Edinburgh ban on new student housing blocks proposed amid fear of oversupply
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
New student housing blocks in the capital should be banned over fears of an oversupply, according to an Edinburgh councillor.
Over 20,000 beds exist in private student halls in the city, and new projects are regularly being approved.
But SNP councillor Danny Aston says the private student halls sector is likely in a bubble, and that the city should look to stem the damage before it bursts.
He has put forward a motion to Thursday's full Edinburgh Council meeting, calling for a moratorium on new purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA) projects.
Cllr Aston said: 'The developers don't seem to see the bursting of the bubble coming. There's plenty of evidence that it's either just started to happen or will happen soon.
'There have been recent applications, recent decisions. They're acting as if none of the issues are really happening.
'I'm concerned by the time they really start to bite, Edinburgh will have been disfigured by a whole bunch of white elephant developments that the operators can't fill.'
Glasgow City Council had an effective moratorium on new PBSA projects between 2019 and 2021, preventing many new projects from starting construction.
Cllr Aston wants councillors to compile a report exploring options for a moratorium, looking to the ban implemented in Glasgow for inspiration.
New PBSA developments are still restricted in parts of the city by planning rules.
PBSA projects are generally targeted at wealthier international students, with their high monthly rents adding a bar to entry for many.
In Edinburgh's private student housing blocks, prices often start at £800 or £900 per month for a room in a shared flat, and climb higher for studio flats.
Cllr Aston continued: 'The higher education sector clearly has financial issues. Edinburgh universities are not going to be immune to that.
'The other aspect directly affecting [the PBSA market] is that we're moving into a more troubled phase in terms of international relations. Relations with China in particular are becoming cooler.
'Chinese students, for a number of years, formed a very big part of the demand for PBSA in Edinburgh, particularly one year masters students, which is a big part of the market.
'And a lot of developers build specifically for that.'
Edinburgh locals have long been speaking out about the proliferation of student housing blocks in the city, with many new projects receiving dozens of planning objections.
A recent application to build a new PBSA block in Dalry saw locals strike out, with 7 student housing blocks already operating within 500 metres of the site.
At the time, law student Xander Lyons told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: 'We have too many [PBSA blocks]. There's so many student housing buildings around here, we've got Orwell Terrace and Bainfield, and then IQ.
'It seems like every time there's a new development planned, it's student flats. If they were affordable, then great, but they're not.
'You're quite often sharing with eight other people, and you're paying 800, maybe 900 pounds a month. It's not going to help the housing crisis.'
And continuing student flats development in Jock's Lodge has drawn anger, with one application last year drawing over 1,000 objections.
Two pubs and a popular local takeaway are in the firing line of the new development, which would host 191 student beds.
But despite the objections, both projects were approved, as they lined up with the city's development guidelines.
Cllr Aston said his motion was aimed at giving the city legroom to tackle the issue, saying: 'What I'm proposing in my motion is to buy some time.
'Give us some space to work out what the impact of the financial challenges and the international context are going to be for higher education.'
He said he was unaware of why the Glasgow moratorium ended, but that if his motion is passed, he would want the report to include this.
If Cllr Aston's motion is passed, council officers would return to the city's Planning Committee by September.
The motion will be discussed at the next full meeting of Edinburgh Council, set to take place on Thursday, 19 June, which can be viewed here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
43 minutes ago
- The National
The Scottish universities accept millions from firms linked to China
Some universities accepted money from companies and institutions with ties to the People's Liberation Army (PLA) in China, including those which are sanctioned by other countries. Other universities took funding from institutions and tech firms accused of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) spy on and target users, spread misinformation and abuse human rights. The director-general of MI5 last year warned vice-chancellors that China and other states the UK Government views as adversaries are attempting to steal technology from universities that can 'deliver their authoritarian, military and commercial priorities'. The Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China said The Ferret's research suggests that funding from CCP-linked organisations in Scottish higher education is particularly prevalent. This, it claimed 'should be a matter of deep concern for ministers and the wider Scottish public'. READ MORE: Labour blasted as 'deeply authoritarian' over plans to proscribe Palestine Action However, the Chinese Embassy in London has accused critics and media outlets of 'politicising and stigmatising normal educational exchanges between the two countries'. It has denied the use of subversive tactics abroad and argues that research collaboration with UK universities has 'enhanced mutual understanding'. The Ferret asked Scotland's universities to disclose funding they received from Chinese organisations between 2020/21 and 2024/25. Ten universities collectively received at least £39.7 million of funding. Of that, £5.5m came from organisations allegedly linked to the military, human rights abuses or spying, or was used to fund controversial Confucius Institutes. These are CCP-funded educational and cultural programmes on UK campuses which have been accused of monitoring and censoring UK students, and pushing propaganda. Dundee University refused The Ferret's request while others withheld some information which, they argued, was commercially sensitive. As such, the true total could be higher. Edinburgh University received more than £11m in research funding from unnamed Chinese organisations but it did not provide further detail. The university said it was not feasible to provide a complete list of possible funding from China. Some of Edinburgh Napier University's funding, £1.2m, came from unnamed Chinese partners for transnational education programmes. St Andrews University would only provide funding information for named organisations, rather than any from China. Military links SOME universities accepted money from Chinese organisations with military ties. Strathclyde University received £130,000 in research funding from Wuxi Paike New Materials Technology, which makes metal forgings for the Chinese military. Strathclyde did not specify when it received the money from the firm, which was sanctioned by the US government in December 2020 due to its military links. Strathclyde also accepted £22,100 for 'research studentship/knowledge exchange' from the Chinese Academy of Sciences on an undisclosed date. The academy is designated 'medium risk' by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), due to its alleged weapons research. ASPI is a defence think tank founded by the Australian Government. It has been described as having a hawkish stance on China and has received funding from overseas governments, including the US and UK, as well as the defence industry. In 2020, a drone submarine developed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences was found by an Indonesian fisherman in the South China Sea and thought to be on a possible covert mission by military observers. The following year, in October 2021, Robert Gordon University (RGU) was given £46,820 by the academy to research spectral imaging – a method of capturing highly detailed images. An RGU spokesperson said the research collaboration was transferred to the university in 2021 after it appointed a professor from Strathclyde who was working on the project. The collaboration ended in 2023. In April this year, The Times reported that RGU, Aberdeen and Strathclyde universities were among 23 UK institutions to have signed an agreement with Chinese institutions with alleged military links, despite warnings from MI5. Surveillance and spying allegations SOME universities accepted money from tech firms, including those accused of helping the CCP to spy on users, and spread misinformation. Heriot-Watt University received between £150,000 and £200,000 from tech firm Huawei to research wireless communications hardware between November 2020 and November 2021. In July 2020, it was announced that Huawei will be banned from UK infrastructure by the end of 2027 over fears it could facilitate spying from China. In 2019, we reported that universities and Police Scotland refused to sever links with the tech giant despite fears their devices may be used to spy for Beijing. Huawei has previously said it had never been asked by the CCP to spy and 'would categorically refuse to comply'. In 2022/23, Edinburgh University accepted £127,973 from tech firm, Tencent, to fund a research project called 'serving big machine learning models'. Allegations of mass surveillance and human rights abuses by Tencent were reported years earlier. READ MORE: Scottish Government announces £3 million in funding for 14 festivals CCP committees within Tencent ensure that the state's 'political goals are pursued', according to a 2020 study from ASPI. A 2022 report from Human Rights Watch claimed that via its messaging app, WeChat, Tencent 'censors and surveils' users on the CCP's behalf and 'hands over user data to authorities when 'sensitive' information is discovered'. 'There have been numerous reports about people getting harassed, detained, or imprisoned for their private messages on WeChat,' it added. A 2020 study from the University of Toronto found that WeChat also monitored users outwith China. Tencent has rejected claims that the CCP uses WeChat for spying. WeChat reportedly spread Russian propaganda and misinformation surrounding Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, while suppressing posts sympathetic to Kyiv, but Tencent declined to comment on the claims. In January, the US added Tencent to a list of businesses it claims work with China's military. Tencent has denied the allegations. Monitoring, restrictions and propaganda SOME organisations funding Scotland's universities have allegedly policed overseas students and restricted their freedoms. Most of these financial contributions were used to fund Confucius Institutes at Scottish universities. Confucius Institutes teach Chinese language and culture, but have been accused of monitoring students, spreading state propaganda, censoring topics – such as the independence of Taiwan – and stifling free speech on campuses. China has rejected the allegations. In 2021, a former Chinese diplomat, who defected to Australia, told The Ferret that China tries to control international students at Scottish universities via student associations. A 2023 report from the UK Parliament's intelligence and security committee said the institutes were run by Hanban, an arm of China's education ministry ultimately controlled by the CCP's propaganda department. Its institutes must obey CCP law, monitor students overseas and influence their behaviour, the report alleged. The last UK government U-turned on a bid to ban the institutes, while top Australian universities closed their institutes in April. Since 2020, Strathclyde, Edinburgh and Heriot-Watt universities have accepted more than £5m, including from Hanban, to fund their Confucius Institutes. Edinburgh's institute was partly funded by Fudan University, which reportedly omitted the phrase 'freedom of thought' from its charter in 2019. Aberdeen University accepted £5000 from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) in November 2023 to fund a visiting researcher. Some European universities have paused or ceased co-operation with the CSC, citing threats to academic freedom, research security and the risk of 'industrial espionage'. Universities 'ignoring evidence of risks' LUKE de Pulford, executive director of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, an international alliance of cross-party politicians, said The Ferret's research was 'shocking, but not surprising'. 'The fact that money is still being allowed to flow without being flagged should be a matter of deep concern for ministers and the wider Scottish public,' he claimed. 'The rest of the UK has been slow to address dependencies which are curtailing academic freedoms and assisting the People's Liberation Army, but this evidence suggests that the problem is even more acute in Scotland and needs urgently to be tackled.' Laura Harth, China in the world director at human rights group Safeguard Defenders, said: 'It remains staggering to see evidence-based institutions consistently ignore the endless amount of evidence on the security, IP theft and foreign interference risks related to co-operation with (CCP) entities. READ MORE: Owen Jones: Opposing Israeli violence is 'extremist'? The world's upside down 'This is the exact opposite of the academic rigour we should expect and an outright denial of their commitment to independent thinking and discovery. 'Universities and other entities that continue to ignore such risks do so at the expense not only of their students and stakeholders, but of our democratic societies as a whole. Such free-riding has to stop.' The Scottish Conservative shadow education secretary, Miles Briggs, said there was 'good reason' to be wary of university funding with alleged links to spying, human rights abuses, the military and other issues. 'For too long SNP ministers have been complacent about the overexposure of the university sector in Scotland without investigating where funding has come from,' he claimed. The Ferret contacted the Chinese Embassy which has previously been critical of what it has branded politicised anti-Chinese rhetoric, but we received no response. Universities ensure 'robust due diligence' ABERDEEN University said it has 'robust procedures in place to ensure due diligence around international collaboration', including 'mitigations' for 'higher risk partnerships' such as a team to review security issues, and the use of an official 'trusted research' checklist. A spokesperson added that the university complies with UK regulations including control requirements around the export or transfer in goods, software or technology, including data, information and technical assistance. Heriot-Watt University said global partnerships were 'vital' to advancing its research and teaching, while also benefitting its students, supporting cultural exchange and contributing to the university's financial sustainability. The university complies with UK Government international security guidelines and partnerships are 'rigorously assessed' to ensure 'academic freedom and institutional autonomy,' a spokesperson added. An Edinburgh University spokesperson said all partnerships, 'including donations and research funding, are subject to a rigorous due diligence process'. A Strathclyde University spokesperson said: 'All of our research is subject to risk assessments, ethical approvals and adherence to UK Government guidelines on national security, export control and the Academic Technology Approval Scheme.' A spokesperson for RGU said: 'All of RGU's international collaborations are developed with robust due diligence and are aligned with the university's commitment to research excellence.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Universities are autonomous institutions and are expected to understand and manage the reputational, ethical and security risks associated with international partnerships. 'This includes conducting appropriate due diligence before entering into new partnerships, and monitoring existing partnerships to ensure they comply with relevant legal requirements'. National security is reserved to the UK Government's Home Office, which did not respond to a request to comment. Every organisation in this article was approached for comment, either directly or via the Chinese consulate in Edinburgh and the Chinese embassy in London.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Premier League's first Chinese footballer now worth £20million after switching careers
Premier League's first Chinese footballer now worth £20million after switching careers Sun Jihai made history as the first Chinese player in the Premier League and he remains a cult hero with Manchester City fans for his displays during his six-year spell with the club Sun Jihai closes down Paul Scholes during a Manchester derby (Image:) A former Manchester City favourite is now worth a whopping £20million after becoming a business mogul. Sun Jihai made history during his six-year City career, becoming the first player from China to play in the Premier League and then the first player from East Asia to score in the English top flight when he netted against Birmingham City in October 2002. That came months after his arrival at the club, who won promotion to the Premier League under Kevin Keegan that year. It wasn't long before Jihai won over supporters with his total commitment on the pitch, clocking in 151 appearances before his exit in summer 2008, coinciding with Sheikh Mansour's takeover. The full-back's last City game was the infamous 8-1 thrashing by Middlesbrough at the end of 2007/08 season. A brief spell at Sheffield United followed before he returned to China in 2009, playing for several clubs and retiring in 2016. He elected not to go down the route of coaching and management. Instead, Jihai became a successful businessman, co-founding HaiQui [HQ] Sports, a sports data company, which set out to provide "datatainment" to fans. The tech company's other projects included a talk show that Jihai appeared on, a sports app called MiaoHi and a match prediction tool called Jihai App. Article continues below Sun Jihai with former Prime Minister David Cameron and Chinese President Xi Jinping during an engagement at the City Football Academy in 2015 (Image: Getty Images ) Jihai has turned his venture into a roaring success, attracting major investments from huge companies, including China Media Capital (CMC), which purchased a 13% stake in City back in 2015. Intrigued by the MiaoHi app – a sports video platform that enables stars and fans to connect – CMC, a company worth £60billion, chose to invest in the business. That investment, along with burgeoning interest in his other projects, has propelled Jihai's net worth to over £20million, according to PeopleWorthWiki. Despite his stratospheric rise in the business world post-retirement, Jihai still remembers his City days with great affection. Reliving an iconic goal against Birmingham in conversation with ex-colleagues Nedum Onuoha and Paul Dickov on City's website last year, he said the memory still triggers "goosebumps." Jihai has fond memories of his time in English football (Image: Manchester City FC ) On his move to City, he said: "Before I came to City, I didn't know the club. I only knew about United. Article continues below "City were in the second division, now the Championship. The agent told me we will go to the Premier League very soon. There were only two months of the season left. I was thinking, 'OK, second division, no problem, I'll join then.' "I had spent a season at Crystal Palace [in 1998/99] and I was always thinking I would like to go back to England. The Premier League, that was the league I wanted to play in."
Edinburgh Live
2 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Princess Charlotte 'handed back' lavish gift worth eye-watering £36k
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Princess Charlotte, third in line to the throne, was reportedly required to return an extraordinarily extravagant gift she received as a newborn. The ten year old princess was given a £36,000 item upon her birth to parents Prince William and Princess Kate in May 2015. However, due to strict Royal protocols, she was unable to retain this pricey gift. The Natural Sapphire Company presented the expensive baby rattle, crafted from 18ct white gold and adorned with diamonds, sapphires, and rubies to form a Union Jack. READ MORE - Edinburgh locals warn 'we will go to war over parking' if development goes ahead READ MORE - Edinburgh Council blasted over 'extremely concerning' £8m deal with convicted landlord On their website, the company explained their decision to splurge on Princess Charlotte's birth. They said: "When Kate and William were engaged with the iconic blue sapphire ring that once belonged to Princess Diana, our sapphire ring sales rocketed. Women everywhere wanted to be just as fashionable as Kate. Today, we continue to grow as a business and it is with great joy that we celebrate the birth of a new royal. "We're thanking Kate and William for introducing our company to the world, by gifting a custom-designed baby rattle, fit for their Princess. Baby gifts made from precious metals are a tradition dating back to the 18th century. Our luxury rattle, worth $45,000 (£36,000), is made from 18k white gold; lined with sapphires, rubies, and diamonds to produce the Union Jack flag.", reports the Mirror. "Such a unique gift, unlike any they will receive from well wishes around the world, will surely be treasured." Although Princess Charlotte was graced with an extravagant gift, it's doubtful she ever laid her hands on the posh rattle. In 2015, speculation arose that Princess Kate may have chosen not to keep the opulent trinket. Kensington Palace remained coy about whether such a lavish present made its way to William and Kate, asserting that they typically decline corporate offerings. Even without the fancy toy, Princess Charlotte wasn't left wanting. It's believed King Charles gave her a handcrafted willow rattle priced at a more modest £25, a less alarming choice for the young Royal to parade, and certainly easier on her parents. Celebrating her tenth birthday last month, the Royal family commemorated the day with a fresh portrait. Kate, using her iPhone, captured the endearing image during a Cumbria visit earlier in the year, now shared on the couple's social media to celebrate Charlotte's significant day. In the picture, Charlotte rests on a grassy knoll, taking a breather on their hike, clad in a camouflaged Jack Pyke jacket and robust backpack. Accompanying the image of the beaming princess were the words "Happy 10th Birthday Princess Charlotte!" complete with a heart emoji and photo credit to Kate. (Image: Kensington Royal/The Princess of Wales)
