‘Bribe for bail' case: Delhi HC turns down clerk's plea for interim relief, says ‘very, very serious allegations'
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday refused interim relief to a court ahlmad (clerk or official) who sought protection from arrest in a 'bribery for bail' case. While seeking a status report from the Delhi government's Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) in the matter, the High Court noted that he was facing 'very, very serious allegations'.
The Indian Express on May 24 had reported that the ACB in January had sought permission from the Principal Secretary, Department of Law, Justice, and Legislative Affairs, to initiate a probe against a Special Judge in the Rouse Avenue Court and his court's ahlmad for the alleged demand and acceptance of bribes for granting bail to accused.
The request, however, was passed on to the High Court. Even as the HC turned down the request on February 14, saying the ACB did not have 'sufficient material' against the Special Judge, it asked the ACB to continue its investigation. The judge was later transferred from Rouse Avenue Court to another court.
On Tuesday, Justice Amit Sharma, while refusing to grant the clerk an interim protection from arrest, orally remarked, 'Very, very serious allegations… A person from our own staff, this is something very serious.'
Senior advocates Mohit Mathur and Maninder Singh, appearing for the accused, told the court that the investigating officer in the case is the ACB officer against whom he had complained in January. 'What fairness can I expect?' he asked the court.
The ACB had lodged an FIR against the clerk on May 16 under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Special Judge of Rouse Avenue Court was transferred on May 20.
Subsequently, the ahlmad filed for anticipatory bail in a Rouse Avenue court, which had rejected the plea on May 22. During the bail hearing, the ahlmad had argued that the ACB had filed a 'false fabricated FIR' against him and had 'tried to frame' the Special Judge to 'settle a score with' him.
The prosecution, on the other hand, opposed the bail, underlining that the clerk was a prime offender and was likely to tamper with evidence. It was also argued that a handwritten slip was allegedly provided by him to the complainant, which indicated his involvement in the alleged offence.
The High Court has posted the matter next for May 29.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
31 minutes ago
- The Hindu
ED raids Himachal Assistant Drug Controller, linked persons in PMLA probe
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Sunday (June 22, 2025) conducted searches against a Himachal Pradesh-based Assistant Drug Controller (ADC), his family members and some others as part of a money laundering investigation linked to charges of bribery and 'political patronage', official sources said. The action has been taken against Nishant Sareen, currently posted as ADC Dharamshala, his father-in-law Ramesh Kumar Gupta and an alleged associate Komal Khanna apart from some others, they said. Five residential and commercial premises in Himachal Pradesh, Haryana and Punjab were searched. The probe relates to 'misuse' of official position by the officer when he was earlier posted as ADC in Baddi (Solan district) as well as during his current tenure, ED sources said. The Central agency, according to the sources, is also investigating the alleged generation of proceeds of crime in this case apart from charges of 'political patronage and complaints of extortion and bribe' against Mr. Sareen. The officer or his legal representatives could not be contacted immediately for a comment on the charges made by the ED. The Office of the Drug Controller is part of the Directorate of Health Safety and Regulation of the H.P. Government. The money laundering case filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) stems from an August, 2019 FIR registered by the State Vigilance and Anti-corruption Bureau (SV&ACB) of Himachal Pradesh Police against Sareen while he was posted as ADC in Baddi. The SV&ACB arrested him in September, 2019 and later charge-sheeted him along with Mr. Khanna. Mr. Sareen was released on bail in October that year and was posted as ADC, Dharamshala in 2024, the sources said. Mr. Sareen, during the Himachal Police investigation, faced charges of receiving bribe from pharmaceutical companies based in Baddi, a pharma hub in the State.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Chhattisgarh HC denies bail to accused in Rs 411 crore 'Hamar-Lab' scam
RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the first bail application of Shashank Chopda, an accused in the alleged Rs 411 crore 'Hamar-Lab' scam. The case, registered by the Economic Offences Wing/Anti-Corruption Bureau (EOW/ACB), Raipur, involves charges under Sections 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code, along with Sections 13(1)(A), 13(2), and 7(C) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha, after hearing arguments from both sides, stated that economic offences are more serious than conventional crimes as they impact the entire economy and pose a grave threat to the country's financial health. The prosecution's case centres on alleged irregularities in the "Hamar-Lab" scheme, launched in 2021 by the Public Health and Family Welfare Department. The scheme aimed to procure essential medical equipment and machines through the Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd (CGMSCL). The FIR alleged that officials from the Directorate of Health Services and CGMSCL placed disproportionate orders without proper budget evaluation or administrative approval, causing a loss of approximately Rs 411 crore to the state exchequer. Senior counsels Siddharth Mridul and Ajay Mishra, appearing for Chopda, argued that their client had no role in the alleged offence and was merely a bidder. They claimed that Chopda's company incurred a loss of Rs 351 crore and was being made a "scapegoat" to evade payment liabilities. They further contended that the EOW/ACB investigation was selective, as no govt officials were questioned or arrested until directed by the High Court. The defence also maintained that there was no risk of evidence tampering since all documents were submitted online and electronic devices, including mobile phones and computers, were already seized. Bail was sought on grounds of parity, citing a Supreme Court stay on the arrest of co-accused Rajesh Gupta in the same case. Dr Sourabh Kumar Pande, Deputy Advocate General for the state, opposed the bail plea, stating that CGMSCL purchased reagents without following due procedures or assessing actual requirements. He alleged that the specifications for medical equipment were "tailor-made" to favour a particular company, resulting in substantial losses. Pande described Chopda as the "mastermind" behind the cartel who influenced govt officials. The Deputy Advocate General also informed the court that five other co-accused, including public servants and CGMSCL officials, were arrested. He expressed concern that if granted bail, Chopda might tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. The High Court observed that economic offences, involving deep-rooted conspiracies and significant losses to public funds, must be treated seriously. It cited Supreme Court judgments emphasising that such crimes impact the national economy and erode public confidence in the financial system. Chief Justice Sinha noted that while a chargesheet was filed against Chopda, the investigation against other accused persons, including govt officials, was ongoing. He stated that the applicant appeared to be a "direct beneficiary" of the crime and could not be equated with co-accused Rajesh Gupta. The court also highlighted that the equipment supplied by Chopda's firm involved "closed system" technology, which would necessitate future procurement of reagents exclusively from his company, potentially leading to a monopoly and depriving the public of access to pathological tests. The court concluded that granting bail at this stage would "embolden corrupt practices" and undermine public trust in the justice delivery system. Chopda, representing Mokshit Corporation, faces several specific allegations, including procuring EDTA tubes (used for blood sample collection) from Mokshit Corporation at an inflated price of Rs 2,352 per piece, while other institutions procured them for a maximum of Rs 8.50. This was later clarified as a typographical error, with the actual price being Rs 23.52 per piece. He is also accused of purchasing reagents worth Rs 300 crore to prevent the expiry of chemicals held by Mokshit Corporation and supplying CBC machines at Rs 17 lakh per unit—significantly higher than the market price of Rs 5 lakh—after Mokshit Corporation was declared L-1 in the tender process. Additionally, he is alleged to have conspired with other firms such as Recorders and Medicare Systems and Shri Sharda Industries to generate illicit profits.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Photojournalist dies after brutal Melbourne assault by released immigration detainee
Dominic O'Brien, a veteran photojournalist, has died after an alleged assault in Footscray. Lominja Friday Yokoju, the suspect, was arrested. Yokoju was initially charged with intentionally causing serious injury. Following O'Brien's death, police are reviewing the charges. The incident has sparked public and political criticism regarding immigration detainee releases. Maribyrnong Council plans to improve safety in Footscray. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The suspect The veteran photojournalist Dominic O' Brien Police investigation Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Veteran photojournalist Dominic O'Brien, 62, has died in hospital, six days after being allegedly assaulted in Footscray on Sunday, June 15. The incident occurred just before 10 am at the intersection of Nicholson and Paisley Streets in an outdoor shopping mall, where O'Brien was reportedly approached by 43‑year‑old Lominja Friday Yokoju Yokoju, a former immigration detainee on a bridging visa and part of the 'NZYQ cohort' released after a High Court ruling in late 2023, was arrested at the scene. He was initially charged with intentionally causing serious injury. Witnesses allege Yokoju struck and stomped on O'Brien's head during the O'Brien, a renowned photographer for major outlets including The Age , The Australian, Getty Images, AAP, and Reuters, was a well‑respected figure in photojournalism and known for his work with Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. Colleagues described him as a 'talented storyteller' who embraced both analogue and digital photography O'Brien's death on Saturday morning, June 21, police confirmed they are reviewing the existing charges and may upgrade them pending the outcome of the post‑ remains in custody and is scheduled to face the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on October 20, 2025, for a committal incident has led to widespread public and political backlash. Figures such as Andrew Hastie and Brad Battin have criticized the government's handling of immigration detainee releases, while the Maribyrnong Council has pledged to bolster safety in Footscray.
