No plans for new public toilets to be open at night-time, says Dublin City Council manager
NEW ON-STREET PUBLIC toilets planned for Dublin city centre will likely only be open during daytime 'retail' hours, despite multiple councillors calling for the facilities to be made available on a 24/7 basis.
In a discussion that lasted over 40 minutes at a Dublin City Council meeting this evening, two dozen councillors spoke about the need to improve access to public toilets in Dublin city centre.
Many were disappointed with aspects of a recent report on the matter by the council's executive manager, which Councillor Daithí Doolan said could have done more to propose 'solutions'.
Councillor Rachel Batten said there is 'something seriously wrong within Dublin City Council in that we can't provide basic facilities within the city and I do think we need to be a little bit more imaginative in how we do it'.
The report details how the cubicles outside St Stephen's Green are the only on-street public toilets available in Dublin city and how a market consultation seeking submissions for partners to manage new public toilets attracted little commercial interest.
The report included a list of toilets located within buildings operated by Dublin City Council that are available for public use. It also used the privately-owned website 'pee.ie' to compile a list of toilets in locations like shopping centres, cultural buildings and service stations.
The council is planning to install new public toilets on O'Connell Street, Smithfield Square, South King Street and Barnardo Square by mid-2026.
These would likely only be open during daytime hours and could charge users a 50 cent fee.
The total cost of the project is expected to reach around €5.7 million.
At this evening's meeting, councillors raised questions and concerns in relation to the report and the current plans for increasing on-street public toilets in the city centre.
Several said they believed the toilets should be free rather than carrying any charge and that they should operate 24 hours a day to open up access for people who are homeless and people in the city for nightlife.
Access to the toilets for people with illnesses or disabilities was also raised, with the suggestion that there should be a normalised system of allowing priority access for people with conditions that mean quick access to such facilities is required.
Councillors questioned why the cost of the project was foreseen to be so high and whether the cost could be brought down by selling space for commercial advertisements on the units.
Many said that awareness of existing toilets that can be used by the public is low in some cases and said there should be an advertising or social media campaign, or signage outside of buildings, alerting people to locations where public toilets are available inside buildings.
Advertisement
Responding to councillors' concerns, manager Richard Shakespeare said the toilets will be 'used day in, day out' and will need 'cleaners there constantly servicing them' and potentially security staff.
He said those costs are factored into the council's estimates but that ultimately 'we have to go for procurement for this and the market will tell us what the cost of doing this is'.
'Look, the hours of operation – what we're looking at at the moment is retail hours,' he said.
'In general, people who are in town for the night-time economy are in a bar, a restaurant, a venue, a theatre – there are toilets in all of those facilities.
'If we're going to open these up 24 hours a day, the [cost] numbers I'm talking about here are going to quadruple for management.
'They need to be cleaned, so it's going to get more expensive [if they're open for longer].'
On raising awareness about existing toilets, Shakespeare said: 'We will talk to the press office on advertising the locations of where they are. Social media, that's very easily done.
'But I don't think we'll be going down the road of a proliferation of signs around the city indicating where every toilet is, but we can certainly look at what easy options are available,' he continued.
He said that CCTV could be potentially considered for security needs but that it would raise issues in relation to privacy and data protection
He said management could 'certainly look at' facilitating priority access for people with c certain illnesses.
There were 60 on-street public toilets available in Dublin city centre in the 1970s, but this figure dropped to zero by the end of the 1990s and remained at zero until 2020.
Temporary toilet units were installed outside St Stephen's Green and on Wolfe Tone Street (later relocated on Ryder's Row) in March 2020 while businesses and the bathrooms within them were closed.
The St Stephen's Green unit, which contains seven toilet cubicles, is still in place, though the Ryder's Row unit was removed in 2022 'due to low usage, high costs, and anti-social complaints'.
Both units experienced peak levels of use during the summers of 2020 and 2021, with around 23,000 visits in total per week.
That later fell to around 1,800 visits per week to the St Stephen's Green unit by the end of 2022 after business had resumed as normal following the removal of Covid-19 restrictions.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Glasnevin housing plan leaves uncertainty for businesses
Businesses in an industrial estate on the northside of Dublin say they are facing an uncertain future due to Dublin City Council's plans to redevelop the area for housing. Under the Ballyboggan Masterplan, the local authority plans to rezone 77 hectares of industrial land - between Glasnevin and Cabra - to develop 6,000 homes. However, some businesses say they are having trouble finding areas to relocate to and are calling on the council to help them source alternative sites. Igoe International, a 48-year-old family business that supplies building products as well as manufacturing and exporting roofing products, has operated from Dublin Industrial Estate for 30 years. Managing Director Vincent Igoe said: "It's probably sitting on about 2,000sq/m and to find similar space and zoned industrial around here is almost impossible so it would pose a difficulty in answering the question - where do we go when all of this stuff is supposedly going to kick off? "We've been here for 30 years and all our customers are here. We've also invested in making our display areas and showrooms and stuff like that here and we're obviously close to the city so we get footfall and traffic. "A lot of the businesses around here would be fairly mature. A lot of them are kind of family businesses, and a bit like our own, that could have been passed down to a son or someone on succession. So they're all pretty much in the same boat." Mr Igoe said that he would like to see Dublin City Council (DCC) help businesses such as his source alternative industrial sites. "We've had a little look around. There's not much on the market. The spaces are limited and the prices are quite high. So no matter what way you kick the ball you're almost at a disadvantage here. "There's a lot of space a little bit up the road towards Blanchardstown, or and maybe they could accommodate zoning some land for industrial use around there. That would probably be a sensible solution." Bob Cameron, of Cameron Cars, said that he may consider retiring and winding up his more than 20-year-old business because moving to an alternative site at the current market rates is not viable. "I've been operating in this estate nearly 20 years. There's nowhere really we can move to. I need a lot of car park spaces as I have about 100 cars in stock. "There's no real viable plan for us. Everybody's just holding on and just trying to find what's happening. "If it is going to happen, we have to be compensated. We have to be paid for the movement and also another unit. "It's kind of at the point that I nearly have to pack it in because it just won't it won't work. It's not viable." It is not just businesses who are concerned about the development. The Ballyboggan Masterplan proposes the development of 6,000 homes in mainly two- to four-storey units. But a number of submissions made as part of a public consultation said that the number lacks ambition and called on DCC to build more. However, Senior Lecturer in Housing at Technological University Dublin, Dr Lorcan Sirr, said that he believes the council is taking the right approach. "I think it's really good actually and I think they have the density levels about right at 100 to 250 units per hectare and their focus is on more family units rather than smaller, high income, high yield investment units. "They're looking to house families here, which is what we're sort of lacking in Dublin. "In the last two years alone, 95% of all new housing that has been built in Dublin City Council areas has been apartments and 95% for rent. "So the focus on something that people can actually get their hands on, and that would be for families, would be really beneficial, and what's needed in the city. "In theory, high density sounds great, we should squeeze as many units on as possible. What you get though is higher land values, that means the cost of construction is going to be higher. That means whatever comes out the other end is going to be less affordable for people. "So if you moderate the density, you might get fewer households on it, but at least the housing that comes out will be affordable to build and affordable to live in there for the people who do end up living there. So I think they've got it about right." However, Dr Sirr says it could take a number of years for the homes to materialise. "If the State takes more control over it, you will probably see a steadier rate of delivery. It could take ten years to do this, at least. If we go all out relying on the private sector, we could be here in 20 years. "We see this with other regeneration projects in Dublin that are still on the go many years later, the likes of Adamstown, that should have been developed a long time ago, but because of the circular nature of the property market in which it relied, they are still only being developed to this day." Plan supports development of new Dublin neighbourhood - DCC DCC said that the chosen density is in line with sustainable development guidelines and the Dublin City Development Plan. The council added that, when it comes to the future of businesses, the majority of lands are in private ownership and it will support those who wish to redevelop as well as the retention and consolidation of many existing businesses. However, it said that regeneration of this type is complex and will take many years to achieve. "The Baile Bogáin (Ballyboggan) Masterplan supports the development of a new mixed use neighbourhood in Dublin which aligns with the Government's National Planning Framework. "This will be achieved through the robust spatial framework that is designed to guide future redevelopment opportunities in a coherent and sustainable manner, while ensuring that urban design is imperative to regeneration. "Fundamental to the regeneration of this area is the retention and consolidation of existing businesses as the area transitions towards more diversified mixed uses," the council said.
Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
Dublin City Council plans 38 new apartments for Drimnagh
The new apartment block, designed by Proctor & Matthews Architects, was discussed at yesterday's DCC South Central Area meeting and will be built on a site previously occupied by a funeral home. It will contain 10 one-bedroom, 22 two-bedroom and 6 three-bedroom units, and will include a playground and a shared garden for residents within a central courtyard. Planting within the courtyard space will also be native and support biodiversity, the council promises. The proposal is set to be built alongside a new library for the area. All homes in the scheme will have a minimum of an A2 BER rating, and will be heated using heat pumps, with solar panels to support the building's energy requirements. Construction on site is expected to start in May 2027, subject to planning approval and appointment of a contractor, with residents able to move in from November 2028. Speaking at the council meeting, Sinn Féin councillor Daithí Doolan said the development was 'great news' for Drimnagh and surrounding areas. "This will be setting the standard for housing across the city and beyond,' he said. 'It will be the jewel in the crown of D12. "This shows what can be delivered when the city council are given the funds to build housing. It is important that the government realise this and give adequate funding to allow city council acquire more land to build council and affordable housing to meet the needs of the city.' Other councillors also praised the scheme, with Ray Cunningham saying that it looked 'amazing'. "It's great to see it being built on a site that's been derelict for so long,' the Green Party member said. "I also want to thank the team in Dublin council for coming out with a lot of information recently, on Twitter, on LinkedIn, a lot of posts explaining what was happening with the site and putting the correct information out into the public domain to stop bad actors from spreading lies.' Dublin City Council has substantially missed its Department of Housing-imposed homebuilding targets for the years 2022 to 2024. For those years, 2,341 homes were delivered in the local authority area, equating to 49pc of the target of 4,800, although it has committed to exceeding its targets for this year and next. Funded by the Local Democracy Reporting Scheme
Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
Dublin Port Company paid city council €1.7m in vacant site levy on land valued at €4m
The property, which was valued at €4m in 2019, was added to the vacant site register of Dublin City Council in 2018. The city council looked for payments of €280,000 for each year that the land remained vacant. Dublin Port Company appealed that decision but were unsuccessful. The company has since paid a total of €1.68m to the council and said they were now hoping to dispose of the site as it was remote from the port and not of core use. Dublin Port Company said they had at one stage been in discussions with the Land Development Agency about using it for residential use. However, plans for its sale fell through when the zoning of the site – which is next to the Dublin Port Tunnel control building – was changed. In discussions with Dublin City Council last year, the port company asked if the money paid could be used for a greenway project nearby. They suggested it be allocated to the Liffey Tolka Project, which will create a 'new boulevard' between the estuary of the Tolka River and the Liffey. A letter to the council said: 'The project will mitigate against the existing harsh landscape of East Wall Road and create a safe pedestrian and cycle route away from the main traffic movements.' They said it would also provide a route for communications and power cabling, as well as connecting two already existing cycleways. A letter said: 'Dublin Port Company will be ceding several metres of its frontage to this greenway. This project will have significant community gain, and it will be a project that will positively impact on all users of the East Wall Road.' However, Dublin City Council said they could give no assurances on how the funds would be used and were currently developing a policy on what to do with the vacant site levy. ADVERTISEMENT The council said they would be open to discussions on the Liffey Tolka Project – but that it would have to be the subject of a legal agreement. The documents were released following a request under the Access to Information on the Environment (AIE) Regulations. Being remote from the port, the site is not core to port use Dublin Port Company had originally argued that the correspondence was not 'environmental information', but following an appeal they were told to release the records by the Commissioner for Environmental Information. A statement from the Dublin Port Company said: '[We were] in discussions with the Land Development Agency about the Polefield site near the Port Tunnel between 2019 and 2022 regarding its potential redevelopment for residential use. 'However, due to a change in the zoning, the sale could no longer proceed. The port challenged the Vacant Site Levy decision in relation to the site and the decision was upheld on appeal. 'The port subsequently made a payment of €1.68m to Dublin City Council in 2024. Being remote from the port, the site is not core to port use, and DPC is open to disposal of it.'
