Despite Clashes With US Presidents, Netanyahu Usually Gets His Way
Jerusalem:
A little over a month ago, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to have been shunted to the shadows by US President Donald Trump, who hopscotched the Middle East without visiting Israel, traditionally Washington's closest regional ally.
Worse still, from Netanyahu's perspective, Trump lifted sanctions on neighbouring Syria - something Israel opposed - and talked up the prospects of securing a nuclear deal with Iran, something the prime minister has always cautioned against.
Fast forward five weeks and the United States has bombed Iran's main nuclear installations, fulfilling a decades-old dream of Netanyahu to convince Washington to bring its full military might to thwart Tehran's atomic ambitions.
The US attack underscores a broader truth that has defined Netanyahu's career: no matter how fraught his relationships with successive presidents, he normally ends up getting what he wants.
For over three decades, Netanyahu has clashed - often spectacularly - with American leaders. He has lectured them, defied them, embarrassed them publicly and privately. And yet, across Democratic and Republican administrations, US military aid has flowed largely uninterrupted to Israel. Washington remains Israel's chief arms supplier and diplomatic shield.
"He probably has concluded that he always gets away with it," said a senior United Nations official in Jerusalem who declined to be named. "It's hard to argue otherwise."
Just one month ago, opposition leader Yair Lapid accused Netanyahu of destroying Israel's relations with the United States. This weekend's action represents the closest US-Israeli military alignment yet against a common adversary.
Withstanding Pressure
Netanyahu's belief in his ability to advance his agenda, and withstand American pressure when needed, has deep roots.
Barely a month after becoming prime minister for the first time in 1996, he met President Bill Clinton in Washington and immediately rubbed him up the wrong way.
"Who the f--- does he think he is? Who's the f---ing superpower here?" Clinton asked his aides afterwards, according to US diplomat Aaron David Miller, who was present.
But vital US aid to Israel continued to flow - something that would remain a constant over the years.
Netanyahu was voted out of office in a 1999 election and did not return to power until a decade later, by which time Barack Obama, a Democrat like Clinton, was in the White House.
Relations between the two turned openly hostile, initially over Israeli settlement building in occupied territory that Palestinians claim for a future stake - a constant thorn in US-Israeli relations.
Matters deteriorated further as Obama entered negotiations with Iran to curb its nuclear drive - a project that Israel said is aimed at creating atomic bombs and that Tehran has said is for purely civilian purposes.
Netanyahu spoke to Congress in 2015 at the invitation of Republicans to denounce the prospective deal, without informing the White House. "(The accord) doesn't block Iran's path to the bomb; it paves Iran's path to the bomb," he said.
Obama was widely reported to have been furious, but still, the following year Washington delivered the largest military aid package to Israel in US history - $38 billion over 10 years.
Political analysts say Netanyahu takes US support as a given, confident that backing from evangelical Christians and the small Jewish-American community will guarantee that Israel remains well-armed, however much he antagonises the White House.
Convincing Trump
When Hamas militants launched a surprise attack on Israel in October 2023, then-President Joe Biden flew to Israel to show his support, authorising a huge flow of weapons to help with the conflict unleashed in Gaza.
But relations between Netanyahu, a right-winger, and Biden, a Democrat, deteriorated rapidly, as Washington grew alarmed by the spiralling number of civilian deaths and the burgeoning humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave.
Biden held back on some heavy munitions deliveries and imposed sanctions on a number of violent Israeli settlers, so his defeat at the hands of Trump in last November's presidential election was celebrated by Netanyahu. Finally, he had a Republican in office at a crucial moment for Israel.
However, things did not go smoothly, at least to start with.
Like Biden before him, Trump was unhappy at the protracted conflict in Gaza and then he blindsided Netanyahu during a meeting on April 7, when he revealed that he was launching direct talks with Tehran aimed at finding a diplomatic solution to the protracted nuclear stand-off with Iran.
But while Trump publicly positioned himself as a peacemaker, Netanyahu consistently pushed for military intervention. Although it is unclear if Netanyahu ever got him to say "yes" to Israel's war plans, it was at least not a "no", according to two senior US officials and a senior Israeli source.
As soon as Israel launched its aerial war on Iran in the early hours of June 13, Israel pushed the United States to join in, urging Trump to be on the winning side of history, two Israeli officials said last week.
"Mr President, Finish the job!" read large billboards that have popped up in Tel Aviv.
The sense of relief when the US bombers struck Iran's most protected nuclear sites on Sunday was palpable.
"Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history," Netanyahu said in a brief video address.
"May God bless our unshakeable alliance, our unbreakable faith," he concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
24 minutes ago
- News18
US Increases West Asia Evacuations, Travel Alerts After Trump Orders Strikes On Iran
In internal and public notices, the US State Department over the weekend significantly ramped up its cautionary advice to Americans in the Middle East. The US State Department has increased emergency evacuation flights for American citizens seeking to leave Israel, directed nonessential staff to depart the US Embassy in Lebanon, and heightened travel advisories across the Middle East due to fears of potential Iranian retaliation against US interests in the region. In internal and public notices, the department over the weekend significantly ramped up its cautionary advice to Americans in the Middle East. In a notice on Sunday, after American strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, the department said it had ordered nonessential personnel and the families of staff at the US Embassy in Beirut to leave Lebanon 'due to the volatile and unpredictable security situation in the region." The notice made no mention of any potential evacuation flights or other assistance for private Americans wanting to leave Lebanon but said those who want to should try to use existing commercial services to depart. At the same time, the department issued warnings to US citizens in Saudi Arabia and Turkey to take extra security precautions given the uncertainty. 'Given reports of regional hostilities, the US Mission to Saudi Arabia has advised its personnel to exercise increased caution and limit non-essential travel to any military installations in the region," the department said in its notice for Saudi Arabia. In Turkey, the department said US personnel 'have been cautioned to maintain a low profile and instructed to avoid personal travel to the US Consulate Adana consular district," which includes the NATO airbase at Incirlik. 'Negative sentiment toward US foreign policy may prompt actions against US or Western interests in Turkey," the statement said. Late Saturday, the department said it was stepping up evacuation flights for American citizens from Israel to Europe and continuing to draw down its staff at diplomatic missions in Iraq. But even before the US airstrikes on Iran were made public by President Donald Trump on Saturday evening in Washington, the US Embassy in Jerusalem had announced the start of evacuation flights for private Americans from Israel. After the US strikes in Iran, security officers at all US embassies and consulates have been instructed to conduct reviews of their posts' security posture and report back to the State Department by late Sunday. First Published: June 22, 2025, 23:36 IST
News18
24 minutes ago
- News18
Will Trump Resume Talks With Iran After Bombing Its Nuke Sites? Top US Officials Weigh In
Last Updated: While President Donald Trump remained silent publicly after addressing the nation the previous evening, his top officials spoke at length about the US' motive behind Iran war. After airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, the Trump administration on Sunday signalled openness to renewed diplomacy while maintaining that the US does not seek a wider war. While President Donald Trump remained silent publicly on Sunday after addressing the nation the previous evening, his top officials spoke at length about the US' motive behind Iran war. Trump's top officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shared their views on the Iran conflict. Their unified message highlighted that the US aims to deter Iran's nuclear ambitions, not pursue regime change. At a Pentagon briefing, Hegseth stated, 'America does not seek war," while Vice President Vance told reporters the strikes offered Iran an opportunity to return to negotiations. 'Operation Midnight Hammer," he said, used 'decoys and deception," and encountered no Iranian military resistance, according to Hegseth and Gen. Caine. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth emphasised. Caine confirmed that the US had struck Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, and that all three sites sustained significant damage. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," he said. In a TV interview, Vance refrained from discussing classified intelligence but said he was confident the operation had 'substantially delayed" Iran's nuclear weapons program. 'I think it's going to be many, many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon," he added. Vance also noted that the US had negotiated seriously with Iran before resorting to military action. 'I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship… and if they're willing to do that, the United States is all ears." Secretary of State Rubio told Face the Nation that while there are 'no planned military operations right now against Iran," the US would respond if attacked. 'Unless they mess around and they attack US interests," he warned. Despite President Trump's past promises to avoid extended conflicts, it's uncertain whether Iran views avoiding escalation as in its own best interest. Meanwhile, global reaction has been mixed, with some nations fearing the strikes could further destabilise the Middle East, particularly amid an ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. Earlier this month, Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian nuclear infrastructure and military leadership, prompting Iranian retaliation and ultimately leading to the US intervention. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, condemned the US strikes, calling them a violation of sovereignty and international law. 'They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities," he said. 'I don't know how much room is left for diplomacy." China and Russia both condemned the attacks, urging a return to political dialogue. Russia called the strikes 'a gross violation of international law," while Turkey warned of the risk of escalation to a 'global level." British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the UK was relocating military assets to safeguard its interests, while leaders of Canada, Germany, Italy, and France all supported a swift return to diplomacy. The attacks have also raised concerns about potential disruptions to the global oil supply, with Iran hinting at closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key channel for global energy trade. Oil prices have surged over 20 per cent in the past month as tensions in the region escalated. The Pentagon did not provide new details on Iran's current nuclear capabilities. Hegseth said the operation followed a 60-day window Trump gave Iran to engage in talks. 'Iran found out that when Trump says 60 days… he means it," Hegseth said. 'Otherwise, that nuclear program… will not exist." Caine and Hegseth added that B-2 bombers launched from Missouri, supported by a deception plan involving decoy aircraft, executed the strikes using 14 bunker-buster bombs. The mission ran from 6:40 p.m. to 7:05 p.m. ET on Saturday — approximately 2:10 a.m. in Iran on Sunday. tags : donald trump iran us Location : United States of America (USA) First Published: June 22, 2025, 23:30 IST News world Will Trump Resume Talks With Iran After Bombing Its Nuke Sites? Top US Officials Weigh In
Economic Times
26 minutes ago
- Economic Times
The regime must go: Iranians hope for a new dawn
Let us first be clear: for most Iranians, this is not our war. This is a war between Israel and the Islamic Republic, which has held Iranians hostage for more than four decades, and which has put them in harm's way with its reckless ambition. The regime has always declared its determination to destroy Israel, and it was drawing perilously close to carrying out that aim. Anyone who has passed through the Islamic Republic's education system, anyone who has witnessed its relentless destabilising of Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and Yemen, knows just how sincerely the regime is committed to destruction, and exactly why it has continued to push its uranium enrichment programme. Like other Iranians, my heart breaks at the spectacle of bombs falling on my country. But the principal threat to our safety and well-being remains the regime itself. Over the past week, with the internet shut down, large numbers of citizens in Tehran and other cities have been arrested by the regime's security forces-supposedly for collaborating with Israel. Leading clerics have called for waves of killings as a solution to the state's military humiliation: 'I request the head of the judiciary to try these traitors in a field court,' said one last Friday, 'and execute them in public'. Declaring that executions had already begun, Amnesty International the same day condemned 'official calls for expedited trials and executions' designed to 'assert control and instil fear among the people of Iran.' The Islamic Republic is not a 'normal' government, which acts to protect the nation and its people in times of trouble. It is more like a hostile occupying force, from which most Iranians dream of liberation. That is why, for many millions, the present moment, terrifying as it is, feels like a historic opportunity. We know by now that peaceful protest is not sufficient to bring down one of the most violent and entrenched regimes in modern history. The Israeli strikes have accomplished what years of protest could not-the dismantling of key pillars of the regime's machinery of oppression. But as if the Islamic Republic were not enough, we Iranians have to deal with another obstacle, potentially mightier still: the immense cynicism of international opinion. Foreign leaders and newspapers pour scorn on our democratic hopes, telling us that we should make peace with our brutal government for fear it be replaced by something worse. I want to correct this twisted and heartless who wish to preserve the current regime usually offer Iraq as a cautionary tale-look what happened there, they warn, as a result of 'regime change'. Thanks to Iran's ancient civilisation and deep political tradition, it enjoys a unified national identity and deep internal cohesion. Not only that, but Iranians have already spent years anticipating just this moment: designing the post-regime reality and planning the political and social is an alternative in place. This explains the overwhelming popularity of Iran's crown prince Reza Pahlavi, who has become the symbol of that transition. He offers himself as a unifying figure during Iran's shift from totalitarian rule to secular democracy. As the heir to Iran's oldest political institution, the monarchy, he remains the most trusted and recognisable figure among Iranians both inside and outside the country. Many of those who do not desire a monarchy for the future Iran, also recognise him as a stabilising figure capable of leading the country through this pivotal moment, and safeguarding Iran's territorial integrity. Beyond Iran, Pahlavi has also advanced a regional vision for peace. His proposed Cyrus Accords-grounded in secular governance, mutual recognition and non-intervention-draw on Iran's venerable tradition of political tolerance. With the Islamic Republic removed, it is far easier to imagine a stable, peaceful and mutually cooperative West Asia. The best option for the international community is to give its full support to this vision, which is the democratic hope of the Iranian people, and which will bring immense advantages to millions outside Iran. The best way to avoid Iran falling into chaos is to back a figure who is able to command trust across political lines. Iran's crown prince is the only figure capable, for instance, of securing the loyalty of those who are defecting from the Islamic Republic is at its weakest. Having lost control of Iranian airspace, it is unable to protect itself, let alone the Iranian people. Its leader is hiding in a bunker. And Iranians are ready to take over where Israel's military assault finishes, to expel the regime, and to implement their plans. That is what the international community should support. This is what will ensure the end of this out of fear or complacency, however, many foreign leaders wish to preserve the present regime, albeit in chastened form. If such cowardice prevails, and the Islamic Republic endures, the consequences for Iranians will be catastrophic. As in the past, humiliation abroad is compensated by brutality at home. The regime now has the perfect pretext for a new wave of repression under the guise of 'national security'.But the danger is not only internal. The wounded regime will not retreat -it will retaliate. It will double down on regional aggression and accelerate its pursuit of nuclear weapons. Its obsession with Israel's destruction will intensify. If the regime survives, in other words, it will be emboldened to new levels of aggression, internal and external. Whether rightly or wrongly, foreign military action has brought about an important opportunity. But this opportunity will vanish if the West repeats the mistakes of the past. The most dangerous course now would be to throw the regime a lifeline-through quiet diplomacy, sanctions relief, or rhetorical 'balance' that legitimises the illegitimate. Iranians are not asking to be rescued. They are asking to be recognised. What they need is space to determine their own destiny-and acknowledgement of the leadership they have already chosen. Other countries should realise the folly of imposing frameworks of their own or manipulating Iran's hope on the horizon is not just the collapse of a regime. It is the end of an occupation. And with the right support, it can mark the rebirth of a sovereign, secular, democratic and peaceful Iran. And an end to the nightmare the Islamic Republic has caused to all around it. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Looking for quick buck in unlisted shares? Better think twice! Small finance banks struggle with perception. Will numbers turn the tide? Aadit Palicha on Zepto dark store raid, dark patterns, and IPO China rare earths blockade: Will electric vehicles assembly lines fall silent? Flames below deck: The silent threat lurking in cargo holds Is India ready to hit the aspirational 8% growth mark? For medium- to long-term investors with moderate risk appetite: 6 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 40% Sin goods, but not sin stocks from a long-term perspective: 6 stocks from liquor industry with an upside potential of up to 34%
