WSJ comes down heavily on Donald Trump again; says the President surrendered to China in trade war
The Wall Street Journal wasn't shy this week when it ripped into US president Donald Trump's recent reversal of tariffs on Chinese imports, calling the move less a victory than a "major retreat", as per a report.
WSJ Says Donald Trump's China Tariff Deal Looks More Like a Surrender
In an editorial entitled "The Great Trump Tariff Rollback," the Journal's editorial board presented the deal as far from the "historic trade win" the White House touted it to be, according to DailyBeast.
'Rarely has an economic policy been repudiated as soundly, and as quickly, as President Trump's Liberation Day tariffs—and by Mr. Trump's own hand,' the board said in their criticism of the administration's action in reducing the tariffs on Chinese products from a record-high 145% to 30%, as per the report. China subsequently lowered its own levies from 125% to 10%.
While the stock market applauded the news, rallying on Monday, the Journal wasn't so optimistic. 'The China deal is more surrender than Trump victory,' the editorial opined bluntly, as per DailyBeast. It also noted that 'Apart from the tariff rollback, neither side announced any broader concessions on the substantive trade issues that weigh on the U.S.-China relationship," quoted DailyBeast.
The editorial also mentioned that, 'One tragedy of Mr. Trump's shoot-America-in-the-foot-first approach is that he's hurt his chances of rallying a united front of countries against Beijing's mercantilism,' adding that, 'By targeting allies with tariffs, Mr. Trump has eroded trust in America's economic and political reliability,' as quoted in the report.
Live Events
Feud Between Trump and the Wall Street Journal Heats Up Again
This latest confrontation comes after Trump's long-standing feud with the Murdoch-owned newspaper. Trump lashed out at a Wall Street Journal reporter just last week, calling the newspaper "China-oriented" and adding that it had "gone to hell," reported DailyBeast. Later,the Trump administration said that Trump 'nuked' The Journal at the time, as per the report.
FAQs
Why is the Wall Street Journal criticizing Trump now?
They believe rolling back tariffs looks like a surrender, not a win, and undermines Trump's own trade policy.
What exactly did Trump do with tariffs?
He cut US tariffs on Chinese imports from 145% to 30%. China lowered its own from 125% to 10%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
38 minutes ago
- Hans India
The covert US strike that targeted Iran's nuclear core
In an unprecedented show of military precision, the United States carried out a high-stakes mission dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, targeting three of Iran's most secure nuclear facilities using stealth bombers, cruise missiles, and an elaborate web of decoys. The 18-hour round-trip strike was launched from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri under complete secrecy at 12:01 AM EDT. Seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers armed with GBU-57 "bunker buster" bombs took off silently, flying low across the Atlantic Ocean with minimal communications. Each bomber was accompanied by support aircraft, joining the formation in the Middle East to ensure the mission went undetected. The Pentagon revealed that another set of B-2s flew west toward the Pacific Ocean in a sophisticated diversion tactic, leading the world to believe the US was preparing for a separate offensive near Guam. This decoy mission was known only to a select group of top military planners and senior leadership, including President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who monitored the mission from the White House Situation Room. At the heart of the strike was Iran's Fordo nuclear enrichment facility—deeply buried beneath a mountain, believed to be 80-90 meters (262-295 feet) underground. This target required the rarely used GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs)—each capable of piercing over 18 meters (60 feet) of reinforced concrete or up to 61 meters (200 feet) of earth. The Pentagon confirmed that 14 MOPs were dropped across Fordo and a second facility at Natanz. In tandem, Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from a US Navy submarine in the Arabian Sea struck a third nuclear site near Isfahan—delivering a synchronized, multi-pronged offensive in under 30 minutes. Despite extensive radar systems in Iran, no air defenses fired during the operation. According to defense analysts, Israel's prior control over Iranian airspace may have paved the way for the bombers to operate unchallenged. While US officials hailed the mission as a tactical success and claimed the destruction of key nuclear capabilities, Iran has acknowledged the strikes but downplayed the extent of the damage. Experts say it could take weeks or even months to assess the true impact, especially given how deeply the facilities are fortified underground. In total, more than 125 US aircraft and 75 precision-guided munitions were used in the assault. The entire operation spanned multiple continents, required numerous mid-air refuelings, and remains a benchmark for modern stealth warfare. 'This was the kind of coordinated, complex military strike only the US could pull off,' said Dr. Stacie Pettyjohn, a defense expert at the Center for a New American Security. 'But whether it truly resets Iran's nuclear program remains to be seen.' The world now watches closely, as both Iran and the US weigh their next moves—militarily and diplomatically.
India Today
40 minutes ago
- India Today
Iran's retaliation against US strikes could come in next 48 hours: Report
Iran could launch retaliatory attacks against US forces in the Middle East within the next 48 hours, further escalating the conflict in the region following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the the Trump administration is continuing diplomatic efforts to prevent further conflict, two US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to news agency Reuters, said intelligence assessments point to a heightened threat window in the next day or has vowed to defend itself after the US struck multiple targets, including components of its nuclear infrastructure, in what Washington described as a preemptive move to prevent an "unacceptable escalation" in the region. The strikes have prompted fears of a broader military conflict between the long-time President Donald Trump, who authorised the mission dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, warned that any Iranian retaliation would be met with "a force far greater than that used in the weekend US attacks".In preemptive moves, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the US military has heightened protection measures for its troops in the region, including those stationed in Iraq and US maintains around 40,000 troops across the Middle East, many of whom operate high-value assets including air defence systems, fighter aircraft, and warships—all of which could be vulnerable in the event of a coordinated Iranian week, the Pentagon began repositioning some of those assets to reduce exposure. Among the moves was the moving out of aircraft from the sprawling Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which houses around 10,000 US personnel and serves as a strategic hub for operations across the its vows to retaliate, Tehran has so far refrained from attacking US positions or attempting to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway through which roughly a quarter of the world's oil shipments al-Rahim Mousavi, Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, said the country will respond appropriately to the American aggression."Regardless of the damage caused to the three nuclear facilities, we will respond against the US simply because it attacked our country," Mousavi said.- EndsMust Watch
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
Hungary Pride March Wins Backing Of Some Foreign Embassies, But Not US
Britain, France and Germany and 30 other countries expressed support on Monday for Hungary's LGBTQ community and a Budapest Pride march on June 28, which was banned by police after the government denounced it as potentially harmful to children. However the U.S., whose President Donald Trump shares Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's suspicion of efforts to promote diversity and transgender rights, was not a signatory of a statement by the countries' embassies backing the march. Parliament, in which Orban's Fidesz party has a majority, passed a law in March that created a legal basis for police to ban Pride marches of the LGBTQ community on the grounds that protecting children should supersede the right to assemble. Critics see the move to ban Pride as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of a general election next year when Orban will face a strong opposition challenger, seen by some recent opinion polls as pulling ahead. Orban's government promotes a strongly Christian-conservative agenda, and Fidesz has been trying to cater to core conservative voters mostly in the countryside ahead of the elections. Passage of the new law allowed police to ban the 30th Pride march last week, but Budapest's liberal mayor and the organisers of the event said the march will be held despite the police ban on June 28. "On the 30th occasion of the Budapest Pride Festival, we, the undersigned embassies and cultural institutes, reaffirm our support for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ+) persons in Hungary and around the world," the embassies' statement said. The statement said the Budapest Pride March "has been a symbol of resilience and progress, reflecting the vital role of LGBTIQ+ persons in the further development of democracy." Orban, in power since 2010 in the EU member Central European country, portrays himself as defending family values and said in February that organisers should not even bother organising Pride in Budapest this year.
