US-China trade talks keep investors guessing, markets mixed
NEW YORK, June 11 — Global stock markets moved indecisively yesterday as investors waited for the outcome of US-China talks aimed at cementing a fragile trade war truce between the world's two biggest economies.
A second day of high-level talks in London between the United States and China stretched into the evening Tuesday with no concrete announcements so far.
US equities finished higher following a choppy session, while European ones closed in mixed territory, and Asia mostly closed down.
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Bloomberg Television that the talks were 'going well' and that he expected yesterday's discussions to last 'all day.'
But FHN Financial's Chris Low said Lutnick's upbeat appraisal was offset by 'a TikTok channel associated with Chinese television suggesting that there are still some significant differences between the two sides.'
Analysts said that any positive sign of agreement would fuel a rise in equities -- but that it could be restrained.
'We wouldn't bank on a big turnaround thanks to any potential trade breakthroughs,' said Thomas Mathews, head analyst of Asia Pacific markets for Capital Economics.
'We doubt that the US will back off completely. That's likely to restrain any relief rally,' he said.
The talks were expected to be dominated by Chinese exports of rare earth minerals used in a wide range of products including smartphones, electric vehicle batteries and green technology.
Beijing in return was looking for Washington to ease controls on its exports of sensitive electronic components.
In Europe, Paris's CAC 40 closed slightly up but Frankfurt's Dax slipped well down.
London's FTSE 100 index closed higher after weak UK unemployment data raised the chances of the Bank of England cutting interest rates into next year, a move which often propels stock prices. It could reach a new record this week if it continues to gain.
Shares in European Union markets, in contrast, could be weakened by the conspicuous lack of any deal between Washington and Brussels before a July 9 deadline for 50 per cent US tariffs to take effect. Britain has already sealed an agreement.
Investors are also awaiting key US inflation data this week, which could impact the Federal Reserve's monetary policy.
Analysts warn Trump's tariffs will refuel inflation, strengthening the argument to keep interest rates on hold instead of lowering them when the Fed meets next week.
Citing trade tensions and the resulting policy uncertainty, the World Bank lowered its 2025 projection for global GDP growth to 2.3 per cent in its latest economic prospects report, down from 2.7 per cent expected in January.
The US economy is expected to grow by 1.4 per cent this year, a sharp slowdown for the world's biggest economy from a 2.8 per cent expansion in 2024. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
11 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Tariffs, inflation and a shaky job market: US Federal Reserve split on when to cut rates
WASHINGTON, June 21 — The close split at the US Federal Reserve over whether to keep hedging against inflation risks or move forward faster with rate cuts came through yesterday in the first public comments from policymakers following a decision this week to hold borrowing costs steady for now. Rising tariffs are expected to raise inflation over the rest of the year, with a new Federal Reserve monetary policy report yesterday concluding that higher import taxes had already raised inflation for goods even if headline inflation, including services, remains weaker than expected in recent months. But Fed Governor Christopher Waller yesterday said he felt the inflation risk from tariffs was small, and the Fed should cut rates as soon as its next meeting in July, because recent price increases have been moderate while he sees some worrying signs for the job market such as a high unemployment rate among recent college graduates. 'Any tariff inflation ... I don't think is going to be that big and we should just look through it in terms of setting policy,' Waller said on CNBC's Squawk Box. 'The data the last few months has been showing that trend inflation is looking pretty good ... We could do this as early as July.' 'I'm all in favour of saying maybe we should start thinking about cutting the policy rate at the next meeting, because we don't want to wait till the job market tanks before we start cutting the policy rate,' Waller said. In a Reuters interview, Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin took a more tempered view, arguing that with inflation still above the Fed's 2 per cent target after a multi-year battle to contain it, key tariff debates still unresolved, and the unemployment rate at a low 4.2 per cent, there was no urgency to cut rates. 'Nothing is burning on either side such that it suggests there's a rush to act,' Barkin said. 'I'm not in a mood to ignore a spike in inflation were it to come ... We'll have to see if it comes. 'I'm comfortable with where we are ... Core inflation is still over target. Being modestly restrictive is a good way to address that.' San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly had what may be an in-between view, telling CNBC late yesterday a rate cut in the autumn would be 'more appropriate' than a July move unless the labour market falters. While tariffs could give rise to meaningful inflation, she said, there is 'a lot to be said' for the view that businesses will find ways not to pass higher costs on to their customers, tempering any inflation impact. The Fed should not be preemptive and needs to watch where the data goes, she said, but with data in hand showing both inflation and the job market cooling, 'we cannot wait so long that we forget that the fundamentals of the economy are moving in a direction where an interest rate adjustment might be necessary.' The job market is still solid, she said, but 'we're at a point where additional softening could turn into weakening, which I don't want to see, and we can't allow for that to happen because we're waiting for inflation to pop up just around the corner.' The Fed this week held its policy rate steady in the 4.25 to 4.5 per cent range where it has been since December. The Trump administration says the tariffs will ultimately help the US economy, and the president has demanded the Fed slash rates immediately. New Fed economic projections this week, by contrast, anticipate slower growth and higher inflation. Those projections showed policymakers overall still anticipate rate cuts later in the year, a sign they do feel tariffs will raise prices but not in a persistent way. Opinion, however, was closely divided in what Barkin called a 'bimodal' split, with seven policymakers seeing zero cuts needed this year, and eight anchoring the median at two cuts, which aligns with investors' view of quarter-point reductions at the Fed's September and December meetings. Though none of the three identified their specific rate views, their comments sketched their ongoing debate over how seriously and persistently President Donald Trump's efforts to recast global trade will influence the path of prices, jobs and growth in coming months. In a Wednesday press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell cautioned against putting too much weight on any particular outlook at this point, given how volatile the debate around trade has been and how many key decisions remain outstanding. Powell testifies in Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday of next week as part of regular semiannual hearings on monetary policy, which in this case follows a week of insults from Trump and demands to cut rates, and nervous chatter on Wall Street about the president's plans for the Fed when Powell departs next May. Powell on Wednesday seemed content to wait for more data before resuming rate cuts. 'For the time being we are well positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance,' Powell told reporters. — Reuters
Malay Mail
14 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trump floats firing ‘numbskull' Fed chair Powell
WASHINGTON, June 21 — US President Donald Trump escalated his criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Friday -- publicly mulling whether to fire the official and appoint himself to the central bank. The Republican leader, who regularly berates Powell over the bank's decisions not to lower interest rates, took to Truth Social to smear the banker as a 'numbskull,' 'moron' and 'obvious Trump Hater.' 'I fully understand that my strong criticism of him makes it more difficult for him to do what he should be doing, lowering Rates, but I've tried it all different ways,' said Trump, who appointed Powell during his first term. 'I've been nice, I've been neutral, and I've been nasty, and nice and neutral didn't work!' Powell's term does not conclude until next year. He has said his dismissal would be unlawful, and that he has no intention of stepping down voluntary if Trump asks. 'I don't know why the Board doesn't override this Total and Complete Moron!' Trump posted. 'Maybe, just maybe, I'll have to change my mind about firing him? But regardless, his Term ends shortly!' Trump lashed out after the Fed held interest rates steady for a fourth consecutive meeting on Wednesday, forecasting higher inflation and cooler growth as Trump's tariffs take hold. The projections were its first since Trump unleashed sweeping 10 percent tariffs on almost all trading partners in April. — AFP
Malay Mail
15 hours ago
- Malay Mail
US may target Samsung, Hynix, TSMC operations in China, sources say
WASHINGTON, June 21 — The US Department of Commerce is considering revoking authorisations granted in recent years to global chipmakers Samsung, SK Hynix and TSMC, making it more difficult for them to receive US goods and technology at their plants in China, according to people familiar with the matter. The chances of the United States withdrawing the authorisations are unclear. But with such a move, it would be harder for foreign chipmakers to operate in China, where they produce semiconductors used in a wide range of industries. A White House official said the United States was 'just laying the groundwork' in case the truce reached between the two countries fell apart. But the official expressed confidence that the trade agreement would go forward and that rare earths would flow from China, as agreed. 'There is currently no intention of deploying this tactic,' the official said. 'It's another tool we want in our toolbox in case either this agreement falls through or any other catalyst throws a wrench in bilateral relations.' Shares of US chip equipment makers that supply plants in China fell when the Wall Street Journal first reported the news earlier yesterday. KLA Corp dropped 2.4 per cent, Lam Research fell 1.9 per cent and Applied Materials sank 2 per cent. Shares of Micron, a major competitor to Samsung and SK Hynix in the memory chip sector, rose 1.5 per cent. A TSMC spokesman declined comment. Samsung and Hynix did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lam Research, KLA and Applied Materials did not immediately respond, either. In October 2022, after the United States placed sweeping restrictions on US chipmaking equipment to China, it gave foreign manufacturers like Samsung and Hynix letters authorising them to receive goods. In 2023 and 2024, the companies received what is known as Validated End User status in order to continue the trade. A company with VEU status is able to receive designated goods from a US company without the supplier obtaining multiple export licenses to ship to them. VEU status enables entities to receive US-controlled products and technologies 'more easily, quickly and reliably,' as the Commerce Department website puts it. The VEU authorisations come with conditions, a person familiar with the matter said, including prohibitions on certain equipment and reporting requirements. 'Chipmakers will still be able to operate in China,' a Commerce Department spokesperson said in a statement when asked about the possible revocations. 'The new enforcement mechanisms on chips mirror licensing requirements that apply to other semiconductor companies that export to China and ensure the United States has an equal and reciprocal process.' Industry sources said that if it became more difficult for US semiconductor equipment companies to ship to foreign multinationals, it would only help domestic Chinese competitors. 'It's a gift,' one said. — Reuters
