT US Auto news:Is this the next Subaru WRX? Mysterious performance car teased.
Sky News AU
14 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Iranian people ‘desperate' for a regime change
Republican Strategist Amanda Makki says the general Iranian population is 'desperate' to see a regime change. 'Well, certainly no Iranian wants to see their fellow country mates, their relatives, their friends, their family, their loved ones be affected by this,' Ms Makki told Sky News Australia. 'But if I could tell you how many times I've heard … how desperately the Iranians would to see a regime change, to go back to how their homeland was, or to even leave their country if they could, they would be willing to do it in a heartbeat.'
9 News
14 hours ago
- 9 News
'Don't owe you': Senator says Australia can't back US in Middle East
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Independent Senator Jacqui Lambie says Australia cannot join any more US ventures in the Middle East, after Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the government supported the White House in its military attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. US President Donald Trump yesterday revealed the US had attacked three sites in Iran, including the key complex of Fordow, prompting Iran's leaders to pledge a response. Trump's actions have split onlookers, with many world leaders calling for de-escalation and diplomacy instead of further violence. Senator Jacqui Lambie. (Today) Lambie said the bombing operation, launched less than three days after Trump said he would take up to "two weeks" to decide whether or not to intervene in Iran, had destroyed any trust between the US and Iran. She told Today the "bottom line" was that the US had re-entered a theatre of war in the Middle East, which ran contrary to Trump's campaign promises and public stance as an anti-war president. "You just put your shoe in the water there, your toes in the water there, and you're back in that war," Lambie said. Donald Trump announced US attacks on Iran yesterday. (AP) "But what I will say is this - we certainly can't back you up this time, and we don't owe you anything." Lambie said Australia's military was not "fit for purpose" to be involved in a war. "It'll be 10 years before this country can commit troops that are fully fit, ready to go," she said. This satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows the Fordow enrichment facility in Iran after the US strikes. (Maxar Technologies) "We've got no idea where this is going, we've got no idea where this is going to end up, and on the other side we have Ukraine and Russia still going on." The federal government yesterday issued a statement calling for de-escalation following the US bombings. Speaking on Today, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said this morning that the government supported the strikes. "We support action to prevent Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon," Wong said. "And that is what this is." But she maintained calls for diplomacy to resume, saying nobody wanted to see another full-scale war in the Middle East. War USA Iran military Australia national World Middle East CONTACT US
