logo
JPMorgan Chase is heading upmarket to woo America's millionaires

JPMorgan Chase is heading upmarket to woo America's millionaires

NBC News27-05-2025

JPMorgan Chase thinks it has cracked the code on managing more money for America's millionaires.
It's not a new financial product, a novel software program or an enticing sign-up bonus. Instead, it's a refurbished take on an old concept — the brick-and-mortar bank branch — along with new standards for service that are at the heart of its aspirations.
The bank is unveiling 14 of these new format branches — each acquired when JPMorgan took over First Republic in 2023 — in tony ZIP codes in New York, California, Florida and Massachusetts, including Napa, Palm Beach and Wellesley Hills.
It's part of JPMorgan's push to convince affluent Americans, many who already use Chase checking accounts or credit cards, that the bank is ready to manage their millions.
JPMorgan is the country's biggest bank by deposits and assets and has a top share in areas as disparate as Wall Street trading and retail credit cards. But one of the only major categories where it isn't a clear leader is in wealth management; peers like Morgan Stanley and Bank of America exceed it there.
While half of the 19 million affluent households in the U.S. bank with JPMorgan, it has just a 10% share of their investing dollars, according to Jennifer Roberts, CEO of Chase Consumer Banking.
'We have this giant opportunity to convince customers to have their wealth management business with us in addition to their deposit relationship,' Roberts said in a recent interview.
Helped by its acquisition of First Republic, which was known for catering to rich families living on either coast, JPMorgan decided to launch a new tier of service. Called J.P. Morgan Private Client, it is anchored by the new physical locations, of which there will be 31 by the end of next year.
The service comes with its own mobile banking app, but its main appeal is the in-person experience: Instead of being handed off to multiple employees like at a Chase branch, J.P. Morgan Private Client members are assigned to a single banker.
'What First Republic did really well was deliver a concierge-level of service where if you have an issue, a person owned it for you and you didn't have to worry about it,' Roberts said. 'So with this experience we are going to deliver a more elevated concierge type of service, like you would expect at a high-end hotel.'
The price of entry: at least $750,000 in deposits and investments, though Roberts said the bank is aiming for those with around $2 million to $3 million in balances.
Quiet opulence
The new locations, dubbed J.P. Morgan Financial Centers, have a warm feel and an earth-tone color palette that intentionally sets them apart from the nearly 5,000 Chase branches operated by the bank.
During a recent visit to a Manhattan location, the vibe is family office-meets hotel, with soaring ceilings, living room-style seating areas and art-filled meeting rooms scattered over two floors.
Gone is the traditional row of bank tellers; there is instead a concierge desk and a solitary ATM machine. Instead of lollipops, visitors are offered squares of Dylan's chocolate. The space is quiet, except for the crack of a Perrier being opened or the whir of an espresso machine.
The design elements and hushed environment are 'really meant to illustrate that we're there to have a more serious, less-transactional conversation about your wealth planning over the course of time,' said Stevie Baron, JPMorgan's head of affluent banking.
Those conversations involve planning for long-term goals and examining clients' portfolios to see whether they are on track to reach them, he said.
Elements of the new high-end branch format could find their way to regular Chase branches, especially the 1,000 or so that are in high-income areas, Baron said.
JPMorgan executives have said the bank's branch network has already succeeded as a feeder into the firm's wealth management offerings.
The new service tier — which sits above the bank's Chase Private Client offering, which is for those with at least $150,000 in balances and is delivered in the regular branches — is expected to help JPMorgan's retail bank double client assets from the $1.08 trillion it reached in March.
'Obviously it's a big challenge, because clients already have their established wealth managers, but it's something that we've been making really strong progress in,' Roberts said.
Come one, come all
But attempting to create a new, more luxurious brand from a mainstream one — think the difference between Toyota and its luxury brand Lexus — is not without its risks. Or at least, momentary confusion.
So far, the two flagship financial centers in New York and San Francisco opened late last year haven't seen heavy foot traffic, Roberts admitted.
'Our biggest challenge is that we don't have people walking in because they don't really understand what they are,' Roberts said. 'So we just need to get the awareness out there.'
While JPMorgan is leaning on the first part of its name, rather than Chase, to signal exclusivity for the new branches, that may deter people from walking through the doors and starting conversations.
'I just want this to be acknowledged: We're never going to turn someone away. Any customer can come and leverage any of our branches at any time,' Roberts said.
'We want people walking in, having the experience, meeting with our experts and understanding how we can help support their financial goals over time,' she said.
JP Morgan's Palm Beach Reception.Courtesy: JP Morgan

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump pleads with oil companies to keep prices down after Iran blockade threat
Trump pleads with oil companies to keep prices down after Iran blockade threat

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump pleads with oil companies to keep prices down after Iran blockade threat

Donald Trump is calling on 'everyone' to 'keep oil prices down' and has commanded the Department of Energy to open up drilling after oil prices surged to their highest levels in the wake of the president's attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN,' he wrote in an all-caps message on Truth Social on Monday. 'I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' he added. In a separate post, he ordered the Department of Energy to 'DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' International energy traders have braced for massive disruptions following Iran's parliamentary vote to support the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a strategically important choke point for the world's oil supply. Within hours after Saturday's attacks, roughly 50 oil tankers were seen scrambling to leave the strait. 'We're on it!' energy Secretary Chris Wright responded to Trump's post. 'Thanks to President Trump's leadership, America's energy security is stronger than ever before.' U.S. crude oil futures surged by more than 6 percent to peak at $78 a barrel on Sunday — more than $1 higher than the price set at the time of Trump's inauguration on January 20. The spike is likely to trickle down to gasoline prices as Americans prepare for a three-day Fourth of July weekend.

Support for solar energy and offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents, AP-NORC poll says
Support for solar energy and offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents, AP-NORC poll says

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Support for solar energy and offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents, AP-NORC poll says

Americans' support for green energy tax credits and renewable energies like wind and solar power has decreased in recent years, according to a new poll, driven by a softening in support from Democrats and independents. The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that U.S. adults' support for tax credits for electric vehicles and solar panels has weakened, as well as their enthusiasm for offshore wind farm expansion. While Democrats remain the strongest supporters of these initiatives, the poll reveals signs of growing cynicism within their ranks. The poll results coincide with sweeping changes President Donald Trump 's Republican administration is making to regulations related to energy and climate change, including slashing the federal workforce in these departments. And although Democrats and independents have weakened their support for some green energy initiatives, there has not been an increase in support for Trump's energy policies. The poll found only about 4 in 10 U.S. adults — including only 1 in 10 Democrats and about 2 in 10 independents, along with three-quarters of Republicans — approve of the way Trump is handling climate change, which largely tracks with his overall approval rating. Democrats and independents drive decline in support for renewable energy credits About 6 in 10 Democrats, 58%, favor tax credits for purchasing an electric vehicle, down from about 7 in 10 in 2022. Among independents, support declined from 49% in 2022 to 28%. Only one-quarter of Republicans supported this policy in 2022, and that hasn't changed measurably. 'As far as the pollution goes ... the vehicles nowadays put out very little emissions to the air,' said JD Johnson, a 62-year-old Democrat from Meadowview, Virginia, who somewhat opposes tax credits to purchase an electric vehicle. That's partly because he sees the electric vehicle manufacturing process as energy intensive and believes gasoline-powered vehicles have made improvements with the pollutants they emit. The decline in favoring solar panel tax credits was across the board rather than being concentrated among Democrats. 'For solar panels, in all honesty, I don't think they're that efficient yet,' said Glenn Savage, 78, a left-leaning independent from Rock Hill, South Carolina. 'I'd rather see them pour money into research and try to get the solar panels more efficient before they start giving tax breaks to the public. I may be wrong on that, but that's just my thought.' Scientists say transitioning to renewable energies and ditching fossil fuels that release planet-warming emissions are essential to protect the planet. Billions of dollars in project grants for clean technologies awarded during President Joe Biden 's Democratic administration have been canceled by the Trump administration, and the offshore wind sector has been stunted by Trump's executive order that paused approvals, permits and loans for wind energy projects. Fewer than half of U.S. adults, 44%, now say that offshore wind farms should be expanded in the U.S., down from 59% in 2022. About half favor expanding solar panel farms, while about two-thirds were in support in 2022. When people are concerned about the economy and their personal finances, environmental issues are sometimes prioritized less, said Talbot Andrews, an assistant professor in the department of government at Cornell University who was not involved in the poll. 'I think it makes people anxious to think about increased taxes or increased spending on environmental issues when the cost of eggs are going through the roof,' Andrews said. Low support for Trump's efforts to expand offshore drilling and coal mining Trump has championed the expansion of offshore oil drilling, as well as domestic coal production. Despite a decline in support for expanded renewable energies, the new poll shows that only about one-third of U.S. adults think offshore drilling for oil and natural gas should be expanded in the U.S., and only about one-quarter say this about coal mining. In both cases, Republicans are much more likely than Democrats to support expanding these energy sources. Trump has sought to open up national monuments for oil drilling, but more U.S. adults oppose than support auctioning off more public space for oil drilling. Only about one-quarter of U.S. adults favor this, while 4 in 10 are opposed. Republicans are much more likely than independents or Democrats to be in support. Bipartisan support for consumer rebates and home appliance ratings The Energy Star program that certifies appliances, such as dishwashers and refrigerators, as energy efficient recently appeared in headlines when the EPA made plans to scrap the program. The blue and white logo is well recognized, and experts say the program has long had bipartisan support until recently. The poll found three-quarters of Democrats support providing consumer rebates for efficient home appliances, compared with 6 in 10 Republicans. Patrick Buck, 54, from Chicago, describes himself as a liberal Republican and is a fan of the consumer rebates for energy-efficient appliances. 'It seems to work in terms of transforming what people have in their houses, because a lot of people have a lot of old appliances and just can't afford new ones,' he said. Safe air, water, meat and produce The poll found only about 2 in 10 U.S. adults are 'extremely' or 'very' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of their drinking water, the air they breathe and the meat, poultry, fruits and vegetables they buy in grocery stores. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults are 'somewhat' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of each of these, and about 4 in 10 are 'not very' or 'not at all' confident. The Trump administration has announced plans to roll back rules and policies related to limiting pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, such as rules that limit pollution from power plants and blocking California's efforts to phase out cars that run on gas. The federal government has also cut staff at the Food and Drug Administration, the federal agency tasked with protecting public health and ensuring food supply safety. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Iran, oil and the price we all pay
Iran, oil and the price we all pay

ITV News

time4 hours ago

  • ITV News

Iran, oil and the price we all pay

The world is, in theory, trying to wean itself off its dependence on hydrocarbons but oil remains the lifeblood of economic when it comes to oil, there are two types of countries: those that produce it and those that consume it. The UK is a consumer.A sustained spike in oil prices would push up the price of petrol and diesel at the pumps here and inflation more conflict between Iran and Israel, now joined by the United States, has the potential to cause another energy price shock at a time when households in the UK are still feeling bruised by the last one, triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Oil prices briefly spiked to $80 a barrel overnight, up from around $60 at the start of the month, before easing back to $ worry is that Iran may respond to the US bombing of its nuclear facilities at the weekend by attacking energy infrastructure in the Middle-East or shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The Persian Gulf pumps a third of the world's to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), around 20 million barrels of oil a day, around one fifth of global demand, passes through the Strait of Hormuz - from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq and Iran - en route to markets, predominantly in shipping lane is also an important supply route for Liquified Natural Gas from Qatar and Abu Dhabi. What happens next to the price of energy we use depends on how and if the Islamic republic the intensity of the fighting eases so too will the upward pressure of prices. If it escalates, the oil prices would dash towards $100 a barrel and potentially beyond - JP Morgan has $120 - $130 pencilled in for 'worst-case scenario' in which the Strait of Hormuz is shut for an extended period. Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz before but has never done so, even during the 'tanker wars' between Iran and Iraq in the 1980s. There are practical reasons why not. Iran has a navy but would find a blockade hard to enforce, it would also be an act of self-harm - oil and gas revenues make-up almost half of the government's the US has a fleet stationed in the Gulf and China (which relies on imports of Iranian oil) may decide to intervene. But Iran's options are narrowing and desperate regimes sometimes take desperate measures. In the event of closure, Saudi Arabia could divert oil West through its network of pipelines but oil from Iraq, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar would, in effect, be stranded. The head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned that US decision to attack Iran could damage economic growth more widely if the price of oil surges. Kristalina Georgieva told Bloomberg that she 'prays' supply routes won't be worst may not happen but the perceived risk has increased, dragging the market price of energy up with living standards here in the UK, this is unhelpful. Until this month, lower oil prices - a side-effect of the trade war President Trump unleashed on April 2 - had been one of the few economic bright with a car has been enjoying the cheapest petrol and diesel prices, when adjusted for inflation, for twenty years. Sagging energy prices also strengthened the case for the Bank of England to cut interest rates. When the US fired its 'bunker buster' bombs at the Fardow nuclear site, the outlook for inflation here darkened.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store