US ambassador Lord Mendelson says UK's 'reset' with the EU is just the beginning as he fails to rule out rejoining the bloc

The UK's 'reset' with the European Union is just the beginning, Lord Mandelson has said, following the Prime Minister's deal with Brussels.
The Ambassador to the US failed to rule out rejoining the bloc in the future as he spoke about the agreement yesterday.
His comments come after Keir Starmer was accused of a Brexit 'surrender' last week after agreeing to make concessions on EU fishing rights and plans to introduce a youth mobility scheme.
In a speech to the Atlantic Council think-tank in Washington, Lord Mandelson said the Prime Minister had embarked on a reset to improve the 'miserable' deal with which the UK left the EU.
He said the agreement would 'finish the job' and 'tie up some loose ends which we've done in trade, energy co-operation, police and border security and intelligence sharing and now, of course, in defence.'
He added: 'It's the beginning. It's the foundation of a reset. It's not the end of it.'
Referring to Britain's place on the world stage, Lord Mandelson said that while the UK would not be rejoining the EU soon, he did not rule out a future return.
'We're not in the European Union any more and we're not going to go back for the foreseeable future, certainly, but we are European,' he said.
Lord Mandelson also said that the UK would seek to negotiate a decrease in Donald Trump's tariffs on British exports. Sir Keir managed to lower tariffs in a deal with the US but failed to cut the 10 per cent baseline rate.
While Lord Mandelson said he could understand Mr Trump's 'frustration' that led him to introduce tariffs, he said they were not 'welcome'.
'We need to address [reciprocal tariffs] and we're agreed to do so,' he said, adding that the UK and US could use 'non-tariff barriers'.
Warning that Europe must no longer rely on the US for security, he said that Mr Trump had done the bloc 'a favour' in saying he would no longer be responsible for protecting allies.
He said the world had lived in a 'fantasy' that a 'friendly heavyweight across the water would be there when the going gets tough'.
Lord Mandelson's remarks came after Pedro Serrano, the EU Ambassador to the UK, said the UK and EU were 'old friends entering an era of new beginnings'.
Writing in the i newspaper, he said that their respective economies were 'joined at the hip' and that more would be done to strengthen ties.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Reuters

10 minutes ago

• Reuters

UAE stocks bounce back amid hopes of regional de-escalation

June 20 (Reuters) - Stock exchanges in the United Arab Emirates rebounded on Friday, buoyed by hopes of a potential de-escalation in regional tensions. Investor sentiment improved following European efforts to bring Tehran back to the negotiating table and a pause in U.S. involvement in the Middle East conflict. The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump would decide on "whether or not to go" with U.S. involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks, citing the possibility of negotiations involving Iran in the near future. Dubai's main index (.DFMGI), opens new tab snapped a three-day losing streak, rising 1.6%, driven by gains in real estate and materials sector stocks. Among the top performers, Dubai's developer Emaar Properties ( opens new tab jumped 1.2%, while state-owned Parkin Company ( opens new tab advanced 4.8%. Separately, UAE created a new ministry of foreign trade, and appointed Thani al Zeyoudi as its minister, the United Arab Emirates prime minister and Dubai ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum said in a post on X on Friday. Abu Dhabi's benchmark index (.FTFADGI) also rebounded, gaining 1% after three consecutive sessions of losses. First Abu Dhabi Bank ( opens new tab rose 2.7%, while Adnoc Gas ( opens new tab advanced 2.5%. Real estate developer Aldar Properties ( opens new tab gained 4.5% after reporting over AED 3.5 billion in sales at its Fahid Beach Residences and The Beach House projects. Despite Friday's gains, Dubai's index posted a second consecutive weekly loss, down 0.2% after nine straight weeks of gains. Abu Dhabi mirrored the trend with a 0.5% weekly decline, according to LSEG data. Meanwhile, oil prices — a key driver of Gulf financial markets — fell 2.3% to $77.04 per barrel as of 11:40 GMT.

The Independent

15 minutes ago

• The Independent

What's the point of the UK talking to Tehran? More than you might think…

Europe's frantic diplomatic mission in Geneva may go down as one of its most arduous ventures on the world stage – and also one of its most consequential. The foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany must persuade a battered Iranian regime to kow-tow to the US and Israel over its nuclear ambitions, or face likely annihilation. All three European powers would, of course, love to see the back of supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei's corrupt and brutal theocracy. But they rightly fear the regime's capacity to unleash death and destruction before it goes. If Trump joins Israel in the war on Iran with US bunker-busting bombs on nuclear sites, and it succeeds in killing Khamenei, there will still be plenty of Iranian hardliners left who will be willing to fight to the death. Previous inhibitions will not apply. That could mean use of a dirty bomb in the West, or chaos unleashed in the Strait of Hormuz, through which 90 per cent of the Gulf's oil passes. For the world at large, the stakes are that high. British foreign secretary David Lammy – after meeting his US counterpart, Marco Rubio, and presidential envoy Steve Witkoff in Washington on Thursday – said that the UK was 'determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon". He thinks a window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution, as Trump dithers over whether to attack the regime, as US neo-cons and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu are demanding – or whether to heed the no-more-wars mantra of his Maga base. And so, in search of a diplomatic solution, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi is meeting with his European counterparts in Switzerland. But what can be achieved? For all their good intentions – French president Emmanuel Macron said the diplomats would make a "comprehensive, diplomatic and technical offer of negotiation" to Iran – the Europeans are unlikely to persuade the Iranians to pull back from the brink. At least not on their own. While one Iranian diplomat said Tehran was willing to pursue 'a balanced and pragmatic policy in its dealings with Europe, and engage rationally with both East and West', Araghchi said there will be 'no talks' with the US over Iran's nuclear programme while the Israeli bombardment continues: 'The Americans want negotiations and have sent messages several times, but we have clearly said that there is no room for dialogue.' But there is a useful point to holding talks on neutral ground with Tehran – and it's not simply to ask them nicely and face-to-face if they wouldn't mind stopping with their nuclear enrichment programme. Rather than relaying Trump and Netanyahu's demands to Iran, Geneva is about feeding back to the White House – translating Tehran's position for the US president. The Europeans aren't there to stop the war, they're Trump-whispering for the Ayatollah. It's not clear that European diplomats have the connections they need to have a greater role to play than this, useful though it will prove. But when it comes to a practical breakthrough, some of the Gulf states might, however. Behind the scenes, figures in what some dub 'Iran's deep state' – many of them members of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – are talking to representatives of Oman and Qatar; it might be these Middle Eastern countries that can make the difference, in a second stage of dialogue. Qatar, for its part, will likely hold more sway over Washington than London or Paris. All the peacemakers, though, will be battling the plans of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Nothing less that the obliteration of the regime in Tehran will satisfy him. Worryingly, Israel's premier appears to have been joined by an increasingly pro-war Fox News, with Sean Hannity this week declaring that Iran 'is the biggest existential threat to the entire western world'. The West should have learnt by now – after the disasters in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya – that enforced regime change in the Middle East is best avoided. Andreas Krieg, a leading Iran expert at King's College London thinks regime change in Iran would 'not be clean or peaceful'. If the current theocracy falls, there is no significant alternative political-social structure to lead this country of 92 million into the light. The IRGC, a ruthless military-industrial complex, would not easily cede control of the Iranian economy. Instead, with 190,000 personnel and a similar number of Basij paramilitaries to call on, it might well create a military dictatorship. The West and Israel would be back to square one. And the Iranian people would be no better off. Ironically, the last time the West brought about regime change in Iran – by booting out, in 1953, the democratically elected premier Mohammad Mosaddegh (for which we have British Petroleum and the CIA to thank) – it laid the groundwork for the emergence of the current Islamic Republic in the 1970s. In between rounds of golf, as he ponders his next steps in the Middle East, you can't help wishing Potus would be shown – by Lammy or anyone else – the relevant pages of a history book. It is within the president's power to unleash hell – or stop history repeating itself. After the Geneva talks, let's hope he listens to what the Trump-whisperers tell him.

BBC News

16 minutes ago

• BBC News

Moneystone Park plan approved for Moorlands despite dozens objecting

The final phase of plans to redevelop a former quarry and turn it into a holiday park have been lodges, an archery building and a watersports centre will be built at Moneystone Quarry near Cheadle, Staffordshire, as part of a wider Moneystone Park scheme from Laver decision came after plans for the first 190 lodges at the site were approved on appeal, having initially been refused by Staffordshire Moorlands District Council in 2023, over concerns about the Woodford, planning advisor for Laver Leisure, told councillors that the development would be a "unique and exciting scheme". "It's a well-designed and attractive scheme that successfully integrates the timber lodges, watersports centre and archery centre into a strong landscape framework," he told Thursday's meeting."There are significant economic and social benefits which the scheme will bring to the area." There were 48 objections to the scheme, including from councillor Su Beardmore, who represents Staffordshire Moorlands – Churnet Valley on Staffordshire County Reform councillor said the proposed 60 lodges were "effectively static-type caravans with metal chassis and brickwork skirting"."It is concerning that such a design is primarily aimed at cost-savings and stringent requirements associated with building regulations, rather than enhancing a rural environment with a high-quality design," she also referred to concerns raised by some residents over the site's instability but the authority was told the removal of water from the land had made the ground more stable. Before voting to approve the plans, councillors said a planning inspector's decision to approve the previous application on appeal meant they could not block the new proposal on design Mark Johnson said: "I too wish these lodges exhibited slightly more flair, but, as has been made very clear, our hands are tied by the inspector's decision."Councillor Keith Hoptroff added that the development would improve the quarry's safety and make "good use of a vast site". This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.