ACRES payment delays ‘source of great frustration' for Heydon
The Minister for Agriculture, Food, and the Marine Martin Heydon has expressed his frustration around payment delays for farmers in the Agri-Climate Rural Environment Scheme (ACRES).
The minister was responding to a question in the Dáil last evening (Tuesday, May 20) from Fianna Fáil TD Albert Dolan about the reason for the delay in payments.
'Not a week goes by in which I do not have a farmer in east Galway contacting my office regarding the delays to ACRES payments.
'What has gone so wrong with ACRES payments? Why has there been such a delay? What lessons will be learned to ensure this does not happen again?' Deputy Dolan said.
ACRES is the €1.5 billion flagship agri-environmental scheme provided under Ireland's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plan 2023-2027.
ACRES
Minister Heydon said that 'payments in respect of farmers' participation in the ACRES scheme continue to issue on a weekly basis as cases pass all validation checks'.
'Last week, I announced that balancing payments in respect of the 2024 scheme year have commenced with more than €33 million issuing to 42,444 participants.
'A total of €490 million has issued since ACRES payments commenced at the end of 2023,' he said.
'However, I am acutely aware that others are still awaiting payments. This is a source of great frustration for me. I have been dealing with it since the minute I assumed this role.
'In the case of the 2023 scheme year, 97% of participants have been paid in full. As regards 2024, 90% of participants have received their advance payments and almost 88% of these have now received a balancing payment,' the minister added.
Heydon said that the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) is 'committed to resolving the issues that have been delaying the remaining payments as soon as possible and is making progress in this regard'.
'I know that is cold comfort if you are one of the few who still have not been sorted. We have made significant progress and built momentum, which I continue to do,' he said.
Payments
Deputy Dolan told the minister that it is important to show farmers that if they sign up for a scheme they need to be assured of payment on time.
Minister Heydon said that when he took office it was not acceptable to him to 'meet so many farmers where in many instances, the fault was with the department'.
'In some instances it was with themselves for various reasons but in the majority of cases, it has been on our side.
'I have visited Johnstown Castle and have engaged directly with the officials. I have directed additional resources into the units.
'I have got down into the detail of the different cohorts and how they are affected.
'One reason it takes time to fix this is that I am not willing to have a quick fix that needs a manual intervention every year.
'I want to make sure that the resolution here means that this problem does not recur every year. That is why we are getting through this and I stick to the commitments I made previously to resolve this as quickly as possible,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
IFA raises alarm over CAP as Germany pushes back on bigger EU budget
European People's Party calls for bigger budget to meet new priorities Irish farmers could be caught in the crossfire of a major budget row in Europe, as Germany resists calls for more EU spending while changes to CAP funding threaten to reshape rural incomes. The European Union's next long-term budget must be bigger than the current one, the main political group in the European Parliament said, putting itself on a collision course with the biggest contributor Germany, which does not want any increase.
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
There is still a small chance of rescuing Wexford lagoon from the same fate as Lough Neagh
Ireland still enjoys a reasonably healthy democracy, but we should not underestimate the potential for untruths and wilful ignorance to infect our political discourse. The Government, on the whole, does not deny climate science. So far so good. But when it comes to water quality, alternative facts are endemic. I witnessed an example of this on June 5th. The Minister for Agriculture Martin Heydon was challenged outside a Department of Agriculture conference by a group of activists from Animal Rebellion over the impact of agricultural run-off into Lady's Island, an important saltwater lagoon in Co Wexford. 'Where's the evidence for that?' he replied tetchily. It is tempting to craft a detailed response to the Minister, listing out all the studies published over the last two decades by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and forwarded as a matter of course to his department, but what is the point? Either the Minister is poorly informed or prefers not to know. READ MORE The facts are actually piled high in EPA reports on the shelves of his own department and those of Teagasc and local authorities. The EPA's catchment studies show agriculture accounts for roughly 70 per cent of nitrogen inputs in the southeast of Ireland. The data overwhelmingly points to farming – livestock and tillage – as the dominant pressure on water quality. And nitrate pollution is actually on the rise at more than a third of river sites. An Taisce's recent submission to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy stated that the nitrogen pollution problem in the south and southeast was a result of ineffective regulation, combined with a notable lack of enforcement of the regulations we do have. All the scientific evidence points to the need for a radical reduction in fertiliser and slurry spreading in sensitive catchments. An EPA-funded study published earlier this year and conducted by Aquafact found a five to seven-fold reduction in nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to Lady's Island Lake would be necessary to return the lagoon to good ecological status. [ 'The lough isn't just dying, it's been killed': How Lough Neagh reached crisis point ] This will require changes to farming practices and the construction of buffers and wetlands, as well as tree planting, to contain the nutrient losses. It will also require stepped up inspections and enforcement: since 2018, Wexford County Council has only conducted 30 farm inspections despite the critical state of the lagoon. The Aquafact study was considered at a hearing of the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy last week. There was no denial evident from the experts who addressed the committee. Not from Wexford County Council , nor from the National Parks and Wildlife Service . Their representatives pointed out that it has been known for four decades that Lady's Island, an ecologically important saltwater lagoon used by migrating birds, was in steady decline. Local farmers are, on the whole, compliant with the environmental regulations. But if the government's Nitrates Action Plan is not fit for purpose, and permits too much nitrates and phosphates to be deposited in sensitive catchments, then nutrient run-off and pollution is inevitable. However, the Minister for Agriculture has yet to state in the Dáil that he will act decisively to improve water quality, hiding instead behind vague statements such as 'science is telling us things are not where they should be'. It seems like everyone apart from the Minister for Agriculture is in agreement that radical measures are required to reduce nutrient losses. But if the Minister believes there is insufficient evidence to act, then he can justify more studies, more talk, more delays. Politically speaking, his goal is to retain the nitrates derogation (which permits higher stocking rates of cattle), not to save Lady's Island. Retaining the nitrates derogation has become the rallying cry for the entire agricultural sector and its political backers, despite the obvious problem that it is adding to the pollution burden in our rivers, lakes and estuaries. So it would be wrong to think of the death of Lady's Island as a tragedy. Government policy on nitrates is designed to fail, but to keep the derogation regardless. The policy is to sacrifice water quality where it cannot be improved with modest interventions, to support agricultural exports. The Minister has a small chance of rescuing the lagoon from the fate of Lough Neagh by acting decisively to reduce nutrient pollution and to fund the required measures, but I won't be holding my breath. Sadhbh O'Neill is a climate and environmental researcher
Agriland
13-06-2025
- Agriland
Ag Committee chair calls for withdrawal of NAP public consultation
The chairperson of the Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (AERA) Committee, Robbie Butler has called for the withdrawal of the current Nutrients Action Programme (NAP) public consultation in Northern Ireland. Butler did so courtesy of his contribution to a Stormont Assembly debate on the matter earlier this week. Butler said in his address: 'There is no doubt that improving water quality in Lough Neagh and in our rivers is essential. 'No one in this chamber, and certainly no one in our rural communities, denies the scale of the problem.' NAP public consultation The AERA committee chair went on to explain why he felt the NAP public consultation should be withdrawn. ' But we must be honest: the proposals currently on the table risk alienating the very people whose buy-in, expertise and practical action are essential to achieving real, lasting change,' Butler said. 'Over 3,500 farms face the prospect of stricter phosphorus limits, compulsory buffer strips, and mandatory investment in low-emission slurry equipment. 'These NAP proposals are not being introduced into a vacuum. They come at a time of immense financial pressure, workforce stress, and a growing sense of disconnect between policy-makers and those working the land.' The AERA committee chairperson went on to confirm his attendance at a recent service of remembrance to honour those who have died on farms, whether by tragic accident or by suicide. He said: 'That reality is a sobering reminder of the toll these pressures are already taking. 'With serious and very real pressures growing on family farms in Northern Ireland, we must without doubt face up to our environmental responsibilities: but we must not break our farmers to do so. 'That's why I support the call for the withdrawal of the NAP consultation: not to abandon progress, but to create space for a better, fairer, more joined-up approach. One that is evidence-based, co-designed, and genuinely multi-sectoral.' Threats to water quality But the Lagan Valley-based Ulster Unionist Party politician feels that simply to end the NAP public consultation process does not go far enough. He said he wants to ensure that agriculture is not seen as the only source of pollution affecting Lough Neagh. Nor is it the only sector in need of reform. Butler explained: 'Water quality in our rivers and lakes is being degraded not just by nutrient runoff, but also by inadequate wastewater treatment infrastructure, industrial discharge, urban runoff, and rising temperatures driven by climate change. 'Invasive species like zebra mussels have altered the very ecology of the lough. 'The question of whether to dredge or not to dredge remains contentious. These wider factors must be part of the conversation too : not pushed to the sidelines.' Butler outlined the type of strategy he felt should replace the current NAP public consultation. 'If we isolate agriculture while ignoring these other pressures, we risk making the same mistakes again. Worse still, we risk losing the confidence of rural communities; communities who want to be part of the solution but too often feel they are treated as the problem.' 'That's why we need a reset. A strategy that respects farmers, rewards best practice, and reflects the collective responsibility we all share for protecting our environment. 'That includes collaboration between the minister for agriculture, environment and rural affairs and the minister for infrastructure — particularly around the chronic underinvestment in wastewater infrastructure that continues to contribute to pollution across the region.'
