Despite ranked-choice voting, Adrienne Adams declines to back rivals in NYC mayor's race
NEW YORK — Mayoral candidate Adrienne Adams declined Thursday to say who she voted for, even as her opponents — and chief supporter — have begun to capitalize on the city's ranked-choice voting system in their collective quest to block Andrew Cuomo's return to power.
'I voted for me and I voted for my community,' the City Council speaker said after leaving her polling station in the Jamaica section of Queens on the sixth day of early voting ahead of the June 24 Democratic primary.
Asked who else she ranked on her ballot, Adams replied, 'Well, I still believe in the secrecy of the ballot, and I voted for me and my community.'
She specifically declined to say whether she voted for democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani — the first choice for the Working Families Party, which endorsed Adams as part of a four-person slate intended to oppose Cuomo.
The secrecy from Adams stands in contrast to the recent — albeit late — cross endorsements candidates and top surrogates are making to blunt Cuomo's rise. The former governor, a household name, is beating the lesser-known Adams among Black New Yorkers, even though she'd be New York City's first Black female mayor.
Mamdani and Brad Lander endorsed one another last week — likely a bigger benefit to Mamdani if he outpaces Lander as is expected, though the city comptroller is having a strong close to his campaign season.
Some people on Adams' team were hoping she'd back her rivals. To that end, her aides had prepared a statement asserting her support for the Working Families Party's slate, but internal disagreements blocked it from being released, someone with knowledge of the matter told POLITICO. That person was granted anonymity to freely discuss private campaign strategy.
Adams' chief endorser, New York State Attorney General Letitia James, announced support for Lander, Mamdani and Myrie as her second, third and fourth picks Saturday in a rebuke to Cuomo, her political nemesis.
New Yorkers can select up to five candidates, in order of preference, when they head to the polls Tuesday in the city's relatively new ranked-choice voting system.
Adams entered the race late, with low name recognition and insufficient funds to take on the former governor. A low-profile politician who would be New York City's first female mayor, she was urged into the race by James, who wants to see Cuomo defeated but didn't want to run for the job. A report from James' office four years ago substantiated allegations Cuomo sexually harassed female staffers, leading to his resignation. He denies the claims.
Adams is viewed by political insiders as a candidate with a lot of potential for growth, but has yet to meet that expectation in a race dominated by Cuomo and Mamdani, the democratic socialist who routinely polls second. Where Cuomo enjoys popularity in the Council speaker's Queens district of older Black homeowners, Mamdani excites a younger, wealthier and whiter crowd.
On the campaign trail, Adams has criticized both candidates, delivering a searing rebuke of Cuomo's Covid policies in a speech about her deceased father and questioning Mamdani's inexperience on the debate stage. She also released a since-deleted social media post that slammed the state lawmaker's vow to abolish ICE.
Cuomo has not told his supporters to rank anyone else on their ballots, including state Sen. Jessica Ramos — who broke with the Working Families Party and endorsed him.
Defeating Cuomo on his political turf — which overlaps with her own — was always going to be a challenge for the Council speaker, but her broader appeal made her an attractive choice for voters seeking an experienced alternative to Cuomo. She's routinely polling a distant fourth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Stossel calls Trump ‘arrogant bully' but supports him targeting DEI, university funding
Journalist John Stossel said President Trump is an 'arrogant bully' during a special, John Stossel: Give Me Liberty!, set to air Sunday at 7 p.m. ET on NewsNation, while commending policy changes implemented by the White House. 'He's an arrogant bully, but I love it that he's changing the way things were,' Stossel told Connell McShane. The former Fox News reporter said he had 'mixed feelings' about Trump's takedown of some colleges and universities – he criticized the president for his attacks on the universities but indicated he supports pulling some funding. 'Why were we giving these rich institutions so much money anyway?' he asked, later adding, 'I don't like it when he threatens them.' The Trump administration revoked millions in grants from Harvard University, alleging that the school's administration is harboring students with antisemitic views for supporting Palestine amid the war in Gaza. 'America is what America is because everybody has a right to speak and say things that may be stupid or sometimes hurtful,' Stossel said. 'It's important that we have that right, and where Trump implies he's going to cut off the money, well, we shouldn't be giving them the money in the first place,' he added. Stossel noted that money might be better spent supporting the efforts of companies. However, he commended the president for supporting the removal of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives from the federal government in a January executive order. 'It was captured by the left, and it made people afraid to talk to people who were different from them,' Stossel told McShane. 'A Harvard Business School study found that the companies that had good DEI programs the longest hired fewer Black female managers,' he added. 'It just poisons speech and thank God it seems to be over.'
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Donald Trump appears to knock Juneteenth celebrations
Donald Trump appears to knock Juneteenth celebrations Show Caption Hide Caption Tiktok stays as President Donald Trump extends deadline for ban President Donald Trump signed an executive order extending the deadline to ban Tiktok. President Donald Trump appeared to criticize Juneteenth celebrations in a post on social media, saying there are "too many non-working holidays in America." "It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed," Trump said on June 19. "The workers don't want it either! Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year." The president did not specifically name the holiday in his post. Juneteenth commemorates the events of June 19, 1865, when the last Black slaves of the Confederacy were ordered free following the arrival of Union troops in Galveston, Texas. It has long been celebrated by Black Americans, but it rose to national prominence in 2020 amid protests against racial inequities, sparked in part by the police killings of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd. It was officially recognized a federal holiday by then-President Joe Biden in 2021. It wasn't immediately clear what costs Trump was referring to in his post. Private companies are not forced to close on federal holidays, and many don't. Most national banks, federal offices and the United States Postal Service were closed in honor of Juneteenth. However, major retailers such as Walmart, Costco, Target and Starbucks were open on the holiday. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked by reporters earlier in the day whether Trump was expected to commemorate Juneteenth. 'I'm not tracking his signature on a proclamation today," she responded. "I know this is a federal holiday." Trump has previously honored Juneteenth, including in his first term as president. But Trump created controversy in 2020 after scheduling his first rally since COVID-19 lockdowns in Tulsa, Oklahoma – the site of one of the worst massacres of Black Americans in the country's history – on Juneteenth. He later changed the date of the event. Contributing: Jeanine Santucci, Saman Shafiq
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Majority of Democratic voters think the party should stop focusing on transgender issues and replace leadership
A majority of Democrats believe the party needs fresh blood and only a small fraction feel it should prioritize transgender rights issues, according to a new poll. The Reuters/Ipsos survey, released Thursday, found 62% of self-identifying Democrats agree that party leadership 'should be replaced with new people.' In contrast, only 30% of Republicans surveyed felt the same about their party leadership. 3 The poll found a disconnect between what Democratic voters say their top issues are and what they view as priorities for party leaders. Michael Nagle Nearly half of Democrats (49%) said they were 'unsatisfied' with the current crop of leaders in the party, while 41% said they were 'satisfied' and 10% marked 'unsure.' Democratic voters also indicated a deep disconnect between what they want the party to focus on ahead of the 2026 midterm elections and what they view as leadership's priorities – with some noting that it appears the Democratic Party is belaboring transgender issues. Only 17% of Democrats said allowing transgender people to compete in women and girls' sports should be a priority for the party. However, 28% responded that they believe party leaders see it as a top issue. 'There are more important things to be moving the needle on,' Benjamin Villagomez, who is transgender, told Reuters. 'There are more pressing issues, things that actually matter to people's livelihoods,' the 33-year-old from Austin, Texas added. 3 Only 17% of Democrats said allowing transgender people to compete in women and girls' sports should be a priority for the party. Getty Images 3 28% of Democrats said the transgender sports issue is treated as a priority by party leaders. Reuters Gaps between the rank-and-file and party leaders were particularly high on economic issues. For example, 86% of Democrats said raising taxes on wealthy Americans and large corporations should be a priority, but only 72% felt it was a top concern for party leaders. Similarly, 73% identified reducing corporate spending in politics as a priority, but just 58% believed it was a leadership priority. On promoting affordable childcare, lowering prescription drug costs, making health insurance more readily available and backing mass transit – respondents viewed party leaders as less passionate than themselves. The dissatisfaction in party priorities was stronger among younger Democrats, those between 18-39, the poll found. The poll was conducted between June 11-16 and it surveyed 4,258 people nationwide, including 1,293 Democrats. It had a margin of error of about 3 percentage points.
