How Middle Eastern leaders may react to U.S. strike against Iran

President Trump is claiming success from the U.S.'s military strike to cripple Iran's nuclear capabilities, yet there is uncertainty on how the Middle East region will respond. NBC News' Matt Bradley reports from Tel Aviv on how Iran has been perceived by other nations in the region in recent decades and how that may indicate Middle Eastern leaders' reaction to the current strikes.June 22, 2025

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Times

28 minutes ago

• Times

Offer of talks went unanswered — so Trump sent bombers instead

T he clock started ticking down towards the US bombing of Iran after the Iranian regime failed to respond within a 60-day deadline set in a private letter from President Trump to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Even as military preparations were in full swing over the past week, senior officials said Trump remained open throughout to a meaningful overture from Tehran, as indicated when he told his press secretary to announce on Thursday that he would decide 'within two weeks' whether or not to join Israel's campaign. Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, went even further, saying on Sunday that the bombing mission could have been aborted while the planes were in the air if circumstances had changed.

Daily Mirror

43 minutes ago

• Daily Mirror

Donald Trump's defence chief claims Iran attack was shared with lawmakers

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth was asked when congress was informed that President Trump had taken executive action to launch an offensive on Iran US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth revealed to journalists that Congress was not informed about Saturday's strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities until after they had taken place. In a press briefing on Sunday morning, the former Fox News pundit turned Trump ally responded to reporters' queries about the surprising move. When one journalist asked the 45-year-old when Congress was notified that the president had taken executive action, he answered, "They were notified after the planes were safely out." ‌ After a brief pause, he added, "Uh, we complied with the notification requirements of the War Powers Act." Then, a moment later, he stated: "They were. ..immediately thereafter" ‌ Several politicians from both parties have criticised Trump's action, accusing the president of acting unconstitutionally. Congressman Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican and vocal opponent of U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, reacted on X just minutes after Trump announced the offensive, stating, "This is not Constitutional." Massie has been a key figure behind a bipartisan war powers resolution aimed at preventing American military engagement in the ongoing Middle East tensions, reports the Mirror US. Others were more restrained in their criticism while still expressing concern about executive overreach, with Republican Warren Davidson, a congressman for Ohio tweeting: "While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional." Marjorie Taylor Greene, a staunch Trump supporter, has openly criticised the President for siding with Israel in its conflict against Iran. ‌ On social media, she fumed: "Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war." She also pointed out the cause and effect of the hostilities: "There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first." The political sphere was caught off guard by Trump's sudden move, especially since he had previously declared that he would take "two weeks" to decide on US involvement in Israel's conflict with Iran. ‌ Trump had earlier indicated a period of contemplation, saying, "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiation that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go in the next two weeks," as read by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt last Thursday. In a surprising admission, Trump acknowledged his collaboration with Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in orchestrating the strikes, expressing gratitude towards Netanyahu for his backing. Netanyahu reciprocated the sentiment on Fox News, stating, "Tonight, President Trump and the US acted with a lot of strength. President Trump, I thank you. The people of Israel thank you." According to the Iranian state-affiliated news agency, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard issued a stern response: "Today's act of aggression by the terrorist American regime has granted the Islamic Republic of Iran the legitimate right to act in self-defense, including through options that go beyond the delusional calculations of the aggressor coalition." The comments were somewhat enigmatic regarding the specific 'options', but the menace was unmistakable. With an air of defiance, they continued: "The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is well-versed in the realities of this full-scale hybrid war and will never be intimidated by the noise of Trump or the criminal gangs ruling Washington and Tel Aviv."

The Sun

an hour ago

• The Sun

US might have killed any immediate threat of an Iranian nuke but here's why it may not have won the war yet

PRESIDENT Donald Trump's surprise attack on Iran's three main nuclear sites is a dramatic escalation of the Middle East crisis. By neutralising the places where it was enriching uranium to A-bomb grade, the Americans have almost certainly killed any immediate threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon. 3 3 3 But Washington has not necessarily won the war yet. Israel's extraordinary decapitation strikes on military leaders and nuclear scientists ten days ago battered the Islamic Republic but it did not back down. Even taking out Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei himself would not necessarily collapse the regime or make Iran give in. America can do vastly more harm to the Iranians than Israel, but will they back off? More importantly, could Iran's leaders survive giving in to Trump's demand they abandon any nuclear enrichment project to Washington's satisfaction? Cutting their losses by accepting Trump's demands would be wisest for the sake of 90million ordinary Iranians. Remember, Trump had ominously ordered the ten million people of the capital, Tehran, to evacuate the city for their own safety. But Iran's leaders are drenched in the cult of martyrdom. Suicide bombing was promoted by the ayatollahs' regime from the beginning. Their proxies in Lebanon blew up 242 US Marines there in 1983 with the first 'spectacular' suicide truck bomb. Watch Trump hail 'very successful' bombing on Iran's nuke bases Next month in their religious calendar is Muharram, which is when Iran's Shiites celebrate what cynical secular Westerners regard as past futile sacrifices. So making the case for cutting losses goes against the grain. Even if Khamenei and the official Iran government go for a deal with Trump, they could face a backlash from hardline fanatics. They could argue America and Israel are never going to risk a ground invasion. Trump's supporters won't accept body bags coming back from Iran as they did from Afghanistan and Iraq for years for nothing. They can sit out an air war and absorb the bombs and casualties, they hope. And they can shoot and hang any Iranians who protest. As the Revolutionary Guards controlling Iran's missiles showed immediately after the American air strikes, they can hit back hard — at least against Israel. They may be shrewd enough to avoid US targets so Trump won't retaliate against Iran, but hit Washington's allies. Israel was already in their sights and, however effective its defences, even a handful of missiles getting in paralyses a port like Haifa or the main airport, Ben Gurion Israel is losing money hand over fist, if mercifully few lives. The Iranians would be wise to find a way to calm things rather than stirring up more death and destruction. Mark Almond Let's not ignore that Britain could find itself in the line of fire. Long before the current crisis, Iranian propaganda demonised us as the Little Satan scurrying along beside the American Great Satan. So when Keir Starmer voiced the British government's support for the US and Israel's right to nullify the Iranian nuclear threat, that will have been 'proof' enough for Iran's fanatical missile controllers. Only the day before Trump's salvo of bunker busters and cruise missiles on Iran, a man was arrested for allegedly scouting the British base at Akrotiri, apparently as a target for a potential terrorist attack. Although a British passport holder, he is reported to be an ethnic Azeri, the second-biggest part of Iran's population mix. The Ayatollah himself is half-Azeri through his mother. Iran could have 'sleeper cells' of similar saboteurs waiting for the signal to go into action against Britain and other US allies — or even inside the US itself. The Iranians would be wise to find a way to calm things rather than stirring up more death and destruction. But that was true long before this war broke out.