Trump extends deadline for TikTok sale by another 90 days to Sep 17
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump announced on Thursday (Jun 19) that he has given social media platform TikTok another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States.
'I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025),' he posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time.
A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration.
The Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video-sharing app.
'I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok,' Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. 'If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension.'
TikTok on Thursday welcomed Trump's decision.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users,' the platform said in a statement.
Digital Cold War?
Motivated by a belief in Washington that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government, the ban took effect on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, with ByteDance having made no attempt to find a suitor.
TikTok 'has become a symbol of the US-China tech rivalry; a flashpoint in the new Cold War for digital control,' said Shweta Singh, an assistant professor of information systems at Warwick Business School in Britain.
Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, but reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform – which boasts almost two billion global users – after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election.
The president announced an initial 75-day delay of the ban upon taking office. A second extension pushed the deadline to June 19.
He said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance 'a lot of money' for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations.
Trump knows that TikTok is 'wildly popular' in the United States, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday, when asked about the latest extension.
'He also wants to protect Americans' data and privacy concerns on this app, and he believes we can do both things at the same time.'
The president is 'just not motivated to do anything about TikTok,' said independent analyst Rob Enderle. 'Unless they get on his bad side, TikTok is probably going to be in pretty good shape.'
Tariff turmoil
Trump said in April that China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over his tariffs on Beijing.
ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be 'subject to approval under Chinese law'.
Possible solutions reportedly include seeing existing US investors in ByteDance roll over their stakes into a new independent global TikTok company.
Additional US investors, including Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone, would be brought on to reduce ByteDance's share in the new TikTok.
Much of TikTok's US activity is already housed on Oracle servers, and the company's chairman Larry Ellison is a longtime Trump ally.
Uncertainty remains, particularly over what would happen to TikTok's valuable algorithm.
'TikTok without its algorithm is like Harry Potter without his wand. It's simply not as powerful,' said Kelsey Chickering, a principal analyst at Forrester.
Despite the turmoil, TikTok has been continuing with business as usual. The platform on Monday introduced a new 'Symphony' suite of generative artificial intelligence tools for advertisers to turn words or photos into video snippets for the platform. AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Vietnam's top leader plans US trip as tariff deadline looms
Vietnam's Communist Party chief To Lam is expected to lead a delegation of officials and business executives. PHOTO: AFP HANOI – Vietnam's Communist Party chief To Lam is preparing to travel to the US in coming weeks as the two sides look to clinch a trade deal before US President Donald Trump's higher tariffs kick in, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr Lam aims to meet Mr Trump to help finalise an agreement, the people said, asking not to be identified as the trip isn't finalised yet. It's unclear what date the party chief will travel, although preparations are being made for him to be there in the next few weeks, they said. He is expected to lead a delegation of Vietnamese officials and business executives, they said, as the nation looks to seal more deals to buy additional American goods to reduce its trade surplus with the US. Ms Pham Thu Hang, a spokeswoman for Vietnam's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said she hadn't received any information about the visit when asked about it at a regular press briefing on June 19. The White House declined to comment. Negotiators are close to a framework agreement under which Vietnam is pushing for tariffs in the range of 20 per cent to 25 per cent, Bloomberg News previously reported. The US is demanding stricter enforcement against the transshipment of Chinese products and the removal of non-tariff barriers. The two sides held more talks in a virtual meeting on June 19, attended by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Vietnam's trade ministry said in a statement. Trade Minister Nguyen Hong Dien told the officials Vietnam seeks 'to develop practical and harmonious' rules with the US to deter fraudulent exports. He also welcomed the proposals from Mr Lutnick and Mr Greer 'to advance the negotiation process,' according to the statement. Vietnam has engaged in weeks of intense trade diplomacy since Mr Trump imposed a so-called reciprocal tariff rate of 46 per cent on imports from the country. He then postponed the duties until July 9, temporarily setting a 10 per cent import tax on trading partners to allow time for talks. In recent weeks, top officials from Vietnam have gone to the US to rally support. The agriculture minister secured US$3 billion (S$3.85 billion) worth of provisional deals during a tour of US states. The trade minister met with executives from Nike Inc, Gap Inc and Walmart Inc to encourage key industry players to get behind negotiation efforts. Vietnam is a critical industrial base for these companies, which count on the nation's factories to manufacture goods ranging from T-shirts and jeans to basketball shoes. Brands raced to move manufacturing to Vietnam over the past decade as US-China tensions escalated, helping turn the country into one of the world's biggest production hubs. The South-east Asian nation's trade connections with China, its largest bilateral trade partner, have been a major sticking point in negotiations. During Mr Trump's economic battle with Beijing in his first term, the manufacturing shift to Vietnam helped build the kind of massive trade surplus that has drawn the ire of the US president. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
43 minutes ago
- Business Times
Will he or won't he? How to parse Donald Trump's daily show
IN 1929, two French historians founded a journal called Annales d'Histoire economique et sociale and began writing a new kind of history. Their predecessors had chronicled the doings of kings and presidents: wars, treaties and personality clashes. Annales historians dismissed most of that as trivial 'events', mere 'headlines of the past'. The Annales' star Fernand Braudel wrote: 'Events are the ephemera of history; they pass across its stage like fireflies, hardly glimpsed before they settle back into darkness.' The Annales school focused on the long term: lasting forces such as a region's climate, geography, its mentalite, or social and economic trends. These were the factors that shaped human existence. The tension between long and short-term has always remained. But in our time, it seems to have become unprecedentedly acute, with the slow-burn climate crisis overshadowed by US President Donald Trump's daily show. To make sense of our era, we need to think like Annales historians. Braudel wrote that history operated on three levels of time. There was 'geographical time', meaning the relationship of humans to their environment; 'social time', meaning economic, demographic and cultural cycles; and 'individual time', or short-term events. But Trump operates on a fourth level of time: the daily news cycle. He is the master of our century's two most successful innovations in entertainment: first reality TV, then social media. His administration is structured like a reality series. This is not a metaphor. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Although Trump abandoned the collapsing TV industry for politics, he still thinks like a reality performer. Reality TV perches in the zone that he naturally inhabits, between fiction and non-fiction. His show is structured around a main character who exists in a state of non-stop conflict with countless enemies, many of whom are former associates. He regularly introduces new characters, typically chosen for their entertainment value, TV experience and/or looks. Picking Elon Musk to co-star in the recent series was inspired casting. No wonder Joe Biden's low-energy show was discontinued. Every day, the world tunes in to see which character has been humiliated, threatened or thrown off the island. Trump's posts provide the commentary. Episodes end with the kinds of cliffhangers essential to reality TV: Will he dump Vladimir Putin 'in two weeks'? Will he reinstate tariffs after his '90-day pause'? Will he make up with Musk? Will he strike Iran? Trump rarely allows viewers time to think. In reality TV, the moment you stop entertaining, the audience switches off. With our attention spans fried, it is hard to know which storylines are consequential. Probably even Trump is not sure. Was his dressing-down of Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office just 'great television', as he called it, or did it signify the abandonment of Ukraine? Was the National Guard's battle of Los Angeles just a mini action movie or a calculated step towards authoritarian control? Sometimes, an ostensibly meaningless episode conveys a deeper truth: when Trump threatened to annex Canada, the message was that if the US could turn on its friendliest friend, then every alliance was dispensable. The deaths of more than 300,000 people worldwide so far (as estimated by Brooke Nichols of Boston University), killed by Trump's slashing of American aid, are plainly momentous, yet have happened off-screen as both Trump and most viewers seem to consider them insufficiently entertaining. It is only human that we are gripped by Trump's spectacle. Similarly, Braudel wrote that the contemporaries of King Philip II of Spain 'felt, rightly or wrongly, that they were participating in a mighty drama which they regarded above all as one personal to them. Possibly, probably even, they were under an illusion. But this illusion, this feeling of being an eyewitness of a universal spectacle, helped to give meaning to their lives.' Still, we should be aware that we are under an illusion. We need to drag our eyes away from Trump and ask, as Annales historians would, 'What is happening that is consequential?' They introduced climate into historiography. Climate change, too, impersonal a story for most viewers, would have fascinated them. So would the advent of artificial intelligence and the collapsing birth rates that mean China, Japan and much of eastern Europe are projected to lose population by 2100 on a scale unseen since Europe's 14th-century Black Death. By contrast, I doubt the Annales lot would have wasted much time on Trump's show. There is, wrote Braudel, 'a miscellany of trivia and daily happenings which rises like a cloud of dust from any living civilisation'. FINANCIAL TIMES
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Cook Islands PM decries New Zealand's ‘patronising' aid pause
Cook Islands PM Mark Brown defended his nation's ties with China, saying they did not 'compromise' its independence. PHOTO: AFP WELLINGTON - Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown on June 20 condemned 'patronising' neighbour New Zealand, which halted aid to the Pacific island nation after it signed a slew of deals with China. Major partner New Zealand has halted millions of dollars in aid to Cook Islands, citing a 'lack of consultation' over agreements struck with China in February. Self-governing Cook Islands has a 'free association' pact with New Zealand, its former colonial ruler which provides budgetary assistance as well as help on foreign affairs and defence. 'The relationship between the Cook Islands and New Zealand is defined by partnership, not paternalism,' Mr Brown said in a speech to Parliament. 'Decisions to unilaterally pause core sector support reflect a patronising approach inconsistent with modern partnership.' Mr Brown defended his nation's ties with China, saying they did not 'compromise' its independence, adding that no military or defence arrangements had been made. 'No debt commitments, no erosion of our national sovereignty,' he told Parliament. New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon visited Beijing on June 20, where he was welcomed by Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'There are no historical grievances or fundamental conflicts of interest between China and New Zealand,' Mr Xi told Mr Luxon, according to Chinese state news agency Xinhua. The readout did not directly mention Beijing's relationship with the Cook Islands or Wellington's spat with its former colony. Mr Luxon meanwhile reaffirmed in a statement New Zealand's interest in the 'peace, security and prosperity of the Pacific'. 'Repair and restore trust' The Cook Islands caught New Zealand off guard when it signed a string of agreements with China covering deep-sea mining, regional cooperation and economic issues. A New Zealand government spokesperson said aid had been paused because of a 'lack of consultation' surrounding the agreements. New Zealand provided US$116 million (S$149.09 million) to Cook Islands over the past three years, according to government figures. It was due to make an US$11 million development payment in the coming months and would not consider resuming funding until the Cook Islands government took steps to 'repair the relationship and restore trust', the spokesperson added. China and the Cook Islands have both pushed back, with Beijing's foreign ministry saying on June 19 that the deals 'should not be interfered with'. Mr Brown added that the nation had been 'open and transparent'. China has looked to boost diplomatic, economic and security ties with Pacific Island nations in recent years, sowing unease among traditional regional powers the United States, Australia and New Zealand. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
