Giving S'wak kids opportunity at world-class education
Law (third from left) presenting the items to Rogers while Tiang (in yellow) looks on.
Sarawak International School Foundation is to begin enrolment for its Sibu school's first academic year.
The new school was built with the objective of making international education accessible to Sarawak's lower-income families.
Sarawak Public Health, Housing and Local Government Deputy Minister Datuk Michael Tiang said the school was part of the state government's ongoing commitment to educational equity and development.
'This is the latest Yayasan Sarawak International School and we will start recruitment for the Sibu campus next year,' said Tiang, who is also Pelawan assemblyman.
'Recruitment will be open to all Sarawak citizens regardless of racial background, but our top priority is to serve the B40 group.'
He said the quota for students from M40 and T20 households would be limited to ensure that those from financially disadvantaged backgrounds were prioritised.
'Our mission is clear, to give every Sarawak child a fair chance at a world-class education.'
Tiang highlighted another major initiative by the state government – the introduction of free tertiary education for Sarawak citizens starting next year.
The policy aims to alleviate financial burdens on families and ensure that no student is left behind due to economic constraints.
The free education is for Sarawakians studying in five state-owned universities – Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Campus, Curtin University Malaysia, University of Technology Sarawak, i-CATS University College, and Centre for Technology Excellence Sarawak (Centexs).
'I spoke with a parent whose daughter was afraid to pursue higher education after seeing her family struggle with her older sibling's university expenses.
'When I told him his daughter could apply for our free tertiary education programme next year, he was relieved.'
Tiang also said that university students would receive a monthly RM1,200 allowance from the state government.
'These efforts give real hope to our younger generation. They don't have to worry and can focus on upgrading themselves and contributing to the community.'
He said this at the presentation of electrical items to Destiny for Children (DFC), a local community initiative that provides education to stateless and undocumented children in Sibu.
Donated by Sarawak Central Zone Electrical & Electronic Goods Sales & Services Association, the donated items were presented by project organising chairperson Michelle Law to DFC headmistress Pauline Rogers.
Tiang also commended DFC for offering early and primary education to children who were otherwise unable to enrol in public schools.
He added that the Sarawak government, through the Women, Early Childhood and Community Well-being Development Ministry led by Datuk Seri Fatimah Abdullah, had formally adopted DFC to provide financial and administrative support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
13 hours ago
- The Sun
Whistleblowers get protection if rules are followed: MACC
KUALA LUMPUR: Individuals who report information about misconduct directly to enforcement agencies and meet the prescribed criteria and conditions will be granted protection as informants or whistleblowers. Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Senior Director (Legal and Prosecution Division) Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said this is an important aspect the public needs to understand, apart from not being able to disclose the information to the public. He said that although the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 protects informants against improper retaliation, such protection is only applicable if reports are made through legal procedures to enforcement agencies such as the MACC, the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) or relevant government agencies. 'There's a misconception that anyone with information about misconduct can automatically seek protection as a whistleblower. In reality, it's not that simple. 'A common misunderstanding is the belief that informants can publicly disclose information, for example, to the media or on social media, before officially applying for protection. This is incorrect,' he told Bernama. He said that in order to qualify for whistleblower protection, a report must also be made in good faith and not be driven by personal motives such as revenge or defamation. Additionally, the whistleblower must not be involved in the offence being reported, he added. Citing Section 11(1) of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, he said, protection can be revoked if the whistleblower is found to have participated in the misconduct they exposed. 'This provision is crucial to maintaining the integrity of whistleblowers and to prevent the misuse of protected status as a shield against offences they have committed,' he said. Wan Shaharuddin said that while the law provides legal protection, whistleblowers still face various challenges, including being labelled ass 'complainants' or 'traitors', fears of retaliation and discrimination, and a general lack of public understanding about the legal process for applying for protection. In efforts to encourage more individuals, especially civil servants, to report corruption cases, he said, the government has introduced cash incentives and official recognition for those who report corruption to the MACC since 2011. He shared that as of last year, 514 civil servants had received rewards totalling over RM1 million, with the highest individual reward amounting to RM100,000. In addition, Wan Shaharuddin said that to further enhance whistleblower protection, the government had tabled the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025 in the Dewan Rakyat on March 6. 'The amendment aims to strengthen protection for whistleblowers who report misconduct, particularly in cases of corruption within both the public and private sectors. It is expected to provide more comprehensive protection to whistleblowers, including protection from harmful actions and immunity from civil or criminal action. 'This amendment is hoped to encourage more individuals to come forward to report misconduct without fear,' he said.
The Sun
13 hours ago
- The Sun
Understand procedures for whistleblowers' protection , information cannot be made public
KUALA LUMPUR: Individuals who report information about misconduct directly to enforcement agencies and meet the prescribed criteria and conditions will be granted protection as informants or whistleblowers. Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Senior Director (Legal and Prosecution Division) Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said this is an important aspect the public needs to understand, apart from not being able to disclose the information to the public. He said that although the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 protects informants against improper retaliation, such protection is only applicable if reports are made through legal procedures to enforcement agencies such as the MACC, the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) or relevant government agencies. 'There's a misconception that anyone with information about misconduct can automatically seek protection as a whistleblower. In reality, it's not that simple. 'A common misunderstanding is the belief that informants can publicly disclose information, for example, to the media or on social media, before officially applying for protection. This is incorrect,' he told Bernama. He said that in order to qualify for whistleblower protection, a report must also be made in good faith and not be driven by personal motives such as revenge or defamation. Additionally, the whistleblower must not be involved in the offence being reported, he added. Citing Section 11(1) of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, he said, protection can be revoked if the whistleblower is found to have participated in the misconduct they exposed. 'This provision is crucial to maintaining the integrity of whistleblowers and to prevent the misuse of protected status as a shield against offences they have committed,' he said. Wan Shaharuddin said that while the law provides legal protection, whistleblowers still face various challenges, including being labelled ass 'complainants' or 'traitors', fears of retaliation and discrimination, and a general lack of public understanding about the legal process for applying for protection. In efforts to encourage more individuals, especially civil servants, to report corruption cases, he said, the government has introduced cash incentives and official recognition for those who report corruption to the MACC since 2011. He shared that as of last year, 514 civil servants had received rewards totalling over RM1 million, with the highest individual reward amounting to RM100,000. In addition, Wan Shaharuddin said that to further enhance whistleblower protection, the government had tabled the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025 in the Dewan Rakyat on March 6. 'The amendment aims to strengthen protection for whistleblowers who report misconduct, particularly in cases of corruption within both the public and private sectors. It is expected to provide more comprehensive protection to whistleblowers, including protection from harmful actions and immunity from civil or criminal action. 'This amendment is hoped to encourage more individuals to come forward to report misconduct without fear,' he said.
Malay Mail
20 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Nothing shocking about he who reports ending up being charged for an offence — Hafiz Hassan
JUNE 20 — Section 11(1)(a) of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711) says that an enforcement agency (EA) 'shall revoke' a whistleblower protection if EA is of the opinion, based on its investigation or in the course of its investigation that the whistleblower himself has participated in the improper conduct disclosed in his report to the EA. The word 'shall' means must; there is no discretion. Some reformists have called for, among others, that 'shall' be substituted with 'may' to allow for discretion in the EA to allow whistleblower protection in genuine cases where a whistleblower is remorseful and has repented his participation in the improper conduct. Be that as it may, the EA 'shall give a written notice to that effect to the whistleblower' — Section 11(2). Aggrieved by the decision of the EA, the whistleblower may refer the decision to the court for determination — Section 11(3). The court may make an order for the preservation of the whistleblower protection and may also make such consequential orders necessary to give effect to the order for relief — Section 11(4). Section 11(1)(a) of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711) says that an enforcement agency (EA) 'shall revoke' a whistleblower protection if EA is of the opinion, based on its investigation or in the course of its investigation that the whistleblower himself has participated in the improper conduct disclosed in his report to the EA. — Pexels pic There is no carte blanche protection, yet there is redress for the decision to revoke protection. Accordingly, there is nothing shocking if a whistleblower who has co-operated with authorities is later informed he would be charged in court on June 30. In any case, as I had written in December 2022, he who makes a report can be investigated, and charged if the investigation reveals an offence committed by him. Such a course of action is not prohibited by Section 107(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) which deals with information relating to the commission of an offence. It does not in any way prescribe the persons to be charged following the investigation. Following investigation, the person who makes a report can himself be charged if the investigation reveals an offence committed by him. Nothing shocking about he who reports ending up being charged for an offence. *This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
