Developers' operational costs expected to rise

Maybank IB said the SST on construction services from July 1, 2025 will add pressure to property developers' margins for ongoing (sold) projects.
PETALING JAYA: Property developers' operational costs could rise following the government's move to impose a 6% sales and service tax (SST) on construction services.
Effective July 1, 2025, construction services for infrastructure, commercial and industrial buildings will be subject to a 6% service tax if the taxable value exceeds RM1.5mil annually.
However, exemptions are provided for residential buildings, public utilities related to housing, and non-reviewable contracts, which will enjoy a 12-month grace period from the effective date.
Additionally, business-to-business (B2B) relief will be available to prevent double taxation.
According to Maybank Investment Bank Research, the SST on construction services from July 1, 2025 will add pressure to property developers' margins for ongoing (sold) projects, as they might have to absorb the additional cost for commercial and industrial builds.
It pointed out that there is currently no guideline on how it applies to contracts entered into before July 1 but billed thereafter, or whether it is only applicable to new contracts signed after the SST implementation date.
'As most contracts incorporate a regulatory change review clause, developers are expected to bear this SST, rather than contractors,' the research house said.
It believes that developers are likely to pass on these additional costs to buyers (those unsold stock and future projects) to avoid margin erosion stemming from rising construction costs.
However, a slower economic growth trajectory and weak market demand could constrain pricing power.
'Developers engaged in data centre (DC) construction, including Eco World Development Group Bhd (EcoWorld Malaysia) and Sime Darby Property Bhd (SimeProp), could also see increased expenditure, potentially reducing their internal rate of return,' it said.
Maybank IB estimates a four-sen reduction in EcoWorld Malaysia and SimeProp's revised net asset value or RNAV estimates due to the 6% additional costs associated with their DC constructions.
The research house added that with a strategic emphasis on generating recurring income from investment properties in recent years, such as malls, the 8% SST on rental income would be borne by tenants, which could restrain developers' leverage for rental increment negotiations.
'We maintain our earnings forecasts, pending clarity. Maintain 'neutral' on the property sector.
'Our buys are Eco World International Bhd , S P Setia Bhd and EcoWorld Malaysia,' it said.
The research house highlighted risks to its calls including weaker-than-expected property sales dragged by weaker economic outlook, policy risks, stricter lending measures by the banks, higher-than-expected liquidated ascertained damages compensation following the latest ruling by the Federal Court, and rising building material costs and labour issues.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Borneo Post

an hour ago

• Borneo Post

Taxing taste of Malaysian politics

PM Anwar shared this image of himself pushing a wheelbarrow, captioned 'New Year Clean-up' in ushering in 2025. The photo was widely welcomed by Malaysians, many interpreting it as a hopeful metaphor for a national reset. Yet as SST kicks in, some wonder: will the clean-up go beyond optics – down to the kitchen table? — Photo from Facebook MALAYSIAN politics has certainly entered a new flavour spectrum with the words of politicians not about budget, economy or investment but about what's on our meal plates. Acting Muda president Amira Aisya Abd Aziz recently whipped out a storm by comparing Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's supposed love for avocado toast to Najib Razak's infamous switch from rice to quinoa. When 'kolo mee', 'roti canai' and 'nasi lemak' are breakfast of the people (despite rising prices), bringing up avocados and quinoa of the present prime minister and a former one, respectively, which are out-of-touch with everyday Malaysia, seems like a strategic move of Muda. It speaks to how political branding now happens not in speeches or slogans, but in what leaders are seen eating, wearing, or doing on a holiday. But let's unpack this properly – before someone throws a durian into the batter. The timing of Muda's food commentary was not accidental. It came just as the government announced the expansion of the Sales and Service Tax (SST) scheduled to take effect this July 1 with the imposition of five per cent to 10 per cent sales tax on selected non-essential goods and broaden the service tax to include services such as rental or leasing, construction, finance, private healthcare, education, and beauty. For many urban middle-class Malaysians, this tax hike stings. Expanded sales tax includes imported fruits; thus, avocado being considered imported goods was uttered by Anwar: 'If the rich want to eat avocados, then they will need to pay a little more.' So what better way to channel discontent than by framing it as a class issue? Muda's avocado analogy may seem like harmless satire, but it taps into a deeper frustration – that leaders may be preaching belt-tightening while they are enjoying imported produce. Whether or not Anwar actually had avocado toast is beside the point. The image has taken root. And in politics, perception is often more powerful than fact. Najib's quinoa moment in 2018 became a national punchline. For a leader under scrutiny for corruption and excess, his choice of a trendy, protein-packed South-American grain, instead of humble rice, was the icing on a chocolate cake. In contrast, Anwar's 'avocado' is not being mocked as luxurious, but to signal detachment from the people. The narrative is 'the Prime Minister does not know the suffering of the people'. This shift is unfavourable to the Madani Government. It shows that younger politicians are now savvier in using cultural signals such as food, fashion and fitness routines to frame their critiques. But it also raises a key question – is this fair game? Both avocado and quinoa are dear to me – not as symbols of elitism, but out of necessity and circumstance. Back when Najib's quinoa quote made headlines, I was struggling with gluten intolerance. I had to replace wheat with quinoa. It was not about being trendy; it was about survival. For two years, quinoa — pricey as it was — became part of my daily diet until, thankfully, I could slowly reintroduce wheat without discomfort. As for avocados, they were not always this high-end item that you now find on café menus with microgreens and olive oil. When I was stationed in Sabah, avocados were so abundant and cheap, I could have avocado toast at any time I wanted without it costing me more than a regular breakfast. In fact, Sabah grows them and in recent years, Sarawak does too. After all, it is a superfood and many lower income groups could afford locally produced avocado. Ironically, Anwar may have picked a food that is not elitist at all — just under-appreciated local produce. That's where I find him a little naïve. He could have used his breakfast moment to celebrate Malaysian farmers and promote food security – not unwittingly serving himself on a silver platter for social media roast. Quoting Prof Dr Ramasamy: 'At least he should have gone one step further by urging Malaysian farmers to plant avocado trees to bring down the imported fruit. 'I am sure his buddy Mohammed Sabu, the Minister of Agriculture, might welcome it especially coming from the Prime Minister.' Muda's strategy could be seen as clever youth-oriented political branding. In a crowded opposition landscape, they need to be louder and fresher. But surely Muda, a party built on reform and ideas resorting to comparing grocery lists risks appearing superficial. More importantly, it shifts the focus from policy to personality. The expanded SST, for instance, deserves serious scrutiny. Is it a fair way to broaden the tax base? Will the government ensure these revenues are channelled into healthcare, education, and cost-of-living relief? Could exemptions be refined to protect vulnerable groups? These are the questions worth debating – not whether Anwar spreads avocado over its breakfast toast. Likewise, when Opposition leaders resort to metaphors instead of manifestos, we must ask – where's your alternative policy? What would Muda do differently on SST, tax reform, or public spending? In the end, it is not what our leaders eat that should matter most – it is what they serve us. If Anwar's policies can stabilise the economy, lower inflation, and protect the poor, then let him enjoy his avocado. If Najib's quinoa came with billion-ringgit scandals, then no amount of quinoa can redeem that taste. And if Muda can only offer critiques based on food preferences, then perhaps it is time for them to go back to the kitchen – and cook up better policies. Because for most Malaysians, the question remains simple – can I still afford breakfast next month? anwar ibrahim cost of living economy Madani malaysia SST tax

The Star

13 hours ago

• The Star

Expansion of SST burdens people and raises prices, says Dr Wee

PETALING JAYA: The expansion of the Sales and Services Tax (SST) will further burden the people and give businesses an excuse to raise prices, says MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong. He said that unlike the Goods and Services Tax (GST), the SST lacks transparency, consistency, and the capacity to generate sustainable revenue. 'The government's continued expansion of SST, likely due to fiscal pressure, is a burden to the people and gives businesses an excuse to raise prices. 'MCA urges the government to take these concerns seriously and consider the constructive feedback from all sectors,' he said on Facebook on Saturday (June 21). Dr Wee said that reintroducing the GST could ensure the stability and strength of the country. He said that the GST is widely recognised for its transparency and efficiency. 'A responsible approach would be to exempt certain SMEs and vulnerable groups from the policy, rather than just postponing the rollout. 'A delay is only a short-term fix. In fact, it should be seen as a starting point for reviving the GST,' he said at the E-Invoice Seminar hosted by the MCA Political Education Committee and School of Political Studies earlier today. Dr Wee added that if GST is implemented, the e-invoice function would be included in the taxation software. 'I emphasised that while the government announced a revised timeline for e-invoice implementation on June 5, simply delaying it won't solve the root issues. MCA is of the view that the e-invoice component is a subset of the GST system,' he added. Last week, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said that reintroducing GST would unfairly burden lower-income earners. He said the implementation of GST would mean the poor, including fishermen, smallholders, low-wage earners, and street vendors, would be taxed on everyday essentials. On June 9, the Finance Ministry announced that the reviewed and expanded SST rates would come into effect next month. The measure is aimed at strengthening the country's fiscal position by increasing revenue and broadening the tax base, the ministry said.

The Star

17 hours ago

• The Star

The moral case for GST

The road to a broad-based consumption tax in Malaysia has been long and tortuous, stretching back more than a decade before its brief life under Barisan Nasional (BN). In December 2009, the then-government first introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Bill in Parliament, pledging that a uniform, 6% levy would replace the patchwork of Sales and Service Taxes (SST) then ranging from 5 to 15%. Despite initial plans to roll out GST by late 2011, fierce public resistance, fueled by fears of rising living costs and concerns about insufficient safeguards for low-income households, led to repeated postponements.