US Fed expected to pause cuts again and wait for clarity on tariffs

Trump has imposed steep levies on China, and lower "baseline" levies of 10 percent on goods from most other countries, along with 25 percent duties on specific items like steel, automobiles and aluminum.
The president has also paused higher duties on dozens of other trading partners until July to give them time to renegotiate existing arrangements with the United States.
Most economists expect the tariffs introduced since January to push up prices and cool economic growth -- at least in the short run -- potentially keeping the Fed on hold for longer.
"The Fed has to be very focused on maintaining inflation so that it doesn't start moving back up in a more persistent way," said Loretta Mester, who recently stepped down after a decade as president of the Cleveland Fed.
"That would undermine all the work that was done over the last three years of getting inflation down," she told AFP.
- 'Good place to be' -
The Fed has held its key interest rate at between 4.25 percent and 4.50 percent since December, as it continues its plan to bring inflation to the bank's long-term target of two percent, with another eye firmly fixed on keeping unemployment under control.
Recent data points to inflation hitting that target ahead of the introduction of Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs, while unemployment has remained relatively stable, hugging close to historic lows.
At the same time, various "softer" data points such as consumer confidence surveys have pointed to a sharp decline in optimism about the health of the US economy -- and growing concerns about inflation.
"Whether the economy enters a recession or not, it's hard to say at this point," said Mester, now an adjunct professor of finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
"I think the committee remains in good condition here, and most likely they'll remain on hold at this meeting," said Jim Bullard, the long-serving former president of the St. Louis Fed.
"I think it's a good place for them to be while there's a lot of turbulence in the trade war," added Bullard, now dean of the Daniels School of Business at Purdue University.
Financial markets overwhelmingly expect the Fed to announce another rate cut pause on Wednesday, according to data from CME Group.
Pushing back rate cuts
US hiring data for April published last week came in better than expected, lowering anxiety about the health of the labor market -- and reducing pressure on the Fed's rate-setting committee to reach for rate cuts.
Economists at several large banks including Goldman Sachs and Barclays subsequently delayed their expectations for rate cuts from June to July.
"Cutting in late July allows the committee to see more data on the evolution of the labor market, and should benefit from resolving uncertainty about tariffs and fiscal policy," economists at Barclays wrote in a note to clients published Friday.
Other analysts see rate cuts happening even later, depending on the effects of the tariffs.
The rise in longer-run inflation expectations in the survey data points to growing concerns that tariff-related price pressures could become embedded in the US economy, even as the market-based measures have remained close to the two percent target.
"I would be sort of in the camp (saying) prove to me that they're (tariffs are) not going to be inflationary," Mester said, adding it would be "unwise" to assume that inflation expectations were stable given the recent survey data.
But Bullard from Purdue took a different view, stressing the stability of the market-based measures.
"I haven't liked the survey-based measures of inflation expectations, because they seem to be partly about inflation, but partly about many other issues, maybe, including politics," he said.
"This is a moment where you might want to look through the survey-based measures that are talking about very extreme levels of inflation that don't seem likely to develop near-term," he added.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Euronews

23 minutes ago

• Euronews

Trump hints at possibiity of regime change in Iran

US President Donald Trump on Sunday hinted at the possibility of regime change in Iran, questioning the future of Iran's ruling theocracy. Trump's social media jab at the regime in Iran came after he ordered a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites, raising the risk of a wider war in the Middle East amid warnings from his MAGA base and allies and foes from abroad. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' His comments seemingly contradicted an earlier call to Iran for negotiations and de-escalation in Tehran's war with Israel. Trump's words also marked something of a reversal from his Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said. Trump's aides play down US involvement in conflict Speaking on Fox News on Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that any retaliation against the US or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the Iranian regime at risk.' Rubio explained that what the US administration has made clear is that it wants Iran to stop any development of nuclear weapons. But beyond that, the world is awash in uncertainty at a fragile moment that could decide whether parts of the globe tip into war or find a way to salvage a relative peace. Vice President JD Vance also spoke at news outlets. 'We're not at war with Iran,' Vance said on NBC. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' According to him, the strike offers a chance to restart stalled talks on reducing Iran's nuclear program. Despite the efforts of Trump's senior aides to clarify the situation and put out a coordinated message and strategy on the US involvement or plan, Trump himself has made a series of intimidating statements even as he has simultaneously called to restart negotiations. Analysts believe the messaging makes it hard to get a complete read on whether the US president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran that began earlier this month. Before Trump's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging from Trump's secretary of state, top military adviser, vice president, and head of the Pentagon indicated a belief that any fallout would be controlled. The Israel-Iran conflict began on 13 June when Israel attacked Iran's military infrastructure, killing 10 of Tehran's nuclear scientists. Iran responded with ballistic missiles and drone attacks on Israel, but Iran's military capabilities are believed to have been severely decimated after Israel's aerial campaign that took out much of Tehran's air defences and missile launchers. At least 950 people have been killed by Israel's strikes on Iran, and 27 people have died from Iran's retaliatory strikes on Israel.

France 24

2 hours ago

• France 24

Live: Trump says strikes on Iran inflicted 'monumental damage' to Tehran's nuclear program

US President Donald Trump on Sunday said the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites caused "monumental damage" to Tehran's nuclear development program as the world awaits Iran's response to Trump's risky gambit. Follow our liveblog for all the latest developments. The Pentagon said on Sunday the US bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities was "not about regime change," but President Donald Trump later said on social media "why wouldn't there be a Regime change???'" The Iranian president condemned the US 'aggression' in the country's first reaction to strikes. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 's adviser claimed Iran's enriched uranium remains despite US attacks and that all US bases used to strike Iran are now "legitimate" targets. Israel early Monday said it had carried out new strikes on 'military targets' in Iran.

LeMonde

4 hours ago

• LeMonde

NATO prepares for summit uneasily, as US pressures fellow members

The traditional family photo of the representatives of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's member states, standing shoulder to shoulder in front of the alliance's blue and white logo, will have to hide the discomfort. Yet, as NATO prepares to convene its annual summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on Tuesday, June 24, and Wednesday, June 25, the diplomatic choreography among the 32 participating heads of state and government, including US President Donald Trump, promises to be a delicate balancing act. Indeed, in the background, a crisis is brewing within NATO, particularly over how to approach Russia. Since taking office, the Trump administration has exerted intense pressure on US allies, demanding that they dedicate 5% of their gross domestic products (GDP) to defense spending, up from the current 2% benchmark, or face the risk of US withdrawal from Europe. This will be a central issue at the summit. Yet, for many heavily indebted countries, the effort demanded of them is impossible. In the days leading up to the summit, European representatives also engaged in tough negotiations to have Russia classified as a "threat," contrary to the Trump administration's position. The unease is likely to be reflected, at the very least, in the summit's final statement, which has already been described as "short" and "concise."