'Rooftop Korean' issues chilling threat about LA's future 30 years after Rodney King riots
One of the 'rooftop Koreans' who took to LA's rooftops in 1992 during the Rodney King riots to defend their businesses is furious that history is repeating itself in modern day California.
Tony Moon, one of the so-called 'Rooftop Koreans' who armed themselves in the race riots over three decades ago, has been sounding off on social media, lambasting Governor Gavin Newsom and the Democrats for their response.
In one response to Newsom, he fumed: 'Shut up and sit down. This is the last f*** up that'll seal you (sic) political career as a "has been"'.
Moon is a vocal Second Amendment activist and critic of the Democrats.
Since Friday's unrest exploded, he shared grave predictions for the city's future.
Over 30 years after the 'rooftop Koreans' made headlines with their armed resistance to the 1992 Rodney King Riots, one of the members slammed California Governor Gavin Newsom over his handling of riots gripping Los Angeles this week
'This is how these ICE protests must end: strong police, kettling, arrests, ID'ing, then deport or criminal prosecution.'
The famous images of the 'rooftop Koreans' re-emerged this week amid the riots in Los Angeles, over 30 years since they captured national attention and became a symbol of civilian action against destructive riots.
When violent protests erupted following the police beating of King and subsequent acquittal of the officers involved, the overwhelmed LAPD set up defensive perimeters around certain parts of the city, but left much of Koreatown without direct protection.
Business owners in the community rallied each other to protect their businesses and homes from looters.
They used blanks and warning shots to scatter mobs, and no members were ever charged with shooting or harming protesters.
In a recent interview, Moon, who was 19 at the time, reflected on the chaos.
'You had two different generations, the older generation - my dad and friends in his 40s. They had military training.
'Then you had the younger guys like myself. I was 19 when I was out there. There was no coordination. The only way to recognize who was who... was by how you looked and how you dressed as well.
This week, in light of the modern day unrest, their faces have appeared again online.
Donald Trump Jr. came under fire for posting a meme calling for America to 'Make Rooftop Koreans Great Again!'
Many saw it as an attempt to incite violence.
Other conservatives, including influencer Tiffany Fong, have also shared posts referencing the Rooftop Koreans and their brave efforts.
Moon's criticism of Newsom comes amid mounting scrutiny on the California Governor over his handling of the ongoing riots.
As Los Angeles leaders struggle to contain the protests, Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act to bring peace back to the streets.
The president defended his own decision to sent U.S. Marines as well as California National Guard to Los Angeles, and brushed off Newsom's claim that the deployment inflamed the situation.
And he would not rule out use of an authority to deploy military forces under his control to put down disturbances if he sees fit.
'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see. But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible,' Trump said.
'If we didn't send in the national guard quickly, right now, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground,' Trump told reporters in an impromptu Oval Office meeting with members of his team.
The president also offered a warning, amid complaints from Trump critics that he is using the California standoff to flex authority in Democratic-run states.
'I can inform the rest of the country, when they do it, if they do it, they will be met with equal or greater force than we met here,' Trump said.
'This is the first perhaps of many or perhaps if we didn't attack this one very strongly, you would have them all over the country,' Trump said.
He spoke as he is deploying another 2,000 National Guard troops, along with 700 Marines, to LA.
He railed against people seen on video battling police during street protests that kicked off in opposition to ICE raids to pick up illegal immigrants.
He repeatedly referred to 'bad, sick people' and 'agitators' he said were paid.
'There are certainly areas of Los Angeles you could have called It an insurrection,' Trump said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Markets' Gulf composure fits a wider pattern
LONDON, June 23 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Investors don't seem that bothered about the United States' dramatic intervention in Israel's war with Iran. Despite President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three of the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities over the weekend, asset prices hardly budged. History does suggest geopolitical flashpoints aren't always long-term headaches for investors – but the data doesn't conclusively prove they've made the right call. On Monday morning, the STOXX 600 declined 0.1%, meaning the European equity benchmark is only down around 2.5% since Israeli attacks on June 13. German and Saudi 10-year bond yields rose marginally. The U.S. S&P 500 was also due to drop only 0.1% on opening, according to futures prices collected by LSEG. And Brent oil contracts for August delivery rose just 0.6% to trade at $77 a barrel, admittedly above the $66 level seen earlier this month, but hardly pricing in major disruptions. This all seems highly premature. While Trump called on Sunday for peace following what could reasonably be seen as an act of war, he continues to post on social media about the possibility of Iranian regime change. Iran's parliament has already approved actions to block the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of the world's daily oil supply passes. As such, markets should be braced for further escalation, not less. One explanation might be that investors know that geopolitical storms are often just squalls. A JPMorgan study, opens new tab of 36 different political and martial flashpoints between Germany's invasion of France in 1940 and Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 found that the S&P 500 returned 0.3% in the three months afterwards, against 1.3% over the same period in calmer times. But over six months the returns were the same. Oil-related shocks are, admittedly, different. The 1990 Gulf War saw the S&P 500 drop 20% in the two months after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August, although it recovered these losses by February 1991. But after the five-month Arab oil embargo in 1973, the S&P was still lower five years later. Investors' sangfroid may reflect confidence that Trump's attacks are a run-of-the-mill geopolitical squall. More likely, they see the latest crisis as a potential oil shock, but one that the U.S. can easily contain. There's some logic in that: even if Iran tries to block Hormuz, a move its Supreme National Security Council still needs to approve, the U.S. Fifth Fleet in Bahrain might stop it. Meanwhile, restricting oil exports would hurt Tehran too. Yet the geopolitical received wisdom could easily be wrong, especially if a cornered Iranian regime starts to fear that Trump and Israel will push to replace it, and resorts to drastic measures. In that scenario, markets' relative calm might still quickly turn to panic. Follow George Hay on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fox News host trashes former colleague Tucker Carlson as ‘pro-Putin' following Trump's Iran strikes
Fox News host Trey Gowdy took a none-too-veiled swipe at his former colleague Tucker Carlson and far-right podcaster Steve Bannon on Sunday night, claiming the MAGA isolationists represent the 'pro-Putin wing' of the GOP and that they've been 'begging' Donald Trump not to join Israel in its war with Iran. During a Sunday evening interview with Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), who has long been critical of Carlson (and vice versa) and once even threatened to 'kill' him, Gowdy referenced the unsuccessful efforts by Carlson and Bannon to push Trump away from bombing Iran – all while framing it as part and parcel to their criticisms of America's support of Ukraine amid its three-year war with Russia. 'Congressman, there are few people I know who know the cost of war better than you do,' Gowdy noted. 'So, you mentioned Ukraine, and there is a pro-Putin wing within the party.' Without directly naming Bannon and Carlson, Gowdy continued: 'There are two notable people, one a podcaster and one a former television show host, who literally were begging President Trump to let Israel go it alone.' In recent weeks, Carlson – who was fired by Fox News in 2023 despite hosting its top-rated primetime show – and Bannon have been relentless in their criticism of the conservative cable giant amid Israel's preemptive bombing campaign against Iran. While warning Trump that going to war with Tehran could 'end his presidency' because many 'America First' supporters would feel he's reneging on his promise of no more 'forever wars,' the pair have torn into Fox News and its hawkish hosts for urging the president to take military action and push for 'regime change' in Iran. 'What they are doing is what they always do, which is just turning up the propaganda hose to full blast, and just trying to knock elderly Fox viewers off their feet and make them submit to more wars,' Carlson told Bannon earlier this month. Carlson also specifically called Fox News owner, and his former, boss Rupert Murdoch, as well as longtime Fox star (and Trump confidante) Sean Hannity and weekend host Mark Levin – with whom he's been engaged in a bitter back-and-forth – of being 'warmongers.' Bannon, meanwhile, has gone even further with his broadsides against the top-rated right-wing network. During his War Room podcast on Friday and in comments to Semafor over the weekend, the former Trump strategist – who recently lunched with the president amid the intra-MAGA civil war over Iran – essentially accused Fox of being a paid Israeli proxy. 'People on the right are now confronting an unpleasant reality, a great unmasking: The Murdochs don't put America's interests first,' he told Semafor. 'There needs to be a thorough FARA investigation into Fox's relationship with a foreign power.' Meanwhile, Trump has closely clung to Fox News as it's pushed for direct military confrontation with Iran, all while dismissing Carlson because he no longer works for a cable news network – revealing that the president is still largely influenced by what comes across his TV screen, regardless of the role 'manosphere' podcasters played in his electoral victory. On the broadcast, Gowdy, who filled in as a temporary replacement host in Carlson's time slot following Fox's abrupt termination, went on to ask if there is 'also a moral argument that strong nations should help those who are under attack.' While Gowdy only implicitly referenced Carlson, Crenshaw made it explicit with his response by name-checking the former Fox News star. 'There's certainly a moral argument, but those people don't care about moral arguments, Trey. The argument you can make to them, which is valid, is the self-defense one,' the congressman declared. Adding that the United States is the 'true target of Iran,' Crenshaw insisted that the Iranian government was enriching uranium for nuclear weapons to use against America – claiming this is something Carlson and others aren't taking into consideration. At the same time, Crenshaw seemed to hint that there was a hidden agenda afoot with Carlson's anti-war commentary on Iran. 'What those people get wrong – and Tucker, like you mentioned, and I question their motives also and what's causing these very strange opinions to be had,' Crensahw said. 'Put that aside for a second, what they don't truly understand – they think we're the ones in front of Israel. They think we're the ones stopping Iran from destroying Israel. It's the other way around! Israel is the first speed bump between us and Iran.' Amid Carlson's repeated shots at his former network in the run-up to war with Iran, Fox News hosts and commentators have largely steered clear of returning rhetorical fire on Fox airwaves at their ex-colleague – though Levin has repeatedly torn into Carlson during his radio show and on social media. Gowdy's 'pro-Putin' swipe, meanwhile, would appear to reference Carlson's extremely sympathetic stance towards Russia and its autocratic leader Vladimir Putin – especially after the Kremlin launched its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine back in 2022. Carlson, whose pro-Russia monologues during the early days of the Ukraine War were promoted by the Kremlin, scored an obsequious interview with Putin himself – which has since been taught at Russian schools. During his trip to Moscow to speak with the Russian president, Carlson also f ilmed a number of propagandistic videos gushing over the nation's grocery stores and subway system. Meanwhile, since Trump decided to drop over a dozen bunker-busting bombs on Iran this past week, Carlson has remained radio silent and has not publicly commented on the strikes.
BreakingNews.ie
16 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump calls for producers to pump more oil amid Iran shipping lane fears
President Donald Trump called for the US and other oil-producing economies to pump more oil as crude prices remain volatile following strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Mr Trump urged stepped-up production as the White House sharpened its warnings to Iran against closing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil and gas shipping lane, in retaliation for the US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme. Advertisement 'To the Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' Mr Trump posted on social media. He added: 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' The push by Mr Trump comes at an uncertain moment as US embassies and military installations in the Middle East are on high alert for potential retaliation. The USS Dwight D Eisenhower and other warships cross the Strait of Hormuz into the Persian Gulf (Information Technician Second Class Ruskin Naval/U.S. Navy via AP) Global markets are trying to ascertain what lays ahead after the US struck key Iranian nuclear facilities with a barrage of 30,000-pound bunker busting bombs and Tomahawk missiles. Advertisement Iran's parliament has approved cutting off the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow shipping lane in the Persian Gulf that about 20% of global oil and gas passes through. It is now up to Iran's national security council to decide whether to move forward with the idea, which could lead to a spike in the cost of goods and services worldwide. The price of oil jumped 4% shortly after trading began on Sunday night, but it quickly pared back as the focus shifted from what the US military did to how Iran would react. Oil futures were flip-flopping in Monday morning trading between gains and losses. They still remain higher than they were before the fighting began a little more than a week ago. Advertisement White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt warned Tehran anew against closing the strait, saying 'the Iranian regime would be foolish to make that decision'. The State Department has doubled the number of emergency evacuation flights it is providing for American citizens wishing to leave Israel, and ordered the departure of nonessential staff from the US Embassy in Lebanon. It also is stepping up travel warnings around the Middle East because of concerns Iran will retaliate against US interests in the region. In an alert sent to all Americans worldwide and posted to its website on Sunday, the State Department warned all US citizens abroad to exercise caution. Advertisement White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt (Evan Vucci/AP) The US Embassy in Qatar issued an alert on its website on Monday urging American citizens in the energy-rich nation to 'shelter in place until further notice'. Hours later, the Qatari government issued an extraordinary order to shut its busy airspace. Qatar, across the Persian Gulf from Iran, is home to Al Udeid Air Base, which hosts the forward headquarters of the US military's Central Command. Many energy industry analysts are sceptical that Iran would go forward with a full closure of the strait, something that it has threatened to do in the past. Advertisement Iran would face the possibility of retaliation against its own shipments and the possibility that the move would upset China, the biggest purchaser of Iranian crude.
