logo
Trump Wants Special Prosecutor Investigation Into Biden's 2020 Election Win

Trump Wants Special Prosecutor Investigation Into Biden's 2020 Election Win

Forbes5 hours ago

President Donald Trump called Friday for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate former President Joe Biden's win in the 2020 election, as Trump has continued to push baseless evidence of fraud in the election despite still facing criminal charges for his post-election efforts.
Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden attend Trump's inauguration at the U.S. Capitol building on ... More January 20. POOL/AFP via Getty Images
Trump railed against the 2020 election results on Truth Social Friday morning, claiming the election was a 'total FRAUD.'
The president said a 'Special Prosecutor must be appointed' to investigate the election results, adding, 'Let the work begin!'
Independent investigations have repeatedly determined there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election, with experts debunking Trump's allegations of wrongdoing, and every legal case Trump and his allies have previously brought alleging fraud has failed in court.
Special prosecutors are independent third-party counsel that the attorney general appoints to oversee investigations about issues where the Justice Department might have a conflict of interest in prosecuting the case themselves, such as Jack Smith overseeing the federal government's criminal cases against Trump when he was out of office.
Trump could not order a special prosecutor investigation himself, but Attorney General Pam Bondi, a close ally who has so far acted in line with the president's agenda, could decide to appoint one in response to his request.
The Justice Department has not yet responded to a request for comment.
Trump's continued claims that the 2020 election was 'rigged' come after Smith and the Biden-era DOJ alleged Trump has pushed his fraud claims despite knowing they were false. In court filings for the federal criminal case over Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election results—which has since been dropped—prosecutors alleged Trump was repeatedly told by top advisors that there was no evidence of widespread fraud in the election. Smith alleged Trump and his team made up fraud allegations 'out of whole cloth' and his own advisors never believed their claims, quoting Trump advisor Jason Miller as allegedly saying, 'It's tough to own any of this when it's all just conspiracy s–t beamed down from the mothership.' Prosecutors allege Trump himself similarly did not appear to believe the fraud claims, with the president allegedly telling an aide that the 'details don't matter' after the aide said his evidence of fraud wouldn't hold up in court. Trump allegedly 'mocked' ex-attorney Sidney Powell's claims about voting machines changing results, comparing them to 'Star Trek.' 'It doesn't matter if you won or lost the election. You still have to fight like hell,' Trump was overheard allegedly telling his family, according to prosecutors, who also claim Trump hired ex-attorney Rudy Giuliani because he 'was willing to falsely claim victory and spread knowingly false claims of election fraud.' Trump has denied prosecutors' claims and all allegations of wrongdoing, and since the case was dropped before it went to trial, prosecutors' allegations were never given the chance to be held up or struck down in court. The Washington Post also reported in 2023 that Trump's 2020 campaign commissioned a report into whether there was widespread election fraud, which determined there was no such fraud. Trump Still Faces Consequences For 2020 Election Fraud Claims
Trump was indicted twice for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, including by allegedly pressuring state officials and lawmakers to reject the results based on his fraud allegations. Trump was indicted in federal court and in Georgia state court over the alleged post-election conspiracy, part of four criminal cases brought against him after his first term. (The president has pleaded not guilty in every case.) The federal 2020 election case was ultimately dropped after Trump's reelection in November, given the DOJ's policy of not prosecuting sitting presidents. His Georgia case remains ongoing, though its future is in doubt after a state court ruling that declared Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis should be disqualified from the case over her romantic relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade. The Georgia Supreme Court still has to weigh in on the issue, but if it upholds Willis' disqualification, the case would then have to be taken up by a new prosecutor in order to move forward, and it's unclear when or if that could happen.
Trump and his allies pushed widespread claims of election fraud in the aftermath of Biden's 2020 election win, part of a wide-ranging effort to overturn the election results that overwhelmingly failed both in and out of court. The fraud claims have persisted over the years and remain widely accepted by many Republicans, despite there being no credible evidence to support them, with polling in recent years suggesting approximately 30% of Americans don't believe Biden was legitimately elected. The fraud claims and efforts to overturn the 2020 election have also resulted in numerous consequences for the president's allies who helped him push the fraud claims, with former lawyers like Giuliani, Powell and John Eastman facing criminal charges, law license suspensions and hefty defamation cases against them. Forbes All The Big Moments When Trump Was Told His Fraud Claims Were False, DOJ Alleges—Why They're Key To Conviction By Sara Dorn Forbes The Biggest New Claims Against Trump In Jack Smith's Bombshell Filing By Alison Durkee Forbes Trump Campaign Reportedly Commissioned Study Showing No Widespread Election Fraud—But Continued To Push Claims Anyway By Alison Durkee

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘It was a bloodbath': Cruz, Carlson feud offers preview of 2028
‘It was a bloodbath': Cruz, Carlson feud offers preview of 2028

Politico

time28 minutes ago

  • Politico

‘It was a bloodbath': Cruz, Carlson feud offers preview of 2028

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and conservative media personality Tucker Carlson doubled down on their feud over U.S. involvement in the escalating war between Israel and Iran, with each releasing their own podcasts on Friday following up on the fiery debate earlier this week. The ongoing war of words between the two high-profile conservative thought leaders — both of whom have left the door open to a possible 2028 presidential run — could offer a glimpse at what the first Republican presidential primary of the post-Donald Trump era might look like. 'It was a bloodbath,' Cruz said of his appearance on Carlson's podcast on an episode of 'Verdict with Ted Cruz,' the show he hosts. 'The two of us, frankly, beat the living daylights out of each other for two hours straight.' Carlson and Cruz's contentious conversation — in which both men repeatedly shouted at each other and traded personal insults — revealed fissures on the right between pro-Israel Republicans urging the White House to launch an attack on Iran and conservative isolationists who hope the president will uphold his commitment to keep the U.S. out of foreign conflicts. On Friday, both insisted on their respective podcasts that the other was leading the U.S. down the wrong path. Carlson said Cruz's ominous warnings of Iran's nuclear capabilities were part of an effort to 'justify American involvement in regime change.' '[Carlson] has gotten to a place of hardcore isolationism that I think is really dangerous,' Cruz said on his podcast. Cruz and Carlson's disagreement over the U.S.' policy over the escalating conflict in the Middle East will play out in the coming days. Trump told reporters in New Jersey on Friday he's taking 'a period of time' to decide whether to strike Iran, and that the self-imposed two-week timeframe to launch a strike the White House announced on Thursday would be the 'maximum.' But the two men may also find themselves in competing lanes of the 2028 Republican presidential primary, where the intraparty debate between war hawks and isolationists could be a fault line for Republican primary voters. Carlson said he would consider running for president in 2028 in an episode of his podcast last year, while conceding in the same breath, 'I don't think I'd be very good at it.' 'I would do whatever I could to help,' he told fellow conservative podcast host Patrick Bet-David. 'I want to be helpful.' Cruz, who ran for president against Trump in a bitterly-contested 2016 primary that was punctuated with personal attacks, has not closed the door on a 2028 presidential run. When asked about the possibility of running in 2028 by POLITICO in April, Cruz said he's focused on delivering legislative victories for Republicans — even as he uses his new post heading the Senate Commerce Committee to put his stamp on the direction of the party. Perhaps further forecasting another dynamic of the 2028 primary, Trump refused to show a preference for Carlson or Cruz's position, instead offering praise to both men when asked about the interview. 'Tucker is a nice guy. He called and apologized the other day, because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciated that,' Trump told reporters on Thursday. 'And Ted Cruz is a nice guy. He's been with me for a long time.'

Trump says Harvard agreement on international students may be announced within a week
Trump says Harvard agreement on international students may be announced within a week

Fox News

time30 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump says Harvard agreement on international students may be announced within a week

President Donald Trump on Friday said a deal with Harvard University, related to its policies surrounding international students, may be announced within a week. "Many people have been asking what is going on with Harvard University and their largescale improprieties that we have been addressing, looking for a solution," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so." The president noted the university "acted extremely appropriately" during negotiations, applauding leadership's apparent commitment to do "what is right." "If a Settlement is made on the basis that is currently being discussed, it will be "mindbogglingly" HISTORIC, and very good for our Country," Trump wrote. The announcement came as Federal Judge Allison Burroughs on Friday issued a preliminary injunction, allowing Harvard University to continue hosting international students, despite a Trump executive order. It is a major legal victory for the Ivy League school, which has been fighting a variety of restrictions imposed by the administration. The temporary court order stays in effect until the case is fully decided on the merits. Harvard University sued the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), challenging the revocation of Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). Without the program, current and future international students would be barred from attending the university. Harvard alleged the revocation was the culmination of a retaliatory campaign by the Trump administration on academic freedom at Harvard. Attorneys argued the policy is an infringement of the university's Due Process and First Amendment rights, in particular Harvard's constitutional right to be free of retaliatory action for protected speech, as well as violating the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The order states the revocation cannot be used to negatively affect visa applications, deny entry to the U.S., or be used as a reason to claim a visa holder has lost their non-immigrant status. Harvard University did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store